Wikidata:Administrators' noticeboard
Shortcut: WD:ANAdministrators' noticeboard This is a noticeboard for matters requiring administrator attention.
|
 | If you are a user who has a request for removal of non-public personal information, please note that details should not be posted in public. Contact Wikidata oversighters via the on-wiki interface, or email oversight＠wikidata.org or a local oversighter privately. |
 | If you are requesting the restoration of a deleted item, please be sure to explain how the item meets our notability criteria. If you are claiming that the item "can be described using serious and publicly available references", please list some of those references in your request. See also Wikidata:Guide to requests for undeletion. |
 |
On this page, old discussions are archived. An overview of all archives can be found at this page's archive index. The current archive is located at 2026/10. |
| Attention administrators: This message is appearing because there are more than 100 open requests at Wikidata:Requests for deletions. Please consider helping with the backlog. |
Requests for deletions high ~135 open requests for deletions. |
Report concerning Shovgu
Shovgu does not seem to understand the difference between "mother/native language" vs "official language" as seen here [1] [2].
This is just one issue, I could also get into the fact that they ignore (whether on purpose or due to language barrier) sources/information that contradicts their opinion [3], hopefully that is not going to be necessary. HistoryofIran (talk) 22:12, 4 August 2026 (UTC)
- You are not stopping the edit war. What do you hope to achieve by reverting my edit that linked Wikipedia to Wikidata? https://www.wikidata.org/w/index.php?title=Q161205&diff=prev&oldid=2527289359 Shovgu (talk) 22:18, 4 August 2026 (UTC)
And now they're edit warring again, at Afsharid dynasty [4], completely ignoring what the English article of the Wikidata says ("was an Iranian[1] dynasty founded by Nader Shah (r. 1736–1747) of the Qirqlu clan of the Turkoman Afshar tribe, ruling over Afsharid Iran.[1][2]") and the dozens of sources I listed at their talk page.[1] --HistoryofIran (talk) 22:27, 4 August 2026 (UTC)
- I am not discussing whether the Afshars were an Iranian dynasty. I am discussing the language of the dynasty. What are you talking about? Shovgu (talk) 22:31, 4 August 2026 (UTC)
- Yes, we can all see that. Your addition is roughly translated to "A Turkic dynasty that ruled in Azerbaijan and Iran in the 18th century", which contradicts what sources and the article itself says. Azerbaijan didn't exist back then either [5] [6] [7], as you were also told, but ignore as well. Which is as I said, you ignore sources/information that contradicts your opinion. HistoryofIran (talk) 22:34, 4 August 2026 (UTC)
- As I have explained to you, you are bringing up unrelated topics. "Azerbaijan" is a historical geographical name, and the people we call Azerbaijanis today are one of the Turkic peoples. You are presenting me with sources that contradict claims I never made. Shovgu (talk) 22:44, 4 August 2026 (UTC)
- I say "the Turkic dynasty that ruled Iran"—do you understand? Shovgu (talk) 22:46, 4 August 2026 (UTC)
- This is hopeless... the language barrier is too big of an issue, as also seen on their talk page. Can an admin please help? HistoryofIran (talk) 22:47, 4 August 2026 (UTC)
- Yes, we can all see that. Your addition is roughly translated to "A Turkic dynasty that ruled in Azerbaijan and Iran in the 18th century", which contradicts what sources and the article itself says. Azerbaijan didn't exist back then either [5] [6] [7], as you were also told, but ignore as well. Which is as I said, you ignore sources/information that contradicts your opinion. HistoryofIran (talk) 22:34, 4 August 2026 (UTC)
- Sources regarding the fact that the native language of the dynasties (not the state) was Turkic:
- Sources for the Safavid Dynasty
- "The Role of Azerbaijani Turkish in Safavid Iran", Iranian Studies, Vol. 46, Issue 4, 2013, pp. 569-581.
- "The Poetry of Shah Ismail I", Bulletin of the School of Oriental and African Studies, Vol. 10, No. 4, 1942, pp. 1006a-1053a.
- "Shah Abbas: The Ruthless King Who Became an Iranian Legend", I.B. Tauris, 2009, p. 165.
- "Iran Under the Safavids", Cambridge University Press, 2007, p. 213.
- Sources for the Afsharid Dynasty
- "The Sword of Persia: Nader Shah, from Tribal Warrior to Conquering Tyrant", I.B. Tauris, 2006, pp. 17-19, 34.
- "Nadir Shah's Quest for Legitimacy in Post-Safavid Iran", University Press of Florida, 2006.
- "Frontier Nomads of Iran: A Political and Social History of the Shahsevan", Cambridge University Press, 1997. Shovgu (talk) 22:40, 4 August 2026 (UTC)
- Besides you proving that you still don't understand the difference between "native language" and "official language", it seems you don't understand what "dynasty" means either. Speaking x language does not make you x dynasty, as seen in the listed sources. Matter of the fact is you're ignoring sources/information that you don't like. Also, your citations has no quotes and some has dozens of pages or no pages, no one wants to go on a treasure hunt to find the quotes for you, which I doubt you even have yourself. HistoryofIran (talk) 22:46, 4 August 2026 (UTC)
- I have moved the Turkic language from the "official language" section to the "native language" section. It will remain this way until the discussion concludes. I maintain the position that Turkic was also the official language of the dynasty. I believe Turkic should be included in both sections because it was the language of the Turkic dynasty—rather than the state itself—and was used within the court and the dynasty. Shovgu (talk) 22:56, 4 August 2026 (UTC)
- You still refuse to learn what "official language" means, conflating it with other words despite being told about it a dozens of times now, and having had hours to look it up on a simple Google search. You're still engaging in synthesis of published material, i.e. WP:SYNTH. But thanks for removing it from "official language", still, that doesn't fix the issues of your conduct, including at the Afsharid dynasty. HistoryofIran (talk) 23:03, 4 August 2026 (UTC)
- You are biased. Put aside your own views. Do not hesitate to accept the truth. I am aware of the distinction between a native language and an official language. Given that it was a Turkic dynasty, we agree that their native language was Turkic. However, despite numerous official sources, you refuse to acknowledge that Turkic was also the dynasty's official language, and instead, you present me with sources irrelevant to the topic. Turkic was the dynasty's official language because it was used within the palace, among dynasty members, and in official correspondence—not to mention its use in diplomacy and the military. Persian may have been the state's official language—serving as the international language of that era—but that is irrelevant to our discussion; for instance, the Seljuk Empire was a Turkic empire, yet the state's official language was Persian. You do not want to accept this. Shovgu (talk) 23:28, 4 August 2026 (UTC)
- There are zero reliable sources that mention it being an official language, including in the English Wikipedia of the very subject. Even when you listed the alleged sources here you said it was about "native language of the dynasties". The only one biased is you, as you refuse to listen to reliable sources and only listen to your personal opinion and WP:SYNTH. There are clearly severe WP:CIR issues here. HistoryofIran (talk) 23:38, 4 August 2026 (UTC)
- Let us continue the discussion once you learn to distinguish between the state and the dynasty. A dynasty is not a state for which a document is signed and an official language is designated; rather, a dynasty uses the Turkic language while governing the state. Consider this aspect: "the language of the dynasty." This is documented everywhere, including on the English Wikipedia. If Turkic were merely the dynasty's native tongue—and if the dynasty did not employ it in state administration, internal court affairs, and official correspondence—then it would suffice to regard Turkic simply as their mother tongue. However, that is not the case. Shovgu (talk) 23:48, 4 August 2026 (UTC)
- Again, still failing to understand what official language means and making up stuff as you go, i.e. WP:SYNTH. No point in discussing indeed, hopefully an admin will take a look at your conduct. HistoryofIran (talk) 23:59, 4 August 2026 (UTC)
- A dynasty's official language is not established by a document. Learn to distinguish between the state and the dynasty. I hope the admins will look into this soon. Shovgu (talk) 00:04, 5 August 2026 (UTC)
- Whether state or dynasty, "official language" still has one meaning. You are the one who should learn. There is a reason WP:RS has not supported you once, and contradicts you in the dozens. HistoryofIran (talk) 00:06, 5 August 2026 (UTC)
- You have no grounds to invoke the WP:RS policy here. There is no such thing as an "official language of a dynasty," as it is not an institution; what we are referring to is the language they actually used. Either you do not understand this, or it simply does not suit your agenda. Shovgu (talk) 00:17, 5 August 2026 (UTC)
- If we are referring to the language they spoke, but which wasn't an official language under them, then we don't add it as an "official language", it's that simple really, and I think a part of you know this, which is why you removed it from "official languages" after this report. But I'm done trying to put sense into you after these several hours, I'll let the admins take it from here. HistoryofIran (talk) 00:22, 5 August 2026 (UTC)
- I don't know who you are referring to when you say "a part of you." I am just a human being. What do you mean when you say "a part of you knows this"? What is it that they know? If you are trying to emphasize that the Turkic language isn't being used, then you are simply engaging in a war of words. Because you are still too biased to admit that the language of the ruling dynasty and the language of the state are distinct. I had intended to keep the situation as it was until the discussion concluded, but I changed my mind. Shovgu (talk) 01:10, 5 August 2026 (UTC)
- I had intended to keep the situation as it was until the discussion concluded, but I changed my mind
- You did indeed [8]. So in other words, you doubled down on your disruptive conduct. It was also only two months ago that you got blocked for edit warring. HistoryofIran (talk) 01:41, 5 August 2026 (UTC)
- I don't know who you are referring to when you say "a part of you." I am just a human being. What do you mean when you say "a part of you knows this"? What is it that they know? If you are trying to emphasize that the Turkic language isn't being used, then you are simply engaging in a war of words. Because you are still too biased to admit that the language of the ruling dynasty and the language of the state are distinct. I had intended to keep the situation as it was until the discussion concluded, but I changed my mind. Shovgu (talk) 01:10, 5 August 2026 (UTC)
- If we are referring to the language they spoke, but which wasn't an official language under them, then we don't add it as an "official language", it's that simple really, and I think a part of you know this, which is why you removed it from "official languages" after this report. But I'm done trying to put sense into you after these several hours, I'll let the admins take it from here. HistoryofIran (talk) 00:22, 5 August 2026 (UTC)
- You have no grounds to invoke the WP:RS policy here. There is no such thing as an "official language of a dynasty," as it is not an institution; what we are referring to is the language they actually used. Either you do not understand this, or it simply does not suit your agenda. Shovgu (talk) 00:17, 5 August 2026 (UTC)
- Whether state or dynasty, "official language" still has one meaning. You are the one who should learn. There is a reason WP:RS has not supported you once, and contradicts you in the dozens. HistoryofIran (talk) 00:06, 5 August 2026 (UTC)
- A dynasty's official language is not established by a document. Learn to distinguish between the state and the dynasty. I hope the admins will look into this soon. Shovgu (talk) 00:04, 5 August 2026 (UTC)
- Again, still failing to understand what official language means and making up stuff as you go, i.e. WP:SYNTH. No point in discussing indeed, hopefully an admin will take a look at your conduct. HistoryofIran (talk) 23:59, 4 August 2026 (UTC)
- Let us continue the discussion once you learn to distinguish between the state and the dynasty. A dynasty is not a state for which a document is signed and an official language is designated; rather, a dynasty uses the Turkic language while governing the state. Consider this aspect: "the language of the dynasty." This is documented everywhere, including on the English Wikipedia. If Turkic were merely the dynasty's native tongue—and if the dynasty did not employ it in state administration, internal court affairs, and official correspondence—then it would suffice to regard Turkic simply as their mother tongue. However, that is not the case. Shovgu (talk) 23:48, 4 August 2026 (UTC)
- There are zero reliable sources that mention it being an official language, including in the English Wikipedia of the very subject. Even when you listed the alleged sources here you said it was about "native language of the dynasties". The only one biased is you, as you refuse to listen to reliable sources and only listen to your personal opinion and WP:SYNTH. There are clearly severe WP:CIR issues here. HistoryofIran (talk) 23:38, 4 August 2026 (UTC)
- You are biased. Put aside your own views. Do not hesitate to accept the truth. I am aware of the distinction between a native language and an official language. Given that it was a Turkic dynasty, we agree that their native language was Turkic. However, despite numerous official sources, you refuse to acknowledge that Turkic was also the dynasty's official language, and instead, you present me with sources irrelevant to the topic. Turkic was the dynasty's official language because it was used within the palace, among dynasty members, and in official correspondence—not to mention its use in diplomacy and the military. Persian may have been the state's official language—serving as the international language of that era—but that is irrelevant to our discussion; for instance, the Seljuk Empire was a Turkic empire, yet the state's official language was Persian. You do not want to accept this. Shovgu (talk) 23:28, 4 August 2026 (UTC)
- You still refuse to learn what "official language" means, conflating it with other words despite being told about it a dozens of times now, and having had hours to look it up on a simple Google search. You're still engaging in synthesis of published material, i.e. WP:SYNTH. But thanks for removing it from "official language", still, that doesn't fix the issues of your conduct, including at the Afsharid dynasty. HistoryofIran (talk) 23:03, 4 August 2026 (UTC)
- I have moved the Turkic language from the "official language" section to the "native language" section. It will remain this way until the discussion concludes. I maintain the position that Turkic was also the official language of the dynasty. I believe Turkic should be included in both sections because it was the language of the Turkic dynasty—rather than the state itself—and was used within the court and the dynasty. Shovgu (talk) 22:56, 4 August 2026 (UTC)
- Besides you proving that you still don't understand the difference between "native language" and "official language", it seems you don't understand what "dynasty" means either. Speaking x language does not make you x dynasty, as seen in the listed sources. Matter of the fact is you're ignoring sources/information that you don't like. Also, your citations has no quotes and some has dozens of pages or no pages, no one wants to go on a treasure hunt to find the quotes for you, which I doubt you even have yourself. HistoryofIran (talk) 22:46, 4 August 2026 (UTC)
Shovgu is now engaging in more pov pushing by adding "Azerbaijani" as this figures native language [9], despite them not even speaking that language nor even being of Azerbaijani descent (they were Kipchaks per the sourced English Wikipedia article [10]). --HistoryofIran (talk) 13:55, 9 August 2026 (UTC)
- You have also seen the edit where I included the Persian language.1 You are simply highlighting what suits your own agenda. Did you start looking for errors in my edits only after your complaint failed to yield results? Shovgu (talk) 14:08, 9 August 2026 (UTC)
- You have also seen the edit where I included the Persian language
- Which I also removed. It seems you don't know what "native language" means either (hell, they he didn't even speak Azerbaiajani, let alone it being his native language). And regardless, it doesn't justify adding "Azerbaijani" (which you're now edit warring to restore, even more disruptive).
- You are simply highlighting what suits your own agenda.
- Ironic. HistoryofIran (talk) 14:09, 9 August 2026 (UTC)
- Aha, if you acknowledge that his native language is Azerbaijani—and not Persian—then why are you trying to erase the Azerbaijani language? Shovgu (talk) 14:11, 9 August 2026 (UTC)
- I didn't even remotely say that. Again proving the huge language barrier is too big of an issue. Also, you're still edit warring, clearly not here to build an encyclopedia. HistoryofIran (talk) 14:13, 9 August 2026 (UTC)
- You have just exposed your lie: "You have also seen the edit where I included the Persian language.
- Which I also removed. It seems you don't know what "native language" means either" Shovgu (talk) 14:17, 9 August 2026 (UTC)
- Sigh... HistoryofIran (talk) 14:17, 9 August 2026 (UTC)
- I didn't even remotely say that. Again proving the huge language barrier is too big of an issue. Also, you're still edit warring, clearly not here to build an encyclopedia. HistoryofIran (talk) 14:13, 9 August 2026 (UTC)
- Aha, if you acknowledge that his native language is Azerbaijani—and not Persian—then why are you trying to erase the Azerbaijani language? Shovgu (talk) 14:11, 9 August 2026 (UTC)
- I have fully protected the item to prevent further edit warring.
- @Shovgu, HistoryofIran: You are both warned not to edit war and not to use edit summaries to attack other editors. Please take a step back and discuss the underlying content issue in a collaborative way. Assume good faith. Cut out the insults and personal attacks. Bring in third parties. WD:Project chat is a better venue to get third-party input on content issues. Bovlb (talk) 14:34, 9 August 2026 (UTC)
- But that's the thing, it's not a dispute. Per this thread, Shovgu is adding information not supported by their sourced English articles nor reliable sources, the most blatant one being adding "Azerbaijani" here [11], not only as a language, but a native language a that (which contradicts [12], this is like if I added "Azerbaijani" to Napoleon). They refuse to understand what "official language" and "native language" means. For all of these things they have had days to prove otherwise, but to no avail. Also, if the article gets protected, shouldn't it also get reverted back to its previous revision? Why should Shovgu get to force his way through edit warring, whereas I stopped? HistoryofIran (talk) 14:38, 9 August 2026 (UTC)
- I have already answered that. Stop repeating yourself; you're leading the discussion into a dead end. Shovgu (talk) 14:43, 9 August 2026 (UTC)
- Not at all. HistoryofIran (talk) 14:45, 9 August 2026 (UTC)
- Protection does not endorse the version that happened to be current when I protected the item. See m:The Wrong Version. I am not going to adjudicate the underlying content issue by choosing which version to protect.
- Calling this a content dispute also does not mean that I consider the two positions equally well supported. Please resolve the content question through discussion, preferably with input from uninvolved editors. Bovlb (talk) 14:47, 9 August 2026 (UTC)
- I have requested input from Wikidata:Project chat [13], though despite that I find it hard how to see how it is going to suddenly change the conduct of Shovgu. HistoryofIran (talk) 14:59, 9 August 2026 (UTC)
- @Bovlb: Unfortunately it has now been archived. What now? HistoryofIran (talk) 23:07, 16 August 2026 (UTC)
- I have already answered that. Stop repeating yourself; you're leading the discussion into a dead end. Shovgu (talk) 14:43, 9 August 2026 (UTC)
- But that's the thing, it's not a dispute. Per this thread, Shovgu is adding information not supported by their sourced English articles nor reliable sources, the most blatant one being adding "Azerbaijani" here [11], not only as a language, but a native language a that (which contradicts [12], this is like if I added "Azerbaijani" to Napoleon). They refuse to understand what "official language" and "native language" means. For all of these things they have had days to prove otherwise, but to no avail. Also, if the article gets protected, shouldn't it also get reverted back to its previous revision? Why should Shovgu get to force his way through edit warring, whereas I stopped? HistoryofIran (talk) 14:38, 9 August 2026 (UTC)
Would appreciate an admin looking into this, these are pretty glaring disruptive edits, which Shovgu has somehow gotten away with by edit warring, despite recently being blocked for that. This does not send a good message. HistoryofIran (talk) 14:00, 20 August 2026 (UTC)
In need of admin input
Would really appreciate an admin looking into this. --HistoryofIran (talk) 03:32, 28 August 2026 (UTC)
- More pov pushing by Shovgu.. [14], this is straight up false [15]. In the English Wikipedia WP:GSAA is made for exactly these type of users. HistoryofIran (talk) 20:29, 1 September 2026 (UTC)
- It is ridiculous for you to be monitoring me throughout the day :) I see no error in my edit; I simply added information that is already on Wikipedia—feel free to make additions yourself. . D Shovgu (talk) 21:24, 1 September 2026 (UTC)
- It is ridiculous that you engage in historical falsifications. Clearly not per the diff I linked. HistoryofIran (talk) 01:55, 2 September 2026 (UTC)
- Bump. --HistoryofIran (talk) 09:17, 8 September 2026 (UTC)
- Bump.. HistoryofIran (talk) 11:50, 14 September 2026 (UTC)
- I'm not sure why this has been getting ignored for almost two months. Shovgu is engaging in blatant pov pushing, disregarding what sourced information actually says and even English grammar. Is it simply the one who edit wars the most that is right? HistoryofIran (talk) 02:35, 21 September 2026 (UTC)
- Bump.. HistoryofIran (talk) 11:50, 14 September 2026 (UTC)
- It is ridiculous for you to be monitoring me throughout the day :) I see no error in my edit; I simply added information that is already on Wikipedia—feel free to make additions yourself. . D Shovgu (talk) 21:24, 1 September 2026 (UTC)
References
- ↑ :::::::::Osterhammel, Jürgen (2019). Unfabling the East: The Enlightenment's Encounter with Asia. Princeton University Press. p. 68, "...that fully a third of the army of the Iranian conqueror, Nadir (Nader) Shah..."
- Esposito, John L., (ed) (2004). The Oxford Dictionary of Islam. Oxford University Press. p. 71, "In the conflicts following the death of the Iranian ruler Nadir Shah in 1747..."
- Asher, Catherine Blanshard; Asher, Catherine Ella Blanshard; Asher, Catherine B. (1992). Architecture of Mughal India. Cambridge University Press. p. 301, "...the Iranian ruler Nadir Shah invaded Delhi."
- Tucker, Spencer C., (ed.) (2019). Middle East Conflicts from Ancient Egypt to the 21st Century: An Encyclopedia and Document Collection. ABC-CLIO. p. 695, "...the army of Persian ruler Nadir Shah and Ottoman Empire forces under Yegen Mehmet Pasha."
- Alam, Muzaffar; Subrahmanyam, Sanjay (2007). Indo-Persian Travels in the Age of Discoveries, 1400-1800. Cambridge University Press. p. 245, "...invasion of North India by the Iranian conqueror, Nadir Shah Afshar."
- Schwartz, Schwartz Kevin L. (2020). Remapping Persian Literary History, 1700-1900. Edinburgh University Press. "...on the triumphs and heroics of the Iranian ruler Nadir Shah (r. 1736–47)."
- Emon, Anver M.; Ahmed, Rumee., (ed.) (2018). The Oxford Handbook of Islamic Law. Oxford University Press. p. 495, "...Iranian Afsharid ruler, Nadir Shah (r. 1736–47)..."
- Hofmeester, Karin; Grewe, Bernd-Stefan (2016). Luxury in Global Perspective: Objects and Practices, 1600–2000. Cambridge University Press. p. 27, "...the Persian ruler Nadir Shah (ruled 1736–47) had invaded northern India."
- Kaicker, Abhishek (2020). The King and the People: Sovereignty and Popular Politics in Mughal Delhi. Oxford University Press. p. 18, "Persian ruler Nadir Shah's invasion of the Mughal empire in 1739..."
- Hodgson, Marshall G. S. (2009). The Venture of Islam, Volume 3: The Gunpower Empires and Modern Times. University of Chicago Press. p. 146, "...Iranian ruler Nadir Shah had sacked Delhi..."
- Embree, Ainslie T. (2020). Frontiers into Borders: Defining South Asia States, 1757–1857. Oxford University Press, "...Central Asia fell to the great Persian conqueror, Nadir Shah..."
- Wink, André (2020). The Making of the Indo-Islamic World: c.700–1800 CE. Cambridge University Press. p. 15, "...the Persian conqueror Nadir Shah."
RFU: Q141048072 (Italu Bruno Colares de Oliveira)
Olá. Gostaria de pedir a restauração do item Q141048072 (Italu Bruno Colares de Oliveira).
O item Q141048072 não é propaganda. O item Q141048072 representa um registro factual de Italu Bruno Colares de Oliveira, um pesquisador e autor brasileiro.
Italu Bruno Colares de Oliveira possui registro oficial no ORCID (0000-0002-5510-1445: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5510-1445). Italu Bruno Colares de Oliveira também publicou artigos e livros acadêmicos que têm DOI e ISBN registrados, tais como:
- Artigo no Brazilian Journal of Development (2021) – DOI: 10.34117/BJDV7N1-706 (https://doi.org/10.34117/BJDV7N1-706) - Livro publicado em 2023 – DOI: 10.29327/5336951 (https://doi.org/10.29327/5336951)
Além disso, Italu Bruno Colares de Oliveira aparece em veículos de imprensa, como RedeTV! DF e o programa Fala DF. O item Q141048072 será mantido estritamente com dados neutros e fontes oficiais.
Obrigado. JvL04 (talk) 21:05, 9 September 2026 (UTC)
- Relevant items: Q141048072 (JvL04), Q141008828 (JvL04). CC deleting admins @Madamebiblio, The Squirrel Conspiracy
- See also: Q141244682 Bovlb (talk) 21:32, 9 September 2026 (UTC)
- More opinions are welcome. Madamebiblio (talk) 16:35, 12 September 2026 (UTC)
- @Madamebiblio: Doesn't look like anything notable to me. זיו「Ziv」 • For love letters and other notes 09:56, 13 September 2026 (UTC)
- More opinions are welcome. Madamebiblio (talk) 16:35, 12 September 2026 (UTC)
Request for undeletion: Q138543771 (Siam Eyewear)
Disclosure: this account represents Siam Eyewear and has a conflict of interest regarding the subject. This request was prepared and submitted with AI assistance at the account holder's direction.
Please review whether Q138543771 (Siam Eyewear, an eyewear retailer in Bangkok, Thailand) can be restored under the second criterion of Wikidata:Notability: a clearly identifiable entity describable using serious, publicly available references. I acknowledge the previous deletion discussion, which described it as a non-notable business, and the deletion by Jan Myšák on 3 March 2026 with the log reason "Spam / advertising". I am requesting review of the original item, not recreating it.
The following externally maintained records are offered for consideration:
- Oakley Thailand's official store locator: searching "Siam Eyewear" returns "SIAM EYEWEAR", at "215, SIRINDHORN RD, BANGPLAD", Bangkok 10700, with a "Certified Reseller" badge. The locator's publicly accessible record identifies the store as
oakley_th_retail_TH0063and lists sunglasses and prescription products. - ZEISS's official optician finder, store 1392046: identifies "SIAM EYEWEAR" at "215 SIRINTHORN ROAD BANGPLAD", Bangkok 10700, Thailand, and links to
https://www.siameyewear.com/.
These are brand-maintained retailer-directory records, not independent editorial coverage. I am not claiming that reseller certification automatically establishes Wikidata notability; I ask whether the identifiable business and these public references satisfy criterion 2. I am not claiming a qualifying Wikimedia sitelink or a structural need. The intended scope is neutral, sourced identification of the retailer, without promotional wording or unverified legal-entity details. If these references are insufficient, I accept the community's assessment and will not recreate the item. Thank you. Siameyewear (talk) 02:37, 10 September 2026 (UTC)
- The deleting admin was @Jan Myšák:, but for me, the item doesn't look notable. זיו「Ziv」 • For love letters and other notes 09:59, 13 September 2026 (UTC)
Request for Undeletion (RFU): Q135639324 (Hariharan Ragothaman)
@WikiBayer: This item was deleted on 3 August 2026, 19:36 UTC (delete log, logid 672341123) with the summary “Does not meet the notability policy”. There does not appear to have been an RfD discussion. I am not recreating the item.
Conflict of interest: this item is about me. I understand that may weigh against the request. I am asking for restoration rather than creating a new item, and I will respect the community's decision.
I believe the item meets N2 (identifiers and serious, publicly available references), and I am sharing the strongest sources I have.
Identifiers
- ORCID: https://orcid.org/0009-0005-1164-384X
- IEEE Xplore author ID: https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/author/141431446401906
- Apress/Springer book ISBN 979-8-8688-1696-3 / 979-8-8688-1697-0, DOI 10.1007/979-8-8688-1697-0
Independent sources
- IEEE Computer Society, Computing's Top 30 Early Career Professionals 2025
- IEEE Computer Society, Computing's Top 30: Hariharan Ragothaman
- Springer Nature catalog record for Implementing Identity Management on GCP (Apress, 2025), listing Hariharan Ragothaman as an author: https://link.springer.com/book/10.1007/979-8-8688-1697-0
- IEEE Xplore papers with DOIs, e.g. 10.1109/iceecit63698.2024.10859822, 10848877, 10849302
Talks and interviews (supplementary)
- Carnegie Mellon University SEI: YouTube
- OWASP Boston Application Security Conference: YouTube
- DevOps.com / TechStrong TV interview: YouTube
- TestGuild DevOps Tools Podcast: YouTube
- Other recorded talks: 8DrgMFgzJlY, DlQQCvHFiho
If restored, I am happy for the English description to be a short occupational label rather than a CV-style summary.
Hariharanragothaman (talk) 18:19, 10 September 2026 (UTC)
Not done, although the subject has several notable publication, the cite record only started recently (2024). Coverage are also too scarce. Not notable yet for inclusion. When the subject has attained more coverage and published more works, it could be considered for inclusion. Furthermore, please understand Wikidata community's stand on editing about oneself. Yamato Shiya • (Hello!) 00:27, 14 September 2026 (UTC)
| I think that this discussion is resolved and can be archived. If you disagree, don't hesitate to replace this template with your comment. Yamato Shiya • (Hello!) |
Demande de restauration de Q140372031
Bonjour,
Cette application est décrite par deux articles scientifiques : [16], [17]. Pourrait-n donc restaurer cet élément qui lui était dédié ?
Merci, Maime 11:47, 11 September 2026 (UTC)
Support 2 secondary sources is more than enough to restore I would say. Cheers, VIGNERON (talk) 15:28, 11 September 2026 (UTC)
- @WikiBayer: Ymblanter (talk) 19:16, 11 September 2026 (UTC)
- Bonjour, je suis désolé de revenir vers vous sur ce sujet. Il n'y a pas d'urgence particulière mais nous serions heureux d'être rassurés sur le fait que l'élément pourra être restauré avec les deux références que nous avons données. Merci pour votre aide. CChazot (talk) 09:22, 18 September 2026 (UTC)
Request for undeletion: Q138780062 (NPR77)
I’d like to request the undeletion of Q138780062 (NPR77).
The item was deleted on 27 March 2026 for “Does not meet the notability policy”. When it was deleted, the item only had the name “NPR77” and did not have references showing what the entity was.
Since then, I’ve found these sources that specifically mention NPR77:
- GlobeNewswire — discusses NPR77 and its online casino and sports-betting platform.
- Yahoo Finance — mentions NPR77 in connection with Himalayan Harmony Group.
I’m asking for the deleted item to be reviewed again in light of these sources. I’m not asking for a new item to be created, but for the deleted item to be reconsidered.
Thanks. Nutoledabaurgess (talk) 11:32, 12 September 2026 (UTC)
- These appear to be press releases. Are there any independent sources? Bovlb (talk) 17:33, 12 September 2026 (UTC)
- Thanks for the reply, I appreciate it.
- I found a third-party review of NPR77 published by MightyTips. It covers NPR77’s platform, sportsbook, casino, launch, payment methods, and other details:
- https://www.mightytips.com/bookmakers/npr77-np/ Nutoledabaurgess (talk) 14:46, 16 September 2026 (UTC)
- I also found another third-party article that mentions NPR77 and provides additional coverage:
- https://themarketperiodical.com/2026/05/18/6-best-online-casinos-in-nepal-2026-expert-rankings-reviews/
- Hopefully these additional sources help with the review of the item. Thanks. Nutoledabaurgess (talk) 14:50, 16 September 2026 (UTC)
Report concerning ~2026-47825-28
Seems to be spamming with code Vicarage (talk) 16:25, 13 September 2026 (UTC)
Report concerning User:Benny2706
Benny2706 🔕 (talk • contribs • deleted contribs • logs • filter log • block user • block log • SUL (for IP: GUC)) --Printstream (talk) 19:43, 13 September 2026 (UTC)
High-volume bibliographic item creation — Iamcarbon
Could an admin please take a look at User:Iamcarbon's recent high-volume bibliographic item creation?
I'm not alleging spam or promotion, but the current batch appears highly systematic and possibly automated/semi-automated. There were also previous concerns about the account creating 350+ items in 10 days, which were discussed with the editor.
Some of the new items contain several bibliographic identifiers but no references, so it may be worth checking the source/provenance, duplicate handling, and automation method before the activity continues.
Just asking for a review of the data quality and editing method, rather than any action against the editor. ~~~~ ⚡ Zulier ∆ Talk 07:31, 14 September 2026 (UTC)
- Hi Zullier. I typically create, verify, or improve a few hundred books a day to the existing authors on Wikipedia; using a set of local tools - and manual edits - while helping maintain the separation between works and their editions across the project. It's slow and tedious work; particularly when it uncovers conflations, stubs, and poorly modeled conflicts that need resolved (the books data on wikipedia is a total mess).
- Any missing references typically get added after a few days. Let me know if there's any specific problems you have with the edits or contributions. Iamcarbon (talk) 07:59, 14 September 2026 (UTC)
- Thanks for clarifying. I don't have a problem with the high volume itself or with using local tools. My main concern was the provenance and verification of the bibliographic data, particularly where newly created items initially have several identifiers but no references.
- If the references are normally added afterwards, that's helpful context. I'll take a closer look at a sample of the recent items and raise any specific data or duplicate issues rather than treating the edit volume itself as a problem. ⚡ Zulier ∆ Talk 08:45, 14 September 2026 (UTC)
RFU: Q140187953 (Raze S.R.L.)
This item was deleted on 13 June 2026 by @Madamebiblio for "Does not meet the notability policy". I asked the deleting admin on their talk page on 19 August and followed up on 7 September (User talk:Madamebiblio#Undeletion request: Q140187953 (Raze S.R.L. / GPKingdom)) without receiving a reply, so I am bringing it here. Full disclosure: I am a co-founder of the company; I have not recreated the item.
I believe the item satisfies N2 (serious and publicly available references):
- Dedicated article by an independent newspaper: Leccoonline, 28 May 2026 — https://www.leccoonline.com/notizie/97189/dal-badoni-a-cupertino-la-start-up-di-successo-di-due-ex-studenti
- Independent event coverage naming the company: LeccoToday, 2026 — https://www.leccotoday.it/economia/lario-innovation-network-startup-2026.html
- Dedicated interview: The Digital Moon, June 2026 — https://www.thedigitalmoon.com/intervista-a-gp-kingdom-domande-che-nessun-fan-puo-ignorare/
- Registry: Italian Business Register (Camera di Commercio Como-Lecco), VAT IT04229070133 (VIES-verifiable), REA LC-429420, incorporated 23 April 2025.
If restored, I will immediately attach these as references to the statements and restrict the item to the company (Raze S.R.L.), leaving the news outlet GPKingdom out of it. If the community considers the sources insufficient, I would appreciate knowing what would be needed. Thank you. Lavoro per Raze S.R.L. (talk) 08:05, 14 September 2026 (UTC)
Kathyann23 and Lilabelle23! (Daxor)
Kathyann23 and Lilabelle23! keep turning descriptions of papers about Daxor's BVA-100 blood volume analyzer into ad copy ("Daxor's BVA-100 provides accurate, radioisotopic blood volume measurement..."). They also create new items for such papers with the same kind of text. On enwiki Kathyann23 was warned for promo in June and replied that they're affiliated with the manufacturer (en:User talk:Kathyann23). No disclosure here. Lilabelle23! registered on 14 July and edits only here, on the same papers in the same style. Their last items are from 3 September. I've cleaned up all items. Could an admin have a look, and maybe check if it's the same person? SofiLuiza (talk) 10:28, 14 September 2026 (UTC)
Request for restoration of Q141442394 (Arnaud Segla)
Hello,
My page Q141442394 was recently deleted for "spam/advertising". I understand your vigilance, but this is a legitimate biographical entry for a published author with international institutional identifiers.
This entity is officially registered with:
- ISNI: 0000 0004 8516 6736
- IdRef: 241221191
The books (such as "Une entreprise ethnique en 40 heures") are indexed in national libraries and available on Google Books.
Could you please restore the item? I will make sure it adheres strictly to Wikidata formatting without any promotional tone.
Thank you for your time and understanding. Arnaud Segla (talk) 10:54, 14 September 2026 (UTC)
llow-up: undeletion request for Q140831608 / Q137426576 (Globy)
Hello,
I’m following up on my previous undeletion request for Q140831608 / Q137426576 (Globy), which was archived without a final response from the deleting administrators.
Previous discussion:
https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Wikidata:Administrators%27_noticeboard/Archive/2026/08#Request_for_undeletion:_Q140831608_/_Q137426576_(Globy)
Could an administrator please review whether the item can be restored, or advise what additional independent sourcing would be required?
Thank you. Annagloby (talk) 11:18, 14 September 2026 (UTC)
- The sources which are presented in the previous discussion only demonstrate that the company exists. Not all existing companies are notable. For notability, we require extensive coverage in independent reliable sources, similarly to what would be sufficient for the subject to have an article say on the English Wikipedia (and survive a deletion request there). Ymblanter (talk) 18:45, 14 September 2026 (UTC)
- hank you for the clarification.
- I have gathered additional third-party sources that provide substantive coverage of Globy and its platform:
- Coruzant — “B2B Globy Marketplace Online and Logistics Tools” https://coruzant.com/tech/b2b-sourcing-platform-globy-marketplace/
- Business Post Nigeria — “Globy Platform: B2B Marketplace and Its Logistics Calculator” https://businesspost.ng/general/globy-platform-b2b-marketplace-and-its-logistics-calculator/
- Today News — “China – USA: B2B Trade and Logistics on Globy, Logistics Shipping Calculator + Freight Costs” https://todaynews.co.uk/2024/12/11/china-usa-b2b-trade-and-logistics-on-globy-logistics-shipping-calculator-freight-costs/
- SMEStreet — “Ordering Goods on Globy: Logistics from India to the USA” https://smestreet.in/sectors/logistics/ordering-goods-on-globy-logistics-from-india-to-the-usa-7425638
- These sources discuss Globy, its B2B marketplace, logistics functionality, and platform features in detail rather than merely confirming the company’s existence.
- Globy also currently has a standalone article on the Spanish Wikipedia, where these independent sources are used as references:
- https://es.wikipedia.org/wiki/Globy
- Could you please review these sources and advise whether they are sufficient to establish notability and restore Q140831608 / Q137426576?
- Thank you
- Annagloby (talk) 12:13, 15 September 2026 (UTC)
- https://es.wikipedia.org/wiki/Globy https://www.coherentmarketinsights.com/blog/automotive-and-transportation/multimodal-transport-explained-how-it-works-and-when-to-use-it-3118 https://www.elconfidencialdigital.com/articulo/noticias/european-energy-and-electrical-engineering-fair-enex/20250310132153940874.html https://www.europeanbusinessreview.com/delivery-attempted-meaning-in-shipping-and-logistics/ https://www.re-thinkingthefuture.com/technologies/gp1062-the-wholesale-trading-of-machinery-with-globy/ https://ecommercefastlane.com/globy-com-and-other-b2b-markets/ https://www.seyfarth.com/news-insights/globy-features-article-by-michael-delaney-on-force-majeure-clauses-in-logistics-contracts.html https://directiveconsulting.com/blog/blog-b2b-shopping-platform/ Annagloby (talk) 14:46, 15 September 2026 (UTC)
- If there is a Wikipedia article, the subject is automatically notable for us. The item was created by bot, Q141445527. No need to restore the deleted items as far as I am concerned. Ymblanter (talk) 18:55, 15 September 2026 (UTC)
- https://es.wikipedia.org/wiki/Globy
- https://www.coherentmarketinsights.com/blog/automotive-and-transportation/multimodal-transport-explained-how-it-works-and-when-to-use-it-3118
- https://www.elconfidencialdigital.com/articulo/noticias/european-energy-and-electrical-engineering-fair-enex/20250310132153940874.html
- https://www.europeanbusinessreview.com/delivery-attempted-meaning-in-shipping-and-logistics/
- https://www.re-thinkingthefuture.com/technologies/gp1062-the-wholesale-trading-of-machinery-with-globy/
- https://ecommercefastlane.com/globy-com-and-other-b2b-markets/
- https://www.seyfarth.com/news-insights/globy-features-article-by-michael-delaney-on-force-majeure-clauses-in-logistics-contracts.html
- https://directiveconsulting.com/blog/blog-b2b-shopping-platform/
- https://coruzant.com/tech/b2b-sourcing-platform-globy-marketplace/
- https://businesspost.ng/general/globy-platform-b2b-marketplace-and-its-logistics-calculator/
- https://todaynews.co.uk/2024/12/11/china-usa-b2b-trade-and-logistics-on-globy-logistics-shipping-calculator-freight-costs/
- https://smestreet.in/sectors/logistics/ordering-goods-on-globy-logistics-from-india-to-the-usa-7425638
- https://vnrom.net/2025/12/cong-cu-logistics-nhanh-chong-va-san-thuong-mai-b2b-tren-nen-tang-globy/
- https://www.elconfidencialdigital.com/articulo/noticias/european-energy-and-electrical-engineering-fair-enex/20250310132153940874.html
- https://www.krosno112.pl/artykul/25308,ordering-fitness-and-sports-equipment-on-the-globy-b2b-marketplace
- https://bdgovt.info/organic-goat-feed-on-the-b2b-marketplace-globy/
- https://www.learnenglishteam.com/global-container-tracking-tool/
- https://www.targatocn.it/2026/07/17/leggi-notizia/argomenti/economia-7/articolo/globy-wholesale-platform-tracciamento-online-dei-container-one-e-ispezione-del-carico.html
- https://www.banglacyber.com/unclaimed-cargo/
- https://www.naijatechguide.com/container-tracking-on-the-globy-platform.html
- https://www.re-thinkingthefuture.com/technologies/gp1062-the-wholesale-trading-of-machinery-with-globy/
- https://fitinline.com/article/read/profitable-clothing-order-on-the-b2b-marketplace--globy/
- https://www.unica.ro/advertorial/rascumpara-marfurile-abandonate-de-pe-globy-la-pret-redus-734456
- ttps://tradebrains.in/features/best-textiles-india-united-states-trade-route/
- https://www.hercegovina.info/vijesti/vijesti-na-engleskom/b2b-marketplace-and-quick-logistics-on-globy/236215/
- https://www.tuttotek.it/web-social/speciali-web-social/il-commercio-allingrosso-di-valigeria-custodie-e-borse-opportunita-a-portata-di-click-con-globy
- https://dailynewshungary.com/searching-for-a-new-buyer-of-abandoned-cargo-on-globy/
- All sources here are verified, and no bots were used Annagloby (talk) 09:34, 18 September 2026 (UTC)
- If there is a Wikipedia article, the subject is automatically notable for us. The item was created by bot, Q141445527. No need to restore the deleted items as far as I am concerned. Ymblanter (talk) 18:55, 15 September 2026 (UTC)
Follow-up on auto-archived undeletion request: Q130604188
For transparency, I am the subject of the deleted item and therefore have a COI.
My 4 September request for undeletion of Q130604188 was automatically archived without a final administrative determination. In that discussion, User:Yamato Shiya explicitly asked for opinions from uninvolved administrators and experienced editors, and noted that they were welcome to restore the item if they considered the new evidence sufficient.
I said there that I would not repeat the same arguments, so I will not duplicate the evidence or re-litigate the discussion here.
Could an uninvolved administrator please review the archived discussion and make a final determination on the request — either restore Q130604188 or decline the undeletion request?
Previous discussion: Wikidata:Administrators' noticeboard/Archive/2026/09#Request for undeletion of Q130604188 (David Osipov)
I will treat a clear decline as final unless materially new evidence emerges. David Osipov (talk) 12:38, 14 September 2026 (UTC)
Request for undeletion: KFO framework (Q141161165) and associated paper (Q141158892)
I am Andrew Paul of Americas Great Resorts, the originator of KFO and author of the associated paper. I disclose that connection and request review of these two items under Wikidata:Notability criterion 2. Please assess each item separately.
Both were deleted by Fralambert on 10 September 2026 UTC for not meeting the notability policy:
Framework: Q141161165
The framework is discussed in the following outside publications. Neither article was written or paid for by AGR:
- Hospitality Technology feature, by Michal Christine Escobar, 3 August 2026. It includes a section specifically discussing KFO and its hotel application. I am quoted as a research source. I offer this as coverage of the framework, not independent experimental validation.
- Digital Marketing Stream analysis, 3 September 2026. It discusses the framework and cites the originating paper, while noting its preliminary research status.
My argument is that this coverage provides a basis for describing an identifiable conceptual entity. I am not claiming that KFO is an established scientific consensus.
Paper: Q141158892
The separate work is Knowledge Formation Optimization: A Framework for Shaping AI Conceptual Representations in Advance of Retrieval, by Andrew Paul, originally published 2 June 2026. Version 4.0 was issued 2 September 2026. It is a working paper, not a peer-reviewed journal article.
The Digital Marketing Stream source above links to and discusses the paper. Bibliographic identification is supported by:
- DataCite concept DOI record: 10.5281/zenodo.20636830.
- DataCite version 4 record: 10.5281/zenodo.22264006.
- OpenAlex concept-DOI record, W7164320830.
The DOI and OpenAlex records establish identity and indexing; I do not present them as endorsements. The paper's versions are one work, and I do not claim verified MPRA acceptance or independent scholarly citations from these records.
Would these references support restoration of the framework, the paper, or both? If an item's evidence is insufficient, please explain the specific deficiency. I do not have access to the deleted revisions and cannot establish which references were present at deletion. I am asking for review of the original items, not creating replacements or making an argument about search rankings.
AIAGR (talk) 13:41, 14 September 2026 (UTC)
- @Fralambert: Since you were the deleting administrator, would you be willing to review the additional sources above and indicate whether they support restoration of either item under WD:N criterion 2? A determination on each item, including the specific deficiency if restoration is declined, would be appreciated. Thank you. AIAGR (talk) 16:03, 18 September 2026 (UTC)
Add this article to Pristina’s Wikidata.
https://rmy.wikipedia.org/wiki/Prishtina
Add the Romany article to Pristina, Kosovo’s Wikidata.
Q25270 Albanian Barbie 2026 (talk) 16:21, 14 September 2026 (UTC)
Done, no admin action required. --Amitie 10g (talk) 16:55, 14 September 2026 (UTC)
Enable Reference Tooltips
Hello, admins,
Because {{Efn}} doesn't work without Reference Tooltips, I request the implementation of it. You may use the scripts located at the English Wikipedia. Thanks. --Amitie 10g (talk) 16:53, 14 September 2026 (UTC)
Requesting protection for Q115301620
Constant removal of information by temporary accounts. Semi for at least a year. Dabmasterars (talk) 06:10, 15 September 2026 (UTC)
Request for closure for Mass-editing policy RfC
The discussion and votes have died down on Wikidata:Requests for comment/Mass-editing policy and I'd like to request closure or some clarity about what is missing to get it over the finish line. Thank you! Lydia Pintscher (WMDE) (talk) 09:45, 15 September 2026 (UTC)
Continued item creation
Pablowhite44 (talk • contribs • logs) was previously warned about notability concerns but continues creating new items. One recent example is Q141455250. Could an administrator please take a look at their recent item creations and advise if further action is needed? And I have tagged some items for deletion on the basis of notability issues. The user don't have sufficient knowledge about notability and one more thing on user's userpage there are links to their social media handles.It looks like there user is here just for Promotion nothing else. ⚡ Zulier ∆ Talk 09:57, 15 September 2026 (UTC)
- Good morning,
- Pardon me for any mistakes on my part. I understand the concern about some of my recent items looking promotional. That was not my intention. I was only trying to contribute and create items for people I felt were relevant.
- I’ll be more careful with notability and sources before creating new items.
- Thank you for pointing it out and looking forward to guidance.
- Also,for adding links to my social media,it wasn't an harmful one....i just thought adding my social media link would would make my profile and userpage make more sense but since you have brought it up,I would remove my social media links from my userpage.
- Thank you. Pablowhite44 (talk) 10:22, 15 September 2026 (UTC)
Report concerning User:Sonirx
Sonirx 🔕 (talk • contribs • deleted contribs • logs • filter log • block user • block log • SUL (for IP: GUC)) — Reasons: Spam / spambot. cross-wiki abuse XReport ―MathXplore (talk) 13:07, 15 September 2026 (UTC)
Report concerning User:Local USA
Local USA 🔕 (talk • contribs • deleted contribs • logs • filter log • block user • block log • SUL (for IP: GUC)) — Reasons: Spam / spambot XReport ―MathXplore (talk) 14:09, 15 September 2026 (UTC)
Q141388393 - Giuseppe Emiliano Giannini
Q141388393 - Giuseppe Emiliano Giannini
Requesting undeletion of Q141388393 (deleted as not notable). New evidence for notability #2 and #3:
- ORCID iD: 0009-0007-8720-0126 - https://orcid.org/0009-0007-8720-0126
- Canonical archives: GitHub https://github.com/Mano-Veo/Il-divenire and Zenodo https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.22045616
- Author page with ISBNs: https://www.amazon.it/stores/Giuseppe-Emiliano-Giannini/author/B0H5MFG7YX
- Award: Second Prize Festival di Matera with sculpture "Iperuranio" (certificate available)
- Independent regional source: Concorso "La magia del Natale", Open Space APT Basilicata, Matera, 21 Dec 2024 - https://www.sassilive.it/cultura-e-spettacoli/terza-pagina/premiazione-concorso-letterario-e-artistico-la-magia-del-natale-nellopen-space-apt-basilicata-animazione-con-zio-ludovico-in-piazza-vittorio-veneto-e-festa-dinverno-con-mostra-fotograf/
I have 100+ edits and will add sourced statements P31 Q5, P106 Q1281618 / Q36180, P27 Q38, P496, P166 with S854 references.
Thank you. --GiuseppeGianniniScultore (talk) 18:09, 15 September 2026 (UTC)
Report concerning User:Langusto
Langusto 🔕 (talk • contribs • deleted contribs • logs • filter log • block user • block log • SUL (for IP: GUC)) Edit warring and intentional violation of WD:D on Alternative for Germany (Q6721203) --Printstream (talk) 21:31, 15 September 2026 (UTC)
Olivia Rodrigo Edit
i want to make edits better please ~2026-49271-41 (talk) 22:32, 15 September 2026 (UTC)
Request for undeletion – Thomas A. Blüm (Q141453529)
To whom it may concern.
I would like to request a review of the deletion of the Wikidata item for Thomas A. Blüm.
The item was deleted with the summary "Spam / advertising", with the additional observation that the only contributor was the account TitanBlue67.
TitanBlue67 is my account, and I am Thomas A. Blüm, the person represented by the deleted item. I created the item because it concerned me personally.
However, the content of the item was not advertising or promotional material. It contained my name, two established external identifiers, and links to external websites:
- GND: 1392719143
- ORCID: 0009-0002-4777-396X
The GND is an external authority identifier maintained by the German National Library, while ORCID is a persistent identifier for researchers and authors.
The item also contained a link to my website, which has a descriptive and informative character and contains no advertising or call to action to buy anything, and a link to the website associated with my published work. I acknowledge that these websites are associated with the subject and that the books can be purchased through them. However, the Wikidata item itself contained no advertising text, sales language, pricing information, promotional claims, or call to action. The links served as external references and as additional means of identifying the subject and his published work.
The intention was to provide additional information for a future Wikipedia entry. Such an entry would of course not be written by me or by friends, but would have to meet Wikipedia's own requirements for independent coverage and editorial involvement.
The item had only just been created when it was deleted. Consequently, there was effectively no opportunity to expand the initial record with additional bibliographic information and independent references before it was removed.
For the purpose of this undeletion request, I am providing additional evidence of the subject's identity and publication record. These identifiers were not all present in the original item; they are provided here as supporting evidence:
- GND: 1392719143
- ORCID: 0009-0002-4777-396X
- ISNI: 0000 0005 2961 7861
- OpenAlex: A5121198971
- Google Scholar: rD5-U-gAAAAJ
- ResearchGate: Thomas-Bluem-3
- SSRN: 10814796
The subject, who happens to be me, has also published books with ISBNs, which are independently represented in bibliographic and commercial book catalogues, as well as a substantial publication record.
Notability
Wikidata's current notability policy states that an item is acceptable if it refers to a clearly identifiable conceptual or material entity that can be described using serious and publicly available references.
Thomas A. Blüm is a clearly identifiable individual. His identity is independently represented through established external identifiers, including the GND of the German National Library, as well as ORCID and ISNI. His published books and scholarly publications provide additional publicly accessible bibliographic evidence.
The relevant question is therefore not whether the subject is famous or commercially prominent. Wikidata's notability criterion is not a fame criterion. The relevant question is whether the subject is a clearly identifiable entity that can be described using serious and publicly available references.
In this case, there is an established bibliographic and scholarly record that identifies the subject and his published work.
Number of contributors
The deletion rationale also notes that TitanBlue67 was the only contributor to the item.
I do not believe that the number of contributors is in itself a notability criterion. The item had only just been created when it was deleted, so naturally there had not yet been an opportunity for other contributors to edit it.
The number of contributors should therefore not, by itself, be treated as evidence of spam or advertising. The relevant questions are whether the subject meets the notability criteria and whether the information can be verified.
Spam / advertising
I understand that creating an item about oneself may warrant additional scrutiny. I am not disputing that.
However, Wikidata's own guidance on self-promotion states that self-promotion is not in itself a reason to delete an item, and that notability and maintainability are not determined solely by the creator's identity or motives.
The actual content of the deleted item contained no advertising copy, sales language, pricing information, promotional claims, or call to action. The external links did not ask users to purchase anything. They provided additional information about the identified person and his published work.
I therefore do not believe that the classification "Spam / advertising" accurately describes the content of the item.
If the concern is instead that the available evidence does not satisfy Wikidata's notability criteria, I would appreciate that being considered as the relevant issue rather than classifying the item itself as spam or advertising.
I therefore respectfully request that the deletion of Q141453529 be reconsidered and that the item be restored.
If any particular statement or source is considered inappropriate, I would be happy to address that specifically.
Thank you for your attention to this matter. TitanBlue67 (talk) 23:57, 15 September 2026 (UTC)
RFU: Q138568737 (Md Imdadul Haque Sohag) — new evidence since March 2026
I would like to request a fresh review of the deletion of Q138568737 (Md Imdadul Haque Sohag).
Conflict of interest: I am the subject of the deleted item. I am therefore not recreating the item myself and would appreciate an independent review by an uninvolved administrator.
The item was deleted on 12 March 2026 for not meeting Wikidata's notability policy. A previous undeletion request is archived here:
Wikidata:Administrators' noticeboard/Archive/2026/03
I am not asking for the earlier request to be reconsidered on the same evidence. Since that discussion, additional publicly available third-party coverage has been published.
I believe the item may now satisfy WD:N, particularly criterion 2, because the subject is clearly identifiable and can be described using serious and publicly available references.
New coverage since the March discussion:
- Business Bangladesh, 14 June 2026 — detailed coverage of the Naldanga Estate research and its historical and regional-administration framework:
https://businessbangladesh.com.bd/article/404504
- The Daily Evening News, 9 August 2026 — an extended person-focused profile, From Business Ledgers to Geopolitical Maps, covering professional background, policy analysis, research and geopolitical writing:
https://thedailyeveningnews.com/2026/08/09/from-business-ledgers-to-geopolitical-maps/
- The Daily Ittefaq, 11 August 2026 — substantive coverage of the Naldanga research, including its research question, historical terminology and the concept of intermediary regional authority:
https://www.ittefaq.com.bd/803529/
Additional coverage:
- The Daily Evening News, 9 March 2026 — an extended person-focused profile, From Enterprise to Policy: The Analytical Journey of Md Imdadul Haque Sohag:
Identifier:
I am including the ORCID only to help establish identity, not as independent evidence of notability.
For clarity, I am not relying on self-authored articles, personal websites, social media, search-engine visibility, Knowledge Panel results or SEO claims. I am also not asking that closely similar or republished reports be treated as separate independent sources.
I would be grateful if an uninvolved administrator could review the newer evidence and determine whether restoration is now appropriate under WD:N.
Thank you. ~2026-50048-29 (talk) 01:38, 16 September 2026 (UTC)
Report concerning User:Fauchon L'Hôtel Paris
Fauchon L'Hôtel Paris 🔕 (talk • contribs • deleted contribs • logs • filter log • block user • block log • SUL (for IP: GUC)) — Reasons: Spam / spambot XReport ―MathXplore (talk) 12:51, 16 September 2026 (UTC)
Report concerning User:Lyardaugh
Lyardaugh 🔕 (talk • contribs • deleted contribs • logs • filter log • block user • block log • SUL (for IP: GUC)) — Reasons: Spam / spambot XReport ―MathXplore (talk) 12:54, 16 September 2026 (UTC)
Report concerning User:Ask Iftaykhar
Ask Iftaykhar 🔕 (talk • contribs • deleted contribs • logs • filter log • block user • block log • SUL (for IP: GUC)) — Reasons: Spam / spambot XReport ―MathXplore (talk) 12:56, 16 September 2026 (UTC)
Report concerning User:MangoX8
MangoX8 🔕 (talk • contribs • deleted contribs • logs • filter log • block user • block log • SUL (for IP: GUC)) — Reasons: Spam / spambot XReport ―MathXplore (talk) 12:58, 16 September 2026 (UTC)
Requesting undeletion for Q140797113
Originally created for c:Category:Super Forbidden Love that was deleted, but later undeleted. I therefore request this Wikidata item to be undeleted as well. Dabmasterars (talk) 20:12, 16 September 2026 (UTC)
- A Commons category is not sufficient to establish notability. --Lymantria (talk) 07:56, 18 September 2026 (UTC)
Request for undeletion: Q140999459 (Ministry of Nutrition GmbH)
Dear Community,
The item Q140999459 (Ministry of Nutrition GmbH) was deleted on August 12 by user WikiBayer via an RfD reference (Wikidata:Requests for deletions#Q140999459). Shortly before the deletion, I had already posted evidence supporting the relevance of the company Ministry of Nutrition GmbH at 05:48 UTC. Unfortunately, however, the item was deleted again just 16 minutes later at 06:04 UTC; my evidence was likely never seen.
We have various sources that prove the company's relevance: Cycling News from November 2025: Ministry is mentioned here as the nutrition partner of Red Bull-BORA-hansgrohe. (https://www.cyclingnews.com/cycling-culture/training/from-pistolets-to-performance-gains-inside-remco-evenepoel-and-red-bull-bora-hansgrohes-fuelling-strategy/)
Radsportnews.com has published several independent articles about the company, including ones on its founding, rebranding, and team partnerships. (https://www.radsport-news.com/markt/marktnews_136818.htm)
Radclub.de has also published an independent report on the rebranding of Ministry of Nutrition GmbH. (https://radclub.de/aus-mon-sports-wird-mnstry/)
Ministry of Nutrition GmbH is a registered limited liability company (GmbH), registered with the Stuttgart Local Court under number HRB 767295.
Please review this item again with a view to publishing it. Thank you very much! ~2026-50173-93 (talk) 06:46, 17 September 2026 (UTC)
- @WikiBayer: as deleting admin. --Lymantria (talk) 07:48, 18 September 2026 (UTC)
Undeletion request Q141483615 and Q141484756
I made both of these items and I do work for both of these businesses, so I'm saying that first so nobody has to dig it up. I'm not arguing the policy, I'm asking somebody to look at two sources I don't think got looked at.
Q141483615 is All In Pest Solutions in Pahrump, Nevada. They're a licensed pest control company and the state publishes the list. Nevada Department of Agriculture, Pest Control Program, 2025 licensed operators. Licence 708600. Ryan C. Morneault is on it as Primary Principal, C2 and C3, and James A. Grice as Operator, C2, effective 1/1/2025. Here's the report: https://agri.nv.gov/uploadedFiles/agrinvgov/Content/Plant/PEST/Website%20License%20Report(11).pdf
Q141484756 is HD Diesel Repair Shop, Killdeer and Williston, North Dakota. HD DIESEL LLC, North Dakota Secretary of State ID 318361, filed 7/7/2021, active and in good standing: https://firststop.sos.nd.gov/search/business/318361
I get that being registered isn't the same as being written about. But these aren't directory pages or my own website, they're state records, and the criterion says serious and publicly available. If the answer is still no then that's the answer and I won't put them back up. PMVDIGITAL (talk) 19:39, 17 September 2026 (UTC)
- These sources demonstrate reliably that the entities exist. They do not demonstrate that they are notable according to our standards. I am sure a Wikipedia article about either would not survive a deletion request; our notability criteria for companies are similar to the English Wikipedia. Ymblanter (talk) 18:50, 18 September 2026 (UTC)
Report concerning User:WikiKinoFan
WikiKinoFan 🔕 (talk • contribs • deleted contribs • logs • filter log • block user • block log • SUL (for IP: GUC)) — Reasons: vandalism ―LNTG (talk) 22:07, 17 September 2026 (UTC)
Undeletion request: Q141467467 (এম আবুল কাসেম)
Ttasin863 (talk) 02:04, 18 September 2026 (UTC)
Dexbot deleted Q141467467 on 17 September ("automatic deletion of an item that used to have a sitelink that is deleted and doesn't have any good statement, no backlink in main namespace and no sitelinks"). I created this item myself — the subject, Alhaj M. Abul Kashem (1941–2023), was a Bangladesh Liberation War commander (district commander and district BLF chief of greater Kushtia), and I am his grandson. The bnwiki article was deleted on 17 September; a rewritten draft with independent sources is now waiting for review at bn:খসড়া:এম আবুল কাসেম. When the sitelink disappeared, the bot deleted the item.
Independent coverage of him:
- Prothom Alo: https://www.prothomalo.com/opinion/column/zbi9vf848v
- আলাপচরিতা: https://alapcharita.com/মুক্তিযুদ্ধের-প্রথম-সম্ম/
- সংগ্রামের নোটবুক (based on মুক্তিযুদ্ধ কোষ): https://songramernotebook.com/archives/498261 and https://songramernotebook.com/archives/47851
- বাংলানিউজ: https://banglanews24.com/national/news/bd/1008265.details
- bnwiki articles বংশীতলার যুদ্ধ and কুষ্টিয়ার যুদ্ধ (Q4871506) also describe his role in the battles.
Could an admin review whether the item can be restored? If it should wait until the draft is approved and the sitelink returns, I understand. Ttasin863 (talk) 02:05, 18 September 2026 (UTC)
Report concerning User:OnMusic AI
OnMusic AI 🔕 (talk • contribs • deleted contribs • logs • filter log • block user • block log • SUL (for IP: GUC)) — Reasons: Spam / spambot XReport ―MathXplore (talk) 12:39, 18 September 2026 (UTC)
Report concerning User:AWAInsight
AWAInsight 🔕 (talk • contribs • deleted contribs • logs • filter log • block user • block log • SUL (for IP: GUC)) — Reasons: Spam / spambot XReport ―MathXplore (talk) 12:41, 18 September 2026 (UTC)
Report concerning User:Владимир Александрович Колокольцев
Владимир Александрович Колокольцев 🔕 (talk • contribs • deleted contribs • logs • filter log • block user • block log • SUL (for IP: GUC)) — Reasons: Spam / spambot. Abusing multiple accounts (User:UserHimik & User:7655hyys) XReport ―MathXplore (talk) 12:45, 18 September 2026 (UTC)
Report concerning User:UserHimik
UserHimik 🔕 (talk • contribs • deleted contribs • logs • filter log • block user • block log • SUL (for IP: GUC)) — Reasons: Spam / spambot. Abusing multiple accounts (User:7655hyys) XReport ―MathXplore (talk) 12:46, 18 September 2026 (UTC)
Report concerning User:Boncharm
Boncharm 🔕 (talk • contribs • deleted contribs • logs • filter log • block user • block log • SUL (for IP: GUC)) — Reasons: Spam / spambot XReport ―MathXplore (talk) 12:47, 18 September 2026 (UTC)
Report concerning User:Bismarafiq
Bismarafiq 🔕 (talk • contribs • deleted contribs • logs • filter log • block user • block log • SUL (for IP: GUC)) — Reasons: Spam / spambot. cross-wiki abuse, Wikidata:Autobiography XReport ―MathXplore (talk) 12:51, 18 September 2026 (UTC)
Report concerning User:Fash sba
Fash sba 🔕 (talk • contribs • deleted contribs • logs • filter log • block user • block log • SUL (for IP: GUC)) — Reasons: Spam / spambot. Wikidata:Autobiography XReport ―MathXplore (talk) 12:52, 18 September 2026 (UTC)
Report concerning User:Trusttizo
Trusttizo 🔕 (talk • contribs • deleted contribs • logs • filter log • block user • block log • SUL (for IP: GUC)) — Reasons: Spam / spambot. cross-wiki spam XReport ―MathXplore (talk) 13:41, 18 September 2026 (UTC)
Report concerning User:Miinfotech
Miinfotech 🔕 (talk • contribs • deleted contribs • logs • filter log • block user • block log • SUL (for IP: GUC)) — Reasons: Spam / spambot XReport ―MathXplore (talk) 13:46, 18 September 2026 (UTC)
Report concerning User:Expeditious It Solution
Expeditious It Solution 🔕 (talk • contribs • deleted contribs • logs • filter log • block user • block log • SUL (for IP: GUC)) — Reasons: Spam, [18] ―MathXplore (talk) 15:08, 18 September 2026 (UTC)
Report concerning User:OnequeenR
OnequeenR 🔕 (talk • contribs • deleted contribs • logs • filter log • block user • block log • SUL (for IP: GUC)) — Reasons: Mass incorrect edits for Alexandra/Александра-like entries. User is connected with the Russian singer Александра Лоскутова. Blocked in Russian Wikipedia for similar actions and legal threats. Alex Spade (talk) 18:49, 18 September 2026 (UTC)
Report concerning User:Gear Dryingguy
Gear Dryingguy 🔕 (talk • contribs • deleted contribs • logs • filter log • block user • block log • SUL (for IP: GUC)) — Reasons: Spam / spambot XReport ―MathXplore (talk) 02:50, 19 September 2026 (UTC)
Report concerning User:Shiromni Rampaulsaini
Shiromni Rampaulsaini 🔕 (talk • contribs • deleted contribs • logs • filter log • block user • block log • SUL (for IP: GUC)) — Reasons: Spam / spambot. cross-wiki abuse, Wikidata:Autobiography XReport ―MathXplore (talk) 02:52, 19 September 2026 (UTC)
Report concerning User:Zeeworldblog
Zeeworldblog 🔕 (talk • contribs • deleted contribs • logs • filter log • block user • block log • SUL (for IP: GUC)) — Reasons: Spam / spambot. cross-wiki abuse, Wikidata:Autobiography XReport ―MathXplore (talk) 02:54, 19 September 2026 (UTC)
Report concerning User:~2026-50492-45
~2026-50492-45 🔕 (talk • contribs • deleted contribs • logs • filter log • block user • block log • SUL (for IP: GUC)) — Reasons: Vandalism XReport ―MathXplore (talk) 02:58, 19 September 2026 (UTC)
- Blocked indefinitely. --Saroj (talk) 03:13, 19 September 2026 (UTC)
| I think that this discussion is resolved and can be archived. If you disagree, don't hesitate to replace this template with your comment. --Saroj (talk) 03:13, 19 September 2026 (UTC) |
Report concerning User:きぞく
きぞく 🔕 (talk • contribs • deleted contribs • logs • filter log • block user • block log • SUL (for IP: GUC)) — Reasons: Vandaling The Konjo Act (Q116913551) ―星組背番号10 (talk) 03:36, 19 September 2026 (UTC)
Unprotection request:Q346187
The page was protected due to an edit war, and I have attempted to start a discussion on the user's talk page to reach a consensus. However, the other user has not responded for over a week despite my multiple attempts to communicate.
I also left a final notice stating that I would request unprotection due to a refusal to discuss, but there has still been no response for several days. Since the other editor is refusing to engage in discussion, it is impossible to reach a consensus. I kindly request the unprotection of this page so that constructive editing can resume.
Here are the links to the discussion attempts:
- User talk:~2026-43359-18 (Discussion start)
- User talk:وسيم#Regarding the protection ofd:Q346187(Final notice)
Thank you. ~2026-43359-18 (talk) 04:17, 19 September 2026 (UTC)
Report concerning User:Wikimi-dhiann
Restored from archive since I never got a response. Kinsio (talk ★ contribs) 08:13, 19 September 2026 (UTC)
Wikimi-dhiann 🔕 (talk • contribs • deleted contribs • logs • filter log • block user • block log • SUL (for IP: GUC)) — Reasons: Not exactly vandalism (hard to say, really, for reasons I make clear below, but it doesn't feel malicious to me?) but I keep seeing this user's edits making very strange disruptive changes to items (such as my initial encounter with them, noticing that they added several classes to my constraints on cause and effect modeling properties that defeated the entire purpose of the constraints, which I tried to start a dialogue with them about at Property talk:P828#Added acceptable subject classes and never got a response). My big concern is that I've also noticed what seems to be a pattern of failure to respond to other editors inquiring about their edits. Examples that I could find:
- User talk:Wikimi-dhiann#organization (Q43229) – 22 Oct 2024
- Talk:Q132621#Adrenaline vs epinephrine – 22 Nov 2024
- Talk:Q18291605 – 27 Nov 2024
- User talk:Wikimi-dhiann#Reworking of climate change categorization – 26 Dec 2024, 10 Feb 2025, 12 Jun 2025, 14 Jul 2025
- Failure to respond to inquiries mentioned in Talk:Q125928#Confusing definition and inconsistent Wikipedia articles
- Property talk:P828#Added acceptable subject classes as mentioned above – 21 Aug 2026
I wasn't sure where else to go with this; if there's a place more appropriate than AN, just let me know. Thank you! ―Kinsio (talk ★ contribs) 14:25, 10 September 2026 (UTC)
Report concerning User:~2026-50085-37
~2026-50085-37 🔕 (talk • contribs • deleted contribs • logs • filter log • block user • block log • SUL (for IP: GUC)) — Reasons: Long-term abuse. Spam / spambot. Special:Contributions/Wikibotdata XReport ―MathXplore (talk) 08:34, 19 September 2026 (UTC)
Report concerning User:Mscdubai
Mscdubai 🔕 (talk • contribs • deleted contribs • logs • filter log • block user • block log • SUL (for IP: GUC)) — Reasons: Spam / spambot. cross-wiki abuse XReport ―MathXplore (talk) 10:30, 19 September 2026 (UTC)
Report concerning User:Hasbaticom
Hasbaticom 🔕 (talk • contribs • deleted contribs • logs • filter log • block user • block log • SUL (for IP: GUC)) — Reasons: Spam / spambot. cross-wiki abuse XReport ―MathXplore (talk) 11:43, 19 September 2026 (UTC)
Report concerning User:Handyman31331
Handyman31331 🔕 (talk • contribs • deleted contribs • logs • filter log • block user • block log • SUL (for IP: GUC)) — Reasons: Spam / spambot XReport ―MathXplore (talk) 12:12, 19 September 2026 (UTC)
| I think that this discussion is resolved and can be archived. If you disagree, don't hesitate to replace this template with your comment. Ternera (talk) 15:19, 19 September 2026 (UTC) |
Report concerning User:Vunaookami Shiroko
Vunaookami Shiroko 🔕 (talk • contribs • deleted contribs • logs • filter log • block user • block log • SUL (for IP: GUC)) — Reasons: Vandalism. cross-wiki abuse XReport ―MathXplore (talk) 13:59, 19 September 2026 (UTC)
- Locked by stewards. Ternera (talk) 15:18, 19 September 2026 (UTC)
| I think that this discussion is resolved and can be archived. If you disagree, don't hesitate to replace this template with your comment. Ternera (talk) 15:18, 19 September 2026 (UTC) |
Report concerning User:全日空ウイングス
全日空ウイングス 🔕 (talk • contribs • deleted contribs • logs • filter log • block user • block log • SUL (for IP: GUC)) — Reasons: official website (P856) Vandalism-only account. Long-term abuse ―Mugidai (talk) 15:38, 19 September 2026 (UTC)
- Blocked indefinitely. --Saroj (talk) 15:41, 19 September 2026 (UTC)
| I think that this discussion is resolved and can be archived. If you disagree, don't hesitate to replace this template with your comment. --Saroj (talk) 15:41, 19 September 2026 (UTC) |
Manuel Enrique Morales Santiago (Q141498244)
Reason for request: I am requesting the restoration of this item as it was deleted citing a lack of notability, but it represents a legitimate scholarly author with verifiable academic authority and persistent identifiers. The subject has: 1. A verified ORCID iD: 0009-0007-6921-7688 (https://orcid.org/0009-0007-6921-7688) with institutional affiliation as Managing Director of the Scientific Institute of Electronic Government. 2. A persistent scholarly ID in Dialnet: 3123473 (https://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/autor?codigo=3123473). 3. Record in the University of Granada scientific portal (https://produccioncientifica.ugr.es/grupos/23760/colaboracion/investigador/3123473?lang=en). 4. Authorship of the recently published Vertical AI Governance Stack research series (https://research.latinflash.com/).
The item is not 'spam' but a necessary node for scholarly citation and bibliographic integrity. The linked ORCID profile is now public and confirms the subject's identity as a researcher. --~2026-50541-07 (talk) 17:50, 19 September 2026 (UTC)
- Relevant items: Q141498244 (~2026-50541-07). CC deleting admins @WikiBayer Bovlb (talk) 17:58, 19 September 2026 (UTC)
- Please read Wikidata:Notability and Wikidata:Self-promotion WikiBayer (talk) 18:39, 19 September 2026 (UTC)
Spam and likely data privacy violation / Report concerning User:~2026-50538-47
- ~2026-50538-47 🔕 (talk • contribs • deleted contribs • logs • filter log • block user • block log • SUL (for IP: GUC)) --Printstream (talk) 21:04, 19 September 2026 (UTC)
- next: ~2026-50509-40 🔕 (talk • contribs • deleted contribs • logs • filter log • block user • block log • SUL (for IP: GUC)) --Printstream (talk) 21:11, 19 September 2026 (UTC)
- Blocked indefinitely. --Saroj (talk) 06:48, 20 September 2026 (UTC)
| I think that this discussion is resolved and can be archived. If you disagree, don't hesitate to replace this template with your comment. --Saroj (talk) 06:48, 20 September 2026 (UTC) |
Report concerning User:~2026-50573-31
~2026-50573-31 🔕 (talk • contribs • deleted contribs • logs • filter log • block user • block log • SUL (for IP: GUC)) — Reasons: Vandalism XReport ―Mbataw (talk) 21:08, 19 September 2026 (UTC)
- User has been warned. Saroj (talk) 09:50, 20 September 2026 (UTC)
Semiprotect Leoncio Prado Gutiérrez (Q5249169)
Please semiprotect Leoncio Prado Gutiérrez (Q5249169) since there are constant vandalism edits by temporary accounts after the semi-protection period expired.. Thanks. --Ovruni (talk) 23:30, 19 September 2026 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for three months. Bovlb (talk) 23:41, 19 September 2026 (UTC)
| I think that this discussion is resolved and can be archived. If you disagree, don't hesitate to replace this template with your comment. Saroj (talk) 09:49, 20 September 2026 (UTC) |
Report concerning User:ジャーキー
ジャーキー 🔕 (talk • contribs • deleted contribs • logs • filter log • block user • block log • SUL (for IP: GUC)) — Reasons: Vandalism. ja:LTA:HEATHROW ―Kugelschreibers（talk / contributions） 01:56, 20 September 2026 (UTC)
| I think that this discussion is resolved and can be archived. If you disagree, don't hesitate to replace this template with your comment. Saroj (talk) 09:50, 20 September 2026 (UTC) |
Report concerning User:~2026-50307-35
~2026-50307-35 🔕 (talk • contribs • deleted contribs • logs • filter log • block user • block log • SUL (for IP: GUC)) — Reasons: Spam / spambot. related to Special:Contributions/Boommoviearfa XReport ―MathXplore (talk) 05:06, 20 September 2026 (UTC)
- Blocked indefinitely. --Saroj (talk) 09:54, 20 September 2026 (UTC)
| I think that this discussion is resolved and can be archived. If you disagree, don't hesitate to replace this template with your comment. --Saroj (talk) 09:54, 20 September 2026 (UTC) |
Report concerning User:Grep AI
Grep AI 🔕 (talk • contribs • deleted contribs • logs • filter log • block user • block log • SUL (for IP: GUC)) — Reasons: misleading username, XReport ―QueerEcofeminist (talk) 05:08, 20 September 2026 (UTC)
- Blocked indefinitely. --Saroj (talk) 09:55, 20 September 2026 (UTC)
| I think that this discussion is resolved and can be archived. If you disagree, don't hesitate to replace this template with your comment. --Saroj (talk) 09:55, 20 September 2026 (UTC) |
Report concerning User:~2026-50589-08
~2026-50589-08 🔕 (talk • contribs • deleted contribs • logs • filter log • block user • block log • SUL (for IP: GUC)) — Reasons: Spam / spambot. related to Special:Contributions/Miinfotech XReport ―MathXplore (talk) 05:17, 20 September 2026 (UTC)
Follow-up on auto-archived undeletion request: Q141259492 — TJ Muir
The previous undeletion request for Q141259492 was automatically archived without a determination:
I am requesting an administrator review of whether the item can now be restored based on the new ISNI authority record and the existing independent bibliographic records.
Relevant records:
ISNI: https://isni.org/isni/0000000530929483 ISFDB: https://www.isfdb.org/cgi-bin/ea.cgi?250474 Open Library: https://openlibrary.org/authors/OL7554771A/TJ_Muir Fantastic Fiction: https://www.fantasticfiction.com/m/tj-muir/
Could an administrator please determine whether these records satisfy Wikidata’s notability criteria for restoration? If they remain insufficient, I would appreciate clarification about which criterion is not met.
Thank you. ~2026-49319-47 (talk) 15:11, 20 September 2026 (UTC)
Declined this request does not carry any improvement from the last one. Bringing same records, the latest archived discussion already mentioned some reason for insufficiency: scarce coverage for the works created by the subject. I also found no sufficient readership records showing notability of the works among readers. Please avoid recreating same request repeatedly. Yamato Shiya • (Hello!) 15:29, 20 September 2026 (UTC)
| I think that this discussion is resolved and can be archived. If you disagree, don't hesitate to replace this template with your comment. Yamato Shiya • (Hello!) 15:29, 20 September 2026 (UTC) |
Undeletion request: three licensed New York cannabis dispensaries
Hello. On 19 September 2026, WikiBayer deleted three items I had created that day, with the log reason "Mass deletion of pages added by VibeMetrixAI". I would like to ask for them to be restored, or for guidance on what they were missing if they do not qualify.
The deleted items were:
- Q141501485, Cannadreams, 862 9th Ave, New York, NY 10019
- Q141501486, Upstate Exotics, 9200 Niagara Falls Blvd, Niagara Falls, NY 14304
- Q141501487, Dream Daze Dispensary, 5100 Transit Rd, Depew, NY 14043
All three are cannabis retailers licensed by the New York State Office of Cannabis Management, the state licensing authority. Each holds an active licence in the State of New York's official open data licence registry, "Current OCM Licenses" (data.ny.gov dataset jskf-tt3q):
- CANNADREAMS INC., licence OCM-CAURD-24-000114, status Active, 862 9th Ave, New York, NY 10019
- Upstate Exotics, licence OCM-CAURD-24-000147, status Active, 9200 Niagara Falls Blvd, Niagara Falls, NY 14304
- Dream Daze LLC, licence OCM-RETL-24-000156, status Active, 5100 Transit Rd, Depew, NY 14043
My reading of WD:N criterion 2 is that these are clearly identifiable material entities that can be described using serious and publicly available references, a government licence registry published as open data by the licensing authority itself.
Disclosure: I do marketing work for these three businesses, which is why I created the items. I should have declared that at the time and I am declaring it now.
I recognise the likely problem: I created the three items in one run with no references on any statement, from a new account, which looks exactly like promotional mass creation. If they are restored I will add the state licence number and the registry URL as a reference on the statements, and I will not create further items until this is resolved. If restoration is not appropriate, a pointer to what is missing would be genuinely useful so I can correct it rather than repeat it. Thank you. VibeMetrixAI (talk) 15:51, 20 September 2026 (UTC)
Report concerning User:علي احمد عبدالله الحاج
علي احمد عبدالله الحاج 🔕 (talk • contribs • deleted contribs • logs • filter log • block user • block log • SUL (for IP: GUC)) — Reasons: Vandalism XReport ―-- Aws 💬 Talk 16:49, 20 September 2026 (UTC)
Report concerning User:Edokel1
Edokel1 🔕 (talk • contribs • deleted contribs • logs • filter log • block user • block log • SUL (for IP: GUC)) — Reasons: Vandalism. The editor has been engaged in vandalism and disruption (along with Shrashiti), attempting to censor war crime convictions at Hashim Thaçi. Would not surprise me if there is coordinated meatpuppetry or sockpuppetry too. StephenMacky1 (talk) 00:34, 21 September 2026 (UTC)
Report concerning User:Elevatekitchens
Elevatekitchens 🔕 (talk • contribs • deleted contribs • logs • filter log • block user • block log • SUL (for IP: GUC)) — Reasons: Spam / spambot XReport ―MathXplore (talk) 03:13, 21 September 2026 (UTC)
- Blocked indefinitely. --Saroj (talk) 05:01, 21 September 2026 (UTC)
| I think that this discussion is resolved and can be archived. If you disagree, don't hesitate to replace this template with your comment. --Saroj (talk) 05:01, 21 September 2026 (UTC) |
Report concerning User:Syntroz
Syntroz 🔕 (talk • contribs • deleted contribs • logs • filter log • block user • block log • SUL (for IP: GUC)) — Reasons: Spam / spambot XReport ―MathXplore (talk) 03:16, 21 September 2026 (UTC)
- Blocked indefinitely. --Saroj (talk) 05:01, 21 September 2026 (UTC)
| I think that this discussion is resolved and can be archived. If you disagree, don't hesitate to replace this template with your comment. --Saroj (talk) 05:01, 21 September 2026 (UTC) |
Report concerning User:Avayefarvahar66
Avayefarvahar66 🔕 (talk • contribs • deleted contribs • logs • filter log • block user • block log • SUL (for IP: GUC)) — Reasons: Long-term abuse. Block evasion. Special:Contributions/Leiliafagh, Special:Contributions/Neronrv2 XReport ―MathXplore (talk) 03:30, 21 September 2026 (UTC)
| I think that this discussion is resolved and can be archived. If you disagree, don't hesitate to replace this template with your comment. Saroj (talk) 04:53, 21 September 2026 (UTC) |
Report concerning User:XtraPath
XtraPath 🔕 (talk • contribs • deleted contribs • logs • filter log • block user • block log • SUL (for IP: GUC)) — Reasons: Spam / spambot XReport ―MathXplore (talk) 04:39, 21 September 2026 (UTC)
- Blocked indefinitely. --Saroj (talk) 05:05, 21 September 2026 (UTC)
| I think that this discussion is resolved and can be archived. If you disagree, don't hesitate to replace this template with your comment. --Saroj (talk) 05:05, 21 September 2026 (UTC) |
Report concerning User:Zedoxi
Zedoxi 🔕 (talk • contribs • deleted contribs • logs • filter log • block user • block log • SUL (for IP: GUC)) — Reasons: Spam / spambot XReport ―MathXplore (talk) 04:40, 21 September 2026 (UTC)
- Blocked indefinitely. --Saroj (talk) 05:05, 21 September 2026 (UTC)
| I think that this discussion is resolved and can be archived. If you disagree, don't hesitate to replace this template with your comment. --Saroj (talk) 05:05, 21 September 2026 (UTC) |
Report concerning User:Dikho
Dikho 🔕 (talk • contribs • deleted contribs • logs • filter log • block user • block log • SUL (for IP: GUC)) — Reasons: Spam / spambot XReport ―MathXplore (talk) 04:42, 21 September 2026 (UTC)
- Blocked indefinitely. --Saroj (talk) 05:05, 21 September 2026 (UTC)
| I think that this discussion is resolved and can be archived. If you disagree, don't hesitate to replace this template with your comment. --Saroj (talk) 05:05, 21 September 2026 (UTC) |
Report concerning User:Frizwoods
Frizwoods 🔕 (talk • contribs • deleted contribs • logs • filter log • block user • block log • SUL (for IP: GUC)) — Reasons: Spam / spambot XReport ―MathXplore (talk) 08:07, 21 September 2026 (UTC)
- Blocked indefinitely. --Saroj (talk) 08:19, 21 September 2026 (UTC)
| I think that this discussion is resolved and can be archived. If you disagree, don't hesitate to replace this template with your comment. --Saroj (talk) 08:19, 21 September 2026 (UTC) |
Report concerning User:Hairaffairsbyms
Hairaffairsbyms 🔕 (talk • contribs • deleted contribs • logs • filter log • block user • block log • SUL (for IP: GUC)) — Reasons: Spam / spambot XReport ―MathXplore (talk) 08:07, 21 September 2026 (UTC)
- Blocked indefinitely. --Saroj (talk) 08:19, 21 September 2026 (UTC)
| I think that this discussion is resolved and can be archived. If you disagree, don't hesitate to replace this template with your comment. --Saroj (talk) 08:19, 21 September 2026 (UTC) |
Report concerning User:Zinlangliu
Zinlangliu 🔕 (talk • contribs • deleted contribs • logs • filter log • block user • block log • SUL (for IP: GUC)) — Reasons: Spam / spambot XReport ―MathXplore (talk) 08:09, 21 September 2026 (UTC)
- Blocked indefinitely. --Saroj (talk) 08:20, 21 September 2026 (UTC)
| I think that this discussion is resolved and can be archived. If you disagree, don't hesitate to replace this template with your comment. --Saroj (talk) 08:20, 21 September 2026 (UTC) |
Report concerning User:Kim 911
Kim 911 🔕 (talk • contribs • deleted contribs • logs • filter log • block user • block log • SUL (for IP: GUC)) — Reasons: Vandalism. This specific user is instigating an edit war by removing the entry regarding the final resting place of the recently deceased Margaret Papandreou, who was cremated today, with her ashes set to be scattered in the Aegean Sea tomorrow. In his reverts and in spam messages left on my talk page, the user —writing in poor Greek— claims that "resting places" refer only to cemeteries and not the sea. I have explained to him countless times that this is not the case, yet he persists in reverting the addition of the resting place, even though it is supported by a citation. This situation is endless, forcing me to repeatedly restore the information about the resting place and —regrettably— participate in the madness the user has instigated. ―KNIM123 (talk) 22:32, 20 September 2026 (UTC)
- Συγγνώμη Kim 911 (talk) 22:38, 20 September 2026 (UTC)
- This report was deliberately deleted without my consent yesterday at 22:41 by IP ~2026-50822-38, which I believe is linked to the user I am referring to. Furthermore, on my talk page, two other users —one named Panicah and the IP ~2026-50773-36— deleted the discussion regarding the article in question; I believe both of these accounts are also linked to the user I mentioned, acting as sockpuppets. KNIM123 (talk) 09:31, 21 September 2026 (UTC)
- Report removed by Panicah [19]
- Report removed by Panicah again [20]
- Report removed by Kim 911 [21]
- Secretlondon (talk) 10:23, 21 September 2026 (UTC)