Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2016 Jan 11;11(1):e0146487.
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0146487. eCollection 2016.

Twenty Years of Stereotype Threat Research: A Review of Psychological Mediators

Affiliations

Twenty Years of Stereotype Threat Research: A Review of Psychological Mediators

Charlotte R Pennington et al. PLoS One. .

Abstract

This systematic literature review appraises critically the mediating variables of stereotype threat. A bibliographic search was conducted across electronic databases between 1995 and 2015. The search identified 45 experiments from 38 articles and 17 unique proposed mediators that were categorized into affective/subjective (n = 6), cognitive (n = 7) and motivational mechanisms (n = 4). Empirical support was accrued for mediators such as anxiety, negative thinking, and mind-wandering, which are suggested to co-opt working memory resources under stereotype threat. Other research points to the assertion that stereotype threatened individuals may be motivated to disconfirm negative stereotypes, which can have a paradoxical effect of hampering performance. However, stereotype threat appears to affect diverse social groups in different ways, with no one mediator providing unequivocal empirical support. Underpinned by the multi-threat framework, the discussion postulates that different forms of stereotype threat may be mediated by distinct mechanisms.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Figures

Fig 1
Fig 1. Process of article inclusion (following PRISMA).

References

    1. Derks B, Inzlicht M, Kang S. The neuroscience of stigma and stereotype threat. Group Process Intergroup Relat. 2008;11: 163–181. 10.1177/136843020708803 - DOI
    1. Schmader T, Johns M, Forbes C. An integrated process model of stereotype threat effects on performance. Psychol Rev. 2008;115: 336–356. 10.1037/0033-295X.115.2.336 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Steele CM, Aronson J. Stereotype threat and the intellectual test performance of African Americans. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1995;69: 797–811. 10.1037/0022-3514/0022-3514.69.5.797 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Devine PG, Brodish AB. Modern classics in social psychology. Psychol Inq. 2003;14: 196–202. 10.1080/1047840X.2003.9682879 - DOI
    1. Fiske ST. The discomfort index: How to spot a really good idea whose time has come. Psychological Inquiry. 2003;14: 203–208. 10.1080/1047840X.2003.9682880 - DOI

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources