Restricted access

Research article

First published online September 30, 2020

Re-use permissions

The organizational ecology of global governance

David A Lake https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7811-5885 [email protected]View all authors and affiliations

Volume 27, Issue 2

https://doi.org/10.1177/1354066120959407

Abstract

The ecology of governance organizations (GOs) matters for what is or is not governed, what legitimate powers any governor may hold, and whose political preferences are instantiated in rules. The array of actors who comprise the current system of global governance has grown dramatically in recent decades. Especially notable has been the growth of private governance organizations (PGOs). Drawing on organizational ecology, I posit that the rise of PGOs is both required and facilitated by disagreements between states that block the creation of what might be otherwise effective intergovernmental organizations (IGOs). In a form of “double-negative regulation,” states block IGOs, which in turn leave open niches that are then filled by PGOs, which then both complement and sometimes substitute for state law. The organizational ecology approach outlined here extends and refocuses inquiry in systematic ways that give us a fuller understanding of how and why PGOs have emerged as one of the most striking features of the contemporary world order. The key innovations in this paper are to (a) shift the level of analysis from single agents or populations of agents to the entire field of GOs, including states, IGOs, and PGOs and (b) draw on principles of ecology to understand the composition and dynamics of systems of governance.

Get full access to this article

View all access and purchase options for this article.

References

Abbott KW, Genschel P, Snidal D, et al. (eds) (2015) International Organizations as Orchestrators. New York: Cambridge University Press.

Abbott KW, Green JF, Keohane RO (2016) Organizational ecology and institutional change in global governance. International Organization 70(2): 247–277.

Andonova LB, Hale TN, Roger C (2017) National policy and transnational governance of climate change: substitutes or complements? International Studies Quarterly 61(2): 253–268.

Avant DD, Finnemore M, Sell SK (2010) Who Governs the Globe? New York: Cambridge University Press.

Bartley T (2003) Certifying forests and factories: states, social movements, and the rise of private regulation in the apparel and forest products fields. Politics and Society 31(3): 433–464.

Bartley T (2007) How foundations shape social movements: the construction of an organizational field and the rise of forest certification. Social Problems 54(3): 229–255.

Bartley T (2014) Transnational governance and the re-centered state: sustainability or legality? Regulation and Governance 8(1): 93–109.

Bartley T (2018) Rules Without Rights: Land, Labor, and Private Authority in the Global Economy. New York: Oxford University Press.

Barton JH, Goldstein J, Josling TE, et al. (2006) The Evolution of the Trade Regime: Politics, Law, and Economics of the GATT and the WTO. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

Bickerton CJ, Cunliffe P, Gourevitch A (2006) Politics Without Sovereignty: A Critique of Contemporary International Relations. London: UCL Press.

Boone C (2014) Property and Political Order in Africa: Land Rights and the Structure of Politics. New York: Cambridge University Press.

Bradford A (2020) The Brussels Effect: How the European Union Rules the World. New York: Oxford University Press.

Buthe T, Mattli W (2011) The New Global Rulers: The Privatization of Regulation in the World Economy. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

Carroll SB (2016) The Serengeti Rules: The Quest to Discover How Life Works and Why It Matters. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

Cashore B (2002) Legitimacy and the privatization of environmental governance: how Non-State Market Driven (NSMD) governance systems gain rule-making authority. Governance: An International Journal of Policy, Administration, and Institutions 15(4): 503–529.

Cashore B, Stone MW (2012) Can legality verification rescue global forest governance? Analyzing the potential of public and private policy intersection to ameliorate forest challenges in Southeast Asia. Forest Policy and Economics 18(May): 13–22.

Cashore B, Auld G, Newsom D (2004) Governing Through Markets: Forest Certification and the Emergence of Non-State Authority. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.

Dauvergne P, Lister J (2013) Eco-Business: A Big-Brand Takeover of Sustainability. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

David PA (1985) Clio and the economics of Qwerty. American Economic Review 75(2): 332–337.

DiMaggio PJ, Powell WW (1983) The iron cage revisited: institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields. American Sociological Review 48(2): 147–160.

Dingwerth K, Pattberg P (2009) World politics and organizational fields: the case of transnational sustainability governance. European Journal of International Relations 15(4): 707–744.

Eriksen SS, Sending OJ (2013) There is no global public: the idea of the public and the legitimation of governance. International Theory 5(2): 213–237.

Fligstein N, McAdam D (2012) A Theory of Fields. New York: Oxford University Press.

Gourevitch P, Lake DA, Stein JG (2012) The Credibility of Transnational NGOs: When Virtue is not Enough. New York: Cambridge University Press.

Green JF (2013) Order out of Chaos: public and private rules for managing carbon. Global Environmental Politics 13(2): 1–15.

Green JF (2014) Rethinking Private Authority: Agents and Entrepreneurs in Global Environmental Governance. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

Gulbrandsen LH (2005) Sustainable forestry in Sweden: the effect of competition among private certification schemes. The Journal of Environment and Development 14(3): 338–355.

Gulbrandsen LH (2014) Dynamic governance interactions: evolutionary effects of state responses to non-state certification programs. Regulation and Governance 8(1): 74–92.

Hacker JS, Pierson P (2020) Let them East Tweets: How the Right Rules in an Age of Extreme Inequality. New York: Liveright.

Hall RB, Biersteker TJ (2002) The emergence of private authority in the international system. In: Hall RB, Biersteker TJ (eds) The Emergence of Private Authority in Global Governance. New York: Cambridge University Press, 3–22.

Hamilton A, Jay J, Madison J (1961) The Federalist Papers (1787–88). New York: Penguin.

Hannan MT, Freeman J (1989) Organizational Ecology. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

Johnson T (2014) Organizational Progeny: Why Governments are Losing Control Over the Proliferating Structures of Global Governance. New York: Oxford University Press.

Jung D, Lake DA (2011) Markets, hierarchies, and networks: an agent-based organizational ecology. American Journal of Political Science 55(4): 972–990.

Kinderman D (2015) Explaining the rise of national corporate social responsibility: the role of global frameworks, world culture, and corporate interests. In: Tsutsui K, Lim A (eds) Corporate Social Responsibility in a Globalizing World. New York: Cambridge University Press, 107–146.

Kinderman D (2019) The challenges of upward regulatory harmonization: the case of sustainability reporting in the European Union. Regulation and Governance. https://doi.org/10.1111/rego.12240.

Krasner SD (1999) Sovereignty: Organized Hypocrisy. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

Lake DA (2016) The Statebuilder’s Dilemma: On the Limits of Foreign Intervention. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.

Leeson PT (2007) Better off stateless: Somalia before and after government collapse. Journal of Comparative Economics 35(4): 689–710.

Levitsky S, Ziblatt D (2018) How Democracies Die. New York: Crown.

Lim A, Tsutsui K (2015) The social regulation of the economy in the global context. In: Tsutsui K, Lim A (eds) Corporate Social Responsibility in a Globalizing World. New York: Cambridge University Press, 1–24.

Lipscy PY (2017) Renegotiating the World Order: Institutional Change in International Relations. New York: Cambridge University Press.

Locke RM (2013) The Promise and Limits of Private Power: Promoting Labor Standards in a Global Economy. New York: Cambridge University Press.

Loconto A, Fouilleux E (2014) Politics of private regulation: ISEAL and the shaping of transnational sustainability governance. Regulation and Governance 8(2): 166–185.

Mamdani M (1996) Citizen and Subject: Contemporary Africa and the Legacy of Late Colonialism. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

Marx A, Cuypers D (2010) Forest certification as a global environmental governance tool: what is the macro-effectiveness of the Forest Stewardship Council? Regulation and Governance 4(4): 408–434.

Milgrom PR, North DC, Weingast BR (1990) The role of institutions in the revival of trade: the law merchant, private judges, and the Champagne fairs. Economics and Politics 2(1): 1–23.

Nooruddin I, Sokhey SW (2012) Credible certification of child labor free production. In: Gourevitch P, Lake DA, Stein JG (eds) The Credibility of Transnational NGOs: When Virtue is not Enough. New York: Cambridge University Press, 62–85.

North DC, Wallis JJ, Weingast BR (2009) Violence and Social Orders: A Conceptual Framework for Interpreting Recorded Human History. New York: Cambridge University Press.

Olegario R (2003) Credit reporting agencies: a historical perspective. In: Miller MJ (ed.), Credit Reporting Systems and the International Economy. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 115–159.

Osiander A (2001) Sovereignty, international relations, and the Westphalian Myth. International Organization 55(2): 251–287.

Overdevest C (2010) Comparing forest certification schemes: the case of ratcheting standards in the forest sector. Socio-Economic Review 8(1): 47–76.

Overdevest C, Zeitlin J (2014) Assembling an experimental regime: transnational governance interactions in the forest sector. Regulation and Governance 8(1): 22–48.

Philpott D (2001) Revolutions in Sovereignty: How Ideas Shaped Modern International Relations. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

Rodrik D (2011) The Globalization Paradox: Democracy and the Future of the World Economy. New York: W. W. Norton.

Roger C, Dauvergne P (2016) The rise of transnational governance as a field of study. International Studies Review 18(3): 415–437.

Rosenau JN (2002) Governance in a new global order. In: Held D, McGrew A (eds) Governing Globalization: Power, Authority and Global Governance. Malden, MA: Polity Press, 70–86.

Ruggie JG (2013) Just Business: Multinational Corporations and Human Rights. New York: W.W. Norton.

Ruggie JG, Sherman J (2017) The concept of ‘Due Diligence’ in the UN guiding principles on business and human rights: a reply to Jonathan Bonnitcha and Robert McCorquodale. European Journal of International Law 28(3): 921–928.

Scott WR, Davis GF (2007) Organizations and Organizing: Rational, Natural, and Open System Perspectives. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson/Prentice Hall.

Strange S (1996) The Retreat of the State: The Diffusion of Power in the World Economy. New York: Cambridge University Press.

Stroup S, Wong WH (2017) The Authority Trap. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.

Taylor A (2001) American Colonies: The Settling of North America. New York: Penguin.

van der Ven H (2018) Gatekeeper power: understanding the influence of lead firms over transnational sustainability standards. Review of International Political Economy 25(5): 624–646.

van der Ven H, Bernstein S, Hoffmann M (2017) Valuing the contributions of nonstate and subnational actors to climate governance. Global Environmental Politics 17(1): 1–20.

Waltz KN (1979) Theory of International Politics. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.

Weber M (1978) Economy and Society. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.

Wilks S (2013) The Political Power of the Business Corporation. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.

Wong WH (2012) Internal Affairs: How the Structure of NGOs Transforms Human Rights. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.

Young O (1994) International Governance: Protecting the Environment in a Stateless Society. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.

Zurn M (2018) A Theory of Global Governance: Authority, Legitimacy, and Contestation. New York: Oxford University Press.

Biographies

David A Lake is the Gerri-Ann and Gary E. Jacobs Professor of Social Sciences and Distinguished Professor of Political Science at the University of California, San Diego. He has published extensively in International Relations theory and international political economy and served as president of both the International Studies Association (2010–2011) and the American Political Science Association (2016–2017).

You currently have no access to this content. Visit the access options page to authenticate.