Skip to content

Style cleanup of requires\s*\( - #999

Merged
Casey Carter (CaseyCarter) merged 2 commits into
microsoft:masterfrom
CaseyCarter:consistent_requires
Jul 7, 2020
Merged

Casey Carter (CaseyCarter) merged 2 commits into
microsoft:masterfrom
CaseyCarter:consistent_requires

Conversation

@CaseyCarter

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

To consistently follow the guidelines established in #982.

Fixes #982.

To consistently follow the guidelines established in microsoft#982.

Fixes microsoft#982.
@CaseyCarter Casey Carter (CaseyCarter) added the enhancement Something can be improved label Jul 5, 2020
@CaseyCarter
Casey Carter (CaseyCarter) requested a review from a team as a code owner July 5, 2020 14:37

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks good, one formatting nitpick that I don't really care about. Thanks for making this consistent and easier to follow! My biggest concern is that Clang/LLVM/libc++'s "NFC" convention (meaning No Functional Change) is incomprehensible to those who are unfamiliar with it, and it's impossible to search for (so much so that I had to ask on their mailing list). 😹 I think "style cleanup" is self-explanatory.

Comment thread tests/std/tests/P0896R4_ranges_iterator_machinery/test.cpp
@CaseyCarter Casey Carter (CaseyCarter) changed the title [NFC] Style cleanup of requires\s*\( Style cleanup of requires\s*\( Jul 6, 2020
@CaseyCarter

Casey Carter (CaseyCarter) commented Jul 6, 2020 •

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

My biggest concern is that Clang/LLVM/libc++'s "NFC" convention (meaning No Functional Change) is incomprehensible to those who are unfamiliar with it

What? How is it not obvious that "NFC" stands for Near Field Communications? :trollface:

@CaseyCarter Casey Carter (CaseyCarter) changed the title Style cleanup of requires\s*\( Style cleanup of requires\s*\( Jul 7, 2020
@CaseyCarter
Casey Carter (CaseyCarter) merged commit 896e137 into microsoft:master Jul 7, 2020
@CaseyCarter
Casey Carter (CaseyCarter) deleted the consistent_requires branch July 7, 2020 21:24
@CaseyCarter

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

Thanks for this fix. It was absolutely ... required. 😎

@CaseyCarter Casey Carter (CaseyCarter) removed their assignment Jul 7, 2020
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

enhancement Something can be improved

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

xutility: Style inconsistency in the usage of "requires(" and "requires ("

3 participants