User talk:HaileyChoi9
Add topicLamine Yamal
[edit]Hey there!
I just wanted to give you an explanation for why I reverted your edits over at Lamine Yamal. I did not watch the entire YouTube video, but from looking at the transcript, it seems pretty clear to me that he is not fluent in English, and he doesn't claim that he is. If we're going to say he's fluent, we need a source to very clearly establish that.
The fasting link needs to include the entire phrase, because the page it links to is not the page for fasting, it's the page for Ramadan fasting specifically.
For the Ramadan segment, the correct phrasing would be "during which" instead of "in which" but I tend to avoid constructing sentences that require "during which" because it feels clunky. Additionally, we know his intention is to fast every Ramadan, but do we have proof that he does it without ever missing a day? If we say what Ramadan requires of him, we are sticking to facts we can prove.
I hope all this makes sense! Please let me know if you have any questions, and I hope you have a great day. OrdinaryOtter (talk) 04:24, 7 August 2026 (UTC)
September 2026
[edit]
Hello, I'm Balance3641. I noticed that you recently removed content from Islamic nationalism without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Balance3641 🍃 (talk · contribs) 02:51, 7 September 2026 (UTC)
Many edits you make are related to WP:ARBPIA because they are about a Jewish anti-Islamic political party (e.g. , , , , and many others). They can be made only by contributors with "extended confirmed" permission (please see 2nd paragraph in Wikipedia:Contentious topics/Arab–Israeli conflict). You had a previous warning about CT, where this extended confirmed rule was linked . Please do not make such edits until you have such permission. By the rules, all such your edits should be reverted. My very best wishes (talk) 17:05, 7 September 2026 (UTC)
| HaileyChoi9 you are still not ECR yet all your edits are in articles and categories that fall within the ARBPIA area where you are not entitled to edit. Your recent edits also violate WP:BRD and constitute WP:edit warring. Please desist if you want to continue contributing to this project. |
BobFromBrockley (talk) 08:15, 20 September 2026 (UTC)
- Oh yes: ,. @HaileyChoi9, please self-revert. In other edits, the connection to ARBPIA is more debatable, but can be viewed as related "broadly construed" ,,. My very best wishes (talk) 16:31, 21 September 2026 (UTC)
October 2026
[edit]
Hello. I have noticed that you often edit without using an edit summary. Please do your best to always fill in the summary field. This helps your fellow editors use their time more productively, rather than spending it unnecessarily scrutinizing and verifying your work. Explaining your reasoning for a change can also make it less likely to be reverted. Even a short summary is better than no summary, and summaries are particularly important for large, complex, or potentially controversial edits. To help yourself remember, you may wish to set Preferences → Editing → Editor →
Prompt me when entering a blank edit summary (or the default undo summary). Thanks! 海盐沙冰 / aka irisChronomia / Talk / Uploads 10:53, 2 October 2026 (UTC)
- You're reminded again that your recent reverts are about topics designated as a contentious topic WP:Contentious topics/Arab–Israeli conflict, which require WP:ECR status to edit. 海盐沙冰 / aka irisChronomia / Talk / Uploads 10:55, 2 October 2026 (UTC)