Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • News
  • Published:

Weak statistical standards implicated in scientific irreproducibility

One-quarter of studies that meet commonly used statistical cutoff may be false.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

39,95 €

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

References

  1. Johnson, V. E. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1313476110 (2013).

  2. Ioannidis, J. P., Tarone, R. & McLaughlin, J. Epidemiology. 22, 450-456 (2011).

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Additional information

Follow Erika on Twitter @Erika_Check.

Related links

Related links

Related links in Nature Research

US behavioural research studies skew positive 2013-Aug-26

The data detective 2012-Jul-03

Replication studies: Bad copy 2012-May-16

Related external links

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Check Hayden, E. Weak statistical standards implicated in scientific irreproducibility. Nature (2013). https://doi.org/10.1038/nature.2013.14131

Download citation

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nature.2013.14131

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing AI and Robotics

Sign up for the Nature Briefing: AI and Robotics newsletter — what matters in AI and robotics research, free to your inbox weekly.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing: AI and Robotics