Jump to content

User talk:TonySt

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Latest comment: 9 hours ago by Strongshorts in topic A kitten for you!

Welcome!

[edit]

Hello TonySt, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! 

Now, about WP:AIV. Feel free to put test4 on someone's page, but test5 should be for admins. Also, make sure you do the template right, and get the article name right. So it's {{vandal|IPaddress}} and the article was Christopher murt not Christopher Mutt (or at least the one I found). Wikibofh 22:12, 4 December 2005 (UTC)Reply

Ok, thanks, and sorry :-p--TonySt 22:13, 4 December 2005 (UTC)Reply

Warning users for unsourced BLP edits (and regarding Interceptor)

[edit]

Hello again, Stark! I have just noticed in your contributions that you use {{uw-unsourced}} while reverting unsourced BLP edits using C.V.P.I. I recommend using {{uw-biog}}, which makes it more obvious that the user has edited a BLP instead of a standard article in where uw-unsourced can be used. Have a nice day, and good luck coding that! – SimpleObjects-9ei 🏖️/☀️/🥵 19:34, 16 July 2026 (UTC)Reply

Oh yeah Stark, also be careful when a user uses C.V.P.I. to revert an edit of a user with a highly offensive or egregious username, as Interceptor is set to warn users after reverting an edit using it. One time I saw this kind of thing to happen was in Argentina national football team when Hamimh2 reverted an edit of an offensive username and we don't want to waste admins' time having to revdel the creation logs of the "User talk:Grossly offensive username" pages. SimpleObjects-9ei 🏖️/☀️/🥵 (see talk) 23:24, 26 July 2026 (UTC)Reply
Hello! A tip: after an editor is reported to AIV it stops using their username in edit summaries, and no longer warns the editor unless you choose a level in the dashboard. Also, if you manually report an editor to AIV via the dashboard, CVPI does not mention their username in the edit summary of the report to AIV. If it's an LTA with an offensive name, I usually just manually report via the dashboard before making any reverts (and I usually don't revert them more than once per article). TonySt 23:47, 26 July 2026 (UTC)Reply

A barnstar for you!

[edit]
The da Vinci Barnstar
Thank you for creating one of the greatest Wikipedia tools of all time! It makes RC patrolling so much easier, and works identically on mobile! Axolitl (talk | contribs) 05:24, 22 July 2026 (UTC)Reply
Appreciated Axolitl :) I'm happy to hear that it's helping. Thank you for patrolling recent changes! --TonySt 15:08, 22 July 2026 (UTC)Reply
+1 the tool is unbelievably helpful. In solidarity Dafootballguy Want to talk? 23:52, 10 August 2026 (UTC)Reply

Rick Santorum

[edit]

For what it's worth, the Santorum quote was in the wrong place in the article, but it's entirely real and very sourceable. "We have to make the best out of a bad situation." Jan. 20, 2012 interview with Piers Morgan on CNN, during his run for president. --jpgordon𝄢𝄆𝄐𝄇 01:13, 27 July 2026 (UTC)Reply

I reverted because it wasn't properly sourced, not because it was untrue. TonySt 01:20, 27 July 2026 (UTC)Reply
Fair enough. --jpgordon𝄢𝄆𝄐𝄇 02:01, 27 July 2026 (UTC)Reply

Emory Tate

[edit]

Hi, I saw your message. As a chess player, emory tate is undisputely one of the greatest chess players and any chess player will tell you that, unfortunately these gentlemen keep on revoking my edit for reasons I am unsure of. ~2026-41795-39 (talk) 04:18, 27 July 2026 (UTC)Reply

I tried to defend you when Mario was labelling you a vandal, but you're not making this easy. Stop trying to add stuff when it gets reverted. Go to the article talk page instead. Wikipedia is not the free for all anarchist project that it used to be. I know Emory Tate has his fans but he wasn't an all time great or anything like that. He was a master with highly variable results due to his double-edged style. MaxBrowne2 (talk) 04:35, 27 July 2026 (UTC)Reply
Hello! On Wikipedia, details about people need to be supported by a reliable source. If published reliable sources do exist, we can add them as inline citations so readers can verify the information themselves. You can read more about Wikipedia's verifiability policy by clicking this link, and more about citing sources here at this link. Take care. TonySt 04:39, 27 July 2026 (UTC)Reply

Tech News: 2026-31

[edit]

MediaWiki message delivery 18:47, 27 July 2026 (UTC)Reply

Message

[edit]

Information icon I noticed that a message you recently left to a newcomer may have been unduly harsh. Please remember not to bite the newcomers. If you see others making a common mistake, consider politely pointing out what they did wrong and showing them how to correct it. It may take some time, but it helps us retain new editors. Thank you. Please do not bite newcomers. You keep reverting my edits without putting anything on the talk page. I understand you thought that a brief quotation was a copyright issue but Zi fixed that by using the wikipedia template for dictionary.com — Preceding unsigned comment added by ~2026-41649-10 (talk) 05:11, 29 July 2026 (UTC)Reply

Hello! As I mentioned on your talk page, you cannot copy text from your sources. Everything you contribute here needs to be written in your own words. Please do not copy and paste text from copyrighted sources, even with a reference. --TonySt 05:16, 29 July 2026 (UTC)Reply

Message from FoxyBushtail4783

[edit]

Why did you remove what I added to “List of Last Words(21st Century)”? Tyler’s were from Instagram and Frickers on google FoxyBushtail4783 (talk) 16:47, 29 July 2026 (UTC)Reply

Hi Foxy! On Wikipedia, things we write regarding people need to have citations to reliable sources so the reader can verify the information. You can read more about our verifiability policy by clicking this link. Take care --TonySt 17:15, 29 July 2026 (UTC)Reply

The Signpost: 2 August 2026

[edit]
  • On the bright side: The beautiful game
    2026 Men's FIFA World Cup, Wikimania music, and wikipress.
  • Traffic report: Odyssey and Oyarzabal
    To take you in the sun to (Ithaca), to show you the World Cup, it's the time of the season for editing!

Have you considered taking up a mop?

[edit]

– LuniZunie(talk) 17:53, 2 August 2026 (UTC)Reply

Definitely a candidate I would be willing to support. +1! Lynch44 21:39, 2 August 2026 (UTC)Reply
Very appreciated Luni & Lynch! It's not something I've given much thought in the past... Maybe someday :) TonySt 22:22, 2 August 2026 (UTC)Reply
You've only been here 20 years; do you think you have sufficient experience? --jpgordon𝄢𝄆𝄐𝄇 15:26, 3 August 2026 (UTC)Reply
Been here longer than I've been alive... – LuniZunie(talk) 15:29, 3 August 2026 (UTC)Reply
Truthfully I imagine most editors, myself included, can't ever be completely certain of whether they themselves are experienced enough for the bit, regardless of years. It's something only other experienced users can judge, really. The only thing I'm sure of is I will never stop finding new things to learn about the project. --TonySt 18:27, 3 August 2026 (UTC)Reply
Man. I've gotta admit. Tony's one of the reasons I started getting into anti-vandalism. He's literally a grade A+ editor and it will be super awesome to see him help out with the blocking here.‎ — B.J (talk) 04:38, 5 August 2026 (UTC)Reply
Tony's one of the reasons I started getting into anti-vandalism
Me too. – LuniZunie(talk) 04:39, 5 August 2026 (UTC)Reply
That means a lot, I appreciate it BJ & Luni! TonySt 16:48, 5 August 2026 (UTC)Reply
Without Tony's counter-vandalism script, I barely would a help with stopping vandalism. Interceptor has been helpful beyond belief and Tony is always so friendly and welcoming. I would 100% support an adminship campaign for possibly the best vandalism fighter Wikipedia has. In solidarity Dafootballguy Want to talk? 23:49, 10 August 2026 (UTC)Reply
Tony’s the only person who redeemed my interpretation of anti-vandalism workers at all. In solidarity Wikipedian12512 (Talking is fine | contribs) 00:55, 1 September 2026 (UTC)Reply
I always see good reports at UAA from you and hearing positive things about from other admins about your readiness to run :). Would love to see you with a mop.
While it's not the de facto criterion some people make of it, having a GA under the belt can be a big help during an election/RfA (perhaps your lovely The Maine Woods). A bit more information on your user page can help teach new users what userpages are for and find the technical tools you've developed. In solidarity, —Femke (talk) 🐦 12:56, 16 August 2026 (UTC)Reply
Thank you, this feedback means a lot :) TonySt  16:01, 16 August 2026 (UTC)Reply
And I see you’ve entered! Cheers, In solidarity Wikipedian12512 (Talking is fine | contribs) 20:04, 3 October 2026 (UTC)Reply

Tech News: 2026-32

[edit]

MediaWiki message delivery 19:44, 3 August 2026 (UTC)Reply

USS Arizona

[edit]

Good morning. I see your feedback about inclusion of information about the silver from the USS Arizona.

Can you suggest a way to include the information about the silver?

The article was written in 1994 when I did the initial cataloging of the silver in the Capitol Museum which the Museum turned into a booklet about the service. It is factual in the sense that I handled each piece for descriptions (markings, measurements, weights), talked to Pearl Harbor survivors, salvage divers, etc. The article about the Miner is about the finding of the missing bronze that was part of the silver service.

Thanks LPinAZ (talk) 13:03, 10 August 2026 (UTC)Reply

Hi @LPinAZ! Thanks for reaching out. Your best bet is to leave a message with the links (and the context for where they come from) on the article's talk page (click here) to let editors know about these resources. Interested editors can use the information to write content about USS Arizona, and they would then cite your articles with citations supporting the information they add. Thank you for stopping by :) TonySt  20:43, 10 August 2026 (UTC)Reply
Thank you for the info. LPinAZ (talk) 21:13, 10 August 2026 (UTC)Reply

Tech News: 2026-33

[edit]

MediaWiki message delivery 20:43, 10 August 2026 (UTC)Reply

You're fast

[edit]

I was looking at recent changes and when I went to see what that person added to five below, you already reverted it. Impressive SeafoamKitten (talk) 02:32, 12 August 2026 (UTC)Reply

Appreciated, welcome to Wikipedia! TonySt  02:39, 12 August 2026 (UTC)Reply

Possible improvements for CPVI

[edit]

1) A dark mode 2) A version for non-rollbackers 3) Auto report to AIV after being warned for non-vandalism after the max level warning (ie. Blanking past final warning). In solidarity Dafootballguy Want to talk? 04:25, 12 August 2026 (UTC)Reply

Hey @Dafootballguy! Thank you for stopping by :) I'm going to talk about these in reverse order.
It's intentional that it doesn't auto-report when you use a "auto level" button in the dashboard, since many items in the dashboard correspond to behavior that usually doesn't belong at AIV. For your example, if they're blanking whole articles over and over and they're at max level, I'd recommend just using the normal red vandalism button in the toolbar to rollback & auto report, since you're (probably correctly) interpreting their repeated wholesale blanking as vandalism.
I'm pretty firmly in the camp that semiautomated diff viewers should require rollback rights, since they can cause a lot of problems if used ineptly or in bad faith. Earning rollback rights is a relatively good indication that an editor is ready to use these tools.
CVPI does have a dark mode, but it follows your device's settings. So if your phone/computer is set to light mode, it appears as light mode, and if your device is set to dark mode it switches to dark mode instead. At least, that's the way it's supposed to work -- if that's not how it's working for you please let me know and I might ask you for details about your device so I can fix the bug :) TonySt  15:39, 12 August 2026 (UTC)Reply
I'm using a light mode, but I wanted a switch similar to the colorblind mode to turn it to dark mode. In solidarity Dafootballguy Want to talk? 16:45, 12 August 2026 (UTC)Reply
@TonySt a bit of a random question. I just designed a script that filters offensive images and want to add it to the script library. Can I link it to my .js if there are other scripts there (like CPVI)? In solidarity Dafootballguy Want to talk? 17:21, 12 August 2026 (UTC)Reply
@Dafootballguy, I'll keep the "dark mode toggle" idea in mind for the menu -- I can see where there might be cases when it's useful to have dark mode enabled even if you have your device set to light mode.
For your scripting question: common.js is (usually) used as a place where we import scripts, rather than where scripts are written or stored. If I were you, I would move the content filter script into a new .js file (maybe at User:Dafootballguy/ImageContentFilter.js). Then you could install it into your common.js by adding importScript('[[User:Dafootballguy/ImageContentFilter.js]]'); as a new line to your common.js. TonySt  17:47, 12 August 2026 (UTC)Reply
@TonySt I tried that, but the filter stopped functioning. In solidarity Dafootballguy Want to talk? 17:56, 12 August 2026 (UTC)Reply
@Dafootballguy, looks like you missed the top and bottom of your script when you copied it to User:Dafootballguy/ImageContentFilter.js TonySt  17:59, 12 August 2026 (UTC)Reply
@TonySt still not working. In solidarity Dafootballguy Want to talk? 18:01, 12 August 2026 (UTC)Reply
@Dafootballguy Looks like you removed more of the script. Go to this version of your common.js, copy everything beginning with line 11 all the way to line 102, and then paste that as the content of User:Dafootballguy/ImageContentFilter.js. Your current common.js looks good, it's just the ImageContentFilter.js that is incomplete. TonySt  18:08, 12 August 2026 (UTC)Reply
@TonySt I pasted it in 3 sections (the only way it'd work on mobile). Not working. In solidarity Dafootballguy Want to talk? 18:16, 12 August 2026 (UTC)Reply
@Dafootballguy, apologies, at the end of your common.js, remove the brackets from the script name. So instead of importScript('[[User:Dafootballguy/ImageContentFilter.js]]'); it should be importScript('User:Dafootballguy/ImageContentFilter.js'); TonySt  18:19, 12 August 2026 (UTC)Reply
That worked, how do I add this to the script library? In solidarity Dafootballguy Want to talk? 18:22, 12 August 2026 (UTC)Reply
If you mean the user scripts list, there should be some information on that list page with instructions on how to add your script to the list. TonySt  18:25, 12 August 2026 (UTC)Reply
@TonySt I built another script, can you add it to the library for me? In solidarity Dafootballguy Want to talk? 21:14, 12 August 2026 (UTC)Reply
I'd recommend that you add the script to the list yourself, but only after testing it extensively to make sure it works as you expect :) TonySt  23:17, 12 August 2026 (UTC)Reply
It does. I'm working on ReportHub, a way to report to all locations (AIV, ANI, SPI). This one is like ultraviolet except it works for mobile. In solidarity Dafootballguy Want to talk? 23:20, 12 August 2026 (UTC)Reply
@TonySt do you want to test it? The installation directions are here. In solidarity Dafootballguy Want to talk? 23:40, 12 August 2026 (UTC)Reply
Not at this time, but thank you! TonySt  00:38, 13 August 2026 (UTC)Reply
@TonySt can you help me code a section so the reports are signed. It reports without a signature and all the fixes I try break it. In solidarity Dafootballguy Want to talk? 01:07, 13 August 2026 (UTC)Reply
Sorry, I can't help with that. TonySt  01:35, 13 August 2026 (UTC)Reply
It's OK. In solidarity Dafootballguy Want to talk? 02:03, 13 August 2026 (UTC)Reply
I want to install some mobile friendly scripts. Ideas? In solidarity Dafootballguy Want to talk? 22:24, 14 August 2026 (UTC)Reply
@TonySt can you give me a way to use the old view of the dashboard on CPVI, the new way is not colorblind friendly :(. In solidarity Dafootballguy Want to talk? 23:11, 14 August 2026 (UTC)Reply
@Dafootballguy I'm not sure what you mean -- the dashboard hasn't changed in a very long time unless you've found a bug. TonySt  23:25, 14 August 2026 (UTC)Reply
I tried to screenshot it but that isn't allowed. It has big bubbles for the dashboard. With vandalism and report to AIV in all red, as well as the final level warning. Does this make sense? In solidarity Dafootballguy Want to talk? 23:58, 14 August 2026 (UTC)Reply
@TonySt just letting you know I'll be keeping Shabbat as per my religion. I won't be able to respond until sunday. In solidarity Dafootballguy Want to talk? 00:49, 15 August 2026 (UTC)Reply
@TonySt just letting you know I'm back and the issue is still present. In solidarity Dafootballguy Want to talk? 18:51, 16 August 2026 (UTC)Reply
@Dafootballguy, thank you! I'll be updating it soon to use the color-blind colors in the dashboard when you have it in that mode. TonySt  20:03, 16 August 2026 (UTC)Reply
Is there any way I could use the old settings? In solidarity Dafootballguy Want to talk? 20:10, 16 August 2026 (UTC)Reply
@Dafootballguy, I'm not sure which old settings you're describing -- the dashboard should look the same as it was a month or two ago. TonySt  20:27, 16 August 2026 (UTC)Reply

As I described above, it looks very different than the one I'm used to. In solidarity Dafootballguy Want to talk? 20:31, 16 August 2026 (UTC)Reply

The description you gave matches how the dashboard has looked since version 0.9.13, which was released in March. TonySt  20:42, 16 August 2026 (UTC)Reply
For me, it looked like the version that was introduced around 6 months ago. This version appeared 2 days ago and has issues with color as well as it doesn't fill my screen. In solidarity Dafootballguy Want to talk? 20:45, 16 August 2026 (UTC)Reply
It's possible that another script in your common.js is interfering with the way CVPI creates its interface. If the problem only started two days ago you might try reverting to a version of your common.js from before that time. CVPI hasn't had any changes to its code this month. TonySt  20:51, 16 August 2026 (UTC)Reply
It used to show the version seen in the screenshot here. In solidarity Dafootballguy Want to talk? 20:53, 16 August 2026 (UTC)Reply
@TonySt I checked with my main alt. account and CPVI still had the version I'm used to. Dafootballguy Want to talk? In solidarity 01:28, 17 August 2026 (UTC)Reply
My best guess is that another script in your common.js is interfering with CVPI's layout. TonySt  01:31, 17 August 2026 (UTC)Reply
Which one? Dafootballguy Want to talk? In solidarity 02:14, 17 August 2026 (UTC)Reply
¯\_(ツ)_/¯ TonySt  13:39, 17 August 2026 (UTC)Reply
I had a question. How do I get a gadget to get a WP: page? I know interceptor is WP:CPVI and I want to get ReportHub a WP: page. In solidarity, Dafootballguy [Want to talk?] 23:03, 18 August 2026 (UTC)Reply
@TonySt pinging in case you missed this. In solidarity, Dafootballguy (Want to talk?) 22:07, 20 August 2026 (UTC)Reply
I hope you don't take this the wrong way, but I would recommend you become a little more comfortable with JS before that step, since tools in projectspace are expected to be hand-vetted and robust (especially if they modify pages). That being said, I don't think there's a set process to create a projectspace page for a tool. TonySt  22:17, 20 August 2026 (UTC)Reply
I had another editor help with it and fix all of the bugs. While I'd like to improve it, it's still pretty useful. What else needs to be done? (I don't take it the wrong way, helpful criticism is always helpful.) In solidarity, Dafootballguy (Want to talk?) 22:25, 20 August 2026 (UTC)Reply
My only advice is to just make sure you're comfortable enough with the code and the language to make adjustments if anyone identifies any issues. TonySt  22:46, 20 August 2026 (UTC)Reply
I'm running the script with an editor who has a better grasp of tech and coding, although this was my idea. In solidarity, Dafootballguy (Want to talk?) 22:49, 20 August 2026 (UTC)Reply

AI successionism page

[edit]

Hi thanks for msg. Brevity is probably best so: I added about 8 words to the page then put what follows as backup in the form to substantiate:

‘Chaos was described by Edward Lorenz as: ‘When the present determines the future but the approximate present does not approximately determine the future.’ Tech systems that determine the approximate present are not competent to ‘determine the future path of life’ - the phrase is mathematically illiterate and morally vacant.´

All true I think.

The few words I added to the page were something like:

‘Edward Lorenz’s definition of chaos is relevant here.’

All true too I think.

One could argue of course, but I don’t see anything false from me. Do say if you do.

AI successionism seems to me a ruse.

My few words were deleted within (my guess) less than a minute. I thought that sabotage of W principles so told the deleter so.

I love and admire Wikioedia and have always defended it - from the first. I oppose sabotage.

All best 🌱 ~2026-44479-95 (talk) 20:04, 14 August 2026 (UTC)Reply

Tech News: 2026-34

[edit]

MediaWiki message delivery 21:02, 17 August 2026 (UTC)Reply

babka

[edit]

hi! if you read the sources you'll understand the edits, per the note from when I edited it! let me know if you have any questions. Sonomacountyeditor (talk) 22:04, 17 August 2026 (UTC)Reply

Hi @Sonomacountyeditor! I did see the references, including the ones you removed. Please stop attempting to blanket remove well-sourced mentions of Jewish history from food articles (or any other type of article, for that matter). --TonySt  22:07, 17 August 2026 (UTC)Reply
I didn't remove any sources, so if that occurred I do apologize. I removed an attribution as 1. it's false and 2. the cultural differences are detailed later on in the body, it is not appropriate for the intro unless we do that for every variant. Sonomacountyeditor (talk) 22:09, 17 August 2026 (UTC)Reply

Organized Labour September Editing Event

[edit]

You're invited to join the Organized Labour community editing event, a cross-wiki event taking place throughout September 2026!

The campaign brings together Wikimedians interested in improving coverage of organised labour, workers, trade unions, and labour history. We have confirmed collaborations with Wikipedia language editions in English, Dutch, Persian, Serbo-Croatian and French. If you want to add other language editions or other wiki projects you are strongly encouraged to do so! This event spans geography and languages!

This is a one-time invitation. You're receiving it because you previously signed a petition related to Wiki Workers United (WWU). We hope you'll join us!

Regards ~ Shushugah (talk) 14:20, 19 August 2026 (UTC)Reply

hello tony

[edit]

hello tony ~2026-45443-23 (talk) 21:19, 19 August 2026 (UTC)Reply

Hello! TonySt  22:29, 19 August 2026 (UTC)Reply

The Signpost: 24 August 2026

[edit]
  • On the bright side: The great outdoors
    Blue Angels, Indigenous Peoples' Day, and the Perseids meteor shower.
  • Opinion: Are we embarrassed yet?
    One editor wants to find out more about a Department of Justice investigation of Wikipedia and its editors.
  • Comix: WP:FAOWN
    "Explaining civilly" probably should go both ways...

Tech News: 2026-35

[edit]

MediaWiki message delivery 20:43, 24 August 2026 (UTC)Reply

Feedback request: Wikipedia technical issues and templates request for comment

[edit]

Your feedback is requested at Wikipedia:Village pump (policy)/RfC: AI use for generating citations within articles on a "Wikipedia technical issues and templates" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

SodiumBot (botop|talk|contribs) 08:31, 27 August 2026 (UTC)Reply

Nashoba Tech page

[edit]

You instantly deleted my section in that article detailling how awful the school is from a student's perspective. Are you so absolutely dense that you think that writing something horrific about a schools action is vandalism or "not constructive?" Did you even bother to look at the edit reason in the first place or are you just forever waiting to be another cog in the machine to silence a victim's voice? ~2026-46794-35 (talk) 20:21, 27 August 2026 (UTC)Reply

[edit]

Anyone can help to bulid to external link in wikipedia Ranasarkarss (talk) 14:43, 30 August 2026 (UTC)Reply

Hello! Please do not add spam links to Wikipedia. TonySt  17:49, 30 August 2026 (UTC)Reply

Tech News: 2026-36

[edit]

MediaWiki message delivery 20:51, 31 August 2026 (UTC)Reply

Bacha Bazi

[edit]

can i add that it happens in afghanistan and happened in historical turkestan? Brokeshotmet3r (talk) 01:29, 2 September 2026 (UTC)Reply

Hi Brokeshotmet3r! I'm not very familiar with the subject but I wouldn't be surprised if that change was challenged by others since it highlights those locations and omits other areas that are also covered in the article. Actually it looks like it was already reverted, I'm guessing for that reason. Regardless, the reason I reverted your earlier edit wasn't because of that detail but instead because of the unexplained (apparently accidental) blanking. --TonySt  14:01, 2 September 2026 (UTC)Reply
yeah but thanks anyway! Brokeshotmet3r (talk) 14:05, 2 September 2026 (UTC)Reply

Sayf Ibn 'Umar

[edit]

hello. I have just tried to add. My information is based on my unpublished M.A. paper . If you wish i can demonstrate my sourses to you via email. In private. My sourse is Ibn Asakir's Taarih Madinat Dimashq. Thank you Yak5029 (talk) 13:56, 2 September 2026 (UTC)Reply

Hello! We cannot use private sources -- we can only cite information which is published in certain reliable sources. TonySt  14:18, 2 September 2026 (UTC)Reply
Ibn Asaker, Taarih Madinat Dimashq, v.1: 295- 296.
It is about Sayf Ibn Umar transmitting hadith, which is not deemed unreliable. ~2026-47580-01 (talk) 14:28, 2 September 2026 (UTC)Reply
It looks like the article already contains some of the information you added -- there is a section all about the subject transmitting hadith. I'm going to restore part of your edit, but if there's other information (like about their teacher, for example) which is referenced in that source on page 295-296 then you can use an inline citation like this:
{{cite book |last1=Asakir |first1=Ibn |title=Taarih Madinat Dimashq |pages=295-296}}
--TonySt  14:46, 2 September 2026 (UTC)Reply
There looks to be a lot of personal commentary going on in this article, Sayf ibn Umar. Who is best placed to look over the recent edits? SuperFastSpellChecker (talk) 16:46, 3 September 2026 (UTC)Reply
Hello. I have edited that data already. But please do fix the issue with the footnotes
Just have no idea how to. ~2026-47580-01 (talk) 16:49, 3 September 2026 (UTC)Reply
I'm referring to the state of the article as of the date and time of this comment, so the description still stands. I'd be happy to help fixing up footnote once the article has been cleaned up. SuperFastSpellChecker (talk) 16:57, 3 September 2026 (UTC)Reply
@~2026-47580-01: SuperFastSpellChecker is correct that the edits you've made there appear to be commentary, and in some cases they directly contradict the existing sourced information. Historians having doubts about their reliability is definitely not "slander", and if it is slander then we need a source describing it that way. --TonySt  17:00, 3 September 2026 (UTC)Reply
the later hadith critics accused Sayf b. ' Umar of beeing a heretic/ zindiq. And also claimed that he put his own words to otherwise reliable transmitters. That he was accused of zindaqe is considered a slander. ~2026-47580-01 (talk) 17:12, 3 September 2026 (UTC)Reply
@~2026-47580-01, you cannot be the person who decides whether it is slander. I cannot either. It needs to come from reliable published sources, like I mentioned before. TonySt  17:17, 3 September 2026 (UTC)Reply
Thank you. Fixed it. ~2026-47580-01 (talk) 17:19, 3 September 2026 (UTC)Reply
i can of i will publish my owm article on Sayf b. 'Umar, which not the case here. So i have deleted "slandered" and put it like "much contested". ~2026-47580-01 (talk) 17:22, 3 September 2026 (UTC)Reply
Sorry. Misspelling.
" I can be the sourse if ...". And please correct my English if needed! The article had been cleaned. ~2026-47580-01 (talk) 17:24, 3 September 2026 (UTC)Reply

Advice

[edit]

@TonySt little advice for you. You may want to have your userpage in an easier to read text. It looks like there is extra surfaces where there are not. In solidarity, Dafootballguy (Want to talk?) 03:16, 7 September 2026 (UTC)Reply

Hi Dafootballguy! I'm afraid I'm not sure what you mean by extra surfaces. --TonySt  15:34, 7 September 2026 (UTC)Reply
@TonySt it was corrected by autocorrect, I meant spaces (and forgot to subscribe so I missed your response). A random question; can you stop showing the auto posts for the "be bold" tour and user's .js (because only 13 user's can edit those pages). Can you also have a "hide this user" button (maybe as an option in monitor this user), There are sometimes very experienced, good editors who show up. In solidarity, Dafootballguy (Want to talk?) 03:18, 9 September 2026 (UTC)Reply
These are great ideas :) The "hide user" thing is something AntiVandal does well and I'll try to incorporate it somehow. And yes, I've noticed more of those "be bold" things and I think I have a way to make those show up less in a near-future update :) TonySt  02:05, 11 September 2026 (UTC)Reply
@TonySt thanks for your willingness to listen. I eagerly await the newest update. In solidarity, Dafootballguy (Want to talk?) 20:14, 11 September 2026 (UTC)Reply
Also: what about the .js things that keep showing up as well? In solidarity, Dafootballguy (Want to talk?) 20:15, 11 September 2026 (UTC)Reply

Tech News: 2026-37

[edit]

MediaWiki message delivery 18:42, 7 September 2026 (UTC)Reply

Page getting vandalized for no reason

[edit]

Please stop editing Salem Mitchell's wikipedia page. She is a strong advocate for many black woman. ~2026-46989-52 (talk) 22:04, 10 September 2026 (UTC)Reply

Image licensing

[edit]

@TonySt:

Hey there! Seen you around active on recent changes many times and recently received rollbacker so I've been using your tool Interceptor; it's very, very helpful and I'm very appreciative of it.

I was looking to create a topicon for Interceptor users to complement the current userboxes you have listed at WP:CVPI#Userboxes and couldn't find an image logo for CVPI. I've gone ahead and converted the red logo (I assume by page history, at least, that you are the author of) in two of the userboxes to its raw HTML and vectorised it (with very little modification and solely to comply with SVG and non-WP specific HTML formatting).

The SVG is probably eligible by c:Commons:Threshold of originality, but I'd just like to be sure you're alright with me uploading it to Commons for use in this topicon (and, if you'd like, on CVPI related pages and for other interceptor uses). Thanks in advance! Shield \\ |T| - |C| - Solidarity \\ 02:52, 11 September 2026 (UTC)Reply

@.sh1eldo7 I don't have any problem with that -- thank you for doing it, actually -- and I appreciate you checking even though it's within that threshold :) Please also feel free to add it to the project page wherever you feel it would be helpful! TonySt  20:54, 11 September 2026 (UTC)Reply
Thank you very much! Shield \\ |T| - |C| - Solidarity \\ 20:55, 11 September 2026 (UTC)Reply
@TonySt: After much, much annoyance (Commons' SVG parser just ignores CSS/SVG styles declaration, apparently), the files have been uploaded:
Original SVG with incorrectly parsed serif I despite both font family being set to sans-serif and font being set to Arial
PNG conversion at 3.125x pixel density (594x594px)
Thanks! Shield \\ |T| - |C| - Solidarity \\ 22:13, 11 September 2026 (UTC)Reply

Tech News: 2026-38

[edit]

MediaWiki message delivery 15:29, 14 September 2026 (UTC)Reply

Spencer Boldman

[edit]

https://deadline.com/2026/04/spencer-boldman-paola-andino-cast-film-you-cant-leave-1236874499/

it is verifiable Ajd707 (talk) 01:42, 16 September 2026 (UTC)Reply

Hello! On Wikipedia, details about people need to be supported by a reliable source. If published reliable sources do exist, we can add them as inline citations so readers can verify the info themselves. I reverted your edit because it added biographical information about their early life without any references. It looks like you were able to add other information with some references after you reached out to me. Just curious, how did you find that image of the subject? --TonySt  02:21, 16 September 2026 (UTC)Reply
Hi TonySt, thanks for clarifying. The image was provided to me for use on Wikimedia Commons as a more current photograph of the subject. I understand the concern regarding the early-life information and will make sure any future additions are supported by reliable published sources. Thanks for your help. Ajd707 (talk) 02:40, 16 September 2026 (UTC)Reply
Ajd707, what is your relationship with the subject, if you don't mind me asking? TonySt  02:44, 16 September 2026 (UTC)Reply
I’d prefer not to share personal identifying information here, but I understand the conflict of interest concern. I’m happy to follow Wikipedia’s guidelines and rely on independent reliable sources for any proposed changes. Ajd707 (talk) 02:48, 16 September 2026 (UTC)Reply
Ok, I'll leave some information about paid editing requirements on your talk page in case it applies. TonySt  03:00, 16 September 2026 (UTC)Reply

The Signpost: 16 September 2026

[edit]
  • News and notes: The Balance of Power
    Wikimedia employees unionize, officer departs, The Signpost gains sister on Wiktionary

DYK for The Maine Woods

[edit]

On 17 September 2026, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article The Maine Woods, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Theodore Roosevelt was inspired by The Maine Woods to climb a mountain? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/The Maine Woods. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (The Maine Woods), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to nominate it.

Cielquiparle (talk) 00:02, 17 September 2026 (UTC)Reply

Aliens

[edit]

Hello I Am Sorry if I Did Not Mean to Offend. I Know the Alien Did It but the Cover Must happen. You Are Just Doing Your Job. Good Day Sir. ~2026-50260-67 (talk) 03:19, 18 September 2026 (UTC)Reply

October 2026 Administrator Elections – Schedule

[edit]

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 05:46, 26 September 2026 (UTC)Reply

Tech News: 2026-39

[edit]

MediaWiki message delivery 11:54, 27 September 2026 (UTC)Reply

Tech News: 2026-40

[edit]

MediaWiki message delivery 10:47, 28 September 2026 (UTC)Reply

October 2026 Administrator Elections – Call for Candidates

[edit]

The administrator elections process has officially started! Qualified editors are encouraged to find at least one experienced nominator. Self-nominations are also allowed. Please review instructions at Wikipedia:Administrator elections/October 2026/Candidates.

Here is the schedule:

  • September 29 – October 5: Nominations phase (we are here)
  • October 8–12: Discussion phase
  • October 13–19: SecurePoll voting phase

Please note the following:

  • The requirements to run are identical to RFA—a prospective candidate must be extended confirmed. However, in practice, few candidates succeed without ~10K edits, some content creation, no recent behavioral issues, and a nominator.
  • Prospective candidates are advised to become familiar with the community's expectations of administrators, which are much higher than the minimum requirement of having extended confirmed status. This includes reviewing successful and unsuccessful RFAs, reading the essay Wikipedia:Advice for admin elections candidates, and possibly requesting an optional poll on their chances of passing.
  • The process will have a seven day call for candidates phase, a two day pause, a five day discussion phase, and a seven day private vote using SecurePoll. Discussion and questions are only allowed on the candidate pages during the discussion phase.
  • The outcome of this process is identical to making a request for adminship. There is no official difference between an administrator appointed through RFA versus administrator elections.
  • Administrator elections are also a valid means of regaining adminship for de-sysopped editors.

Ask any questions about the process at the talk page. Later, a user talk message will be sent to official candidates with additional information about the process.

If you are interested in the process, please make sure to watchlist the appropriate pages. A watchlist notice will be added when the discussion phase opens, and again when the voting phase opens.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:59, 29 September 2026 (UTC)Reply

Tech News: 2026-41

[edit]

18:50, 5 October 2026 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by MediaWiki message delivery (talk • contribs) 18:50, 5 October 2026 (UTC)Reply

October 2026 Administrator Elections – Candidate Instructions

[edit]

Thank you for choosing to run in the October 2026 administrator elections. This bulletin contains some important information about the next stages of the election process.

As a reminder, the schedule of the election is:

  • October 6–7: Housekeeping phase (we are here)
  • October 8–12: Discussion phase
  • October 13–19: SecurePoll voting phase
  • Scrutineering phase

All times are in UTC. The first date in the range starts at 00:00, and the last date in the range ends at 23:59. So for example, the Discussion phase opens on 8 October 2026 at 00:00 UTC, and ends on 12 October 2026 at 23:59 UTC.

We are currently in the Housekeeping phase. Your candidate subpage will remain closed to questions and discussion. However, this is an excellent opportunity for you to recruit nominators (if you want them) and have them place their nomination statements, and a good time for you to answer the standard three questions, if you have not done so already. We recommend you spend this phase getting your candidate page polished and ready for the next phase.

The discussion phase will take place from October 8–12. Your candidate subpage will open to the public and they will be permitted to discuss you and ask you formal questions, in the same style as a request for adminship (RfA). You are strongly encouraged to be around on those dates to answer the formal questions in a timely manner.

On 13 Oct, we will start the voting phase. The candidate subpages will close to public questions and discussion, and everyone will have a week to use the SecurePoll software to vote, which uses a secret ballot. Anyone can see who has voted, but not who they voted for. You are permitted and encouraged to vote in the election, including voting for yourself. Please note that the vote totals cannot be made public until after voting has ended and as such, it will not be possible for you to see your vote total during the election.

Once voting concludes, we will begin the scrutineering phase, which does not have an exact end date, but typically takes a few days to a week. Once everything is certified, the results will be posted on the results page (you may want to watchlist this page) and transcluded to the main election page. In order to be granted adminship, you must receive at least 70% support, calculated as support ÷ (support + oppose), and must also have received a minimum of 20 support votes. Because this is a vote and not a consensus, there are no bureaucrat discussions ("'crat chats").

Any questions or issues can be asked on the election talk page. Thank you for your participation as a candidate, and best of luck.

-- MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:04, 6 October 2026 (UTC)Reply

Finally

[edit]

Good to see you running for the admin elections. A question about interceptor, can you make it hide all edit to pages that end with /Be bold or .js? In solidarity, Dafootballguy (Want to talk?) 00:26, 7 October 2026 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for the kind words @Dafootballguy :) Yes, I'm going to need to do something like that. I was hoping the "be bold" stuff would be tagged as The Wikipedia Adventure or similar but it turns out they're not tagged in that way. I've avoided whitelisting specific pages but I might need to start filtering those out if I can't find a better solution because I've been noticing them a lot as well. --TonySt  14:53, 7 October 2026 (UTC)Reply

Revert

[edit]

I appreciate how you do that: saves us time. Thanks for reporting. Drmies (talk) 14:49, 7 October 2026 (UTC)Reply

Cheers @Drmies. Maybe after the TPA stuff is implemented we can start a discussion about something similar to the "hide username" feature at meta:SRG, and ask the helperbot to respect it. Seems like that would make it a bit easier for everyone. --TonySt  15:01, 7 October 2026 (UTC)Reply
You're running for admin? You got a quick link for me? Thanks, Drmies (talk) 15:21, 7 October 2026 (UTC)Reply
@Drmies, I am -- here's a link to my candidate page. --TonySt  15:49, 7 October 2026 (UTC)Reply

AV Barnstar for you!

[edit]
The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
This is for your anti-vandal work and for creating my favorite Wikipedia script (interceptor) :) Ednxa (talk) 14:54, 7 October 2026 (UTC)Reply
@Ednxa, much appreciated! Thank you for your help with recent changes patrolling :) --TonySt  15:03, 7 October 2026 (UTC)Reply

October 2026 Administrator Elections – Discussion Phase

[edit]

The discussion phase of the October 2026 administrator elections is officially open. As a reminder, the schedule of the election is:

  • October 8–12: Discussion phase (we are here)
  • October 13–19: SecurePoll voting phase
  • Scrutineering phase

We are currently in the discussion phase. The candidate subpages are open to questions and comments from everyone, in the same style as a request for adminship. You may discuss the candidates at Wikipedia:Administrator elections/October 2026/Discussion phase.

On 13 Oct, we will start the voting phase. The candidate subpages will close to public questions and discussion, and everyone will have a week to use the SecurePoll software to vote, which uses a secret ballot. You can see who voted, but not who they voted for.

Any questions or issues can be asked on the election talk page. Thank you for your participation. Happy electing.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:05, 8 October 2026 (UTC)Reply

A kitten for you!

[edit]

Thank you for all your work on CVPI. It's the only Anti-vandalism script I've tried that isn't clunky on mobile

Strongshorts (talk) 06:42, 8 October 2026 (UTC)Reply