Repository navigation
RAIDZ: Remove some excessive logging - #18059
Merged
Merged
Conversation
There were some per I/O logging into dbgmsg in RAIDZ code, that increased CPU load and wiped useful content out of dbgmsg, for example during routine disk replacement process. I don't think we need it to be that verbose. Signed-off-by: Alexander Motin
behlendorf
approved these changes
Dec 17, 2025
behlendorf
left a comment
Contributor
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Yup, we can shed these.
amotin
added a commit
to amotin/zfs
that referenced
this pull request
Jan 29, 2026
There were some per I/O logging into dbgmsg in RAIDZ code, that increased CPU load and wiped useful content out of dbgmsg, for example during routine disk replacement process. I don't think we need it to be that verbose. Reviewed-by: Brian BehlendorfSigned-off-by: Alexander Motin Closes openzfs#18059
mcmilk
pushed a commit
to mcmilk/zfs
that referenced
this pull request
Jan 31, 2026
There were some per I/O logging into dbgmsg in RAIDZ code, that increased CPU load and wiped useful content out of dbgmsg, for example during routine disk replacement process. I don't think we need it to be that verbose. Reviewed-by: Brian BehlendorfSigned-off-by: Alexander Motin Closes openzfs#18059
amotin
added a commit
to amotin/zfs
that referenced
this pull request
Feb 3, 2026
There were some per I/O logging into dbgmsg in RAIDZ code, that increased CPU load and wiped useful content out of dbgmsg, for example during routine disk replacement process. I don't think we need it to be that verbose. Reviewed-by: Brian BehlendorfSigned-off-by: Alexander Motin Closes openzfs#18059
lundman
pushed a commit
to openzfsonosx/openzfs-fork
that referenced
this pull request
Feb 5, 2026
There were some per I/O logging into dbgmsg in RAIDZ code, that increased CPU load and wiped useful content out of dbgmsg, for example during routine disk replacement process. I don't think we need it to be that verbose. Reviewed-by: Brian BehlendorfSigned-off-by: Alexander Motin Closes openzfs#18059
tonyhutter
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Feb 5, 2026
There were some per I/O logging into dbgmsg in RAIDZ code, that increased CPU load and wiped useful content out of dbgmsg, for example during routine disk replacement process. I don't think we need it to be that verbose. Reviewed-by: Brian BehlendorfSigned-off-by: Alexander Motin Closes #18059
lundman
pushed a commit
to openzfsonwindows/openzfs
that referenced
this pull request
Feb 23, 2026
There were some per I/O logging into dbgmsg in RAIDZ code, that increased CPU load and wiped useful content out of dbgmsg, for example during routine disk replacement process. I don't think we need it to be that verbose. Reviewed-by: Brian BehlendorfSigned-off-by: Alexander Motin Closes openzfs#18059
lundman
pushed a commit
to openzfsonwindows/openzfs
that referenced
this pull request
Feb 23, 2026
There were some per I/O logging into dbgmsg in RAIDZ code, that increased CPU load and wiped useful content out of dbgmsg, for example during routine disk replacement process. I don't think we need it to be that verbose. Reviewed-by: Brian BehlendorfSigned-off-by: Alexander Motin Closes openzfs#18059
tonyhutter
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
May 12, 2026
There were some per I/O logging into dbgmsg in RAIDZ code, that increased CPU load and wiped useful content out of dbgmsg, for example during routine disk replacement process. I don't think we need it to be that verbose. Reviewed-by: Brian BehlendorfSigned-off-by: Alexander Motin Closes #18059
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There were some per I/O logging into dbgmsg in RAIDZ code, that increased CPU load and wiped useful content out of dbgmsg, for example during routine disk replacement process. I don't think we need it to be that verbose.
How Has This Been Tested?
, and observe
dbgmsgno longer trashed.Types of changes
Checklist:
Signed-off-by.