Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Meta-Analysis
. 2017 Oct;83(10):2134-2147.
doi: 10.1111/bcp.13321. Epub 2017 Jun 10.

Fluoxetine and congenital malformations: a systematic review and meta-analysis of cohort studies

Affiliations
Meta-Analysis

Fluoxetine and congenital malformations: a systematic review and meta-analysis of cohort studies

Shan-Yan Gao et al. Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2017 Oct.

Abstract

Aims: To investigate the safety of fluoxetine use during pregnancy, and to better understand the relationship between maternal fluoxetine use during the first trimester and congenital malformations in infants.

Methods: PubMed and Web of Science databases were systematically searched from inception to 21 March 2016. Additional studies were identified in a manual search of the reference lists. Two reviewers independently extracted data. A third reviewer checked the data. Estimates were pooled using a random-effects model to calculate the summarized relative ratios (RR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI).

Results: Among 1918 initially identified articles, 16 cohort studies were included. The offspring of pregnant women exposed to fluoxetine during the first trimester had a statistically increased risk of major malformations (RR = 1.18, 95% CI = 1.08-1.29), cardiovascular malformations (RR = 1.36, 95% CI = 1.17-1.59), septal defects (RR = 1.38, 95% CI = 1.19-1.61), and non-septal defects (RR = 1.39, 95% CI = 1.12-1.73) with low heterogeneity in infants. There were no significant observations of other system-specific malformations in the nervous system, eye, urogenital system, digestive system, respiratory system, or musculoskeletal system, respectively. There was no indication of publication bias.

Conclusions: The results of this meta-analysis indicate maternal fluoxetine use is associated with a slightly increased risk of cardiovascular malformations in infants. Health care providers and pregnant women must weigh the risk-benefit potential of these drugs when making decisions about whether to treat with fluoxetine during pregnancy.

Keywords: antidepressants; birth defects; cardiovascular; depression; meta-analysis.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Flow‐chart of study selection
Figure 2
Figure 2
Forest plots of the relationship between fluoxetine use and risk of major malformations. Squares indicate study‐specific risk estimates (size of the square reflects the study‐specific statistical weight); horizontal lines indicate 95% CI; diamond indicates the summary relative ratio with its 95% CI. RR: relative ratio
Figure 3
Figure 3
Forest plots of the relationship between fluoxetine use and risk of cardiovascular malformations. Squares indicate study‐specific risk estimates (size of the square reflects the study‐specific statistical weight); horizontal lines indicate 95% CI; diamond indicates the summary relative ratio with its 95% CI. RR: relative ratio
Figure 4
Figure 4
Forest plots of the relationship between fluoxetine use and risk of other system‐specific malformations. Squares indicate study‐specific risk estimates (size of the square reflects the study‐specific statistical weight); horizontal lines indicate 95% CI; diamond indicates the summary relative ratio with its 95% CI. RR: relative ratio

Comment in

References

    1. Southan C, Sharman JL, Benson HE, Faccenda E, Pawson AJ, Alexander SP, et al The IUPHAR/BPS Guide to PHARMACOLOGY in 2016: towards curated quantitative interactions between 1300 protein targets and 6000 ligands. Nucl Acids Res 2016; 44: D1054–D1068. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Alexander SPH, Kelly E, Marrion N, Peters JA, Benson HE, Faccenda E, et al The Concise Guide to PHARMACOLOGY 2015/16: Transporters. Br J Pharmacol 2015; 172: 6110–6202. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Murray CL, Lopez AD. The Global Burden of Disease: A Comprehensive Assessment of Mortality and Disability from Diseases, Injuries, and Risk Factors in 1990 and Projected to 2020. Boston, MA: Harvard School of Public Health, 1996.
    1. O'Keane V, Marsh MS. Depression during pregnancy. BMJ 2007; 334: 1003–1005. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Committee on Obstetric Practice . The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists Committee Opinion no. 630. Screening for perinatal depression. Obstet Gynecol 2015; 125: 1268–1271. - PubMed

MeSH terms

Substances