One-quarter of studies that meet commonly used statistical cutoff may be false.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution
Access options
Subscribe to this journal
Receive 52 print issues and online access
199,00 € per year
only 3,83 € per issue
Buy this article
- Purchase on SpringerLink
- Instant access to the full article PDF.
39,95 €
Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout
Subjects
References
Johnson, V. E. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1313476110 (2013).
Ioannidis, J. P., Tarone, R. & McLaughlin, J. Epidemiology. 22, 450-456 (2011).
Additional information
Follow Erika on Twitter @Erika_Check.
Related links
Related links
Related links in Nature Research
US behavioural research studies skew positive 2013-Aug-26
The data detective 2012-Jul-03
Replication studies: Bad copy 2012-May-16
Related external links
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Check Hayden, E. Weak statistical standards implicated in scientific irreproducibility. Nature (2013). https://doi.org/10.1038/nature.2013.14131
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nature.2013.14131