Commons:Requests for checkuser
Shortcuts: COM:CHECK • COM:RFCU • COM:SOCK
This is the place to request investigations of abuse of multiple accounts or of other circumstances that require use of checkuser privileges.
Requesting a check
| These indicators are used by CheckUsers to allow easier at-a-glance reading of their notes, actions and comments. | |
|---|---|
| Request completed | |
| Request declined | |
| Information | |
Please do not ask us to run checks without good reason; be aware of the following before requesting a check:
- Checkuser is a last resort for difficult cases; pursue other options first, such as posting on the administrator's noticeboard. (This is not a venue for requesting administrative action such as blocks or file clean-up.)
- Running a check will only be done to combat disruption on Commons, or as required to assist checkuser investigations on other Wikimedia wikis.
- Valid reasons for running a check include, for example: vandalism where a block of the underlying IP or IP range is needed and suspected block evasion, vote-stacking, or other disruption where technical evidence would prevent or reduce further disruption.
- Requests to check accounts already confirmed on other projects may be declined as redundant.
- Requests to run a check on yourself will be declined.
- Evidence is required. When you request a check, you must include a rationale that demonstrates (e.g., by including diffs) what the disruption to the project is, and why you believe the accounts are related.
- Requests to run a check without evidence or with ambiguous reasoning will result in delays or the request not being investigated.
- The privacy policy does not allow us to make a check that has the effect of revealing IP addresses.
Outcome
Responses will be brief in order to comply with Wikimedia privacy policy. Due to technical limitations, results are not always clear. Closed requests are archived after seven days.
Privacy concerns
If you feel that a checkuser request has led to a violation of the Wikimedia Foundation privacy policy regarding yourself, please refer the case to the Ombuds commission.
If this page is displaying outdated contents even after you refresh the page in your browser, please purge this page's cache.
Requests
[edit]Sahilsambyal
[edit]- Sahilsambyal (talk • contribs • Luxo • SUL • deleted contribs • logs • block user • block log)
Suspected related users
[edit]- Kuttappz (talk • contribs • Luxo • SUL • deleted contribs • logs • block user • block log)
- Tanya (Official) (talk • contribs • Luxo • SUL • deleted contribs • logs • block user • block log)
Rationale, discussion and results
[edit]Another DUCK from this very extensive LTA on en-WP. Uploaded File:ActorMoor.jpg (copyvio) for use on the subject's article on en - a known target of this sock, who's previously created it as User:ActorMoor (renamed as User:Kidi93 prior to glock). Uploads under that account included File:Actor Moor.jpg. --ChompyTheGogoat (talk) 19:38, 4 October 2026 (UTC) Adding additional account once again uploading copyvio portrait for use on LTA's article on en-WP. ChompyTheGogoat (talk) 02:42, 5 October 2026 (UTC)
- Both
Confirmed, blocked and tagged. --Lymantria (talk) 06:26, 5 October 2026 (UTC)
Alatiara
[edit]- Alatiara (talk • contribs • Luxo • SUL • deleted contribs • logs • block user • block log)
Suspected related users
[edit]- RexAura (talk • contribs • Luxo • SUL • deleted contribs • logs • block user • block log)
Rationale, discussion and results
[edit]Reason: The above account re-uploded some (now deleted) out-of-scope coats of arms related to a same unknown blazon/family than 3 other (already) blocked accounts (Alatiara, on top, Miravo and Heraldyka Kresowa). Kontributor 2K (talk) 13:35, 2 October 2026 (UTC)
Confirmed RexAura is Alatiara. Already blocked by Nux. Tagged.
Possible Dagaa111 may also be Alatiara. They have no edits yet on any project, and Alatiara has a pretty obvious behavioral pattern, so I'm leaving that account unblocked/untagged.- The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 17:38, 2 October 2026 (UTC)
TimeoRN24
[edit]- TimeoRN24 (talk • contribs • Luxo • SUL • deleted contribs • logs • block user • block log)
- RonaldMontpon (talk • contribs • Luxo • SUL • deleted contribs • logs • block user • block log)
Rationale, discussion and results
[edit]Reason: Duck test. Both users uploaded the same file. Gyrostat (talk) 13:50, 29 September 2026 (UTC)
Results:
Confirmed:
- KeikoPresidenta (talk • contribs • Luxo • SUL • deleted contribs • logs • block user • block log) (already locked)
- RonaldMontpon (talk • contribs • Luxo • SUL • deleted contribs • logs • block user • block log)
Blocked and tagged. --Lymantria (talk) 17:03, 29 September 2026 (UTC)
- For older requests, please see Commons:Requests for checkuser/Archives