Wikidata:Property proposal/ILI ID
ILI ID
[edit]Originally proposed at Wikidata:Property proposal/Term
| Description | Interlingual Index identifier |
|---|---|
| Data type | External identifier |
| Allowed values | i[1-9]\d* |
| Example | dog (Q144) → i46360. keyboardist (Q1075651) → i90836 |
| Source | CILI: the Collaborative Interlingual Index (Q37052366) |
| External links | Use in sister projects: [ar] • [az] • [bn] • [de] • [en] • [es] • [fa] • [fr] • [he] • [hi] • [it] • [ja] • [ka] • [kn] • [ko] • [ml] • [mr] • [nl] • [pl] • [pt] • [ro] • [ru] • [sv] • [te] • [tr] • [uk] • [ur] • [vi] • [zh] • [commons] • [species] • [wd] • [en.wikt] • [fr.wikt]. |
| Number of IDs in source | more than 100'000 |
| Expected completeness | always incomplete (Q21873886) |
| Formatter URL | http://globalwordnet.org/ili/$1 |
| See also | Wikidata:Property proposal/WordNet ID, Wikidata:Property proposal/Wordnet synset ID |
Motivation
Interlingual Index is an attempt to make a hub for multiple word net (Q2594143). The mapping is available as files on GitHub: https://github.com/globalwordnet/ili and there is a Linked Open Data URI resolving at http://globalwordnet.org/ili/. It links to WordNet (Q533822) 3.0 and 3.1 identifiers. It is meant to be persistent ("ILI IDs should be persistent: we never delete, only deprecate or supercede; we should not change the meaning of the concept" [1]). Thus it seems to more general than linking to individual wordnet identifiers, such as WordNet 3.0 identifiers. Finn Årup Nielsen (fnielsen) (talk) 15:30, 11 April 2018 (UTC)
Notified participants of WikiProject Linguistics
Discussion
Support. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 17:53, 11 April 2018 (UTC)- Comment Aren't regular WordNet identifiers linked using exact match (P2888) (or some other general property that isn't explicitly noted as being a WordNet identifier)? What's stopping these from being linked in the same way? Mahir256 (talk) 15:20, 12 April 2018 (UTC)
- Yes, some WordNet 3.0 identifiers (475 currently, via the "wn" prefix) are being linked via exact match (P2888). There is nothing stopping anyone from using exact match (P2888) to ILI ID URIs, but I would think that having a dedicated property would be better: It is easier to query from SPARQL. The reason to focus on ILI instead of English WordNet identifiers is that ILI seem less volatile (there are three WordNet URI prefixes) and multilingual. — Finn Årup Nielsen (fnielsen) (talk) 17:14, 12 April 2018 (UTC)
- Support interesting, yes I agree this is better than the WordNet approach we were looking at earlier. ArthurPSmith (talk) 19:50, 12 April 2018 (UTC)
@Fnielsen, Pigsonthewing, Mahir256, ArthurPSmith: 
Done: Interlingual Index ID (P5063). − Pintoch (talk) 21:26, 18 April 2018 (UTC)