Property talk:P620
Add topic| This property was previously considered for deletion but kept. |
Documentation
- Start a query
- Current uses
- With precision and calendarmodel
- Statistics by class
- By century
- Date precision
- Calendar models
- List of qualifiers
- Count
date of spacecraft landing in UTC
List of violations of this constraint: Database reports/Constraint violations/P620#Range
List of violations of this constraint: Database reports/Constraint violations/P620#Type Q42889, Q40218, Q5916, Q21211206, Q3099911, SPARQL
List of violations of this constraint: Database reports/Constraint violations/P620#Item P1158, search, SPARQL
List of violations of this constraint: Database reports/Constraint violations/P620#Item P375, search, SPARQL
List of violations of this constraint: Database reports/Constraint violations/P620#Entity types
List of violations of this constraint: Database reports/Constraint violations/P620#Scope, SPARQL
|
This property is being used by:
Please notify projects that use this property before big changes (renaming, deletion, merge with another property, etc.) |
Each P620 claim needs to have at least one source (Help)
Violations query:
SELECT ?item { ?item p:P620 ?claim. OPTIONAL { ?claim prov:wasDerivedFrom ?source . ?source ?p ?v . } FILTER(!bound(?source)) }List of this constraint violations: Database reports/Complex constraint violations/P620#Claims without source
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||
Splashdown
[edit]
Notified participants of WikiProject Astronomy Which is the correct qualifier to indicate, here and in location of landing (P1158), that a landing is in fact a splashdown (Q1642255)? I tried object of statement has role (P3831) in Apollo 7 (Q188486) (see Q188486#P620 and Q188486#P1158), but better alternatives may be available. Thanks, --Epìdosis 14:17, 1 February 2023 (UTC)
- @Epìdosis, I would recommend has characteristic (P1552)splashdown (Q1642255). That said, if location of landing (P1158) is provided, then qualifying either statement with splashdown (Q1642255) seems redundant. It will be clear enough. — Huntster (t @ c) 20:48, 1 February 2023 (UTC)
Should the value account for delay due to long-distance communication?
[edit]For example, Perseverance (Q87749354)UTC date of spacecraft landing (P620)18 February 2021
- @YoshiRulz:
The time given in the item is UTC.Nevermind, I misunderstood. It's a good point. I found https://dataverse.jpl.nasa.gov/file.xhtml?fileId=65142&version=3.0 which clearly gives the reconstructed time as 20:43:49 SCET. I'll change the item to reflect that. — Huntster (t @ c) 16:16, 20 December 2025 (UTC)- Spacecraft Event Time (Q7572660) seems like the perfect solution, thank you. YoshiRulz (talk) 01:54, 21 December 2025 (UTC)
- Properties for deletion
- All Properties
- Properties with time-datatype
- Properties used on 100+ items
- Properties with range constraints
- Properties with constraints on type
- Properties with constraints on items using them
- Properties with entity type constraints
- Properties with scope constraints
- Properties with complex constraints
- Vehicle properties