Hash

[lczyk]

What do these changes do?

Added __hash__ to FrozenList. Normal python lists are not hashable. FrozenList is hashable only when it is frozen, otherwise it throws a RuntimeError.

Are there changes in behavior for the user?

Frozen FrozenLists can now be used as dictionary keys.

Related issue number

N/A.

Checklist

• I think the code is well written
• Unit tests for the changes exist
• Documentation reflects the changes
• If you provide code modifications, please add yourself to CONTRIBUTORS.txt
  • The format is .
  • Please keep the list in alphabetical order, the file is sorted by name.
• Add a new news fragment into the CHANGES folder
  • name it . for example (588.bugfix)
  • if you don't have an issue_id change it to the pr id after creating the pr
  • ensure type is one of the following:
    • .feature: Signifying a new feature.
    • .bugfix: Signifying a bug fix.
    • .doc: Signifying a documentation improvement.
    • .removal: Signifying a deprecation or removal of public API.
    • .misc: A ticket has been closed, but it is not of interest to users.
  • Make sure to use full sentences with correct case and punctuation, for example: "Fix issue with non-ascii contents in doctest text files."

[mjpieters]

Hi 👋

Thank you for contributing a pull request 👍 In principle this is a good addition. But note that:

• __hash__ should raise TypeError when not frozen
• you’ll also need to provide a Cython implementation, see frozenlist/_frozenlist.pyx

[lczyk]

I've added the Cython support. I disagree, however, that the hash of an unfrozen list ought to throw a TypeError. FrozenList is hashable (therefore it's not of the wrong type), it's just that it is an error if one attempts to hash it if it has not been frozen.

[mjpieters]

I've added the Cython support. I disagree, however, that the hash of an unfrozen list ought to throw a TypeError. FrozenList is hashable (therefore it's not of the wrong type), it's just that it is an error if one attempts to hash it if it has not been frozen.

Thinking about this again, you are right. Thanks for adding this!