Skip to main content

Making an Under-Resourced Language Available on the Wikidata Knowledge Graph: Quechua Language

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Information Management and Big Data (SIMBig 2024)

Abstract

Knowledge Graphs (KGs) encode human knowledge in a structured format that can be used by Artificial Intelligence (AI) applications, such as Large Language Models, and Natural Language Processing. However, KGs are mainly built by harvesting the web data, which may over-represent certain viewpoints and languages, while Under-Resourced Language (URL) communities are not considered. As a result, AI applications may inherit these over-representation biases. Therefore, we research the holistic lifecycle of KGs to make the Quechua URL available as a KG. Specifically, we ingest Quechua lexical data into the Wikidata KG, then we explore Wikidata’s capabilities for a community-drive approach. Finally, we managed to add 1591 Quechua lexemes, their senses, forms, and pronunciation audio into Wikidata. Our approach demonstrates the feasibility and potential impact of bringing a URL into a KG, which can benefit a future where AI and its applications takes into account the languages and viewpoints of all.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+
from €39.99 /Month
  • Starting from 10 chapters or articles per month
  • Access and download chapters and articles from more than 300k books and 2,500 journals
  • Cancel anytime
View plans

Buy Now

Chapter
EUR 29.95
Price includes VAT (Germany)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
EUR 67.40
Price includes VAT (Germany)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
EUR 85.59
Price includes VAT (Germany)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Free shipping worldwide - view details

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. 1.

    https://blog.google/products/search/introducing-knowledge-graph-things-not.

  2. 2.

    https://learn.microsoft.com/en-gb/graph/overview.

  3. 3.

    https://www.ethnologue.com.

  4. 4.

    https://wikidata.org.

  5. 5.

    https://qichwa.wikibase.cloud/.

  6. 6.

    https://developer.amazon.com/en-US/docs/alexa/custom-skills/develop-skills-in-multiple-languages.html.

  7. 7.

    https://support.google.com/googlenest/answer/7550584.

  8. 8.

    https://www.go-fair.org/fair-principles/.

  9. 9.

    https://linguistic-lod.org/.

  10. 10.

    https://www.ethnologue.com/language/que/.

  11. 11.

    https://glottolog.org/resource/languoid/id/quec1387.

  12. 12.

    https://iso639-3.sil.org/code/qxp.

  13. 13.

    https://wikipedia.org.

  14. 14.

    https://wikiba.se/.

  15. 15.

    https://runasimi.de.

  16. 16.

    https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Wikidata:Lexicographical_data.

  17. 17.

    We define localization as the process of adapting or updating methods or tools for users or communities who speak other languages and have other needs.

  18. 18.

    https://qichwa.wikibase.cloud/.

  19. 19.

    https://www.wikibase.cloud/.

  20. 20.

    https://vrandezo.github.io/TheSurroundingOcean/?lid=L1322601.

  21. 21.

    https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Wikidata:Tools/Lexicographical_data/en.

References

  1. Aghaei, S., Angele, K., Huaman, E., Bushati, G., Schiestl, M., Fensel, A.: Interactive search on the web: the story so far. Information 13(7), 324 (2022). https://doi.org/10.3390/info13070324

  2. Alexandris, C.: Sense and sensitivity: knowledge graphs as training data for processing cognitive bias, context and information not uttered in spoken interaction. In: Proceedings of the Symposium How Fair is Fair? Achieving Wellbeing AI co-located with Association for the Advancement of Artificial Intelligence 2022 Spring Symposium (AAAI-Spring Symposium 2022), Stanford, CA, 21–23 March 2022. CEUR Workshop Proceedings, vol. 3276, pp. 47–54. CEUR-WS.org (2022). http://ceur-ws.org/Vol-3276/SSS-22_FinalPaper_14.pdf

  3. Andrade Ciudad, L.: Ten news about quechua in the last peruvian census. Letras (Lima) 90, 41–70 (2019). https://doi.org/10.30920/letras.90.132.2

  4. Angele, K., et al.: Semantic Web Empowered E-Tourism, pp. 1–46. Springer, Cham (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-05324-6_22-1

  5. Bapna, A., et al.: Building machine translation systems for the next thousand languages. CoRR abs/2205.03983 (2022). https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2205.03983

  6. Besacier, L., Barnard, E., Karpov, A., Schultz, T.: Automatic speech recognition for under-resourced languages: a survey. Speech Commun. 56, 85–100 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.specom.2013.07.008

  7. Butryna, A., et al.: Google crowdsourced speech corpora and related open-source resources for low-resource languages and dialects: an overview. CoRR abs/2010.06778 (2020). https://arxiv.org/abs/2010.06778

  8. Carbajal Solis, V., et al.: Lenguas Originarias del Peru. Ministerio de Educacion del Peru (2019). https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12799/6261

  9. Casanova, P., Jones, M.: What is a dominant language?: Giacomo leopardi: Theoretician of linguistic inequality. New Literary Hist. 44(3), 379–399 (2013). https://muse.jhu.edu/article/525064

  10. Caswell, I., Breiner, T., van Esch, D., Bapna, A.: Language ID in the wild: unexpected challenges on the path to a thousand-language web text corpus. In: Proceedings of the 28th International Conference on Computational Linguistics, COLING 2020, Barcelona, Spain (Online), 8–13 December 2020, pp. 6588–6608. International Committee on Computational Linguistics (2020). https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/2020.coling-main.579

  11. Del Gratta, R., Frontini, F., Khan, A.F., Mariani, J., Soria, C.: The LRE map for under-resourced languages. In: Workshop Collaboration and Computing for Under-Resourced Languages in the Linked Open Data Era, Satellite Workshop of LREC, vol. 14 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Demartini, G.: Implicit bias in crowdsourced knowledge graphs. In: Companion of the 2019 World Wide Web Conference, WWW 2019, San Francisco, CA, USA, 13–17 May 2019, pp. 624–630. ACM (2019). https://doi.org/10.1145/3308560.3317307

  13. Dwyer, A.M.: Tools and techniques for endangered-language assessment and revitalization. In: Gya, K., Snavely, A., Sperling, E. (Édit.) Minority Language inToday’s Global Society, pp. 201–251 (2012). https://kuscholarworks.ku.edu/bitstream/handle/1808/7109/Dwyer2011_AssessRevitalize.pdf

  14. Färber, M., Bartscherer, F., Menne, C., Rettinger, A.: Linked data quality of dbpedia, freebase, opencyc, wikidata, and YAGO. Semantic Web 9(1), 77–129 (2018). https://doi.org/10.3233/SW-170275

  15. Fensel, D., et al.: Knowledge Graphs - Methodology, Tools and Selected Use Cases. Springer (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-37439-6

  16. Fensel, D., et al.: Why we need knowledge graphs: applications. In: Fensel, D., et al. (eds.) Knowledge Graphs, pp. 95–112. Springer, Cham (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-37439-6_4

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  17. Groth, P., Simperl, E., van Erp, M., Vrandecic, D.: Knowledge graphs and their role in the knowledge engineering of the 21st century (dagstuhl seminar 22372). Dagstuhl Rep. 12(9), 60–120 (2022). https://doi.org/10.4230/DagRep.12.9.60

  18. Hogan, A., et al.: Knowledge Graphs. Synthesis Lectures on Data, Semantics, and Knowledge. Morgan & Claypool Publishers (2021). https://doi.org/10.2200/S01125ED1V01Y202109DSK022

  19. Hornberger, N.H., Coronel-Molina, S.M.: Quechua language shift, maintenance, and revitalization in the andes: the case for language planning. Int. J. Sociol. Lang. 2004(167), 9–67 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Huaman, E.: Steps to knowledge graphs quality assessment. CoRR abs/2208.07779 (2022). https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2208.07779

  21. Huaman, E., Fensel, D.: Knowledge graph curation: a practical framework. In: IJCKG 2021: The 10th International Joint Conference on Knowledge Graphs, Virtual Event, Thailand, 6–8 December 2021, pp. 166–171. ACM (2021). https://doi.org/10.1145/3502223.3502247

  22. Huaman, E., Huaman, J.L., Huaman, W.: Getting quechua closer to final users through knowledge graphs. In: Information Management and Big Data - 9th Annual International Conference, SIMBig 2022, Lima, Peru, 16–18 November 2022, Proceedings. Communications in Computer and Information Science, vol. 1837, pp. 61–69. Springer, Cham (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-35445-8_5

  23. Janowicz, K., Yan, B., Regalia, B., Zhu, R., Mai, G.: Debiasing knowledge graphs: why female presidents are not like female popes. In: Proceedings of the ISWC 2018 Posters & Demonstrations, Industry and Blue Sky Ideas Tracks co-located with 17th International Semantic Web Conference (ISWC 2018), Monterey, USA, October 8th - to - 12th, 2018. CEUR Workshop Proceedings, vol. 2180. CEUR-WS.org (2018). https://ceur-ws.org/Vol-2180/ISWC_2018_Outrageous_Ideas_paper_17.pdf

  24. Kaffee, L., Biswas, R., Keet, C.M., Vakaj, E., de Melo, G.: Multilingual knowledge graphs and low-resource languages: a review. TGDK 1(1), 10:1–10:19 (2023). https://doi.org/10.4230/TGDK.1.1.10

  25. Körner, E., Helfer, F., Schröder, C., Eckart, T., Goldhahn, D.: Crawling under-resourced languages-a portal for community-contributed corpus collection. In: Proceedings of the Workshop on Dataset Creation for Lower-Resourced Languages within the 13th Language Resources and Evaluation Conference, pp. 36–43. European Language Resources Association, Marseille, France (2022). https://aclanthology.org/2022.dclrl-1.5

  26. Kreutzer, J., et al.: Quality at a glance: an audit of web-crawled multilingual datasets. Trans. Assoc. Comput. Linguistics 10, 50–72 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1162/tacl_a_00447

  27. Lignos, C., Holley, N., Palen-Michel, C., Sälevä, J.: Toward more meaningful resources for lower-resourced languages. In: Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: ACL 2022, Dublin, Ireland, 22–27 May 2022, pp. 523–532. Association for Computational Linguistics (2022). https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/2022.findings-acl.44

  28. Lópes, L.E.: Educación bilingüe en puno-perú: activos y pasivos de un programa de educatión rural en los andes. Lingüística indígena e educação na América Latina. Campinas: UNICAMP, pp. 13–70 (1993). https://etnolinguistica.wdfiles.com/local--files/biblio%3Alopez-1993-educacion/Lopez_1993_EducacionBilinguePunoPeru.pdf

  29. Nations, U.: The united nations permanent forum on indigenous issues: Indigenous languages. https://www.un.org/development/desa/indigenouspeoples/wp-content/uploads/sites/19/2018/04/Indigenous-Languages.pdf

  30. Paulheim, H.: Knowledge graph refinement: a survey of approaches and evaluation methods. Semantic Web 8(3), 489–508 (2017). https://doi.org/10.3233/SW-160218

  31. Radstok, W., Chekol, M.W., Schäfer, M.T.: Are knowledge graph embedding models biased, or is it the data that they are trained on? In: Proceedings of the 2nd Wikidata Workshop (Wikidata 2021) co-located with the 20th International Semantic Web Conference (ISWC 2021), Virtual Conference, 24 October 2021. CEUR Workshop Proceedings, vol. 2982. CEUR-WS.org (2021). https://ceur-ws.org/Vol-2982/paper-5.pdf

  32. Sallabank, J., Austin, P.K.: Endangered languages. In: The Routledge Handbook of Applied Linguistics, pp. 362–373. Routledge (2022). https://www.taylorfrancis.com/chapters/edit/10.4324/9781003082637-31/endangered-languages-julia-sallabank-peter-austin

  33. Simsek, U., et al.: A knowledge graph perspective on knowledge engineering. SN Comput. Sci. 4(1), 16 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s42979-022-01429-x

  34. Voit, M.M., Paulheim, H.: Bias in knowledge graphs - an empirical study with movie recommendation and different language editions of dbpedia. In: 3rd Conference on Language, Data and Knowledge, LDK 2021, 1–3 September 2021, Zaragoza, Spain. OASIcs, vol. 93, pp. 14:1–14:13. Schloss Dagstuhl - Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2021). https://doi.org/10.4230/OASIcs.LDK.2021.14

  35. Zaveri, A., Rula, A., Maurino, A., Pietrobon, R., Lehmann, J., Auer, S.: Quality assessment for linked data: a survey. Semantic Web 7(1), 63–93 (2016). https://doi.org/10.3233/SW-150175

Download references

Acknowledgments

We would like to thank: Maximilian Kristen (WikiMuc) and Hugo Lopez (LinguaLibre) for their technical support. Moreover, the research leading to these results has been supported by the Wikimedia Foundation (grant 22450106) and WikiTongues (grant 2024).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Elwin Huaman.

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2025 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Huaman, E., Huaman, W., Huaman, J.L. (2025). Making an Under-Resourced Language Available on the Wikidata Knowledge Graph: Quechua Language. In: Lossio-Ventura, J.A., Ceh-Varela, E., Díaz, E., Paz Espinoza, F., Tadonki, C., Alatrista-Salas, H. (eds) Information Management and Big Data. SIMBig 2024. Communications in Computer and Information Science, vol 2496. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-91428-7_15

Download citation

Keywords

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Profiles

  1. Elwin Huaman