English Français Deutsch Italiano 中文
More
Español Ελληνικά 日本語 Português Türkçe
The economics of public procurement is an emerging subfield. Public procurement is large enough to matter for macro stabilization and long-run growth, yet it is not a frictionless component of “government purchases”: it is a rule-governed process that turns budgets into contracts, shaping prices, quality, delivery, and the distribution of public money. Using a five-stage procurement-cycle framework, this survey synthesizes evidence from four core areas: (1) how procurement demand transmits through composition, place, and production networks; (2) the size and sources of the wedge between authorized spending and delivered value; (3) how tender and award rules affect entry, bids, and value for money; and (4) how market structure, thin participation, and collusion risks condition performance. Three messages stand out: both public procurement design and contract awards have highly heterogeneous effects on firms and markets, the public procurement wedge is often large, and award prices alone are a noisy performance metric when quality and execution risks matter. We conclude with research priorities and a call for a cumulative “What Works for Public Procurement” evidence base.
Translation created by Artificial Intelligence (LLM)