Reconstruction:Proto-Indo-European/-éh₂

This Proto-Indo-European entry contains reconstructed terms and roots. As such, the term(s) in this entry are not directly attested, but are hypothesized to have existed based on comparative evidence.

Proto-Indo-European

edit

Etymology

edit

    From *-h₂.

    Suffix

    edit

    *-éh₂ n

    1. Creates collective nouns and mass nouns, corresponding to thematic formations with accent on the suffix.

    Usage notes

    edit

    This collective noun suffix gave rise to the thematic neuter plural suffix in nuclear (i.e. non-Anatolian) Indo-European languages. In Anatolian itself, it is disputed whether nouns attested with this suffix are plural or collective in number.

    Derived terms

    edit
    • *-eh₂ (collective form of thematic neuters)
    • ? *-eh₂-s-o-, *-oh₂-s-o- (relational suffix)
      • >? Proto-Anatolian:
      • ⇒ Proto-Italic: *-āsios (+ *-jos) (see there for further descendants)
    • *-i-eh₂ (rebracketed from i-stems)
      • Proto-Balto-Slavic:
        • Proto-Slavic: *-ьja (see there for further descendants)

    Suffix

    edit

      *(o)-éh₂ f[1]

      1. Creates action nouns and abstract nouns.
        ‎*bʰer- (“to bear”) + ‎*-éh₂ → ‎*bʰoréh₂ (“carrying, burden”)

      Usage notes

      edit

      These o-grade feminine abstract nouns are known as τομή (tomḗ)-type nouns in Indo-Europeanist literature.[2]

      Inflection

      edit
      Thematic in *-eh₂
      singular
      nominative *(o)-éh₂
      genitive *(o)-éh₂s
      singular dual plural
      nominative *(o)-éh₂ *(o)-éh₂h₁(e) *(o)-éh₂es
      vocative *(o)-éh₂ *(o)-éh₂h₁(e) *(o)-éh₂es
      accusative *(o)-ā́m *(o)-éh₂h₁(e) *(o)-éh₂m̥s
      genitive *(o)-éh₂s *? *(o)-éh₂oHom
      ablative *(o)-éh₂s *? *(o)-éh₂mos, *(o)-éh₂bʰos
      dative *(o)-éh₂ey *? *(o)-éh₂mos, *(o)-éh₂bʰos
      locative *(o)-éh₂, *(o)-éh₂i *? *(o)-éh₂su
      instrumental *(o)-éh₂h₁ *? *(o)-éh₂mis, *(o)-éh₂bʰis

      Derived terms

      edit
      edit

      Descendants

      edit

      Suffix

      edit

        *(∅)-éh₂ f[1]

        1. Creates action nouns and abstract nouns.
          ‎*bʰewg- (“to flee”) + ‎*-éh₂ → ‎*bʰugéh₂ (“flight”)

        Usage notes

        edit

        These nouns are known as φυγή (phugḗ)-type nouns in Indo-Europeanist literature. They are mainly formed from verbal roots, generally of the shape *CeRT-.

        Inflection

        edit
        Thematic in *-eh₂
        singular
        nominative *(∅)-éh₂
        genitive *(∅)-éh₂s
        singular dual plural
        nominative *(∅)-éh₂ *(∅)-éh₂h₁(e) *(∅)-éh₂es
        vocative *(∅)-éh₂ *(∅)-éh₂h₁(e) *(∅)-éh₂es
        accusative *(∅)-ā́m *(∅)-éh₂h₁(e) *(∅)-éh₂m̥s
        genitive *(∅)-éh₂s *? *(∅)-éh₂oHom
        ablative *(∅)-éh₂s *? *(∅)-éh₂mos, *(∅)-éh₂bʰos
        dative *(∅)-éh₂ey *? *(∅)-éh₂mos, *(∅)-éh₂bʰos
        locative *(∅)-éh₂, *(∅)-éh₂i *? *(∅)-éh₂su
        instrumental *(∅)-éh₂h₁ *? *(∅)-éh₂mis, *(∅)-éh₂bʰis

        Derived terms

        edit

        References

        edit
        1. ↑ 1.0 1.1 Lundquist, Jesse; Yates, Anthony D. (2018), “Chapter XX: Proto-Indo-European”, in Klein, Jared S., Joseph, Brian D., Fritz, Matthias, editors, Handbook of Comparative and Historical Indo-European Linguistics: An International Handbook (Handbücher zur Sprach- und Kommunikationswissenschaft [Handbooks of Linguistics and Communication Science]; 41.2), volume 3, Berlin; Boston: De Gruyter Mouton, →ISBN, § The morphology of Proto-Indo-European, page 2109
        2. ^ Weiss, Michael L. (2009), Outline of the Historical and Comparative Grammar of Latin, Ann Arbor: Beech Stave Press, →ISBN, page 300