Intel Granite Rapids WS vs. AMD Threadripper Zen 5 SMT Performance

Written by Michael Larabel in Processors on 17 September 2026 at 03:14 PM EDT. Page 6 of 6. 4 Comments.
Geometric Mean Of All Test Results benchmark with settings of Result Composite, Intel Xeon 678X vs. AMD Threadripper SMT Performance. TR 9980X: SMT On was the fastest.

When taking the geometric mean of all the raw performance benchmarks conducted, the Intel Xeon 678X saw an 11% improvement in performance with Hyper Threading enabled. The Threadripper 9980X whether at 48 cores to match the Xeon 678X or in its full 64 configuration was 16~18% faster with SMT than having it disabled.

CPU Power Consumption Monitoring Overview benchmark with settings of Accumulated CPU Power Consumption Monitoring.

Beyond the performance benefit, having SMT enabled on these workstation processors led to slightly lower CPU power consumption than when it was disabled.

CPU Temp Monitoring Overview benchmark with settings of Accumulated CPU Temp Monitoring.

There didn't end up being much of a difference in the thermals with SMT enabled versus disabled.

CPU Peak Freq Monitoring Overview benchmark with settings of Accumulated CPU Peak Freq Monitoring.

When the Threadripper 9980X was running at 48 cores its peak frequency was hitting higher typically than the 64 core configuration as affecting the thermal behavior between those tested configurations.

Hopefully this data was helpful if you have been curious about the modern SMT/HT benefits on current-generation workstations. If you appreciate all of my different Linux performance benchmarking, consider joining Phoronix Premium to help make more interesting tests possible.

If you enjoyed this article consider joining Phoronix Premium to view this site ad-free, multi-page articles on a single page, and other benefits. PayPal or Stripe tips are also graciously accepted. Thanks for your support.

Related Articles
About The Author

Michael Larabel is the principal author of Phoronix.com and founded the site in 2004 with a focus on enriching the Linux hardware experience. Michael has written more than 20,000 articles covering the state of Linux hardware support, Linux performance, graphics drivers, and other topics. Michael is also the lead developer of the Phoronix Test Suite, Phoromatic, and OpenBenchmarking.org automated benchmarking software. He can be followed via Twitter, LinkedIn, or contacted via MichaelLarabel.com.