User talk:DotXK

Reverted edit

Hello dot! I seen that you reverted two of my edits on Bully (album). I can understand why you reverted the one with the logo but the alternative cover CAN be proven to be bully V1 as seen here and here. Wobs100 (talk) 00:59, 24 July 2026 (UTC)

Those are misreports, as WW3 (CUCK) wasn't announced yet. Kanye was working on both albums at that time, and it's unlikely that the swastika cover was intended for BULLY since it wasn't at all political and CUCK is. Kanye simply announced the cover with the vague caption "NEW ALBUM COVER", he still hasn't specified if the cover was for CUCK though ᴅᴏᴛXK (BRIXK) (T/C) 01:25, 24 July 2026 (UTC)

oh Wobs100 (talk) 01:34, 24 July 2026 (UTC)

On the Kanye article it lists that the Album cover is for bully though what should be done about that? Wobs100 (talk) 01:39, 24 July 2026 (UTC)

and the other bully articles in other languages for that matter? Wobs100 (talk) 01:42, 24 July 2026 (UTC)

I just removed the claim on the Kanye article

I'll probably do the same for the other BULLY articles (it was only there because they were translated when the English one had that before it got removed) ᴅᴏᴛXK (BRIXK) (T/C) 01:45, 24 July 2026 (UTC)

Update: I started a rename rq to take off "Bully" in their names, also for the wordmark , would uploading to a cat with two other photos (one needs to be transferred from wiki) make sense? Wobs100 (talk) 17:36, 12 September 2026 (UTC)

I don't know what you mean ᴅᴏᴛXK (BRIXK) (T/C) 18:13, 12 September 2026 (UTC)

On the Kanye West swastika images it said that it was for the Bully album on the title as seen here and here.

For the Wordmark, I'm wondering if I should make a category on album images alongside File:Kanye West Gamma Bully dispute.jpg and File:Bully film logo.png, which needs to be uploaded to commons Wobs100 (talk) 18:18, 12 September 2026 (UTC)

Sure! You can make a category for anything. It make sense since the files are very closely related ᴅᴏᴛXK (BRIXK) (T/C) 18:23, 12 September 2026 (UTC)

Done! I had to manually upload (my first time doing so) film logo.png to commons, I put the table on the talk page as I'm not sure how to combine the uploads so its on the talk page Wobs100 (talk) 19:22, 12 September 2026 (UTC)

https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Bully_film_logo.png * Wobs100 (talk) 19:22, 12 September 2026 (UTC)

On "Awesome (song)" for GA-nomination

I want to recommend you to nominate "Awesome (song)" for GA if you want to. It's pretty impressive when it comes to unreleased music. Seeing its good structure and sourcing, I could review it for you. If you don't want to, maybe notify Wackistan. - RTSthestardust (talk) 06:47, 27 July 2026 (UTC)

Your nomination of Awesome (song) is under review

Your good article nomination of the article Awesome (song) is under review. See the review page for more information. This may take up to 7 days; feel free to contact the reviewer with any questions you might have. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of RTSthestardust -- RTSthestardust (talk) 04:02, 5 August 2026 (UTC)

Your nomination of Awesome (song) has passed

Your good article nomination of the article Awesome (song) has passed; congratulations! See the review page for more information. If the article is eligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it within the next seven days. Please also consider reviewing somebody else's nomination to help keep the backlog down. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of RTSthestardust -- RTSthestardust (talk) 05:21, 5 August 2026 (UTC)

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hi DotXK. Thank you for your work on Dreamin of the Past. Another editor, Thilio, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

Hey! I just wanna say thank you for creating this article. Have a nice blessing weekend.

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Thilio}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

CONFUSED SPIRIT(Thilio).Talk 22:35, 15 August 2026 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Gemini Season has been accepted

Gemini Season, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been accepted!

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions. Feel free to further improve your accepted article.

Future articles

• Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without submitting a draft for review. However, you may continue submitting drafts to Articles for creation if you prefer.

• Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

Next steps

• Find other Wikipedia articles related to your topic and add links pointing to the new article. This helps readers find it.
• Group the article with similar subjects by adding relevant categories.
• You may consider nominating a fact from the article within the next 7 days to appear on the Main Page's Did you know section.
• Wikipedia is a work in progress. You can continue to expand and improve the new article.
• The new article will become eligible to be indexed on search engines once patrolled or after 90 days; search engines may take time to reflect this.
• For friendly peer support regarding editing, sourcing, or policies, visit the Teahouse, a question and answer hub for new editors.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

HazelAlbertSheriff (talk) 11:36, 18 August 2026 (UTC)