Jump to content

User talk:SilverLocust

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
Did you know ... that the 2024 U.S. Supreme Court case Department of State v. Muñoz decided that the fundamental right to marry does not give a U.S. citizen a right to challenge their spouse's visa denial? On the main page on 24 July 2024
Did you know ... that because the lord chancellor of England did not freeze assets before trial in 1789, the U.S. Supreme Court decided in 1999 that U.S. courts cannot either? On the main page on 25 October 2024
This user helped "Lisa Blatt" become a good article.
This user helped "Tandon v. Newsom" become a good article.
This user is a member of the Arbitration Committee on the English Wikipedia.
This user has administrator privileges on the English Wikipedia.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Latest comment: 3 days ago by MediaWiki message delivery in topic October 2026 Administrator Elections – Discussion Phase

Welcome to my talk page!

Alternatively, you can ping me on a discussion page by including {{Replyto|SilverLocust}} in a comment or contact me by email or on Discord.


A brownie for you!

[edit]
Thanks for cleaning up after me after I messed up like thrice. I am so sorry for all the inconvenience I caused today. Best, squawk7700 (talk) 23:44, 8 September 2026 (UTC)Reply
No worries, thanks. ~ Jenson (SilverLocust 💬) 23:52, 8 September 2026 (UTC)Reply

Tech News: 2026-38

[edit]

MediaWiki message delivery 15:29, 14 September 2026 (UTC)Reply

Administrators' newsletter – September 2026

[edit]

News and updates for administrators from the past month (August 2026).

Administrator changes

added Dclemens1971
readded
removed

Oversight changes

removed

Guideline and policy news

  • Speedy deletion criteria G15 has been renamed from "LLM-generated pages without human review" to "Unambiguously LLM-generated pages" and has an additional sign of detection added to it following a RfC.

Miscellaneous


Ocease

[edit]

Per this previous discussion on WikiProject Spam, I'm wondering if Businessmasteredit (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · blacklist hits · Edit filter search · what links to user page · count · COIBot · Spamcheck · blacklist hits · user page logs · x-wiki · SUL · Google · StopForumSpam) is Ocease? Similar M.O., anyway. • a frantic turtle 🐢 solidarity 12:36, 23 September 2026 (UTC)Reply

Doesn't look like Ocease to me behaviorally. ~ Jenson (SilverLocust 💬) 13:20, 23 September 2026 (UTC)Reply

October 2026 Administrator Elections – Schedule

[edit]

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 05:46, 26 September 2026 (UTC)Reply

Tech News: 2026-39

[edit]

MediaWiki message delivery 11:54, 27 September 2026 (UTC)Reply

Tech News: 2026-40

[edit]

MediaWiki message delivery 10:47, 28 September 2026 (UTC)Reply

October 2026 Administrator Elections – Call for Candidates

[edit]

The administrator elections process has officially started! Qualified editors are encouraged to find at least one experienced nominator. Self-nominations are also allowed. Please review instructions at Wikipedia:Administrator elections/October 2026/Candidates.

Here is the schedule:

  • September 29 – October 5: Nominations phase (we are here)
  • October 8–12: Discussion phase
  • October 13–19: SecurePoll voting phase

Please note the following:

  • The requirements to run are identical to RFA—a prospective candidate must be extended confirmed. However, in practice, few candidates succeed without ~10K edits, some content creation, no recent behavioral issues, and a nominator.
  • Prospective candidates are advised to become familiar with the community's expectations of administrators, which are much higher than the minimum requirement of having extended confirmed status. This includes reviewing successful and unsuccessful RFAs, reading the essay Wikipedia:Advice for admin elections candidates, and possibly requesting an optional poll on their chances of passing.
  • The process will have a seven day call for candidates phase, a two day pause, a five day discussion phase, and a seven day private vote using SecurePoll. Discussion and questions are only allowed on the candidate pages during the discussion phase.
  • The outcome of this process is identical to making a request for adminship. There is no official difference between an administrator appointed through RFA versus administrator elections.
  • Administrator elections are also a valid means of regaining adminship for de-sysopped editors.

Ask any questions about the process at the talk page. Later, a user talk message will be sent to official candidates with additional information about the process.

If you are interested in the process, please make sure to watchlist the appropriate pages. A watchlist notice will be added when the discussion phase opens, and again when the voting phase opens.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:59, 29 September 2026 (UTC)Reply

Administrators' newsletter – October 2026

[edit]

News and updates for administrators from the past month (September 2026).

Administrator changes

removed

Oversight changes

removed

Guideline and policy news

  • Following an RfC, the good article criteria have been amended to add accessibility requirements.
  • Following an RfC, late signatures added to administrator recall petitions after 720 hours from opening are reverted or struck and do not count towards the threshold, even if the petition has not yet been formally closed.
  • The post-May 2026 administrator elections RfCs concluded with consensus for election monitors to curate blatantly inappropriate questions after posting, and to remove or merge true duplicates, clearly marking merged questions. Calls for candidates will include advisory guidance that users with less than one year’s experience or 5,000 edits generally lack a realistic chance of success.

Technical news

  • Interface administrators no longer need to specify the ResourceLoader option in the definitions for gadgets on MediaWiki:Gadgets-definition as gadgets are always loaded through ResourceLoader. (T298199)
  • The list=abusefilters API module now supports formatversion=2 and includes breaking changes to its responses. In particular, the actions property is now a JSON array rather than a string, regardless of the format version. Maintainers of user scripts and other code using this module should check compatibility and update their code as needed. (T435828)

Arbitration

Obituaries

  • Doug Weller passed away on 30 September 2026. Doug Weller began editing Wikipedia in 2006 and became an administrator in 2008, making nearly 275,000 edits over two decades. He served on the Arbitration Committee from 2015 through 2018 and was also a longtime CheckUser and Oversighter.

Miscellaneous



Your draft article, Draft:De Libellis Famosis

[edit]

Hello, SilverLocust. This message concerns the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "De Libellis Famosis".

Drafts that go unedited for six months are eligible for deletion, in accordance with our draftspace policy, and this one has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission, and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you read this, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the draft so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! DreamRimmer bot II (talk) 08:24, 5 October 2026 (UTC)Reply

Removed protection

[edit]

When you removed the protection from my talk page your explanation for that was "Editing on several occasions after retirement, so full protection is no longer appropriate." I have no recollection of that. Perhaps it is my age, now 82. Could you point out those edits for me. Thanks Kwork2 (talk) 15:30, 5 October 2026 (UTC)Reply

1 May 2021, 13 January 2025, 29 August 2025, 11 September 2025, 2–5 October 2026. See your contributions. ("Editing" includes edits to any page, not just articles.) ~ Jenson (SilverLocust 💬) 18:26, 5 October 2026 (UTC)Reply
Thanks for explaining how to find the edits. But aside from the current issue with one question to the Zionism article, which I admit was a mistake, I see nothing that I would consider an actual edit. The closest was this which I had forgotten, and I think should not be considered an issue:
The article contains this statement: "Kirk promoted the antisemitic Cultural Marxism conspiracy theory, and described universities as "islands of totalitarianism." The wording could use some adjustment because that seems to imply that he was antisemitic although none of the three supporting sources claims that. Kwork2 Sorry if I signed incorrectly, it has been ten years since editing even a talk page, and I have no intention of returning. Just something I noticed. Kwork2 (talk) 12:42, 11 September 2025 (UTC)Reply
Yes, there's significant BLP violations on this page.
(And I'm a social Democrat.) Much of the article isn't written neutrally. SickNWristed (talk) 12:52, 11 September 2025 (UTC)Reply
Agreed. I've changed this. JDiala (talk) 14:10, 11 September 2025 (UTC)Reply
Kwork2 (talk) 21:24, 5 October 2026 (UTC)Reply
Posting a comment is editing whatever page it's posted on. Anything that shows up in your contributions is an edit to a page. ~ Jenson (SilverLocust 💬) 21:34, 5 October 2026 (UTC)Reply
@Kwork2: Also, one of your conditions for being unblocked was a ban from the topic of Judaism, broadly interpreted. Edits (including comments) about antisemitism violate that topic ban. ~ Jenson (SilverLocust 💬) 12:51, 6 October 2026 (UTC)Reply
So you are counting my correcting typos to articles on rare occasions as though they were edits, even though they were not at all articles I edited but just random articles I happened to have read for their information? Kwork2 (talk) 13:52, 6 October 2026 (UTC)Reply
Yes, that's also editing. ~ Jenson (SilverLocust 💬) 13:53, 6 October 2026 (UTC)Reply
That is both amusing and pathetic because administrators apparently feel no need at all to enforce WP:NPOV, which is, or should be, the foundational basis of all work done on Wikipedia and the basis of the claim that it is an encyclopedia:
All encyclopedic content on Wikipedia must be written from a neutral point of view (NPOV), which means representing fairly, proportionately, and, as far as possible, without editorial bias, all the significant views that have been published by reliable sources on a topic.
NPOV is a fundamental principle of Wikipedia and of other Wikimedia projects. It is also one of Wikipedia's three core content policies; the other two are "Verifiability" and "No original research". These policies jointly determine the type and quality of material acceptable in Wikipedia articles, and because they work in harmony, they cannot be interpreted in isolation from one another.
This policy is non-negotiable, and the principles upon which it is based cannot be superseded by other policies or guidelines, nor by editor consensus. Kwork2 (talk) 19:17, 6 October 2026 (UTC)Reply
"Pathetic" is a word to avoid when you're under a civility restriction, have violated multiple topic bans, and are trying to prevent other editors from being able to address issues on your talk page (by arguing against its unprotection). If you find apparent NPOV issues on topics from which you are not banned, then you are free to point those out or address them. ~ Jenson (SilverLocust 💬) 20:06, 6 October 2026 (UTC)Reply
Just what issues need to be discussed on my talk page? Anyone who thought there was a need to do that could have at any time simply requested that the pages protection be removed. That never happened. Does anyone feel a need to discuss the few typos I corrected over the last eleven years? Or is there some other heinous violation, over those eleven years, that needs discussion on my talk page? Kwork2 (talk) 22:19, 6 October 2026 (UTC)Reply

Tech News: 2026-41

[edit]

18:50, 5 October 2026 (UTC)

October 2026 Administrator Elections – Discussion Phase

[edit]

The discussion phase of the October 2026 administrator elections is officially open. As a reminder, the schedule of the election is:

  • October 8–12: Discussion phase (we are here)
  • October 13–19: SecurePoll voting phase
  • Scrutineering phase

We are currently in the discussion phase. The candidate subpages are open to questions and comments from everyone, in the same style as a request for adminship. You may discuss the candidates at Wikipedia:Administrator elections/October 2026/Discussion phase.

On 13 Oct, we will start the voting phase. The candidate subpages will close to public questions and discussion, and everyone will have a week to use the SecurePoll software to vote, which uses a secret ballot. You can see who voted, but not who they voted for.

Any questions or issues can be asked on the election talk page. Thank you for your participation. Happy electing.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:05, 8 October 2026 (UTC)Reply