Wikidata:Requests for permissions/Bureaucrat/Wüstenspringmaus
- The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section. A summary of the conclusions reached follows.
- Closed as successful--Ymblanter (talk) 11:13, 5 May 2025 (UTC)reply
Vote
RfP scheduled to end at 5 May 2025 10:03 (UTC)
- Wüstenspringmaus (talk • contribs • new items • new lexemes • SUL • Block log • User rights log • User rights • xtools)
Hi, I'd like to nominate myself as a bureaucrat. I'm an admin and IA here on Wikidata and a global rollbacker, global renamer and member of the dewiki-ArbCom.
On Wikidata, I mainly fight vandalism, handle various admin tasks, and assist with requests for permissions. While working on these, I've noticed that additional helping hands could be useful, especially when dealing with requests on WD:RFBOT. I believe I've gained relevant experience in handling these requests, and with bureaucrat rights, I think I could perform this work more efficiently.
I've asked our active bureaucrats for their opinions. One suggested that it would be beneficial to have an additional bureaucrat, and another encouraged me to run. As a result, I've decided to run now.
Thanks for your consideration, and please let me know if you have any questions or comments! Best regards, --Wüstenspringmaus talk 10:03, 28 April 2025 (UTC)reply
Votes
[edit]
Support Trusted and experienced candidate. Even though their edit count is a bit on the lower side, I believe that they are fully qualified for this role with their past experiences. Hence, they have my full support. Endorsement from current bureaucrats is also a plus. Jianhui67 talk★contribs 12:28, 28 April 2025 (UTC)reply
Support An extra bureaucrat, and someone interested in focusing in bot requests would be very much helpful, and I believe Wüstenspringmaus can be trusted with this, they have been sysop for a while and have relevant experience. --KonstantinaG07 (talk) 12:49, 28 April 2025 (UTC)reply
Support Sure, thanks for offering to do this. ArthurPSmith (talk) 14:05, 28 April 2025 (UTC)reply
Support --Ameisenigel (talk) 14:14, 28 April 2025 (UTC)reply
Support –FlyingAce✈hello 17:19, 28 April 2025 (UTC)reply
Support —Yahya (talk • contribs.) 17:28, 28 April 2025 (UTC)reply
Support Zero concerns. --Matěj Suchánek (talk) 19:33, 28 April 2025 (UTC)reply
Support --Alaa :)..! 20:34, 28 April 2025 (UTC)reply
Support MisterSynergy (talk) 23:14, 28 April 2025 (UTC)reply
Support--S8321414 (talk) 23:52, 28 April 2025 (UTC)reply
Support Infrastruktur (talk) 06:19, 29 April 2025 (UTC)reply
Support ToadetteEdit (talk) 09:14, 29 April 2025 (UTC)reply
Support --Hoo man (talk) 16:39, 29 April 2025 (UTC)reply
Support --Emu (talk) 20:40, 29 April 2025 (UTC)reply
Support, thanks for a nice collaboration. --Wolverène (talk) 04:42, 30 April 2025 (UTC)reply
Support no concerns. --TenWhile6 08:14, 30 April 2025 (UTC)reply
Support Why not?--BRP ever 12:14, 30 April 2025 (UTC)reply
Support -- Ajraddatz (talk) 16:14, 30 April 2025 (UTC)reply
Support Aqurs1 (talk) 04:34, 1 May 2025 (UTC)reply
Support --حبيشان (talk) 08:48, 1 May 2025 (UTC)reply
Support --Epìdosis 17:22, 1 May 2025 (UTC)reply
Support --Uschoen (talk) 08:06, 2 May 2025 (UTC)reply
Support --Estopedist1 (talk) 12:01, 2 May 2025 (UTC)reply
Comments
[edit]- ...
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section.