Template talk:Artificial intelligence navbox

This template is within the scope of WikiProject Artificial Intelligence, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Artificial intelligence on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Artificial IntelligenceWikipedia:WikiProject Artificial IntelligenceTemplate:WikiProject Artificial IntelligenceArtificial Intelligence

Computing

This template is within the scope of WikiProject Computing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computers, computing, and information technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComputingWikipedia:WikiProject ComputingTemplate:WikiProject ComputingComputing

Technology

This template is within the scope of WikiProject Technology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.TechnologyWikipedia:WikiProject TechnologyTemplate:WikiProject TechnologyTechnology

Redundancy with Template:Large language models and Template:Generative AI

Latest comment: 12 days ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Several fields are redundant with Template:Large language models and Template:Generative AI. Have two lengthy, mostly redundant navboxes makes both of them less useful. The purpose of these navboxes isn't to cram as many links as possible, it's to help readers find related articles.

To help resolve this, I have removed all of the duplicates in the 'implementations > text' field and added List of large language models to consolidated. Additionally, please review WP:BIDIRECTIONAL before adding or adjusting any entries. Grayfell (talk) 23:35, 1 May 2026 (UTC)Reply

@Grayfell: It also overlaps significantly with Template:Artificial intelligence, which covers many of the same topics. Jarble (talk) 19:01, 29 September 2026 (UTC)Reply