Steward requests/Checkuser/2026-04
Appearance
Latest comment: 5 months ago by AmandaNP in topic Requests
| Please do not post any new comments on this page. This is a discussion archive first created in April 2026, although the comments contained were likely posted before and after this date. See current discussion. |
Requests
两万家@zh.wikipedia
Status: Done
- List of users
- 金色奥利奥 (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)
- OULUOBA (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)
- TXGZ (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)
- 徐光明 (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)
- CU log
- Discussion: w:zh:Wikipedia:傀儡調查/案件/两万家
- Enough to say
Confirmed, plus 审查者, 艾美特, 坤舆 -- Amanda (she/her) 21:10, 3 April 2026 (UTC)
夏土賢@zh.wikipedia
Status: Done
- List of users
- JamesHsu0321 (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)
- Faketuttington (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)
- Tuttington (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)
- NatNami (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)
- JohnFJohn (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)
- CU log
- Discussion: zh:Wikipedia:傀儡調查/案件/夏土贤#2026年4月6日
- Hi! I'm the account accused of sockpuppeting. And I want to add that my accountis two years old, and all of the other alt accounts of this user XTX not only have different namestyles but also are very young (made in 2026). It wouldnt make sense for someone to have a sockpuppet already and not use it, creating other accounts instead. I also only made one edit and was accused of this charge for that. JamesHsu0321 (talk) 07:57, 7 April 2026 (UTC)
- I also want to add, that while only recently have i participated in zhiwiki, I have had a few edits in Engwiki, something that XTX never does. JamesHsu0321 (talk) 08:17, 7 April 2026 (UTC)
- +2 acc aqurs 🍧 10:36, 7 April 2026 (UTC)
- Looking into this. Count Count (talk) 11:19, 7 April 2026 (UTC)
- Thanks and i hope for a fair judgement. JamesHsu0321 (talk) 11:30, 7 April 2026 (UTC)
- Looking into this. Count Count (talk) 11:19, 7 April 2026 (UTC)
Confirmed JohnFJohn to NatNami as well as 六擅闯开门, furthermore 接触问世 (already globally locked) and 告罗斯坦 (already locally blocked)- Faketuttington is very
Likely to other already globally locked and locally blocked accounts such as Happyduno - Tuttington is very
Likely to already globally locked and locally blocked Fklsdias - JamesHsu0321 seems
Unrelated
- Count Count (talk) 12:14, 7 April 2026 (UTC)
- @Count Count, right now I believe Tuttington is related to XTX, and Faketuttington is related to Lexxicon123. ~2026-21403-73 (talk) 12:35, 7 April 2026 (UTC)
- Thank you! Can you unlock me? JamesHsu0321 (talk) 12:19, 7 April 2026 (UTC)
- You are not globally locked and for your local block you have to follow local procedures to request an unblock. Count Count (talk) 12:28, 7 April 2026 (UTC)
- So I have to contact my local mods right? Ok thanks. JamesHsu0321 (talk) 12:29, 7 April 2026 (UTC)
- I am not contacting anyone. It is up to you to request your unblock there following local community procedures. Please do not further reply here about your zhwiki block. Count Count (talk) 12:43, 7 April 2026 (UTC)
- Yeah I requested. They unblocked me. I didnt ask you to request it for me. JamesHsu0321 (talk) 12:47, 7 April 2026 (UTC)
- I am not contacting anyone. It is up to you to request your unblock there following local community procedures. Please do not further reply here about your zhwiki block. Count Count (talk) 12:43, 7 April 2026 (UTC)
- So I have to contact my local mods right? Ok thanks. JamesHsu0321 (talk) 12:29, 7 April 2026 (UTC)
- You are not globally locked and for your local block you have to follow local procedures to request an unblock. Count Count (talk) 12:28, 7 April 2026 (UTC)
TwistyTongue@zh.wikipedia
Status: Done
- List of users
- TwistyTongue (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)
- MonoFinet (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)
- Yoruhiru (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)
- CU log
- Discussion: w:zh:Wikipedia:傀儡調查/案件/TwistyTongue
- @Aqurs1: I will state this again for the record and see what I can put together from this later, but not all of us, and I'd venture to say more than less of us are not speakers of Chinese. The obligation is to state in your reporting why the check is justified in English, not that we go to zhwiki and struggle to understand the alleged evidence and sort through a ton of diffs. The one below this is better (given the linked page), but still doesn't meet the standard. -- Amanda (she/her) 03:39, 8 April 2026 (UTC)
- For this one their main similar behavior is marking staled draft for delete template, and helpjng transfer staled AFD report, these behavior ain't looks like what a new user would do, and those work has been done similarly by TwistyTongue. On the below one I think it's fine, I doubt it why it's not meeting standard, sharing same editing behavior/interestwas always a justtified reason for requesting CU as me and other clerk has been done, I have nothing much to elaborate more on the below one. aqurs 🍧 08:08, 8 April 2026 (UTC)
- I mean in the fact that you have not provided links to diffs. Links to diffs are required for SRCU for each claim you are making. It's not our role to make your case for you. I will be happy to review once these have been provided for both requests. -- Amanda (she/her) 08:01, 10 April 2026 (UTC)
- Two comments were moved to #Iwao7752@zh.wikipedia. LuciferianThomas 08:26, 10 April 2026 (UTC)
- FYI I have added user Yoruhiru, they do not have relationship with TwistyTongue, but local discussion issued that those behaviour are also similar with them.
- Behaviour of three accounts marking staled draft, these are not diffs but their action record. [1][2][3]
- Three accounts interested on reporting notability. zh:special:Diff/92207559, zh:special:Diff/90723189, zh:special:Diff/90025226
- zh:special:Diff/89781542, zh:special:Diff/92181301
- zh:special:Diff/92220075, zh:special:Diff/89762358: comment issued on local discussion that M and Y's signature are similar
- M share same editing interest with Y on translating Japanese songs article from jawiki to zhwiki: [4][5][6][7] etc.
- M and Y both use Wikiplus. [8][9]
- MonoFinet account created soon (within a month) after T and Y has been separately blocked indef.
- @AmandaNP The more I checked much detaily, I believe there are more chances, that MonoFinet are Yoruhiru's sockpuppet, rather than TwistyTongue's. However, I would prefer to have a check between three accounts but it's up to you. I agree that the evidence on local page are quite vague, I will slightly review or edit to confirm there are diffs in the local page, thanks. aqurs 🍧 09:36, 10 April 2026 (UTC)
- Note: If the cu entries from here is not being saved, Yoruhiru will be stale within 2 days; and for TwistyTongue, that would be 3 days. aqurs 🍧 12:31, 10 April 2026 (UTC)
- I mean in the fact that you have not provided links to diffs. Links to diffs are required for SRCU for each claim you are making. It's not our role to make your case for you. I will be happy to review once these have been provided for both requests. -- Amanda (she/her) 08:01, 10 April 2026 (UTC)
- For this one their main similar behavior is marking staled draft for delete template, and helpjng transfer staled AFD report, these behavior ain't looks like what a new user would do, and those work has been done similarly by TwistyTongue. On the below one I think it's fine, I doubt it why it's not meeting standard, sharing same editing behavior/interestwas always a justtified reason for requesting CU as me and other clerk has been done, I have nothing much to elaborate more on the below one. aqurs 🍧 08:08, 8 April 2026 (UTC)
Unrelated TwistyTongue, Yoruhiru
Inconclusive MonoFinet due to sole proxy use
Confirmed S3L3CTEDFOOL, 元嬰之下皆為螻蟻, 川悦者, Xdm202603, TwistyTongue- -- Amanda (she/her) 23:00, 12 April 2026 (UTC)
Iwao7752@zh.wikipedia
Status: Done
- List of users
- Iwao7752 (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)
- Fesawd (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)
- CU log
- Discussion: w:zh:Wikipedia:傀儡調查/案件/Iwao7752
- The following comments were moved from #TwistyTongue@zh.wikipedia. LuciferianThomas 08:26, 10 April 2026 (UTC)
- May I provide the log proofs for the below case? zh:Special:Redirect/logid/15752017 and zh:Special:Redirect/logid/16242600. Taiwanese Elephant🐘(talk|contribs) 08:12, 10 April 2026 (UTC)
- And here's another proof: zh:Special:Redirect/logid/15606697 Taiwanese Elephant🐘(talk|contribs) 08:16, 10 April 2026 (UTC)
- Thanks @User:臺灣象象. Confirming above diffs are exact those that show two accounts have share similar interest on that individual, and would have a check are they socks or meat, or nor both of possibilities, thanks. aqurs 🍧 09:41, 10 April 2026 (UTC)
- Not sure if this is helpful: they created the same hoax draft in enwiki: en:Draft:Shen Yulin and en:Draft:Shen yulin. -- Tim (talk) 06:31, 11 April 2026 (UTC)
- I opened a sockpuppet investigation on enwiki:w:Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Iwao7752 Taiwanese Elephant🐘(talk|contribs) 07:07, 11 April 2026 (UTC)
- Noting for the record that en:Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Iwao7752 has been closed without action. These accounts were not active at the same time on enwiki, and therefore do not appear to have been in breach of the English Wikipedia sockpuppetry policy. If a steward has any queries, please do not hesitate to ping me. Thanks, Jack Frost (talk) 07:27, 11 April 2026 (UTC)
- Although they weren't both active on enwiki at the same time, "the user simply forgot their password"...? Both accounts were active on zhwiki. Tim (talk) 08:50, 11 April 2026 (UTC)
- Not sure if this is helpful: they created the same hoax draft in enwiki: en:Draft:Shen Yulin and en:Draft:Shen yulin. -- Tim (talk) 06:31, 11 April 2026 (UTC)
Looking at the comments left on zhwiki SPI page, it appears there are opinions suggesting that they may not be the same user. I would like to ask if other clerks agree with this, and I would appreciate it if you could let me know if the opinions of other users are only of secondary significance. --Sotiale (talk) 13:25, 11 April 2026 (UTC)
- They are editing same draft at zhwiki now: [10] Tim (talk) 14:48, 12 April 2026 (UTC)
- The two accounts are now
Confirmed. -- Amanda (she/her) 23:07, 12 April 2026 (UTC)
Wiki Bahasa Melayu@ms.wikipedia
Status: Done
- List of users
- Wiki Bahasa Melayu (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)
- BASIKAL TUA (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)
- BASIKAL 122 (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)
- Muhd Affiq Affiqal (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)
- CU log
- Discussion:
- The link to no sockpuppetry policy on mswiki is here: Wikipedia:Pengguna boneka Hakimi97 (talk) 09:05, 15 April 2026 (UTC)
- @Hakimi97: Wiki Bahasa Melayu is
Confirmed to MOTOSIKAL123 (and thus now globally locked as lock evasion), and the link between Wiki Bahasa Melayu and BASIKA TUA is highly
Likely (both technically and behaviourally). Cannot checkuser the other two as neither have edited in over 90 days. //shb (t • c) 09:09, 15 April 2026 (UTC)
Wiki Bahasa Melayu (123)@ms.wikipedia
Status: Not done
- List of users
- Wiki Bahasa Melayu (123) (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)
- Wiki Bahasa Melayu (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)
- MOTOSIKAL123 (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)
- CU log
- Discussion: Wikipedia:Pengguna boneka (local policy on no sockpuppetry)
- I've locked this account as an obvious sock. I don't think a CU is of any use here. //shb (t • c) 12:20, 16 April 2026 (UTC)
LWCU for spam farm
Status: Not done
- List of users
- BoySow1990 (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)
- Jankonz (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)
- Bentek2k3 (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)
- Floreanza (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)
- Nada1998 (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)
- Shaqiri52 (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)
- Ramsiye (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)
- Jokunpo23 (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)
- Harénaz (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)
- Pessina25 (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)
- ~2026-22871-59 (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)
- ~2026-23020-41 (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)
- ~2026-23030-52 (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)
- ~2026-23098-31 (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)
- ~2026-22792-14 (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)
- ~2026-22964-56 (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)
- ~2026-23047-56 (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)
- ~2026-23149-25 (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)
- ~2026-23102-81 (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)
- ~2026-22817-82 (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)
- ~2026-22784-55 (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)
- ~2026-22824-12 (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)
- ~2026-14332-22 (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)
- ~2026-20654-30 (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)
- ~2026-16992-76 (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)
- ~2026-21966-49 (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)
- ~2026-21687-39 (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)
- ~2026-20923-80 (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)
- ~2026-17190-41 (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)
- ~2026-17283-63 (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)
- ~2026-20904-15 (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)
- ~2026-17517-93 (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)
- ~2026-22128-20 (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)
- ~2026-22459-75 (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)
- ~2026-17277-53 (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)
- ~2026-20854-76 (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)
- ~2026-20898-59 (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)
- ~2026-17045-85 (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)
- ~2026-21861-82 (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)
- ~2026-20807-81 (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)
- ~2026-17131-27 (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)
- ~2026-17400-95 (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)
- ~2026-20775-53 (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)
- ~2026-17584-42 (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)
- After taking a brief look at the first few, this is not a job for SRCU. SRG would be the place to run with this. -- Amanda (she/her) 13:55, 19 April 2026 (UTC)