Jump to content

User talk:Ziv

Add topic
From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Latest comment: 1 day ago by Ashtroyde in topic Madonna und Kind Pseudo Pier Francesco Fiorentino
Ziv's Talk archive

• 2023–2024
• 2025
• 2026
Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, Ysabella!
Afrikaans | Alemannisch | asturianu | azərbaycanca | Bahasa Banjar | català | čeština | Cymraeg | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | English | español | Esperanto | euskara | estremeñu | français | Frysk | galego | hrvatski | Bahasa Indonesia | interlingua | Interlingue | íslenska | italiano | Kiswahili | Kurdî | Latina | lietuvių | magyar | Bahasa Melayu | Mirandés | Nederlands | norsk bokmål | occitan | Plattdüütsch | polski | português | português do Brasil | română | rumantsch | Scots | shqip | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | Basa Sunda | suomi | svenska | Tagalog | Türkçe | vèneto | Tiếng Việt | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | беларуская | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | Ирон | македонски | нохчийн | русский | српски / srpski | тоҷикӣ | українська | ქართული | Հայերեն | नेपाली | भोजपुरी | मराठी | हिन्दी | অসমীয়া | বাংলা | தமிழ் | മലയാളം | සිංහල | ไทย | ລາວ | ၽႃႇသႃႇတႆး  | မြန်မာဘာသာ | 한국어 | 日本語 | 中文 | 中文(台灣)‎ | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | 粵語 | עברית | اردو | العربية | تۆرکجه | سنڌي | فارسی | +/−

Just for copy

[edit]
Ziv's Admin Statistik: Adminstats
Admin statistics
Action Count
Edits 159988
Edits+Deleted 176698
Pages deleted 60022
Revisions deleted 64
Pages restored 420
Pages protected 85
Pages unprotected 2
Pages imported 167
Protections modified 8
Users blocked 111
Users reblocked 3
User rights modified 1
Users created 1

Kategorienkram:

Kategorie riesig, Pflege benötigt: {{Diffuseat}}

Jeweils noch vervollständigen:

Bei Dateien:

  • Kennzeichnen von Bildauschnitten:
    • Kleines Bild → {{Extracted from|Name des grossen Bildes inkl. Dateiendung}}
    • Grosses Bild → {{Image extracted|Name des kleinen Bildes inkl. Dateiendung}}
  • Einsortierung unter ein bestimmtes Land, Jahr, Monat und Tag:
    • {{Taken on|JJJJ-MM-DD|location=Staat}}

Verschiebungsanträge: Category:Media requiring renaming

  • Verschieben ohne Antrag:

Bei der Begründung die passende Nummer von COM:FNC nachschlagen und die Bearbeitungszeile je nachdem mit [[COM:FR#FR1|Criterion 1]], [[COM:FR#FR2|Criterion 2]], [[COM:FR#FR3|Criterion 3]], [[COM:FR#FR4|Criterion 4]], [[COM:FR#FR5|Criterion 5]] oder [[COM:FR#FR6|Criterion 6]] ausfüllen und eine kurze Erklärung dazu.

  • Bei offensichtlicher Copyvio oder wenn schon ein Löschantrag drauf ist: [[COM:FRNOT]] dranhängen → COM:FRNOT.

Löschkram:

  • Löschvorschlag → oft benutzt: [[COM:SPAM]]: out of scope, useless vacation snapshot,
    • bei Bildern, die bei Löschkandidaten hochgeladen wurden und vermutlich nie mehr benutzt werden: COM:NOTUSED
  • Keine Lizenz → {{No permission since|month=|day=|year=}}
  • Copyvio → Werkzeug benutzen, für einen Link noch |source= einfügen.
  • Falsch benannte Kategorie, die nach Verschieben gelöscht werden sollte → {{bad name|richtig benannte Kategorie}}
  • Redundant/schlechte Qualität → Templates unter COM:Redundant
    bisher von mir am meisten gebraucht:
    {{Duplicate|Name der zu behaltenden Datei inkl. Dateiendung}}
  • Schnelllöschen →
    COM:SPEEDY für den Löschcode →
    {{SD|1=Code: , sowie Allenfalls weitere Erklärungen dazu ~~~~}}
  • Wenn Difflinks nötig sind: [[Special:Diff/1234567890]] ← Nummer durch die aktuelle Bearbeitungs-ID ersetzen!

Weitere Codes oder Ergänzungen folgen.

COM:NETCOPYVIO → [[COM:NETCOPYVIO]]

The vast majority of images found on the internet are copyright-protected and may {{notok}} '''not''' be uploaded. The fact that an image has been posted to a publicly-available website does not give you implied permission to re-use it nor to upload it here. Many websites are silent on copyright issues, but images on those sites are just as off-limits as those on sites which explicitly say "''Copyright, all rights reserved''". Works are copyrighted by default in most countries due to their agreement with the [[:en:Berne Convention|Berne Convention]]; a copyright notice or a © sign is not needed.

Greets: זיו「Ziv」

Reset your license review

[edit]

Hi, Ziv! Just now I reset license review reslut you did on File:251015_aespa.png, because it should have tagged as {{YouTube CC-BY 4.0}} but {{YouTube}}. I would appreciate your understanding. T4NeGMp7P4en (talk) 18:20, 8 July 2026 (UTC)Reply

Hello @T4NeGMp7P4en.
Thanks for the fix. Best regards, זיו「Ziv」 • For love letters and other notes 18:23, 8 July 2026 (UTC)Reply

Hoheitszeichen der Gemeinden des Kantons Jura

[edit]

Ciao Ziv! Vor Jahren wurde im Wikiprojekt Wappen eine Anfrage zu den Hoheitszeichen der Gemeinden des Kantons Jura gestellt. Ich bin endlich dazu gekommen, diese Anfrage fertig zu bearbeiten. Der Anfragesteller hat sich jedoch seit einigen Monaten nicht mehr auf Commons blicken lassen. Kannst du die Sache übernehmen und die globalen Ersetzungen vornehmen? Merci! ARK (talk) 11:53, 9 July 2026 (UTC)Reply

Sali @ARK
Aber sehr gerne doch. Ab Morgen habe ich Zeit dafür. Beste Grüsse, זיו「Ziv」 • For love letters and other notes 20:48, 9 July 2026 (UTC)Reply
Update: @ARK.
Viel gab es nicht mehr zu tun, SpinnerLaserzthe2nd war schon fleissig dran, obwohl er dann nicht konsequent alles tauscht oder mal was vergisst. Jedenfalls jetzt erledigt. Beste Grüsse, זיו「Ziv」 • For love letters and other notes 09:48, 10 July 2026 (UTC)Reply
@Ziv: Vielen Dank! Kann ich LUX Rëmeleng COA.svg noch global ersetzt haben? Gruss, ARK (talk)

Ping vom Help desk

[edit]

Hallo Ziv, magst Du eventuell noch mal auf https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Help_desk#h-העלאת_קבצי_קול_קריאת_התורה-20260630131900 vorbeischauen? Deine Sprachkenntnisse wären sehr willkommen bei einer Hilfeanfrage auf Hebräisch. Ich hatte dich dort angepingt, aber das kann untergegangen sein. Grüße, Grand-Duc (talk) 12:52, 9 July 2026 (UTC)Reply

Hallo @Grand-Duc.
Das ist bei mir tatsächlich untergegangen. Ich werde später nach der Arbeit antworten. זיו「Ziv」 • For love letters and other notes 14:41, 9 July 2026 (UTC)Reply
Vielen Dank nochmals. Beste Grüsse, זיו「Ziv」 • For love letters and other notes 20:47, 9 July 2026 (UTC)Reply

Duplicate discussion

[edit]

Hi, I think I have the wrong end of the stick, or maybe am looking at the analysis without understanding something flawed about it. A simplistic check for SHA1 duplicates created by the DPLA bot in the last 30 days, shows a backlog of nearly 60,000 files. The most recent was created last night, The Piker.

Could you try to explain why this is okay, as I'm not understanding Dominic's reasoning and it feels pointless repeating the same facts in a loop? Thanks Fæ (talk) 09:22, 13 July 2026 (UTC)Reply

Hello @Fæ.
I have no idea why DPLA is producing so many duplicates. Much of it is due to the DPLA ID changing. The goal, however, should be to prevent it from uploading so many duplicates and instead simply change the file description and filename of the files that have already been uploaded to Commons. Best regards, זיו「Ziv」 • For love letters and other notes 09:27, 13 July 2026 (UTC)Reply
Thanks. Well, having repeated myself several times, I need to back away. Let me know if you need any related analysis, I've dealt with non-identical duplicate detection and so forth several times but do not want to step on Dominic's toes when there's plenty of other issues to focus on. Fæ (talk) 09:31, 13 July 2026 (UTC)Reply
I personally like Dominic. He's solved quite a few problems which I drew his attention to. I think he'll definitely manage to get the duplicate problem under control somehow. I'm a complete programming novice myself and only delete the stuff that DPLA-bot tags as duplicates. If the upload comes from DPLA-bot itself, then I couldn't care less, but I do intervene when it comes to user uploads from very active users like yourself who have uploaded many valuable files to Commons. Frankly, I don't see why a bot upload should be more important in that case. זיו「Ziv」 • For love letters and other notes 09:39, 13 July 2026 (UTC)Reply
Dear @Fæ.
I’m not entirely sure if I found all the files from June. Perhaps you could have your bot search to see if "DPLA" appears in the filename of any of your uploads. As for me, I’m really sorry; I thought I was doing the right thing 😢. All the best, זיו「Ziv」 • For love letters and other notes 18:02, 14 July 2026 (UTC)Reply
Oh goodness. I apologize if you felt bad for this. There's absolutely nothing to feel guilty about! I appreciate your efforts to help out. Fæ (talk) 18:07, 14 July 2026 (UTC)Reply
Thank you so much! Your words mean a lot to me, as someone who has contributed to Commons for much longer and more than I have. זיו「Ziv」 • For love letters and other notes 18:23, 14 July 2026 (UTC)Reply
FYI not sure how complete this is https://quarry.wmcloud.org/query/107288. This is where the number of 218 came from. I haven't delved into them as hoping that Dominic might respond to the request. I don't think there were deletions so have not researched that? Fæ (talk) 19:29, 14 July 2026 (UTC)Reply

Re File:.ae domain logo.png

[edit]

The problem with a copy and paste move is that the file history isn't moved along with the file. Therefore it should be deleted and properly moved with FileImporter. I can't transfer it now since it already exists here, it has to be deleted first, then I can import it correctly. Jonteemil (talk) 00:55, 24 July 2026 (UTC)Reply

Hello @Jonteemil.
Okay, I just learned something: the file can not be moved to Commons at all. You wouldn't be able to comply with my request to do it yourself, because I just tried it and it doesn't work, even with my extended rights. So, please accept my apologies.
The version history is likely not the main issue here; rather, the question is whether the English Wikipedia actually needs a local copy of it.
However, I have since complied with your request: I deleted the file, re-uploaded it, and marked the versions on the English-language Wikipedia accordingly. Best regards, זיו「Ziv」 • For love letters and other notes 10:42, 24 July 2026 (UTC)Reply
New Files: File:Ascension Island domain logo (.ac).png & File:United Arab Emirates domain logo (.ae).png. זיו「Ziv」 • For love letters and other notes 10:43, 24 July 2026 (UTC)Reply
Thanks! I think the reason they couldn't be imported here originally is that the files already were here, you can't import duplicates. However now since you deleted the file, you then could import them. And the original upload log is not needed now since the upload log are imported along with the file. Only before FileImported was created did you need to copy the file log manually. No apologies needed :) Jonteemil (talk) 14:11, 24 July 2026 (UTC)Reply
The upload log is something I always add when importing files, because of the fact not everyone looks into the file history. The log makes it clear to everyone. זיו「Ziv」 • For love letters and other notes 14:16, 24 July 2026 (UTC)Reply
But what? You do realize that your just duplicating the file history, right? See https://limewire.com/d/m12ls#Zkgrgt0zzY. Jonteemil (talk) 14:32, 24 July 2026 (UTC)Reply
Nothing is made more clear by you adding the same information again. Jonteemil (talk) 14:33, 24 July 2026 (UTC)Reply
However, no one has ever been able to explain to me why this is wrong; I’ve always handled it this way, including with the other files I’ve imported so far. I consider it transparent, since, as I said, the average user isn't interested in the version history. זיו「Ziv」 • For love letters and other notes 15:07, 24 July 2026 (UTC)Reply
I mean, the information isn't wrong, of course, but duplicating it, as you do, is wrong. What is more transparent now than without it? I'm bringing this to VP I think unless you finally agree with me. Jonteemil (talk) 09:29, 25 July 2026 (UTC)Reply
I don't know if it's right or wrong, but why do other-language Wikipedias offer a link to copy the log after a file has been transferred to Commons? I’m actually not the only one who does that, but I can’t show you an example right now. No, I won't agree with you, as I consider the upload log useful. זיו「Ziv」 • For love letters and other notes 09:35, 25 July 2026 (UTC)Reply

Hello, this file, deleted by you, has been reuploaded as File:معالي إبراهيم العنقري مع معالي محمد الملحم ومعالي ابراهيم العساt.jpg by the uploader. I tagged it with {{Npd}} and the uploader removed it and replaced it with a source link, but I really see no evidence of it being own work at the source. Jonteemil (talk) 21:44, 3 August 2026 (UTC)Reply

Hello @Jonteemil.
I have speed-deleted the image. Thanks for the heads-up. Best regards, זיו「Ziv」 • For love letters and other notes 21:51, 3 August 2026 (UTC)Reply

Specification

[edit]

Hello @Ziv, I am writing to you following the conclusion of this procedure and in particular for File:Silvio Lavornia.jpg, which was not restored Under Italian law, Public Administrations are subject to a strict rule known as Open by Default. This principle dictates that if a government entity publishes a document, dataset, or image online without explicitly adding a restrictive copyright notice (like "All rights reserved"), that file automatically becomes Open Data. Therefore, the fact that the 2017 archived website had no copyright notice at all is exactly the legal trigger that makes these files free. If the Province of Caserta had wanted to restrict the use of those files back in 2017, they were legally required to explicitly state it. Since they remained silent on the matter, the files were legally born as Open Data. You might legitimately wonder how this works timeline-wise. The reference law is Article 52, paragraph 2 of the Digital Administration Code (commonly known in Italy as CAD, Decreto Legislativo 82/2005). Although the Code itself dates back to 2005, this specific "Open by Default" paragraph was officially injected into it via a later amendment in 2012 (specifically, Article 9, paragraph 1 n. 2 of Decree-Law 179/2012 "Data and documents published by the responsible administrative bodies—by any means and without the express adoption of a license [...] are deemed to be released as open data"). This means that when the archived website was active in 2017, this open-data mandate had already been in full legal force for five years. Today, the current version of the website displays a CC BY 4.0 logo in its Legal Notes. They haven't fundamentally changed the license today; rather, they are simply complying with the law by explicitly writing down the open status that their contents already legally possessed since 2012. ​In conclusion, under Italian law, any file published by a local government entity in 2017 without a restrictive copyright warning is legally Open Data. We can safely keep and upload these archived files by applying the current CC BY 4.0 license. ​I hope this breakdown clears up any remaining concerns. Thank you! Flopao (talk) 08:05, 4 August 2026 (UTC)Reply

Hello @Flopao.
At Commons:Undeletion_requests/Archive/2026-08#Request_for_undeletion_File:Anacleto_Colombiano.jpg @ZioNicco: 's explanation was sufficient for me. But let's clear this up. My Italian is usually good enough for simple conversations, but not for reading legal texts. @Ruthven: , please enlighten me. Should File:Silvio Lavornia.jpg also be restored, adding archive links as correct source, one for the main page and one for the full image? License {{Italy-CAD-OBD}} instead of {{Cc-by-4.0}}? Thank you. Best regards, זיו「Ziv」 • For love letters and other notes 09:30, 4 August 2026 (UTC)Reply
Hi! The Italian institutions are slowwwwwly moving towards free license. So, it's correct to use {{Italy-CAD-OBD}} for those governmental websites that do not specify any license. When a license is specified, like in this case of Provincia di Caserta, we generally use the CC BY 4.0 template. But we can modify the Italy-CAD-OBD in order to include other websites applying CC BY 4.0.
For the File:Silvio Lavornia.jpg, note that the archived version from 2017-06-01 does not have the CC BY 4.0 statement in Note legali [1]. I would restore it using as source the main page and using the Italy-CAD-OBD template. Cheers, Ruthven (msg) 14:26, 4 August 2026 (UTC)Reply
Thank you very much for the detailed explanation. I will restore the file later after my shift and adjust it accordingly. Best regards, זיו「Ziv」 • For love letters and other notes 14:36, 4 August 2026 (UTC)Reply


File:Nooshafarin02.jpg

[edit]

I just want to confirm that it is OK to keep a nude photo of an underage 15 year old? is it not considered child porn or would it not violate child sexual abuse material (CSAM) laws? Dance8pk (talk) 18:51, 26 August 2026 (UTC)Reply

An unproblematic image from a country that was not always so prudish, nominated for deletion by an account whose sole activity is targeting this image and whose edits on the English Wikipedia have mostly been reverted. That pretty much says it all. COM:NOTHERE. זיו「Ziv」 • For love letters and other notes 07:32, 27 August 2026 (UTC)Reply

Hello!

[edit]

Thank you for moving my pages for rename and delete ones SDed! ;) ~2026-46750-33 (talk) 15:59, 30 August 2026 (UTC)Reply

File:OpenAI logo.svg

[edit]

File:OpenAI logo.svg has been marked for speedy deletion. (Reason: None)

Why not upload a picture of a plant, animal, or anything else which fits into our scope. You can contribute any media type you want, including but not limited to images, videos, music, and 3D models. Start uploading now! If you don't have anything to upload at the moment, why not take a look at our best images or best videos, sounds and 3D models. If you have any doubts/questions don't hesitate to visit our help desk.

User who nominated the file for deletion (Nominator) : Johnj1995.

I'm a computer program; please don't ask me questions but ask the user who nominated your file(s) for deletion (shown above) or at our Help Desk. //Deletion Notification Bot 2 (talk) 19:01, 2 September 2026 (UTC)Reply

Dup tagging

[edit]

The duplicate templating is now automated as suggested, so it is limited to topping up the duplicates category a couple of times a day. It only adds files if the backlog is under 200 and it runs slowly. There's just under 4,000 2-duplicates listed for the DPLA now, i.e. files with exactly one other identical duplicate. Other cases with higher numbers of duplicates are either caused because of blank pages or can be handled with DRs. Interestingly only one 3-duplicate case is left, so it feels like this housekeeping is almost finished, Deletion requests/Files in Category:DPLA dups 5.

It's worth remembering the method if any bot creates mass duplicates again, in this case after getting SQL working in quarry, the results can be exported to a CSV file and then have a pywikibot programme examine each SHA1 value in turn. Running in my local crontab is not an unreasonable thing to do with it. Other technical solutions, like using something running on toolforge could be worth it, if the case had much larger numbers, however an even better solution in large 'bad bot' related case would be to agree mass deletion and let a bot do it all, rather than sticking in the volunteer queue.

Thanks for taking your time chipping away at this case. Fæ (talk) 10:05, 4 September 2026 (UTC)Reply

Hello @Fæ.
Yes, this would probably be easy to program, but in this case, I'm one of the most clueless users imaginable. I'm against a bot that has the authority to delete files, because ultimately, a human should always oversee what gets deleted, even if it's just exact duplicates. Best regards, זיו「Ziv」 • For love letters and other notes 17:59, 4 September 2026 (UTC)Reply

Unblock request for Wikidata (Block ID #77935)

[edit]

Dear Ziv, I apologize for contacting you here. I am unable to reach you on Wikidata due to my block.

I have posted an unblock request on my Wikidata talk page (User talk:Worksmile). I would be very grateful if you could review it at your convenience.

The block was caused by a junior employee who added promotional content to the user page without understanding Wikidata's policies. We sincerely apologize and commit to following all rules going forward.

Thank you, Worksmile team Worksmile (talk) 11:32, 4 September 2026 (UTC)Reply

Hello @Worksmile.
Since this concerns Wikidata rather than Commons, I will provide you with a detailed answer there. Many thanks and best regards, זיו「Ziv」 • For love letters and other notes 17:55, 4 September 2026 (UTC)Reply

Duplicate details merge

[edit]

Hello @Ziv! Have 2 questions:

  1. Why did you delete File:Adding more maize meal during the cooking process.jpg instead of File:Adding more maize meal during the cooking process 2.jpg I suggested (but you reverted). Don't you see distortion (curves) on the photo you kept in the center, which usually occurs when you take a photo of something from a CRT display (monitor or TV), that was absent on initial (I bet original, showed - I guess - 13 minutes later on CRT display to make photo you kept) photo you deleted? I mean... curves probably an (unintentional) work of art and (probably) valuable to someone, but what makes you take such unusual deletion priority of deleting original keeping it's distorted copy?
  2. What does mean "Merging details from duplicate" note here? Does it some kind of automated details copy while deleting the duplicates? Usually I try to combine details before SD nomination, but what I see probably make my such action excessive. Is that thing some kind of automatic and I can no more care about combining it before SDing?

~2026-48162-51 (talk) 13:05, 7 September 2026 (UTC)Reply

As of 1st question - if image you've chosen to keep any way valuable, maybe it's good idea to just merge them both instead? ~2026-48162-51 (talk) 13:11, 7 September 2026 (UTC)Reply
Hello @~2026-48162-51.
That is very easy to explain. The images were identical, but the second upload was larger in megabytes, so I reversed the selection. Only your template was removed; nothing else was changed. Note: An image you have tagged as a duplicate is not always deleted; administrators can still reverse the selection if there are grounds for doing so.
Best regards, זיו「Ziv」 • For love letters and other notes 13:14, 7 September 2026 (UTC)Reply
I undeleted File:Adding more maize meal during the cooking process.jpg. Please take a second look. זיו「Ziv」 • For love letters and other notes 13:25, 7 September 2026 (UTC)Reply
I didn't mean any critics. I know SD nomination doesn't guarantee deletion. I was just trying to understand the logic. Now it makes sense, thanks ;) But now, having looked closely, I see that the original image is fine when in full-resolution, but the downsized one (i.e. page thumbnail) shows exactly the same (or at least similar) distortion as the second one...
Looks like they both bad or good enough: the original image was also taken from a TV ;), but the contrast in the second one is suppressed (so the cameraman's hand wouldn't be visible). Wonder they both looks good on the full-scale... I don't understand the nature of distorsion on downscaled. First time I ever see connected to scale I choose and not image itself...
I guess I'll just nominate them for merging (although I don't understand what value they have). Sorry for bothering you. I just needed to understand.
Appreciated :) ~2026-48162-51 (talk) 13:39, 7 September 2026 (UTC)Reply
Oh, sorry, what about answering the 2nd question? That will be really useful to know it further. ~2026-48162-51 (talk) 13:40, 7 September 2026 (UTC)Reply
I’ve noticed the hands now, but it looks almost as if this isn't an original work—see COM:SS. It might make more sense to hold a deletion discussion for both images. זיו「Ziv」 • For love letters and other notes 13:50, 7 September 2026 (UTC)Reply
Thanks! Looks like found even more screenshots there...
Will continue @Commons:Help desk#Screenshots as I still can't make massive DRs. What I meant as 2nd question was aboout "Merging details from duplicate" option there. I want to understand have I still merge details manually or no need as it always autodone by deleting admininstrator. ~2026-48162-51 (talk) 16:55, 7 September 2026 (UTC)Reply
[edit]

Hi there, I do not really understand why you deleted the logo. I thought as Amazon logos are uploaded here as well, it would be ok to upload a logo? Or is it the description? Because that could easily be changed. Can you please explain that to me? Thank you so much. Ansgar.B (talk) 15:12, 10 September 2026 (UTC)Reply

Hallo @Ansgar.B.
Du gestattest doch das ich dir auf Deutsch antworte, da wir beide dieser Sprache mächtig sind. Gelöscht ist das Logo zwar noch nicht, ich selbst habe es bloss zur Löschung unter COM:GCSD#G10 (Files and pages created as advertisements) nominiert und löschen wird es dann ein anderer Admin.
Tatsächlich aber gehört der Upload zu einem mittlerweile gelöschten Wikidata-Elelement, das nicht von relevanz ist und in diesem Sinne hat auch dieses Logo unter COM:OOS für Commons keinen weiteren Nutzen, dazu kommt noch hinzu, dass dies dein bisheriger einziger Beitrag auf Commons war, in diesem Sinne würde auch der Löschgrund COM:GCSD#F10 (Personal files by non-contributors) zutreffen.
Mit besten Grüssen, זיו「Ziv」 • For love letters and other notes 17:02, 10 September 2026 (UTC)Reply
Servus,
Ok den wikidata Eintrag hast du anscheinend auch gelöscht.
Darf ich fragen wieso? Amazon hat doch auch ein Profil inkl Logo. 😀
Wenn es um den Link zu der Webseite geht kann der gerne raus.
Ich hatte wirklich nichts Böses im Sinn, mir hat ein SEO Experte gesagt ich soll den Eintrag machen.
Also sorry für die Arbeit. (War für mich auch viel Arbeit 🙁)
VG Ansgar.B (talk) 17:42, 10 September 2026 (UTC)Reply
Hallo @Ansgar.B.
Entschuldige bitte, niemand hat dir böse Absichten unterstellt, du wurdest hier einfach nur schlecht beraten. Der Vergleich mit einem weltumspannenden Konzern wie Amazon hinkt dann aber schon ein wenig, dazu gibt es allein in 124 verschieden Sprachversionen einen Wikipediaartikel und unzählige weitere zu Amazon Nebenprodukte wie z.B prime usw…
Nichts für ungut. Beste Grüsse, זיו「Ziv」 • For love letters and other notes 07:16, 11 September 2026 (UTC)Reply

File:USAMMA emblem pdf www.amlc.army.mil 986x900px.png

[edit]

File:USAMMA emblem pdf www.amlc.army.mil 986x900px.png has been marked for speedy deletion. (Reason: COM:ADVERT)

Why not upload a picture of a plant, animal, or anything else which fits into our scope. You can contribute any media type you want, including but not limited to images, videos, music, and 3D models. Start uploading now! If you don't have anything to upload at the moment, why not take a look at our best images or best videos, sounds and 3D models. If you have any doubts/questions don't hesitate to visit our help desk.

User who nominated the file for deletion (Nominator) : ~2026-48708-14.

I'm a computer program; please don't ask me questions but ask the user who nominated your file(s) for deletion (shown above) or at our Help Desk. //Deletion Notification Bot 2 (talk) 22:02, 10 September 2026 (UTC)Reply

File:BlasonduRY.svg

[edit]

File:BlasonduRY.svg has been marked for speedy deletion. (Reason: CSD G2 (Unused and implausible, or broken redirect))

Why not upload a picture of a plant, animal, or anything else which fits into our scope. You can contribute any media type you want, including but not limited to images, videos, music, and 3D models. Start uploading now! If you don't have anything to upload at the moment, why not take a look at our best images or best videos, sounds and 3D models. If you have any doubts/questions don't hesitate to visit our help desk.

User who nominated the file for deletion (Nominator) : Kontributor 2K.

And also:

I'm a computer program; please don't ask me questions but ask the user who nominated your file(s) for deletion (shown above) or at our Help Desk. //Deletion Notification Bot 2 (talk) 10:43, 11 September 2026 (UTC)Reply


File:United States Army Western Hemisphere Command SSI api.army.mil 2025 12 05 751x976px.png has been marked for speedy deletion. (Reason: COM:ADVERT spam url)

Why not upload a picture of a plant, animal, or anything else which fits into our scope. You can contribute any media type you want, including but not limited to images, videos, music, and 3D models. Start uploading now! If you don't have anything to upload at the moment, why not take a look at our best images or best videos, sounds and 3D models. If you have any doubts/questions don't hesitate to visit our help desk.

User who nominated the file for deletion (Nominator) : ~2026-49216-86.

I'm a computer program; please don't ask me questions but ask the user who nominated your file(s) for deletion (shown above) or at our Help Desk. //Deletion Notification Bot 2 (talk) 17:52, 11 September 2026 (UTC)Reply

No need

[edit]

Hello! Why do you think there's no need if you commented while moving about link exactly? ~2026-49216-86 (talk) 18:21, 11 September 2026 (UTC)Reply

There are absolutely no reasons to delete redirects, period. זיו「Ziv」 • For love letters and other notes 18:38, 11 September 2026 (UTC)Reply
I see. Despite I disagree, still thank you for sharing your vision. ~2026-49216-86 (talk) 04:57, 12 September 2026 (UTC)Reply

File:Plaza Mayor Valladolid1 retouched.jpg

[edit]

File:Plaza Mayor Valladolid1 retouched.jpg has been marked for speedy deletion. (Reason: Make room to upload another file)

Why not upload a picture of a plant, animal, or anything else which fits into our scope. You can contribute any media type you want, including but not limited to images, videos, music, and 3D models. Start uploading now! If you don't have anything to upload at the moment, why not take a look at our best images or best videos, sounds and 3D models. If you have any doubts/questions don't hesitate to visit our help desk.

User who nominated the file for deletion (Nominator) : Lojwe.

I'm a computer program; please don't ask me questions but ask the user who nominated your file(s) for deletion (shown above) or at our Help Desk. //Deletion Notification Bot 2 (talk) 07:09, 12 September 2026 (UTC)Reply

File:Rediff.com Logo.gif

[edit]

File:Rediff.com Logo.gif has been marked for speedy deletion. (Reason: COM:ADVERT spam url)

Why not upload a picture of a plant, animal, or anything else which fits into our scope. You can contribute any media type you want, including but not limited to images, videos, music, and 3D models. Start uploading now! If you don't have anything to upload at the moment, why not take a look at our best images or best videos, sounds and 3D models. If you have any doubts/questions don't hesitate to visit our help desk.

User who nominated the file for deletion (Nominator) : ~2026-49420-22.

I'm a computer program; please don't ask me questions but ask the user who nominated your file(s) for deletion (shown above) or at our Help Desk. //Deletion Notification Bot 2 (talk) 11:54, 12 September 2026 (UTC)Reply

File:Rediff.com Logo.gif

[edit]
File:Rediff.com Logo.gif has been nominated for deletion at

This is a deletion request for the community to discuss whether the nominated page should be kept or deleted. Please voice your opinion in the linked request above. Thank you very much!

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

  — 🇺🇦Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me🇺🇦 13:50, 12 September 2026 (UTC)Reply

File:Plaza Mayor Valladolid1 modified.jpg

[edit]

File:Plaza Mayor Valladolid1 modified.jpg has been marked for speedy deletion. (Reason: Make room to upload another version)

Why not upload a picture of a plant, animal, or anything else which fits into our scope. You can contribute any media type you want, including but not limited to images, videos, music, and 3D models. Start uploading now! If you don't have anything to upload at the moment, why not take a look at our best images or best videos, sounds and 3D models. If you have any doubts/questions don't hesitate to visit our help desk.

User who nominated the file for deletion (Nominator) : Lojwe.

I'm a computer program; please don't ask me questions but ask the user who nominated your file(s) for deletion (shown above) or at our Help Desk. //Deletion Notification Bot 2 (talk) 00:47, 13 September 2026 (UTC)Reply

You declined the reaming request because for you the old filename is good enough, but it actually isn't, because even in the movies the characters in the image aren't the only members of the Guardians of the Galaxy (and Yondu isn't even part of the group). Mikirito 07 (talk) 21:43, 18 September 2026 (UTC)Reply

Hello @Mikirito 07.
That’s nonsense. Please read en:Yondu first, and then we can talk further. זיו「Ziv」 • For love letters and other notes 21:53, 18 September 2026 (UTC)Reply
The cosplays in the picture are based on the MCU version of the characters, and in the MCU Yondu was never part of the team. Mikirito 07 (talk) 22:04, 18 September 2026 (UTC)Reply
I have no idea about that, but the file is correctly categorized under Category:Cosplay of Yondu, which is a subcategory of Category:Cosplay of the Guardians of the Galaxy. In my opinion, the file doesn't need to be renamed; it might just need an update of the file description, if necessary at all. זיו「Ziv」 • For love letters and other notes 22:22, 18 September 2026 (UTC)Reply
I think renaming the file would be more clear. Mikirito 07 (talk) 22:24, 18 September 2026 (UTC)Reply
Well, the filename "Guardians of the Galaxy Cosplay" is clear enough—what more do you need? If it matters to you, then change the file description and add notes to the file. That would be far more beneficial for the file than renaming it. זיו「Ziv」 • For love letters and other notes 22:39, 18 September 2026 (UTC)Reply
Ok, thanks for the advise :) Mikirito 07 (talk) 12:58, 19 September 2026 (UTC)Reply

Request to review F10 nomination: Wesley Paterson headshot 2026.png

[edit]

Hello Ziv. I am Wesley Paterson, the subject and uploader of File:Wesley Paterson headshot 2026.png, so I have a conflict of interest. Could you please review the F10 nomination in light of the following coverage?

My proposed educational rationale is identification of a consultant whose work is documented in this reporting, rather than use as a personal photo collection. I understand that coverage does not establish the photograph's copyright status and that Commons licensing requirements apply separately.

I have left the deletion tag in place. Would you consider whether a regular deletion discussion, rather than speedy deletion under F10, is appropriate? Thank you. WesPaterson (talk) 14:16, 21 September 2026 (UTC)Reply

Hello @WesPaterson:
No, I will not restore it. 1. The image appears to show you, yet it is not a selfie. The copyright holder is therefore the photographer, not you and they did not give consent for the upload to Commons. For this reason, the image remains deleted.
Best regards, זיו「Ziv」 • For love letters and other notes 14:31, 21 September 2026 (UTC)Reply
Thank you for explaining the concern. I appreciate the need to verify permissions and would like to resolve this cooperatively.
The deleted portrait was taken by Jaylyn Wereley of Charisma Photography. I commissioned it and own the copyright. I am not claiming to have taken the photograph myself, and Jaylyn should be credited as the photographer separately from my copyright ownership.
The statement that the photographer must own the copyright because the image is not a selfie does not account for copyright transferred to another person. I would appreciate treating this as an ownership-verification question rather than a settled conclusion that I do not own the rights. For future cases, a request for clarification would be welcome.
I understand that Commons needs verifiable permission, not merely my assertion here. I will pursue verification through the Volunteer Response Team and will not re-upload the deleted file to bypass the decision. I also understand that permission verification and Commons’ educational-scope requirements are separate issues.
My goal is accurate attribution, verified permissions, and an appropriate resolution. Thank you. WesPaterson (talk) 16:45, 21 September 2026 (UTC)Reply
(Chiming in:) Wesley, there is also another problem: https://hivedetect.ai/: 99.9% AI, https://www.idetect.org/: 97.2% AI, https://truthscan.com/: 96% AI, https://imagedetector.com/ 96% AI, https://isgen.ai/: 100% AI, https://isthisai.com/: 96% AI. We do not host AI generated images of living people. --Achim55 (talk) 18:06, 21 September 2026 (UTC)Reply
Is this the photo in question - https://speakerscanada.com/keynote-speaker/wesley-paterson/ - This is me, not AI WesPaterson (talk) 18:34, 21 September 2026 (UTC)Reply
No, your upload was this one. --Achim55 (talk) 18:59, 21 September 2026 (UTC)Reply
Can I swap that one out for the other one then? That one is an AI generated one from a series of other photographs taken of me... this newer one is more authentic and recent WesPaterson (talk) 19:05, 21 September 2026 (UTC)Reply
@WesPaterson, have you actually read what COM:GCSD#F10 means? The image was your only contribution to Commons; it was used solely in a Wikidata item that has since been deleted. The image is of no further use to Commons under COM:OOS, and it also falls under COM:WEBHOST. זיו「Ziv」 • For love letters and other notes 01:57, 22 September 2026 (UTC)Reply
Can I post an image from a professional photographer that I have copyright to? - https://speakerscanada.com/keynote-speaker/wesley-paterson/ here is an example of where it is being used as a headshot ~2026-51036-79 (talk) 02:00, 22 September 2026 (UTC)Reply
@WesPaterson, please log in if you already have an account.
Regarding your question: while I cannot forbid you from uploading another new photo, you should expect that this one, too, will be subject to a speedy deletion request, as it remains an upload from a non-contributor that offers no further utility and fails from being in scope due to COM:OOS. זיו「Ziv」 • For love letters and other notes 12:08, 24 September 2026 (UTC)Reply

File:1st May demonstation in Moscow 1946.jpg

[edit]

File:1st May demonstation in Moscow 1946.jpg has been marked for speedy deletion. (Reason: ненужное перенаправление)

Why not upload a picture of a plant, animal, or anything else which fits into our scope. You can contribute any media type you want, including but not limited to images, videos, music, and 3D models. Start uploading now! If you don't have anything to upload at the moment, why not take a look at our best images or best videos, sounds and 3D models. If you have any doubts/questions don't hesitate to visit our help desk.

User who nominated the file for deletion (Nominator) : MasterRus21thCentury.

I'm a computer program; please don't ask me questions but ask the user who nominated your file(s) for deletion (shown above) or at our Help Desk. //Deletion Notification Bot 2 (talk) 04:49, 24 September 2026 (UTC)Reply

File:Flavio Bolsonaro em 2006.jpg

[edit]

Hi there Ziv. Can I object for your rejection on File:Flavio Bolsonaro em 2006.jpg renaming? It is precisely part of the TSE electoral portraits set. All pictures, in all sets, are (or should be) named on the standard [YEAR] CANDIDATO [POSITION] [NAME] [STATE ABBREVIATION OR CITY NAME] ([TSE INTERNAL NUMBER]).jpg. Some uploaders are unaware of this standard, specially in the older pics, but it is used in 99% of sets, see for instance Category:TSE electoral portraits of 2026 for more recent examples. Also notice all pictures shared by TSE (Electoral Tribunal in Brazil) are on 161x225px size.--ArlindoPereira (talk) 07:30, 24 September 2026 (UTC)Reply

Hello @ArlindoPereira.
Did you even read the additional information regarding the move criterion 4? It states the following:
Just because images share a category does not mean that they are part of a set. There are two scenarios that this criterion is designed for. First, certain complex templates (such as those that use BSicons or that display football kits) assume that the images used in them will follow a specific naming convention. Wikisource also uses a specific naming convention for the source files they transcribe. Second, files that form parts of a whole (such as scans from the same book or large images that are divided into smaller portions due to Commons’ upload size restriction) should follow the same naming convention so that they appear together, in order, in categories and lists.
Photos of politicians are neither railway icons (BSicons) nor football kits. Furthermore, these are not files whose specific naming sequence is mandatory for Wikisource. Renaming them under criterion 4 is therefore not permissible, and you will likely have to live with the current filenames, unless the name is incorrect or completely meaningless. Neither of these applies to the filename of File:Flavio Bolsonaro em 2006.jpg. Best regards, זיו「Ziv」 • For love letters and other notes 12:02, 24 September 2026 (UTC)Reply

File:Testspiel gegen FC Bayern München 03.JPG

[edit]

File:Testspiel gegen FC Bayern München 03.JPG has been marked for speedy deletion. (Reason: None)

Why not upload a picture of a plant, animal, or anything else which fits into our scope. You can contribute any media type you want, including but not limited to images, videos, music, and 3D models. Start uploading now! If you don't have anything to upload at the moment, why not take a look at our best images or best videos, sounds and 3D models. If you have any doubts/questions don't hesitate to visit our help desk.

User who nominated the file for deletion (Nominator) : Timmy96.

I'm a computer program; please don't ask me questions but ask the user who nominated your file(s) for deletion (shown above) or at our Help Desk. //Deletion Notification Bot 2 (talk) 15:10, 2 October 2026 (UTC)Reply

[edit]

You have reported original content as copyright infringement (the file Araposter). Why exactly? OTEureka (talk) 14:07, 3 October 2026 (UTC)Reply

Hello @OTEureka.
The reason for deletion was COM:GCSD#F3, because that is what it looks like. If that explanation isn't sufficient for you, I change the deletion reason to COM:GCSD#F10 instead, an AI-generated image by a user with no constructive global contributions. Otherwise, I cannot see any meaningful use under COM:OOS either. However, you are welcome to submit a undelete request at COM:UNDEL; explain that the poster is entirely your own work and state the purpose for which it was uploaded. Best regards, זיו「Ziv」 • For love letters and other notes 20:42, 3 October 2026 (UTC)Reply
Not AI generated & not derivative. I have a suspicion there is another reason you deleted it. OTEureka (talk) 23:38, 3 October 2026 (UTC)Reply
@OTEureka: In general, posters are in scope if were used as such, e.g. in case of film, was shown on cinemas. Completely independent creations not falls under this criteria. Evelino Ucelo (talk) 08:32, 9 October 2026 (UTC)Reply

Madonna und Kind Pseudo Pier Francesco Fiorentino

[edit]

Hallo Ziv,

Du hast die von mir vor ein paar Tagen hochgeladene Bilddatei [Pseudo Pier Francesco Fiorentino Madonna and Child 1942.9.50.jpg] gelöscht, vermutlich unter der Annahme, dass sie identisch mit [Madonna and Child A14718.jpg] ist. Aus zwei Gründen bin ich etwas unglücklich mit Deiner Aktion:

  • Die beiden Dateien sind nicht identisch; die von mir hochgeladene Version war etwas detaillierter (2785 x 4096 Pixel ggü. 2720 x 4000) - gut, den Unterschied sieht man wahrscheinlich nicht einmal mit Lupe - und
  • der Dateiname der gelöschten Datei war informativer ("Pseudo Pier Francesco Fiorentino Madonna and Child 1942.9.50.jpg" enthält ggü. "Madonna and Child A14718.jpg" den Notnamen des Malers sowie die Inventarnummer in der National Gallery of Art; "A14718" sagt mir hingegen jetzt nix).

Daher würde ich es begrüßen, wenn Du die Löschaktion wieder rückgängig machen würdest (falls die gelöschte Datei nicht bereits auf Nimmerwiedersehen in irgendeinem Orkus verschwunden ist).

Grüße und ein schönes Wochenende, Ashtroyde (talk) 16:21, 9 October 2026 (UTC)Reply

Hallo @Ashtroyde.
Auf Commons verschwindet nix in irgendwelchen "Orken". Löschen heisst eigentlich es wird "unsichtbar für die Öffentlichkeit" und Nutzer mit Spezialrechten haben weiterhin Zugriff da drauf. Zu deinem Upload: File:Pseudo Pier Francesco Fiorentino Madonna and Child 1942.9.50.jpg wurde von @M2k~dewiki: als Duplikat getaggt und ich habe dem stattgegeben. Einen grossen Unterschied kann ich da nicht erkennen, bei deinem Upload sind zudem die Zehen des Jesuskindes abgeschnitten, während auf File:Madonna and Child A14718.jpg das vollständige Gemälde zu sehen ist. Ich habe die Datei jetzt trotzdem mal wiederhergestellt, dann kannst du vergleichen. זיו「Ziv」 • For love letters and other notes 08:38, 10 October 2026 (UTC)Reply
Nachtrag: Das mit den Zehen ist nicht korrekt, wurde mir aber in der Vorschau vor der Wiederherstellung so angezeigt. Trotzdem bleibt dein Upload ein Duplikat, der ältere Upload vom August 2016 hat mit 12,39 MB deutlich mehr bytes. זיו「Ziv」 • For love letters and other notes 08:42, 10 October 2026 (UTC)Reply
Danke!
Ich bin mir nicht sicher, ob die Dateigröße in diesem Fall so aussagekräftig ist. Beide Bilder scheinen ja aus derselben Quelle zu stammen, direkt von der NGA heruntergeladen, da scheint es mir nicht sehr plausibel, dass die nun plötzlich ein qualitativ minderwertigeres Foto ins Netz stellen. Vielleicht haben sie jetzt einfach ein besseres Komprimierungsverfahren verwendet als 2016? Aber Du kennst Dich damit vermutlich besser aus als ich, wenn Du täglich mit x Bildern auf Commons jonglierst.
Viele Grüße, Ashtroyde (talk) 08:58, 10 October 2026 (UTC)Reply
Beim Duplikate löschen erscheint den Administratoren ein Auswahlfenster, wo dann beide Dateien darin abgebildet sind. Deine hat darin zwar minimal mehr Pixel aber weniger Megabytes. Darf ich also deinen Upload wieder als Duplikat löschen? Wir könnten das andere File auch in File:Anonymus (Follower of Fra Filippo Lippi and Pesellino) - Madonna and Child (A14718).jpg umbenennen, dann ist der Titel aussagekräftiger. זיו「Ziv」 • For love letters and other notes 09:30, 10 October 2026 (UTC)Reply
Wegen mir kannst Du das machen; dann würde ich mir aber den aussagekräftigeren Dateinamen wünschen. Was bedeutet denn die "A14718"? Wie oben geschrieben, finde ich die "1942.9.50" (Inventarnummer der NGA) aussagekräftiger. Ashtroyde (talk) 09:48, 10 October 2026 (UTC)Reply
A14718 erscheint in den Exifdaten als Kurztitel und vermutlich wurde es deswegen damals so hochgeladen. Meiner Meinung nach spricht aber auch nichts dagegen die Inventranummer zu verwenden. Was wäre denn dein Namensvorschlag? זיו「Ziv」 • For love letters and other notes 09:51, 10 October 2026 (UTC)Reply
Was hältst Du von File:Anonymus (Pseudo Pier Francesco Fiorentino) - Madonna and Child (NGA 1942.9.50).jpg oder File:Anonymus (Lippi-Pesellino-Imitator) - Madonna and Child (NGA 1942.9.50).jpg? Auf der WP und auch im Museumswesen scheint "Pseudo Pier Francesco Fiorentino" gebräuchlicher zu sein, während mir "Lippi-Pesellino-Imitator" im wissenschaftlichen Kontext üblicher (und auf jeden Fall genauer) zu sein scheint. Im Sinne der Commons-internen Kohärenz tendiere ich leicht zum Pseudo, aus wissenschaftlicher Sicht klar zum Imitator, aber letztendlich müsst Ihr das wissen, die Ihr Euch täglich mit Commons-Dateinamen herumschlagt. Ashtroyde (talk) 10:22, 10 October 2026 (UTC)Reply
Der erste Vorschlag erscheunt nun aus Blaulink. Ich habe mich dafür entschieden, da auch die Kategorie wo es einsortiert ist, so benannt ist. Das andere File habe ich inzwischen auch wieder eine WL umgewandelt. Beste Grüsse und ein schönes Weekend. זיו「Ziv」 • For love letters and other notes 10:49, 10 October 2026 (UTC)Reply
Danke, Dir auch! Ashtroyde (talk) 11:22, 10 October 2026 (UTC)Reply