The text of the entry was: Did you know ... that the cervix, which in adult women is much smaller than the rest of the uterus, is twice as large during childhood as the body of the uterus?
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Anatomy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Anatomy on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.AnatomyWikipedia:WikiProject AnatomyTemplate:WikiProject AnatomyAnatomy
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women's History, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Women's history and related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women's HistoryWikipedia:WikiProject Women's HistoryTemplate:WikiProject Women's HistoryWomen's History
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women's Health, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of women's health on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women's HealthWikipedia:WikiProject Women's HealthTemplate:WikiProject Women's Healthwomen's health
This article has been rated as Top-importance on the importance scale.
The content of Cockscomb cervix was merged into Cervix on September 8, 2018. The former page's history now serves to provide attribution for that content in the latter page, and it must not be deleted as long as the latter page exists. For the discussion at that location, see its talk page.
Latest comment: 1 month ago1 comment1 person in discussion
The cervix is stated to be 4cm long in the beginning of the article, but 2-3cm long directly under the first diagram (captioned Diagram of the uterus and part of the vagina). The source for the first description (4cm) is from 2017, while the second source is from 1994. I think the second description should be changed to match the first considering the more recent citation, but I'm not 100% sure what would be best. If anyone knows the best way to fix the discrepancy, please let me know or go ahead and edit! Thanks! Isabellagoulet (talk) 04:17, 4 September 2026 (UTC)Reply