Jump to content

Wikidata:Requests for checkuser

Shortcuts: WD:CHECK, WD:RFCU
From Wikidata
Latest comment: 1 hour ago by Yamato Shiya in topic Developerayushanand


For the place to request CheckUser access, see Wikidata:Requests for permissions/CheckUser.
If this page is displaying outdated contents even after you refresh the page in your browser, please Purge.
For older requests, please see Wikidata:Requests for checkuser/Archives

Requests

[edit]

1992amir1992

[edit]
Latest comment: 14 days ago6 comments3 people in discussion

19 September 2026

[edit]

[this diff for possible log damage.]

I am not highly certain about the intent of ShadowArrow 2005, but this edit appears to have removed or overwritten comments by me and another participating editor from the relevant RfD discussion while adding material concerning a different RfD. I am including the edit for review because the apparent removal of discussion and the unusual editing pattern may be relevant to this case.

Rationale, discussion and results

[edit]

Reason: User:Elham-Rahma appeared to be a single-purpose account when this request was filed, with its initial Wikidata activity consisting of participation in the deletion discussion for Wikidata:Requests_for_deletions#Q141488662 (Q141488662) supporting retention of the item. The account did not appear to have other substantive participation on Wikidata at that time.

This raises concerns about possible sockpuppetry, meatpuppetry, canvassing, or coordinated participation in the discussion. A review is requested to determine whether there is any undisclosed connection between User:Elham-Rahma and User:1992amir1992. (Also see: Commons user talk page for Elham-Rahma.)

The later activity of User:Elham-Rahma on Commons concerning File:Amir Aslmand.jpg, as well as the additional activity documented in this case, is also provided for review. --ANTORLGOY (talk) 10:37, 19 September 2026 (UTC)Reply

See Special:GoToComment/c-Whyiseverythingalreadyused-20260919155700-ANTORLGOY-20260919154300 for additional evidence concerning the related activity. Whyiseverythingalreadyused (t · c · he/him) 16:16, 19 September 2026 (UTC)Reply

Results: Confirmed 1992amir1992 = Elham-Rahma (blocked and tagged - vote stacking), Unrelated ShadowArrow 2005. --Lymantria (talk) 16:53, 20 September 2026 (UTC)Reply

Thanks Lymantria ANTORLGOY (talk) 02:48, 21 September 2026 (UTC)Reply

21 September 2026

[edit]

Rationale, discussion and results

[edit]

Reason: User:1993Ana-Saja1992 has participated in the same deletion discussion concerning Wikidata:Requests_for_deletions#Q141488662_and_Q141502196, and the account's activity is relevant to the previously investigated account relationship involving User:1992amir1992 and User:Elham-Rahma.

See this [[1]].

In that discussion, User:1993Ana-Saja1992 made a statement concerning the creation and maintenance of profiles for multiple named individuals and described the people involved as members of the same organization. The statement also refers to specific individuals for whom profiles were planned, including Amir Aslam and Sajjad Baba, which are directly connected to the same RfD activity.

This is relevant because User:1992amir1992 previously stated that an organization creates person-specific usernames and accounts and retains those accounts, while colleagues participate separately. A CheckUser investigation has already confirmed that User:1992amir1992 and User:Elham-Rahma are the same account user and that the accounts were involved in vote stacking.

I am therefore requesting a check to determine whether User:1993Ana-Saja1992 is technically connected to User:1992amir1992 or the already-confirmed related account, or whether the apparent connection is instead explained by the claimed organizational arrangement.

I am not asserting that User:1993Ana-Saja1992 is a sockpuppet. The purpose of this request is to allow the CheckUsers to determine whether there is an account connection that could be relevant to the discussion and the apparent coordinated activity. CC @Lymantria. --ANTORLGOY (talk) 02:59, 21 September 2026 (UTC)Reply

Results: Likely Blocked and tagged. --Lymantria (talk) 05:17, 21 September 2026 (UTC)Reply

90nikos

[edit]
Latest comment: 14 days ago2 comments2 people in discussion

21 September 2026

[edit]

Rationale, discussion and results

[edit]

Reason: per Special:Permalink/2548108449#Report_concerning_User:Kim_911 Saroj (talk) 10:34, 21 September 2026 (UTC)Reply

Results: Confirmed:

Blocked if necessary and tagged. --Lymantria (talk) 13:03, 21 September 2026 (UTC)Reply

Matlin

[edit]
Latest comment: 6 days ago2 comments2 people in discussion

See archive for older requests in this case.

28 September 2026

[edit]

Rationale, discussion and results

[edit]

Reason: This user is reverting my edits and restoring incorrect aliases based on the names created by the author of the sejm-wielki.pl website. These names are incorrect and do not appear in any sources. Examples: [2], [3], [4], [5]. Similar behaviour was observed in the case of user Nibemben (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log · CA · checkuser (log) · investigate) (see example), who turned out to be a sockpuppet of user Matlin (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log · CA · checkuser (log) · investigate). Khan Tengri (talk) 07:44, 28 September 2026 (UTC)Reply

Results: Likely, blocked and tagged. --Lymantria (talk) 17:03, 28 September 2026 (UTC)Reply

Georgelike0292

[edit]
Latest comment: 6 days ago6 comments3 people in discussion

13 July 2026

[edit]

Rationale, discussion and results

[edit]

Reason: I came accross this case by a request at WD:AN. A quick first check on possible sockpuppetry gave me this (possible) master. Lymantria (talk) 09:27, 13 July 2026 (UTC)Reply

Results: Likely to Confirmed to each other and master:

Blocked and tagged. Related to en:Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Usgasireedui0911. This is possibly not the complete picture. --Lymantria (talk) 10:17, 13 July 2026 (UTC)Reply

05 August 2026

[edit]

Rationale, discussion and results

[edit]

Reason: The user keeps create hoaxes about Mozart family (non-existing children and other relatives), just like some of the accounts above. Harold (talk) 09:07, 5 August 2026 (UTC)Reply

Results: ✓ Done by Jasper Deng. --Lymantria (talk) 10:26, 22 August 2026 (UTC)Reply

28 September 2026

[edit]

Rationale, discussion and results

[edit]

Reason: See Harold's block request. Samoasambia ✎ 13:05, 28 September 2026 (UTC)Reply

Results: Likely Blocked and tagged. --Lymantria (talk) 16:48, 28 September 2026 (UTC)Reply

FHGence

[edit]
Latest comment: 5 hours ago3 comments3 people in discussion

04 October 2026

[edit]

Rationale, discussion and results

[edit]

Reason: Mass creation of roughly ~40 non-notable, promo-ish items, most of them about entrepreneurs. All of these follow the very same generic structure, consisting of social media identifiers, occupation, and basic personal data. Two of them have similar usernames (Baderbot and Nexxabot). They have edited the same pages as well:

This pattern has spread across other wikis as well. For example, both Amgstow and FHGence created Roberto Panciatici on simplewiki. I am confident they are all the same person and would not be surprised if there were additional socks out there that I may have overlooked. Thank you in advance, —Hasley + 04:58, 4 October 2026 (UTC)Reply

Results: Joymoster is Possible to Likely. The others are Confirmed to Wikidata:Requests for checkuser/Case/Bakalia756, and thus this case should be merged into that one. Additionally, the following accounts are also Confirmed to be the same as this group (other than Joymoster):

All blocked and tagged. It's additionally Possible that this whole group is an extension of Wikidata:Requests for checkuser/Case/Marcyway4 but I will defer to @Lymantria: to make a firmer determination of that.--Jasper Deng (talk) 06:31, 5 October 2026 (UTC)Reply

Case moved to Bakalia756, link to Marcyway4 Unlikely. --Lymantria (talk) 08:42, 5 October 2026 (UTC)Reply

Rajiv kamlesh

[edit]
Latest comment: 8 hours ago2 comments2 people in discussion

04 October 2026

[edit]

Rationale, discussion and results

[edit]

Reason: Promoting same person. Regards, ZI Jony (Talk) 21:02, 4 October 2026 (UTC)Reply

Results: All of them are long Stale. --Jasper Deng (talk) 06:34, 5 October 2026 (UTC)Reply

Developerayushanand

[edit]
Latest comment: 1 hour ago1 comment1 person in discussion

05 October 2026

[edit]

Rationale, discussion and results

[edit]

Reason: I noticed that these two account seem to be working on the same promotional item. The masterpuppet account previously created Q140454710 which clearly are about themselves, judging from the user name. I deleted the item on July. Several days ago (4th of October), a new account were created, and created Q141639180 which had same subject label with previous item. The second item was deleted by Ameisenigel on 4th of October. Due to this I suspect the second account is a sockpuppet. My reasoning also supported by the fact that the sockpuppet account create two WD:AN request related to the deleted subject: the book they wrote and the subject item itself. Yamato Shiya • (Hello!) 13:09, 5 October 2026 (UTC)Reply

Results:

Retrieved from "https://www.wikidata.org/w/index.php?title=Wikidata:Requests_for_checkuser&oldid=2553456339"