Jump to content

Steward requests/Checkuser/2026-03

From Meta, a Wikimedia project coordination wiki
Latest comment: 6 months ago by Sotiale in topic Requests


Requests

郁凡儿@zh.wikipedia

I've taken the trash out. -- Amanda (she/her) 04:55, 1 March 2026 (UTC)

劉宥杰@zh.wikiversity

Oh, I'll take care of this today. --Sotiale (talk) 04:25, 6 March 2026 (UTC)
  •  Confirmed 楊曜誠, 黃致元, 林敦韋, 劉宥杰

--Sotiale (talk) 12:55, 6 March 2026 (UTC)

Pktlaurence@zh.wikipedia

I will take care of this today. --Sotiale (talk) 04:27, 6 March 2026 (UTC)
  •  Confirmed Alyplscomeback and Pktlaurence

--Sotiale (talk) 13:02, 6 March 2026 (UTC)

Tommy860119@zh.wikipedia

I will take care of this today. --Sotiale (talk) 04:27, 6 March 2026 (UTC)
  •  Confirmed 戴亨, 佐仲升
  • Likely Likely and  Confirmed accounts: 翟沛泓, 今天應該很高興, 狄蔓尤

--Sotiale (talk) 13:14, 6 March 2026 (UTC)

台南賴哥@zh.wikipedia

Not done This goes against guidance from the Ombuds. TAs are considered the same as IPs, because non-CUs can connect them to an IP. I get zhwiki has been in the habit of asking "did they do any logged out editing, not this specific logged out editing" but that walks way too fine of a line especially in this circumstance where the assumption will be if I say they have that this TA is them, needs to be blocked and you would take action on the IP. Please use behavioral evidence to make this determination. -- Amanda (she/her) 12:40, 7 March 2026 (UTC)

Louischen88888@zh.wikipedia

 Confirmed 3 accounts plus 妲雲婭. -- Amanda (she/her) 08:01, 9 March 2026 (UTC)

Sr Andrei Mihai@ro.wikipedia

  •  Confirmed Group 1: Sr Andrei Mihai, MariaBumici
  •  Confirmed Group 2: Victor Pruteanu, Marin1984
  • Unrelated Unrelated IulianGrosu

  • Unrelated Unrelated Group 1 and 2

From a technical point of view. --Sotiale (talk) 13:44, 9 March 2026 (UTC)

Hexexie@zh.wikipedia

Unrelated Unrelated. AramilFeraxa (talk) 06:16, 10 March 2026 (UTC)

2020一起前進@zh.wikipedia

  • Unrelated Unrelated all.

--Sotiale (talk) 12:36, 10 March 2026 (UTC)

~2026-15323-84@no.wikipedia

According to the guidance from Ombuds we can’t publicly link Temporary Account to the registered account. AramilFeraxa (talk) 06:14, 11 March 2026 (UTC)
OK. I wasn’t aware of that.
I did get somewhat of a semi-confirmation anyway, because the registered user wrote a comment without being logged in, then one minute later changed the signature from temp user to the registered user’s signature. That was a different temp user name than the one listed here, but same IP. Based on the content in the comments, and the edit history in the article suggested for deletion – and related articles, it’s pretty clear that both have a conflict of interest. 1000mm (talk) 12:04, 11 March 2026 (UTC)

Malvixe@arz.wikipedia

  • Likely Likely to be LTA Adfgeeyl.

--Count Count (talk) 07:03, 12 March 2026 (UTC)

Hello @Count Count, So Based on that can you Block him? Thank you! -- Aws 💬 Talk 12:17, 12 March 2026 (UTC)
Blocked. Count Count (talk) 13:00, 12 March 2026 (UTC)
Hello my friend @Count Count
On what basis are you blocking me?
I have not done anything wrong, and I have nothing to do with that account at all. The administrators on Egyptian Wikipedia communicate with me normally.
I request that my block be lifted immediately. Malvixe (talk) 13:18, 12 March 2026 (UTC)
@Malvixe: Your account has been blocked as a sock puppet of blocked user User:Adfgeeyl based on CheckUser information. I will not lift your block. Count Count (talk) 13:26, 12 March 2026 (UTC)

Rex Norvegiae@no.wikipedia

All three accounts are Possible Possible. Given our lack of understanding of traditional ISP setups in the relevant countries, this is the best result we can give. -- Amanda (she/her) 11:30, 13 March 2026 (UTC)
Thanks! 1000mm (talk) 11:31, 13 March 2026 (UTC)

Adfgeeyl@arz.wikipedia

Not done as we are not allowed to link between named editors and temporary accounts/IPs. -Barras talk 14:24, 18 March 2026 (UTC)
@Barras, Can you confirm or refute whether all these IPs are linked to the same individual/network ? -- Aws 💬 Talk 14:28, 18 March 2026 (UTC)
@أوس To gain that info you may contact any local arz.wp admin. The U4C members also have the ability to check that. It's nothing for us stewards to do. -Barras talk 14:36, 18 March 2026 (UTC)

Anohthterwikipedian@en.wikinews

 Declined We do not do self-requested checks, if they believe you are actively abusively socking they shall file in a request themselves supported with diffs backing up their claims.--A09|(pogovor) 20:19, 19 March 2026 (UTC)

Şəxsiyyəti istintaqla araşdırılan İran vətəndaşı‬@az.wikipedia

I can't run a check on the first as allegedly trolling & previous WP experience are not enough to run a check. I need evidence of disruption from them. The second one which clearly attempts to Impersonate TRM I'm just going to lock as CU was not fruitful. -- Amanda (she/her) 12:38, 12 March 2026 (UTC)
Due to the LTA, I think it would be appropriate to check. Many accounts have been created here, and there may also be other sleeper accounts. I believe this is that user, and if possible, run a check would help reach a clearer technical conclusion. Sincerely, Qədir (talk) 14:59, 12 March 2026 (UTC)
The obligation is on the requestor to provide evidence of the connection before the check can be ran, usually in the form of diffs. You say the first account is an LTA? We need to know how you came to that conclusion. The link of accounts does not match a particular pattern other than potentially long usernames. This is not sufficient to run the check yet. -- Amanda (she/her) 11:08, 13 March 2026 (UTC)
Alright. Could you please keep this request open? I'll review it and get back to you. Sincerely, Qədir (talk) 15:55, 13 March 2026 (UTC)
Closing as this has been open an additional week. Request can be refiled. -- Amanda (she/her) 23:46, 21 March 2026 (UTC)

Nzxcbm@arz.wikipedia

This edit and the one following it justify a check in my opinion. I am looking into it. Count Count (talk) 11:30, 26 March 2026 (UTC)

Nzxcbm is  Confirmed and Locked Locked. --Count Count (talk) 11:45, 26 March 2026 (UTC)

Sofiapwhite@en.wikiversity

I am looking into it. Count Count (talk) 15:31, 27 March 2026 (UTC)
@MathXplore: Sofiapwhite and Helensludovico are  Confirmed.
Also  Confirmed belonging to that group is Loricarol xwiki-contribs (alt • mw) • xwiki blocks • CA • gblock • glist • abuselog • SC • lwcheckuser.
The others are Unrelated Unrelated. However as most IP addresses used are identified as callback proxies they are still Possible Possible. Count Count (talk) 15:51, 27 March 2026 (UTC)

Tayloryy@en.wikiversity

Looking into it. Count Count (talk) 16:01, 27 March 2026 (UTC)
@MathXplore: Stanley098 and Tayloryy are  Confirmed.
Xm partner, Xm Partner Code 'GKY33 and also Snake9494 xwiki-contribs (alt • mw) • xwiki blocks • CA • gblock • glist • abuselog • SC • lwcheckuser (already locked) are  Confirmed.
Funding Pips Referral Code 2A40D477 and also Grethchen xwiki-contribs (alt • mw) • xwiki blocks • CA • gblock • glist • abuselog • SC • lwcheckuser (already locked) are  Confirmed. Count Count (talk) 16:09, 27 March 2026 (UTC)

SwessienHooktsiu@zh.wikipedia

  • Stale

--Sotiale (talk) 13:48, 31 March 2026 (UTC)

Levelaunt@zh.wikipedia

--Sotiale (talk) 13:54, 31 March 2026 (UTC)