Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Meta-Analysis
. 2020 Aug;23(8):1298-1309.
doi: 10.1111/ele.13527. Epub 2020 May 5.

The effects of livestock grazing on biodiversity are multi-trophic: a meta-analysis

Affiliations
Meta-Analysis

The effects of livestock grazing on biodiversity are multi-trophic: a meta-analysis

Alessandro Filazzola et al. Ecol Lett. 2020 Aug.

Abstract

Anthropogenic disturbance has generated a significant loss of biodiversity worldwide and grazing by domestic herbivores is a contributing disturbance. Although the effects of grazing on plants are commonly explored, here we address the potential multi-trophic effects on animal biodiversity (e.g. herbivores, pollinators and predators). We conducted a meta-analysis on 109 independent studies that tested the response of animals or plants to livestock grazing relative to livestock excluded. Across all animals, livestock exclusion increased abundance and diversity, but these effects were greatest for trophic levels directly dependent on plants, such as herbivores and pollinators. Detritivores were the only trophic level whose abundance decreased with livestock exclusion. We also found that the number of years since livestock was excluded influenced the community and that the effects of grazer exclusion on animal diversity were strongest in temperate climates. These findings synthesise the effects of livestock grazing beyond plants and demonstrate the indirect impacts of livestock grazing on multiple trophic levels in the animal community. We identified the potentially long-term impacts that livestock grazing can have on lower trophic levels and consequences for biological conservation. We also highlight the potentially inevitable cost to global biodiversity from livestock grazing that must be balanced against socio-economic benefits.

Keywords: Conservation; disturbance; domestic grazers; exclosure; global; graze; herbivory; trophic cascade.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Andresen, H., Bakker, J.P., Brongers, M., Heydemann, B. & Irmler, U. (1990). Long-term changes of salt marsh communities by cattle grazing. Vegetatio, 89, 137-148.
    1. Andriuzzi, W.S. & Wall, D.H. (2017). Responses of belowground communities to large aboveground herbivores: Meta-analysis reveals biome-dependent patterns and critical research gaps. Glob. Chang. Biol., 23, 3857-3868.
    1. Archer, S., Schimel, D.S. & Holland, E.A. (1995). Mechanisms of shrubland expansion: land use, climate or CO2? Clim. Change, 29, 91-99.
    1. Augustine, D.J., Frelich, L.E. & Jordan, P.A. (1998). Evidence for two alternate stable states in an ungulate grazing system. Ecol. Appl., 8, 1260-1269.
    1. Van Auken, O.W. (2009). Causes and consequences of woody plant encroachment into western North American grasslands. J. Environ. Manage., 90, 2931-2942.

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources