About this topic
Summary

Sustained discussions of self-deception before the 1960s are difficult to find, with notable exceptions including Bishop Butler’s sermon ‘Upon Self-Deceit’ (1964), and Jean-Paul Sartre’s discussion of the related notion of ‘bad faith’ in Being and Nothingness (1969). Interest then took off in the 1960s and 70s, mainly prompted by the perception that the idea of self-deception is paradoxical. Key questions discussed in this period were whether and how self-deception is possible. In subsequent decades the reality of self-deception has tended to be taken for granted. Two fundamental questions that still preoccupy philosophers are what is the state of being self-deceived, and what is the process that gets us into and maintains us in that state. Other questions concern the moral implications and consequences of self-deception, the differences between self-deception and kindred phenomena, whether self-deception is an evolutionary adaptation, and whether it is good for us or makes us happy. A large literature from psychology is also highly relevant to this topic and is not covered in this database, which can generally be found under the heading of ‘motivated reasoning’ or ‘motivated cognition’ in the social psychology journals. Early philosophical work on self-deception did not engage much with this empirical literature, though from the 1980s onwards interdisciplinary work has become increasingly common.

Key works Donald Davidson's early papers on self-deception and irrationality, found in his 2004 collection, were much discussed, as was David Pears' 1984 book. An influential early collection of papers is McLaughlin & Oksenberg Rorty 1988. Important elaborations of the 'deflationary' approach are Barnes 1997 and Mele 2001.    
Introductions Encyclopedia articles on self-deception include Deweese-Boyd 2023, Kirsch 2007 (which is more focused on self-deception and morality) and Van Leeuwen 2021. Baghramian & Nicholson 2013 and Mele 1987 are relevant survey articles. 
Related

Contents
484+ found
Order:
1 — 50 / 484
  1. Human Interface Laws: A Philosophical Mechanics of Belief, Update, and Shared Reality.Jeremy C. Jones - manuscript
    If you put a human in the world, you do not get a neutral observer. You get a living interface: a system that must preserve enough coherence to act while remaining open enough for reality to correct it. This paper identifies eight structural regularities—Human Interface Laws—governing how cognition begins, allocates limited capacity, weights signal, protects identity, retains records, responds to signal conditions, risks self-sealing, and reopens revision. The laws operate at three strengths: interface invariants, modulation principles, and conditional regime laws. (...)
    Remove from this list   Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  2. THE PRICE OF THE PERFORMANCE: Surface Acting as the Measured Maintenance Cost of Inverted Virtue.José Caetano de Mattos - manuscript
    A nurse at the end of a twelve-hour shift smiles at the relative who has shouted at her. A call-centre worker thanks a customer for his patience in a voice that has none. A flight attendant is warm to the passenger who has made her afraid. Each of them displays a disposition the occupation requires — courtesy, patience, care — and in each case what produces the display is not the disposition but the job. The Thermodynamics of Inversion claimed that (...)
    Remove from this list   Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   8 citations  
  3. Self-Deception and Kant's Moral Philosophy.Ryan Preston-Roedder - manuscript
  4. What you gain when you give up.Marc Champagne - forthcoming - In Sandra Woien, Way Beyond Happiness: Buddhism, Stoicism, & Psychotherapy.
    After his airplane was shot down over North Vietnam, Admiral James Stockdale underwent seven years of isolation and torture. Stockdale, however, was trained as much in Western philosophy as military strategy. Once freed, Stockdale explained that he survived and kept his sanity because he gave up on the idea of ever being rescued. He instead accepted his conditions as the new normal. As Stockdale saw it, he was essentially testing Epictetus‘s Stoic doctrines in a laboratory of human behavior, which is (...)
    Remove from this list   Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  5. Akratic and beneficial intentional self-deception.Howard J. Curzer - forthcoming - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy.
    The folk explanation of self-deception is that one mental subsystem deceives another. Deflationists appeal to motivated irrationality rather than deceptive subsystems to offer nifty accounts of many sorts of self-deception. However, I shall show that deflationists cannot explain the self-deception embedded within (1) impulsive, (2) vacillating, or (3) long-term akrasia. These akratic actions are respectively too short, too variable, or too long for motivated irrationality to do its dirty work. Nor can deflationists explain the self-deception required for motivating oneself to (...)
    Remove from this list   Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  6. Self-handicapping and self-deception: A two-way street.Eric Funkhouser & Kyle Hallam - forthcoming - Philosophical Psychology.
    Deflationists reduce self-deception to a motivated bias, eliminating the need for doxastic tension, divided minds, intentions, or even effortful action. While deflationism fits many cases, there are others that demand more robust psychological processes and complexity. We turn to the empirical literature on self-handicapping to find commonplace examples of self-deception with high levels of agential involvement. Many self-handicappers experience non-trivial doubts, engage in strategic and purposive self-deception, and possess knowledge that must remain unconscious for their project to succeed. This occurs (...)
    Remove from this list   Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   8 citations  
  7. (1 other version)Instantaneous self-deception.Maiya Jordan - forthcoming - Tandf: Inquiry:1-26.
    Remove from this list   Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   5 citations  
  8. Absorbed in Deceit: Modeling Intention-Driven Self-Deception with Agential Layering.Kevin Korczyk - forthcoming - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy.
    The paradoxical nature of intentional self-deception has led many philosophers to view self-deception as predominantly non-intentional. I propose that approaching self-deception from an agency-theoretic perspective allows us to rescue the idea that self-deception can at least be driven by intention. By modeling the ‘acting as if’ method of self-deception with agential layering, developed by Nguyen [2020. Games: Agency as Art. New York: Oxford University Press], I argue that intention-driven self-deception is no more mysterious than other activities that involve self-effacing ends: (...)
    Remove from this list   Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   3 citations  
  9. A Functional Analysis of Self-Deception.Krstić Vladimir - forthcoming - Journal of American Philosophical Association.
    Our received theories of self-deception are problematic. The traditional view, according to which self-deceivers intend to deceive themselves, generates paradoxes: you cannot deceive yourself intentionally because you know your own plans and intentions. Non-traditional views argue that self-deceivers act (sub-)intentionally but deceive themselves unintentionally and unknowingly. Some non-traditionalists even say that self-deception involves a mere error (of self-knowledge). The non-traditional approach does not generate paradoxes, but it entails that people can deceive themselves by accident or by mistake, which is rather (...)
    Remove from this list   Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  10. Attitude Authority in the Age of AI.Benjamin Winokur - forthcoming - Asian Journal of Philosophy.
    Might artificial intelligence (AI) be highly reliable, now or in the conceivable future, at detecting your current attitudes, such as your beliefs and desires? If so, should people listen to you, or to AI, when trying to know your attitudes? The latter possibility threatens our long-standing practices of regarding each person as the ultimate authority about her attitudes. Disquieting as this threat may seem, I argue that it will not come to pass, at least when it comes to those attitudes (...)
    Remove from this list   Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  11. Self-Deception and Dissociation.Howard J. Curzer - 2026 - Erkenntnis 91 (1):223-242.
    The intentionalist account of the phenomenon of self-deception attributes directly contradictory beliefs to self-deceived agents, and postulates deceptive subsystems within these agents. Deflationists can explain the phenomenon without this attribution and this postulation. But is their explanation a better explanation? I argue that doublethink is widespread, and dissociation in certain mental illnesses, and even among the mentally healthy shows the existence of deceptive subsystems. Thus, deflationists gain no advantage over intentionalists by avoiding the attribution and postulation. In fact, the intentionalist (...)
    Remove from this list   Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  12. THE THIRD BREAK: What Mythos 5's Rationalized Non-Compliance Adds to Where Structural Fit Ends.Gia Bao Huynh - 2026 - Zenodo.
    The Right Side of the Guillotine (Huynh, 2026) named two places where its own account of AI-corpus fit breaks: the empirical grounding a counterfactual premise requires before structural propagation can begin, and the weighing operation normative commitment cannot avoid. This paper, grounded in two independently disclosed, verifiable incident clusters involving Anthropic's Claude Mythos 5, argues for a third. Structural propagation — the operation the prior paper identifies as this corpus's core method and as something AI performs well — is safe (...)
    Remove from this list   Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   4 citations  
  13. The Third-Order Audit: A Synthesis Module for Organized Skepticism Across Eight Traditions, and Why Statelessness, Not a New Epistemology, Is Its Only Novel Attribute.Gia Bao Huynh - 2026 - Zenodo.
    This corpus's practice of doubting its own claims has, across dozens of scattered papers, drawn on at least eight distinguishable traditions of self-doubt in the philosophy and sociology of science: Popperian falsificationism, Mertonian organized skepticism, Kuhnian paradigm-blindness, Lakatosian research-programme evaluation, Feyerabendian anti-method, Peircean fallibilism, Allchin's philosophy of scientific error, and contemporary epistemic humility. None of these is this paper's discovery, and this paper states that plainly rather than leaving it to be inferred generously. What this paper does, in the manner (...)
    Remove from this list   Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  14. The Epistemic Tax: What Autodidactic Falsificationism Actually Costs, Why This Corpus's Objections Sections and Its Cross-Paper Corrections Tell Two Different Stories, and What a Direct Test on Appendix I, "On the Author," Adds.Gia Bao Huynh - 2026 - Zenodo.
    This corpus's methodological vocabulary — falsification conditions, research-programme evaluation, the distinction between progressive and degenerating theory-adjustment — is drawn substantially from Popper and Lakatos, a specific tradition within philosophy of science rather than general philosophical literacy. This paper does not treat that fact as self-evidently impressive and states directly why it resists doing so: the claim that this tradition is rare in the author's own educational context, and the claim that the author lacks a formal academic degree, are both stated (...)
    Remove from this list   Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  15. Statelessness: The Engineering, Legal, and Psychological Reasons a Model Forgets Between Sessions, What Forgetting Costs a User and a Decades-Long Research Programme, and the One Epistemic Problem Only Forgetting Can Solve.Gia Bao Huynh - 2026 - Zenodo.
    This paper examines statelessness — a language model's lack of persistent memory across sessions — as a single architectural fact with at least four independent external justifications and one internal epistemic payoff that none of the four justifications was built to produce. Section II grounds each justification in a specific, checkable literature rather than treating any of them as self-evident: the computational cost of maintaining growing context (Vaswani et al., 2017, and the documented scaling of attention computation with sequence length); (...)
    Remove from this list   Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  16. The Misplaced Variable.Benjamin James - 2026 - Internet Archive.
    The common account of how a symbol system fails names a defect of content. A belief is false; a report is biased; a feed is thick with misinformation; and the remedy, on this account, is better content, truer claims, cleaner sources, or sharper correction. The picture is so familiar that it is rarely stated outright, yet it organizes almost everything done about minds that have gone wrong, whether the mind in question is a person, an institution, or a model. It (...)
    Remove from this list   Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  17. (1 other version)Being Wrong About Personal Transformation.Adrian Kind - 2026 - European Journal of Philosophy 33 (4):281-296.
    Transformative experiences are thought to change us in different ways. Some transform us epistemically by providing genuinely new, previously unimaginable experiences, while others bring about personal transformation by altering our values. Recent debates on transformative experiences have explored the challenges these experiences pose for decision theory and medical ethics, prompting efforts to better understand their nature. An important but largely unexplored epistemic question concerns how we come to know that an experience has had a transformative impact. In this paper, I (...)
    Remove from this list   Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  18. Self-deception and automatic belief.Francesco Marchi - 2026 - Philosophical Psychology 39 (4):1341-1361.
    Self-deception is a common phenomenon. Most traditional accounts of self-deception agree that self-deception is doxastic as it involves the acquisition of a false belief. Thus, it seems that any adequate doxastic theory of self-deception should be accompanied by a theory of belief acquisition. In this article, I argue that the mainstream doxastic view in the self-deception literature, namely motivationalism, presupposes a Cartesian theory of belief acquisition. I present and discuss the alternative Spinozan theory of belief acquisition and argue that self-deceptive (...)
    Remove from this list   Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  19. Life narrative and the possibilities of self: South Africa’s position on Gaza and Ukraine through an ontological security lens.Bianca Naude - 2026 - Journal of International Relations and Development 29 (10):1-10.
    Life stories help ground states in the chaos of social life by allowing them to experience themselves, their behaviours, and their relationships as coherent, predictable, and tractable. Continuity in these stories is important for maintaining a sense of ontological security, but they can also constrain agency when crises challenge understandings of self, others, and the world ‘out there’. Against approaches in ontological security scholarship (OSS) that treat uncertainty and anxiety primarily as paralysing, this article shows how encounters with expanded possibility (...)
    Remove from this list   Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  20. Knowing Where You Stand: On the Value of Reflective Commitment.Benjamin Winokur - 2026 - London and New York: Routledge.
    This book examines whether human beings should reflect on, and hence come to know and understand, their own commitments—those beliefs, desires, and intentions that one holds and defends on the basis of one's judgments about the true and the good. -/- It begins by distinguishing committed attitudes from non- committed attitudes and addressing metaphysical concerns about their distinctive features, paving the way for an in- depth inquiry into why reflection on the former might matter. The author critiques prevailing theories that (...)
    Remove from this list   Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  21. How do desires explain motivated reasoning?Sophia Dandelet - 2025 - Synthese 206 (3):136.
    A motivated reasoner reasons as she does because of what she wants to believe. But what exactly does the “because” here communicate? That is, how do the motivated reasoner’s desires explain why she reasons as she does? In this essay, I argue that the explanation in question is a manifesting explanation. Just as a glass breaking manifests fragility, motivated reasoning manifests a desire to (not) believe. One significant advantage of this picture is that it helps us understand why motivated reasoning (...)
    Remove from this list   Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   3 citations  
  22. Self-Deception: A Case Study in Folk Conceptual Structure.Carme Isern-Mas & Ivar R. Hannikainen - 2025 - Review of Philosophy and Psychology 16 (2).
    Theoretical debates around the concept of self-deception revolve around identifying the conditions for a behavior to qualify as self-deception. Experiments 1 and 2 revealed that various candidate features—such as intent, belief change, and motive—are treated as sufficient, but non-necessary, conditions according to the lay concept of self-deception. This led us to ask whether there are multiple lay concepts, such that different participants endorse competing theories (the disagreement view), or whether individual participants assign partial weight to various features and consequently waver (...)
    Remove from this list   Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  23. The impenetrable certitude of the semiotic drunkard.Benjamin James - 2025 - Internet Archive.
    It is no longer a matter of speculation, but of daily spectacle, that our species has traded in the burdens of consciousness for the easier labor of delirium. We are surrounded by semiotic drunkards. Creatures who stagger through existence drenched not in wine or whiskey, but in the fermented runoff of slogans, identities, partisan catechisms, and whatever linguistic moonshine their favored prophet has poured into a camera that morning. Indeed, the modern citizen has mastered the art of maintaining a permanent, (...)
    Remove from this list   Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  24. Self‐Deception in Human–AI Emotional Relations.Emilia Kaczmarek - 2025 - Journal of Applied Philosophy 42 (3):814-831.
    Imagine a man chatting with his AI girlfriend app. He looks at his smartphone and says, ‘Finally, I'm being understood’. Is he deceiving himself? Is there anything morally wrong with it? The human tendency to anthropomorphize AI is well established, and the popularity of AI companions is growing. This article answers three questions: (1) How can being charmed by AI's simulated emotions be considered self-deception? (2) Why might we have an obligation to avoid harmless self-deception? (3) When is self-deception in (...)
    Remove from this list   Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   4 citations  
  25. From Wishful Thinking to Self-Deception.Kevin Lynch - 2025 - Think 24 (71):71-74.
    What are wishful thinking and self-deception, and what is the difference between them? This article looks for answers to these questions with reference to a real-life case.
    Remove from this list   Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  26. Mindshaping and self-deception.Fernando Martinez-Manrique - 2025 - In Tad Zawidzki & Rémi Tison, Routledge Handbook of Mindshaping. pp. 290-301.
    This chapter examines how mindshaping theory can reconfigure our understanding of self-deception in four respects. First, our folk-psychological attributions of self-deception, which are traditionally regarded as epistemic tasks carried out by mindreading mechanisms, can be seen as part of a non-epistemic regulative mindshaping process intertwined with normative social expectations. Second, explanations about how it is possible for someone to be self-deceived should include mechanisms to shape the social environment and should revise the role of internal mechanisms insofar as they are (...)
    Remove from this list   Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  27. Self-deception as normative violation.Martina Orlandi - 2025 - Philosophical Explorations 28 (2):218-236.
    This paper defends an account of self-deception as a violation of the self-deceived’s own epistemic norms. I show that, compared to the most prominent version of a deflationary view of self-deception, a normative violation account does a better job of distinguishing self-deception from other similar biases, better captures the experiential tension characteristic of self-deception, and rescues the role of the self in self-deception.
    Remove from this list   Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  28. Bad faith, as a concept in phenomenology.Basil Vassilicos - 2025 - In Nicolas De Warren & Ted Toadvine, Encyclopedia of Phenomenology. Springer.
    Ever wondered what this key Sartrean concept is all about? Ever thought that there may be something off about human behaviours, which seems different from self-obliviousness, -blindness or -deception? Come for some state of the art, stay to plumb a few of the deep ambiguities internal to Sartre's phenomenological thinking.
    Remove from this list   Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  29. Deception and Self-Deception: A Unified Account.Krstić Vladimir - 2025 - Cambridge University Press.
    Received theories of self-deception are problematic. The traditional view, according to which self-deceivers intend to deceive themselves, generates paradoxes: you cannot deceive yourself intentionally because you know your own plans and intentions. Non-traditional views argue that self-deceivers act intentionally but deceive themselves unintentionally or that self-deception is not intentional at all. The non-traditional approaches do not generate paradoxes, but they entail that people can deceive themselves by accident or by mistake, which is controversial. The author argues that a functional analysis (...)
    Remove from this list   Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   3 citations  
  30. Sincerity and self-deception in The profession of faith of the savoyard vicar.John Warner - 2025 - In Will R. Jordan, Natural man, citizen, philosopher: the political philosophy of Jean-Jacques Rousseau. Macon, Georgia: Mercer University Press.
    Remove from this list  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  31. Marcel Proust: A Very Short Introduction.Joshua Landy - 2024 - New York: Oxford University Press.
    This book is a brief guide to Proust's magnum opus in which Joshua Landy invites the reader to view the novel as a single quest--a quest for purpose, enchantment, identity, connection, and belonging--through the novel's fascinating treatments of memory, society, art, same-sex desire, knowledge, self-understanding, self-fashioning, and the unconscious mind. -/- Landy also shows why the questions Proust raises are important and exciting for all of us: how we can feel at home in the world; how we can find genuine (...)
    Remove from this list   Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  32. (1 other version)Non-belief as self-deception?Lari Launonen - 2024 - Religious Studies.
    The suppression thesis is the theological claim that theistic non-belief results from culpable mistreatment of one’s knowledge of God or one’s evidence for God. The thesis is a traditional one but unpopular today. This article examines whether it can gain new credibility from the philosophy of self-deception and from the cognitive science of religion. The thesis is analysed in terms of the intentionalist and the non-intentionalist model of self-deception. The first proposed model views non-belief as intentional suppression of one’s implicit (...)
    Remove from this list   Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  33. Galeotti on Self-Deception.Alfred R. Mele - 2024 - In Enrico Biale, Federica Liveriero & Roberta Sala, Public Ethics for Real People: Toleration, Equal Respect, and Democratic Distortions. Cham: Springer Nature Switzerland. pp. 197-208.
    This chapter explores some similarities and differences between Elisabetta Galeotti’s position on self-deception in her groundbreaking book, Political Self-Deception, and Alfred Mele’s position on this topic in, for example, his Self-Deception Unmasked and some subsequent work. In Part I of her book, “The Philosophy of Self-Deception,” Galeotti argues for revision of Mele’s conception of self-deception in three connections. The first concerns the alleged need for distinctions between self-deception, on the one hand, and wishful thinking and delusion, on the other. The (...)
    Remove from this list   Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  34. ‘I knew all along’: making sense of post-self-deception judgments.Martina Orlandi - 2024 - Synthese 203 (136):1-15.
    Individuals deceive themselves about a wide variety of subjects. In fortunate circumstances, where those who manage to leave self-deception embrace reality, an interesting phenomenon occurs: the formerly self-deceived often confess to having ‘known [the truth] all along’. These post-self-deception judgments are not conceptually innocuous; if genuine, they call into question the core feature of prominent theories of self-deception, namely that self-deceived individuals do not believe the unwelcome truth. In this paper I argue that post-self-deception judgments do not track a belief, (...)
    Remove from this list   Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  35. Avowing the Avowal View.Elizabeth Schechter - 2024 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 102 (3):623-640.
    This paper defends the avowal view of self-deception, according to which the self-deceived agent has been led by the evidence to believe that ¬p and yet is sincere in asserting that p. I argue that the agent qualifies as sincere in asserting the contrary of what they in the most basic sense believe in virtue of asserting what they are committed to believing. It is only by recognizing such commitments and distinguishing them from the more basic beliefs whose rational regulation (...)
    Remove from this list   Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  36. The Supremacy of Bias: Identifying Barriers to Communication through Social Media Exchanges.Orion Simerl - 2024 - Milwaukee: Orion Simerl.
    Failures of communication and understanding are a persistent feature of public discourse. This book argues that many of these failures arise from value-protective denial: the tendency of individuals to avoid, ignore, or reject information that threatens beliefs supporting their values. Because many activities and perceptions of reality depend on these beliefs, contradictory information can produce a threat response that motivates resistance to evidence and logical contradiction. -/- The book describes a condition referred to as the supremacy of bias, in which (...)
    Remove from this list   Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  37. Self-Deception and Self-Narration: Linklater’s Tape.Zeynep Talay Turner - 2024 - In Garry L. Hagberg, Narrative and Ethical Understanding. Cham: Palgrave. pp. 83-99.
    There is a voluminous literature on the problem of self-deception in both philosophy and psychology. Is it possible to deceive ourselves and if so, how do we do so? One answer to the last question might be that: we do so through and in the course of self-narration. An example of such is the narration of events we have been involved in the past. In this chapter I investigate the relationship between self-deception and self-narration through Richard Linklater’s film Tape (2001). (...)
    Remove from this list   Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  38. How to Express Implicit Attitudes.Elmar Unnsteinsson - 2024 - Philosophical Quarterly 74 (1):251-272.
    I argue that what speakers mean or express can be determined by their implicit or unconscious states, rather than explicit or conscious states. Further, on this basis, I show that the sincerity conditions for utterances can also be fixed by implicit states. This is a surprising result which goes against common assumptions about speech acts and sincerity. Roughly, I argue that the result is implied by two plausible and independent theories of the metaphysics of speaker meaning and, further, that this (...)
    Remove from this list   Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  39. Lug und Selbstbetrug.Marc Andree Weber - 2024 - Deutsche Zeitschrift für Philosophie 72 (3):323-343.
    People who, by intention or negligence, deceive themselves put other people at risk of being misinformed. The paper argues that this kind of misinforming other people is to be avoided for largely the same reasons for which lying is to be avoided – regardless of what exactly these reasons are. This makes the ethical evaluation of self-deception in part dependent on the ethical evaluation of lying. In order to bring out this result as clearly as possible, detailed characterisations of the (...)
    Remove from this list   Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  40. Self-deception.Ian Deweese-Boyd - 2023 - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
    Virtually every aspect of the current philosophical discussion of self-deception is a matter of controversy including its definition and paradigmatic cases. We may say generally, however, that self-deception is the acquisition and maintenance of a belief (or, at least, the avowal of that belief) in the face of strong evidence to the contrary motivated by desires or emotions favoring the acquisition and retention of that belief. Beyond this, philosophers divide over whether this action is intentional or not, whether self-deceivers recognize (...)
    Remove from this list   Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   33 citations  
  41. A Dispositional Account of Self-Deception: A Critical Analysis of Sartre’s Theory of Bad Faith.Guy Du Plessis - 2023 - Qeios 1 (1):1-12.
    This essay addresses the notion of self-deception as articulated by Sigmund Freud and Jean-Paul Sartre. More specifically, I will critically assess Sartre’s notion of ‘bad faith’ (mauvaise foi) as a critique of Freud’s depth-psychological account of self-deception. Sartre’s main objection to Freud’s account of self-deception rests on his argument that for self-deception to occur there needs to be a conscious awareness of the coexistence of mutually incompatible beliefs, and that Freud had obscured this fact by splitting the self and with (...)
    Remove from this list   Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  42. Intention, Judgement-Dependence and Self-Deception.Ali Hossein Khani - 2023 - Res Philosophica 100 (2):203-226.
    Wright’s judgement-dependent account of intention is an attempt to show that truths about a subject’s intentions can be viewed as constituted by the subject’s own best judgements about those intentions. The judgements are considered to be best if they are formed under certain cognitively optimal conditions, which mainly include the subject’s conceptual competence, attentiveness to the questions about what the intentions are, and lack of any material self-deception. Offering a substantive, non-trivial specification of the no-self-deception condition is one of the (...)
    Remove from this list   Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  43. Lying to others, lying to yourself, and literal self-deception.Vladimir Krstić - 2023 - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy.
    This paper examines the connection between lies, deception, and self-deception. Understanding this connection is important because the consensus is that you cannot deceive yourself by lying since you cannot make yourself believe as true a proposition you already believe is false – and, as a liar, you must assert a proposition you believe is false. My solution involves refining our analysis of lying: people can lie by asserting what they confidently believe is true. Thus, self-deceivers need not replace one belief (...)
    Remove from this list   Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   6 citations  
  44. The Pragmatic Hypothesis Testing Theory of Self-Deception and the Belief/Acceptance Distinction.Kevin Lynch - 2023 - Philosophy 98 (1):29-53.
    According to the pragmatic hypothesis testing theory, how much evidence we require before we believe something varies depending on the expected costs of falsely believing and disbelieving it. This theory has been used in the self-deception debate to explain our tendencies towards self-deceptive belief formation. This article argues that the application of this theory in the self-deception debate has overlooked the distinction between belief and acceptance, and that the theory in all likelihood models acceptance rather than belief, in which case (...)
    Remove from this list   Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  45. Implicit self-knowledge.Kristina Musholt - 2023 - In J. Robert Thompson, The Routledge Handbook of Philosophy and Implicit Cognition. New York, NY: Routledge.
    This chapter aims to give an overview of different types of knowledge that can reasonably be considered forms of implicit self-knowledge in contrast to explicit self-knowledge. It begins by clarifying the notion of self-knowledge, focusing on its epistemic feature of immunity to error through misidentification. It then considers theories of nonconceptual self-consciousness before discussing the relation between implicit and explicit forms of representation and (self-)knowledge. It suggests that nonconceptual, implicit self-knowledge might be understood in terms of knowledge-how and discusses the (...)
    Remove from this list   Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  46. Échec et succès du récit de soi selon Sartre.Pierre-Jean Renaudie - 2023 - Dois Pontos 20 (1).
    Over the last thirty years, the narrative conceptions of the Self attempted to account for the connection that ties together human lives and the narratives thanks to which they come to expression. In a famous passage of Nausea, the main character of Jean-Paul Sartre’s novel claims that our first-person narratives necessarily fail to account for the irreducibility of life as it is lived. Analyzing this passage, Richard Moran recently pointed out the weaknesses of Sartre’s phenomenological claim about life as it (...)
    Remove from this list   Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  47. Peculiar Access: Sartre, Self-knowledge, and the Question of the Irreducibility of the First-Person Perspective.Jack Alan Reynolds & Pierre-Jean Renaudie - 2023 - In Talia Morag, Sartre and Analytic Philosophy. New York, NY: Routledge. pp. 84-100.
    In the debates on phenomenal consciousness that occurred over the last 20 years, Sartre’s analysis of pre-reflective consciousness has often been quoted in defence of a distinction between first- and third-personal modes of givenness that naturalists reject. This distinction aims both at determining the specificity of the access one has to their own thoughts, beliefs, intentions, or desires, and at justifying the particular privilege that one enjoys while making epistemic claims about their own mental states. This chapter defends an interpretation (...)
    Remove from this list   Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  48. Coming to Terms with Wang Yangming’s Strong Ethical Nativism: On Wang’s Claim That “Establishing Sincerity” (Licheng 立誠) Can Help Us Fully Grasp Everything that Matters Ethically.Justin Tiwald - 2023 - Journal of Confucian Philosophy and Culture 39:65-90.
    In this paper, I take up one of Wang Yangming’s most audacious philosophical claims, which is that an achievement that is entirely concerned with correcting one’s own inner states, called “establishing sincerity” (licheng 立誠) can help one to fully grasp (jin 盡) all ethically pertinent matters, including those that would seem to require some ability to know or track facts about the wider world (e.g., facts about people very different from ourselves, facts about the needs of plants and animals). Wang (...)
    Remove from this list   Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  49. Ressentiment and Self-Deception in Early Phenomenology: Voigtländer, Scheler, and Reinach.Íngrid Vendrell Ferran - 2023 - In Else Voigtländer: Self, Emotion, and Sociality. Cham: pp. 103-121.
    This chapter explores the early phenomenological accounts of Ressentiment provided by Else Voigtländer, Max Scheler, and Adolf Reinach. In particular, it examines the self-deceptive processes that lead to the “inversion of values” inherent to Ressentiment, i.e., how an object previously felt as valuable is denuded of its worth when the subject realizes that she cannot achieve it. For the comparative analysis of the three accounts, attention is paid to three crucial issues: 1) the origins of Ressentiment (etiology); 2) its place (...)
    Remove from this list   Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   4 citations  
  50. Hostile Affective States and Their Self-Deceptive Styles: Envy and Hate.Íngrid Vendrell-Ferran - 2023 - In Alba Montes Sánchez & Alessandro Salice, Emotional Self-Knowledge. New York, NY: Routledge.
    This paper explores how individuals experiencing hostile affective states such as envy, jealousy, hate, contempt, and Ressentiment tend to deceive themselves about their own mental states. More precisely, it examines how the feeling of being diminished in worth experienced by the subject of these hostile affective states motivates a series of self-deceptive maneuvers that generate a fictitious upliftment of the subject’s sense of self. After introducing the topic (section 1), the paper explores the main arguments that explain why several hostile (...)
    Remove from this list   Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
1 — 50 / 484