Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2017 Sep 24;7(9):e014417.
doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-014417.

What makes a sustainability tool valuable, practical and useful in real-world healthcare practice? A mixed-methods study on the development of the Long Term Success Tool in Northwest London

Laura Lennox  1   2 , Cathal Doyle  3 , Julie E Reed  3   4 , Derek Bell
Affiliations

What makes a sustainability tool valuable, practical and useful in real-world healthcare practice? A mixed-methods study on the development of the Long Term Success Tool in Northwest London

Laura Lennox et al. BMJ Open. .

Abstract

Objectives: Although improvement initiatives show benefits to patient care, they often fail to sustain. Models and frameworks exist to address this challenge, but issues with design, clarity and usability have been barriers to use in healthcare settings. This work aimed to collaborate with stakeholders to develop a sustainability tool relevant to people in healthcare settings and practical for use in improvement initiatives.

Design: Tool development was conducted in six stages. A scoping literature review, group discussions and a stakeholder engagement event explored literature findings and their resonance with stakeholders in healthcare settings. Interviews, small-scale trialling and piloting explored the design and tested the practicality of the tool in improvement initiatives.

Setting: National Institute for Health Research Collaboration for Leadership in Applied Health Research and Care for Northwest London (CLAHRC NWL).

Participants: CLAHRC NWL improvement initiative teams and staff.

Results: The iterative design process and engagement of stakeholders informed the articulation of the sustainability factors identified from the literature and guided tool design for practical application. Key iterations of factors and tool design are discussed. From the development process, the Long Term Success Tool (LTST) has been designed. The Tool supports those implementing improvements to reflect on 12 sustainability factors to identify risks to increase chances of achieving sustainability over time. The Tool is designed to provide a platform for improvement teams to share their own views on sustainability as well as learn about the different views held within their team to prompt discussion and actions.

Conclusion: The development of the LTST has reinforced the importance of working with stakeholders to design strategies which respond to their needs and preferences and can practically be implemented in real-world settings. Further research is required to study the use and effectiveness of the tool in practice and assess engagement with the method over time.

Keywords: quality Improvement; sustainability; tool.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests: None declared.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Tool development stages and iterations
Figure 2
Figure 2
Team level graph highlighting areas where the team is doing well, where more work is needed and differences of opinion.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Shediac-Rizkallah MC, Bone LR. Planning for the sustainability of community-based health programs: conceptual frameworks and future directions for research, practice and policy. Health Educ Res 1998;13:87–108. 10.1093/her/13.1.87 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Sirkin HL, Keenan P, Jackson A. The hard side of change mangement. Harv Bus Rev 2005:109–18. - PubMed
    1. Wiltsey Stirman S, Kimberly J, Cook N, et al. The sustainability of new programs and innovations: a review of the empirical literature and recommendations for future research. Implement Sci 2012;7:17 10.1186/1748-5908-7-17 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Bowman CC, Sobo EJ, Asch SM, et al. Measuring persistence of implementation: QUERI Series. Implement Sci 2008;3:21 10.1186/1748-5908-3-21 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Williams L, Daggett V, Slaven JE, et al. A cluster-randomised quality improvement study to improve two inpatient stroke quality indicators. BMJ Qual Saf 2016;25:257–64. 10.1136/bmjqs-2015-004188 - DOI - PubMed