User talk:Bovlb

If I left a note on your talk page, you can reply there.

If you received a notability message from me, or have questions about my item rescue process, please see User:Bovlb/item_rescue_workflow.

On this page, old discussions are archived. An overview of all archives can be found at this page's archive index. The current archive is located at 2026.

This user prefers on-wiki communication.

Request for review of unanswered undeletion discussion

Hello Bovlb,

Would you be willing to review an unanswered undeletion request, or advise how to obtain an administrative review?

The request concerns the Knowledge Formation Optimization framework (Q141161165) and its associated working paper (Q141158892). I posted the supporting sources on September 14, contacted the deleting administrator in the discussion on September 18, and requested an uninvolved review on September 24. There has not yet been a response.

For transparency, I am the framework’s originator and the paper’s author; that connection is disclosed in the request.

The existing discussion is here: https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Wikidata:Administrators%27_noticeboard#Request_for_undeletion:_KFO_framework_(Q141161165)_and_associated_paper_(Q141158892)

Could you assess the two items separately, or identify any specific additional evidence needed? Please respond in the existing noticeboard discussion so the review remains in one place.

Thank you. AIAGR (talk) 03:09, 1 October 2026 (UTC)

Update: the noticeboard discussion linked above was archived by SpBot on October 1, 2026, with no administrator response. The archived copy is here: archived discussion. Please respond here on this talk page. AIAGR (talk) 15:51, 1 October 2026 (UTC)

Hello Bovlb, I have not received a response to my request or subsequent update. If you’re unable to help, I would appreciate the courtesy of a brief reply explaining my next step.

The undeletion discussion was archived without an administrator response. How can I obtain an uninvolved administrative review so that the request receives an assessment rather than remaining unanswered?

Thank you. AIAGR (talk) 11:33, 7 October 2026 (UTC)

I am sorry, but I am unable to help you, as I prefer to leave such matters to community discussion. In this case, the tacit conclusion was “no consensus to undelete”. You are welcome to post a new request for undeletion if you can present significant new evidence for notability that was not presented before. You may also want to consult WD:SELF. Bovlb (talk) 14:32, 7 October 2026 (UTC)