Lysias: Difference between revisions
m →Life |
m fixing infobox and removing deprecated parameters (ZackBot 14) |
||
| (12 intermediate revisions by 11 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{Short description|Athenian |
{{Short description|Athenian speechwriter (c. 445–c. 380 BC)}} |
||
{{Other people|Lysias}} |
{{Other people|Lysias}} |
||
{{Use dmy dates|date=July 2025}} |
|||
[[File:Parc de Versailles, Rond-Point des Philosophes, Lysias, Jean Dedieu inv1850n°9452 03.jpg|thumb|Lysias by [[Jean Dedieu]] ([[Gardens of Versailles]])]] |
|||
{{Infobox writer |
|||
'''Lysias''' ({{IPAc-en|ˈ|l|ɪ|s|i|ə|s}}; {{langx|el|Λυσίας}}; c. 445 – c. 380 BC) was a [[Logographer (legal)|logographer]] (speech writer) in [[ancient Greece]]. He was one of the ten [[Attic orators]] included in the "Alexandrian Canon" compiled by [[Aristophanes of Byzantium]] and [[Aristarchus of Samothrace]] in the third century BC. |
|||
| name = Lysias |
|||
| image = Parc de Versailles, Rond-Point des Philosophes, Lysias, Jean Dedieu inv1850n°9452 03.jpg |
|||
| caption = Statue by [[Jean Dedieu]] (Gardens of Versailles) |
|||
| native_name = {{lang|grc|Λυσίας}} |
|||
| birth_date = c. 445 BC |
|||
| birth_place = [[Athens]] (traditional; sometimes given as [[Syracuse, Italy|Syracuse]]) |
|||
| death_date = c. 380 BC |
|||
| occupation = Logographer (speechwriter) |
|||
| notable_works = |
|||
{{Flatlist}} |
|||
* ''[[Against Eratosthenes]]'' |
|||
* ''Against Agoratus'' |
|||
* ''[[Olympic Oration (Lysias)|Olympic Oration]]'' |
|||
{{Endflatlist}} |
|||
| relatives = |
|||
{{Flatlist}} |
|||
* [[Cephalus]] (father) |
|||
* [[Polemarchus]] (brother) |
|||
{{Endflatlist}} |
|||
}} |
|||
'''Lysias''' ({{IPAc-en|ˈ|l|ɪ|s|i|ə|s}}; {{lang|grc|Λυσίας}}; c. 445 – c. 380 BC) was an Athenian [[Logographer (legal)|logographer]] and one of the ten [[Attic orators]] later canonized by [[Aristophanes of Byzantium]] and [[Aristarchus of Samothrace]]. He wrote speeches for litigants across a wide range of public and private actions during the late fifth and early fourth centuries BC, with thirty-four transmitted in the medieval corpus and many others known by title or fragment. Ancient critics, especially [[Dionysius of Halicarnassus]], and modern scholarship identify Lysias as an exemplar of the plain style, emphasizing idiomatic diction, character-appropriate voice, and concise narrative framing. His speech ''[[Against Eratosthenes]]'' and the fragmentary ''[[Olympic Oration (Lysias)|Olympic Oration]]'' are commonly cited for historical evidence on postwar Athens and for programmatic statements on Greek politics. |
|||
==Life== |
==Life== |
||
According to [[Dionysius of Halicarnassus]] and the author of the life ascribed to [[Plutarch]], Lysias was born in 459 BC, which would accord with a tradition that Lysias reached, or passed, the age of eighty. This date was evidently obtained by reckoning back from the foundation of [[Thurii]] (444 |
According to [[Dionysius of Halicarnassus]] and the author of the life ascribed to [[Plutarch]], Lysias was born in 459 BC, which would accord with a tradition that Lysias reached, or passed, the age of eighty. This date was evidently obtained by reckoning back from the foundation of [[Thurii]] (444 BC), since there was a tradition that Lysias had gone there at the age of fifteen.{{sfn|Jebb|1911|p=182}} Modern critics, in general, place his birth later, c. 445 BC, and place the trip to Thurii around 430 BC.Debra Nails, ''The People of Plato'' (Hackett, 2002), p. 190, and S.C. Todd, "Lysias," in ''Oxford Classical Dictionary'' 3rd ed. (1996). |
||
[[Cephalus#Historical persons|Cephalus]], his father, was a native of [[Syracuse, Italy|Syracuse]], and on the invitation of Pericles had settled at Athens. The opening scene of [[Plato]]'s ''[[The Republic (Plato)|Republic]]'' is set at the house of Cephalus's eldest son, [[Polemarchus]], in [[Piraeus]]. The tone of the picture warrants the inference that the [[Sicilia (Roman province)|Sicilian]] family were well known to Plato, and that their houses must often have been hospitable to such gatherings. Further, Plato's ''[[Phaedrus (dialogue)|Phaedrus]]'' opens with [[Phaedrus (Athenian)|Phaedrus]] coming from conversation with Lysias at the house of [[Epicrates of Athens]]: he meets [[Socrates]], with whom he will read and discuss the speech of Lysias he heard. |
[[Cephalus#Historical persons|Cephalus]], his father, was a native of [[Syracuse, Italy|Syracuse]], and on the invitation of Pericles had settled at Athens. The opening scene of [[Plato]]'s ''[[The Republic (Plato)|Republic]]'' is set at the house of Cephalus's eldest son, [[Polemarchus]], in [[Piraeus]]. The tone of the picture warrants the inference that the [[Sicilia (Roman province)|Sicilian]] family were well known to Plato, and that their houses must often have been hospitable to such gatherings.{{sfn|Jebb|1911|p=182}} Further, Plato's ''[[Phaedrus (dialogue)|Phaedrus]]'' opens with [[Phaedrus (Athenian)|Phaedrus]] coming from conversation with Lysias at the house of [[Epicrates of Athens]]: he meets [[Socrates]], with whom he will read and discuss the speech of Lysias he heard. |
||
At Thurii, the colony newly planted on the [[Gulf of Taranto|Tarentine Gulf]], the boy may have seen [[Herodotus]], now a man in middle life, and a friendship may have grown up between them. There, too, Lysias is said to have commenced his studies in [[rhetoric]]—doubtless under a master of the Sicilian school possibly, as tradition said, under [[Tisias]], the pupil of [[Corax of Syracuse|Corax]], whose name is associated with the first attempt to formulate rhetoric as an art. The [[Sicilian Expedition|Athenian invasion of Sicily]] in 415–413 BC during the [[Peloponnesian War]] would ultimately create difficulties for Lysias's family, especially when the campaign ended in a devastating defeat for Athens. The continued attempt to link Lysias to the famous names of the era is illustrated by the ancient ascription to Lysias of a rhetorical exercise purporting to be a speech in which the captive Athenian general [[Nicias]] appealed for mercy to the Sicilians. The terrible blow to Athens quickened the energies of an anti-Athenian faction at Thurii. Lysias and his elder brother Polemarchus, with three hundred other persons, were accused of Atticizing. They were driven from Thurii and settled at Athens (412 BC). |
At Thurii, the colony newly planted on the [[Gulf of Taranto|Tarentine Gulf]], the boy may have seen [[Herodotus]], now a man in middle life, and a friendship may have grown up between them. There, too, Lysias is said to have commenced his studies in [[rhetoric]]—doubtless under a master of the Sicilian school possibly, as tradition said, under [[Tisias]], the pupil of [[Corax of Syracuse|Corax]], whose name is associated with the first attempt to formulate rhetoric as an art.{{sfn|Jebb|1911|p=182}} The [[Sicilian Expedition|Athenian invasion of Sicily]] in 415–413 BC during the [[Peloponnesian War]] would ultimately create difficulties for Lysias's family, especially when the campaign ended in a devastating defeat for Athens.{{Citation needed|date=July 2026}} The continued attempt to link Lysias to the famous names of the era is illustrated by the ancient ascription to Lysias of a rhetorical exercise purporting to be a speech in which the captive Athenian general [[Nicias]] appealed for mercy to the Sicilians. The terrible blow to Athens quickened the energies of an anti-Athenian faction at Thurii. Lysias and his elder brother Polemarchus, with three hundred other persons, were accused of Atticizing. They were driven from Thurii and settled at Athens (412 BC).{{sfn|Jebb|1911|p=182}} |
||
Lysias and Polemarchus were rich men, having inherited property from their father, Cephalus; and Lysias claims that, though merely resident aliens, they discharged public services with a liberality which shamed many of those who enjoyed the franchise (''[[Against Eratosthenes]]'' xii.20). The fact that they owned house property shows that they were classed as ''isoteleis'' ({{lang|grc|ἰσοτελεῖς}}), i.e. foreigners who paid only the same tax as citizens, being exempt from the special tax (μετοίκιον) on [[metic|resident aliens]]. Polemarchus occupied a house in Athens itself, Lysias another in the Piraeus, near which was their shield factory, employing a hundred and twenty skilled [[Slavery in ancient Greece|slaves]]. |
Lysias and Polemarchus were rich men, having inherited property from their father, Cephalus; and Lysias claims that, though merely resident aliens, they discharged public services with a liberality which shamed many of those who enjoyed the franchise (''[[Against Eratosthenes]]'' xii.20). The fact that they owned house property shows that they were classed as ''isoteleis'' ({{lang|grc|ἰσοτελεῖς}}), i.e. foreigners who paid only the same tax as citizens, being exempt from the special tax (μετοίκιον) on [[metic|resident aliens]]. Polemarchus occupied a house in Athens itself, Lysias another in the Piraeus, near which was their shield factory, employing a hundred and twenty skilled [[Slavery in ancient Greece|slaves]].{{sfn|Jebb|1911|p=182}} |
||
In 404 BC, the [[Thirty Tyrants]] were established at [[Athens]] under the protection of a [[Sparta]]n garrison. One of their earliest measures was an attack upon the resident aliens, who were represented as disaffected to the new government. Lysias and Polemarchus were on a list of ten singled out to be the first victims. Polemarchus was arrested and compelled to drink [[Cicuta virosa|hemlock]]. Lysias had a narrow escape, with the help of a large bribe. He slipped by a back-door out of the house in which he was a prisoner and took a boat to [[Megara]]. It appears that he rendered valuable services to the exiles during the reign of the tyrants, and in 403 [[Thrasybulus]] proposed that these services be recognised by the bestowal of the citizenship. The [[ |
In 404 BC, the [[Thirty Tyrants]] were established at [[Athens]] under the protection of a [[Sparta]]n garrison. One of their earliest measures was an attack upon the resident aliens, who were represented as disaffected to the new government. Lysias and Polemarchus were on a list of ten singled out to be the first victims. Polemarchus was arrested and compelled to drink [[Cicuta virosa|hemlock]]. Lysias had a narrow escape, with the help of a large bribe. He slipped by a back-door out of the house in which he was a prisoner and took a boat to [[Megara]]. It appears that he rendered valuable services to the exiles during the reign of the tyrants, and in 403 [[Thrasybulus]] proposed that these services be recognised by the bestowal of the citizenship. The [[Boule (ancient Greece)|Boule]], however, had not yet been reconstituted, and hence the measure could not be introduced to the [[Ecclesia (ancient Athens)|ecclesia]] by the requisite preliminary resolution (προβούλευμα). On this ground, it was successfully opposed.{{sfn|Jebb|1911|p=182}} |
||
During his later years, Lysias—now probably a comparatively poor man owing to the rapacity of the tyrants and his own generosity to the Athenian exiles—appears as a hard-working member of a new profession—that of [[logographer (legal)|logographer]], a writer of speeches to be delivered in the [[ |
During his later years, Lysias—now probably a comparatively poor man owing to the rapacity of the tyrants and his own generosity to the Athenian exiles—appears as a hard-working member of a new profession—that of [[logographer (legal)|logographer]], a writer of speeches to be delivered in the [[Dikasterion|law courts]]. The thirty-four extant are but a small fraction. From 403 to about 380 BC, his industry must have been incessant. The notices of his personal life in these years are scanty. In 403 he came forward as the accuser of [[Eratosthenes (statesman)|Eratosthenes]], one of the Thirty Tyrants. This was his only direct contact with Athenian politics. The story that he wrote a defence for [[Socrates]], which the latter declined to use, probably arose from a confusion. Several years after the death of Socrates, the [[sophist]] [[Polycrates (sophist)|Polycrates]] composed a declamation against him, to which Lysias replied.John Addington Symonds, ''A problem in Greek Ethics,'' XII, p. 64{{sfn|Jebb|1911|p=182}} |
||
A more authentic tradition represents Lysias as having spoken his own Olympiacus at the Olympic festival of 388 BC,{{Cite web |title=Sir Richard C. Jebb, Selections from the Attic Orators, Lysias, Ὀλυμπιακός |url=http://www.perseus.tufts.edu/hopper/text?doc=Perseus:text:1999.04.0100:orator=Lysias:speech=33 |access-date= |
A more authentic tradition represents Lysias as having spoken his own Olympiacus at the Olympic festival of 388 BC,{{Cite web |title=Sir Richard C. Jebb, Selections from the Attic Orators, Lysias, Ὀλυμπιακός |url=http://www.perseus.tufts.edu/hopper/text?doc=Perseus:text:1999.04.0100:orator=Lysias:speech=33 |access-date=24 September 2023 |website=www.perseus.tufts.edu}} to which [[Dionysius I of Syracuse]] had sent a magnificent embassy. Tents embroidered with gold were pitched within the [[sacred enclosure]], and the wealth of Dionysius was vividly shown by the number of chariots which he had entered. Lysias lifted up his voice to denounce Dionysius as, next to [[Artaxerxes I of Persia|Artaxerxes]], the worst enemy of Hellas, and to impress upon the assembled Greeks that one of their foremost duties was to deliver Sicily from a hateful oppression. The latest work of Lysias which can be dated (a fragment of a speech ''For Pherenicus'') belongs to 381 or 380 BC. He probably died in or soon after 380 BC.{{sfn|Jebb|1911|p=182}} |
||
==Style== |
==Style== |
||
{{Rhetoric}} |
{{Rhetoric}} |
||
Lysias displays literary tact, humour, and attention to character in his extant speeches, and is famous for using his skill to conceal his art. It was obviously desirable that a speech written for delivery by a client should be suitable to his age, station and circumstances. Lysias was the first to make this adaptation truly artistic. His language is crafted to flow easily, in contrast to his predecessor [[Antiphon (person)|Antiphon]]'s pursuit of majestic emphasis, to his pupil (and close follower in many respects) [[Isaeus]]' more conspicuous display of artistry and more strictly logical manner of argumentation,Cf. Dionysius of Halicarnassus, ''Isaeus'' 61 and Jebb, ''Attic Orators'' (1893), vol. 2, pp. 290ff. and later to the forceful oratory of [[Demosthenes]]. |
Lysias displays literary tact, humour, and attention to character in his extant speeches, and is famous for using his skill to conceal his art. It was obviously desirable that a speech written for delivery by a client should be suitable to his age, station and circumstances. Lysias was the first to make this adaptation truly artistic.{{sfn|Jebb|1911|p=183}} His language is crafted to flow easily, in contrast to his predecessor [[Antiphon (person)|Antiphon]]'s pursuit of majestic emphasis, to his pupil (and close follower in many respects) [[Isaeus]]' more conspicuous display of artistry and more strictly logical manner of argumentation,Cf. Dionysius of Halicarnassus, ''Isaeus'' 61 and Jebb, ''Attic Orators'' (1893), vol. 2, pp. 290ff. and later to the forceful oratory of [[Demosthenes]]. |
||
Translated into terms of ancient criticism, he became the model of the plain style ({{lang|grc|ἰσχνὸς χαρακτήρ, ἰσχνὴ/λιτὴ/ἀφελὴς λέξις}}: ''genus tenue'' or ''subtile''). Greek and then Roman critics distinguished three styles of rhetorical composition—the grand (or elaborate), the plain and the middle, the plain being nearest to the language of daily life. Greek rhetoric began in the grand style; then Lysias set an exquisite pattern of the plain; and Demosthenes might be considered as having effected an almost ideal compromise. |
Translated into terms of ancient criticism, he became the model of the plain style ({{lang|grc|ἰσχνὸς χαρακτήρ, ἰσχνὴ/λιτὴ/ἀφελὴς λέξις}}: ''genus tenue'' or ''subtile''). Greek and then Roman critics distinguished three styles of rhetorical composition—the grand (or elaborate), the plain and the middle, the plain being nearest to the language of daily life. Greek rhetoric began in the grand style; then Lysias set an exquisite pattern of the plain; and Demosthenes might be considered as having effected an almost ideal compromise.{{sfn|Jebb|1911|p=183}} |
||
The vocabulary of Lysias is relatively simple and would later be regarded as a model of pure diction for [[Atticism|Atticists]]. Most of the rhetorical figures are sparingly used—except such as consist in the parallelism or opposition of clauses. The taste of the day not yet emancipated from the influence of the Sicilian rhetoric probably demanded a large use of [[antithesis]]. Lysias excels in vivid description; he has also the knack of marking the speaker's character by light touches. The structure of his sentences varies a good deal according to the dignity of the subject. He has equal command over the periodic style (κατεστραμμένη λέξις) and the non-periodic or continuous (εἰρομένη, διαλελυμένη). His disposition of his subject-matter is always simple. The speech has usually four parts: introduction (προοίμιον), narrative of facts (διήγησις), proofs (πίστεις), which may be either external, as from witnesses, or internal, derived from argument on the facts, and, lastly, conclusion (ἐπίλογος). |
The vocabulary of Lysias is relatively simple and would later be regarded as a model of pure diction for [[Atticism|Atticists]]. Most of the rhetorical figures are sparingly used—except such as consist in the parallelism or opposition of clauses. The taste of the day not yet emancipated from the influence of the Sicilian rhetoric probably demanded a large use of [[antithesis]]. Lysias excels in vivid description; he has also the knack of marking the speaker's character by light touches. The structure of his sentences varies a good deal according to the dignity of the subject. He has equal command over the periodic style (κατεστραμμένη λέξις) and the non-periodic or continuous (εἰρομένη, διαλελυμένη). His disposition of his subject-matter is always simple. The speech has usually four parts: introduction (προοίμιον), narrative of facts (διήγησις), proofs (πίστεις), which may be either external, as from witnesses, or internal, derived from argument on the facts, and, lastly, conclusion (ἐπίλογος).{{sfn|Jebb|1911|p=183}} |
||
It is in the introduction and the narrative that Lysias is seen at his best. In his greatest extant speech—that ''Against Eratosthenes''—and also in the fragmentary ''Olympiacus'', he has pathos and fire; but these were not characteristic qualities of his work. In [[Cicero]]'s judgment (''[[De Oratore|De Orat.]]'' iii. 7, 28) Demosthenes was peculiarly distinguished by force (''vis''), [[Aeschines]] by resonance (''sonitus''); [[Hypereides]] by acuteness (''acumen''); [[Isocrates]] by sweetness (''suavitas''); the distinction which he assigns to Lysias is ''subtilitas'', an Attic refinement—which, as he elsewhere says (''[[Brutus (Cicero)|Brutus]]'', 16, 64) is often joined to an admirable vigour (''lacerti''). Nor was it oratory alone to which Lysias rendered service; his work had an important effect on all subsequent Greek prose, by showing how perfect elegance could be joined to plainness. Here, in his artistic use of familiar idiom, he might fairly be called the [[Euripides]] of [[Attic Greek|Attic]] prose. His style has attracted interest from modern readers, because it is employed in describing scenes from the everyday life of Athens. |
It is in the introduction and the narrative that Lysias is seen at his best. In his greatest extant speech—that ''Against Eratosthenes''—and also in the fragmentary ''Olympiacus'', he has pathos and fire; but these were not characteristic qualities of his work. In [[Cicero]]'s judgment (''[[De Oratore|De Orat.]]'' iii. 7, 28) Demosthenes was peculiarly distinguished by force (''vis''), [[Aeschines]] by resonance (''sonitus''); [[Hypereides]] by acuteness (''acumen''); [[Isocrates]] by sweetness (''suavitas''); the distinction which he assigns to Lysias is ''subtilitas'', an Attic refinement—which, as he elsewhere says (''[[Brutus (Cicero)|Brutus]]'', 16, 64) is often joined to an admirable vigour (''lacerti''). Nor was it oratory alone to which Lysias rendered service; his work had an important effect on all subsequent Greek prose, by showing how perfect elegance could be joined to plainness. Here, in his artistic use of familiar idiom, he might fairly be called the [[Euripides]] of [[Attic Greek|Attic]] prose. His style has attracted interest from modern readers, because it is employed in describing scenes from the everyday life of Athens.{{sfn|Jebb|1911|p=183}} |
||
==Works== |
==Works== |
||
=== |
===Extant speeches=== |
||
From Lysias we have thirty-four speeches. Three fragmentary ones have come down under the name of Lysias; one hundred and twenty-seven more, now lost, are known from smaller fragments or from titles. In the Augustan age four hundred and twenty-five works bore his name, of which more than two hundred were allowed as genuine by the critics. |
|||
Thirty-four Lysias speeches survive in their entirety. Three fragmentary ones have come down under the name of Lysias, while 127 more, now lost, are known from smaller fragments or from titles. In the Augustan age 425 works bore his name, of which more than 200 were allowed as genuine by the critics.{{sfn|Jebb|1911|p=183}} |
|||
The table below shows the name of the speech (in the ordered listed in the Lamb translation), the suggested date of the speech, the primary rhetorical mode, the main point of the speech, and comments. '''Forensic''' is synonymous with ''judicial'' and denotes speeches made in law courts. '''Epideictic''' is ''ceremonial'' and involves the praise or, less often, the criticism, of the subject. '''Deliberative''' denotes speeches made in legislatures. Notes (e.g., A1, B3, etc.) refer to the list of qualifications below the table. |
|||
The numbering follows the Loeb edition (Lamb). "Jurisdiction" distinguishes public vs private actions where identifiable; "Forum" records Boulē, assembly, or law court when specified by the sources. Concise notes flag authorship or transmission issues. |
|||
{| class="wikitable" |
|||
|- |
|||
{| class="wikitable sortable" |
|||
! Speech |
|||
! data-sort-type="number" | No. |
|||
! Suggested date |
|||
! data-sort-type="text" | Speech |
|||
! Primary rhetorical mode |
|||
! data-sort-type="text" | Date (approx.) |
|||
! Main point of speech |
|||
! data-sort-type="text" | Genre |
|||
! Comment |
|||
! data-sort-type="text" | Jurisdiction |
|||
! data-sort-type="text" | Forum |
|||
! data-sort-type="text" | Core issue |
|||
! data-sort-type="text" | Notes |
|||
|- |
|- |
||
| {{anchor|Lysias 1}}1 |
|||
| 1. [[On the Murder of Eratosthenes]] |
|||
| [[On the Murder of Eratosthenes]] |
|||
| uncertain |
|||
| Uncertain |
|||
| forensic, in public cases [A6]; in private cases [B4] |
|||
| Forensic |
|||
| Euphiletos tries to prove that the murder he committed was not premeditated |
|||
| Public (homicide); Private (special plea) |
|||
| |
|||
| Court |
|||
| Euphiletos argues the killing was not premeditated |
|||
| — |
|||
|- |
|- |
||
| 2 |
| {{anchor|Lysias 2}}2 |
||
| [[Funeral Oration (Lysias)|Funeral Oration]] |
|||
| |
| 392 BC? |
||
| Epideictic |
|||
| epideictic |
|||
| — |
|||
| Praise of fallen soldiers, purported to have been spoken during the [[Corinthian War]]. |
|||
| — |
|||
| Authorship uncertain (style and approach are very different from Lysias's other speeches). |
|||
| Praise of fallen soldiers during the Corinthian War |
|||
| Authorship Uncertain |
|||
|- |
|- |
||
| {{anchor|Lysias 3}}3 |
|||
| 3. [[Against Simon]] |
|||
| [[Against Simon]] |
|||
| 393 BC or later |
| 393 BC or later |
||
| Forensic |
|||
| forensic, in public cases [A6]; in private cases [B4] |
|||
| Public (wounding); Private (special plea) |
|||
| |
|||
| Court |
|||
| |
|||
| — |
|||
| — |
|||
|- |
|- |
||
| {{anchor|Lysias 4}}4 |
|||
| 4. [[On a Wound by Premeditation]] |
|||
| [[On a Wound by Premeditation]] |
|||
| uncertain |
|||
| Uncertain |
|||
| forensic, in public cases [A6] |
|||
| Forensic |
|||
| Defendant is on a charge of wounding his friend, with intent to kill. |
|||
| Public (wounding with intent) |
|||
| |
|||
| Court |
|||
| Defense against charge of wounding with intent to kill |
|||
| — |
|||
|- |
|- |
||
| {{anchor|Lysias 5}}5 |
|||
| 5. For Callias |
|||
| For Callias |
|||
| uncertain |
|||
| Uncertain |
|||
| forensic, in public cases [A7] |
|||
| Forensic |
|||
| A friend defends Callias against accusations of impiety. |
|||
| Public (impiety) |
|||
| Preserved fragmentarily. |
|||
| Court |
|||
| Defense against impiety accusations |
|||
| Fragmentary |
|||
|- |
|- |
||
| {{anchor|Lysias 6}}6 |
|||
| 6. Against Andocides |
|||
| Against Andocides |
|||
| 400/399 BC |
| 400/399 BC |
||
| Forensic |
|||
| forensic, in public cases [A7] |
|||
| Public (impiety) |
|||
| |
|||
| Court |
|||
| certainly spurious, but perhaps contemporary; beginning lost |
|||
| — |
|||
| Generally considered spurious; beginning lost |
|||
|- |
|- |
||
| {{anchor|Lysias 7}}7 |
|||
| 7. Defense in the Matter of the Olive Stump |
|||
| Defense in the Matter of the Olive Stump |
|||
| 396 BC or later |
| 396 BC or later |
||
| Forensic |
|||
| forensic, in public cases [A7] |
|||
| Public (impiety) |
|||
| |
|||
| Court |
|||
| |
|||
| Defense concerning a sacred olive |
|||
| — |
|||
|- |
|- |
||
| {{anchor|Lysias 8}}8 |
|||
| 8. Accusation of Calumny |
|||
| Accusation of Calumny |
|||
| uncertain |
|||
| Uncertain |
|||
| forensic, in private cases [B3] |
|||
| Forensic |
|||
| |
|||
| Private (property claim) |
|||
| spurious |
|||
| Court |
|||
| — |
|||
| Spurious |
|||
|- |
|- |
||
| {{anchor|Lysias 9}}9 |
|||
| 9. For the Soldier |
|||
| For the Soldier |
|||
| c. 395-387 BC |
|||
| 395–387 BC |
|||
| forensic, in public cases [A3] |
|||
| Forensic |
|||
| |
|||
| Public (state claims) |
|||
| |
|||
| Court |
|||
| — |
|||
| — |
|||
|- |
|- |
||
| {{anchor|Lysias 10}}10 |
|||
| 10. Against Theomnestus 1 |
|||
| Against Theomnestus 1 |
|||
| c. 384–383 BC |
|||
| 384–383 BC |
|||
| Forensic, in private cases [B1] |
|||
| Forensic |
|||
| |
|||
| Private (slander) |
|||
| |
|||
| Court |
|||
| — |
|||
| — |
|||
|- |
|- |
||
| {{anchor|Lysias 11}}11 |
|||
| 11. Against Theomnestus 2 |
|||
| Against Theomnestus 2 |
|||
| c. 384–383 BC |
|||
| 384–383 BC |
|||
| Forensic, in private cases [B1] |
|||
| Forensic |
|||
| |
|||
| Private (slander) |
|||
| an epitome (abstract) of Lys. 10 |
|||
| Court |
|||
| — |
|||
| Epitome of Lysias 10 |
|||
|- |
|- |
||
| {{anchor|Lysias 12}}12 |
|||
| 12. [[Against Eratosthenes]] |
|||
| [[Against Eratosthenes]] |
|||
| 403 BC or soon after |
| 403 BC or soon after |
||
| Forensic |
|||
| forensic, in public cases [A6] |
|||
| Public (homicide) |
|||
| Perhaps a pamphlet meant for circulation (reading). |
|||
| Court |
|||
| |
|||
| Accusation of one of the Thirty for Polemarchus’ murder |
|||
| Widely circulated as a reading text |
|||
|- |
|- |
||
| {{anchor|Lysias 13}}13 |
|||
| 13. Against Agoratus |
|||
| Against Agoratus |
|||
| c. 399 BC |
|||
| 399 BC |
|||
| forensic, in public cases [A6] |
|||
| Forensic |
|||
| |
|||
| Public (homicide) |
|||
| |
|||
| Court |
|||
| Prosecution arising from post-Aegospotami politics |
|||
| — |
|||
|- |
|- |
||
| {{anchor|Lysias 14}}14 |
|||
| 14. Against Alcibiades 1 |
|||
| Against Alcibiades 1 |
|||
| 395 BC |
| 395 BC |
||
| Forensic |
|||
| forensic, in public cases [A5] |
|||
| Public (military offences) |
|||
| |
|||
| Court |
|||
| |
|||
| Charges linked to Alcibiades’ conduct |
|||
| — |
|||
|- |
|- |
||
| {{anchor|Lysias 15}}15 |
|||
| 15. Against Alcibiades 2 |
|||
| Against Alcibiades 2 |
|||
| 395 BC |
| 395 BC |
||
| Forensic |
|||
| forensic, in public cases [A5] |
|||
| Public (military offences) |
|||
| |
|||
| Court |
|||
| |
|||
| Companion to 14 |
|||
| — |
|||
|- |
|- |
||
| {{anchor|Lysias 16}}16 |
|||
| 16. In Defense of Mantitheus |
|||
| In Defense of Mantitheus |
|||
| c. 392-389 BC |
|||
| 392–389 BC |
|||
| forensic, in public cases [A4] |
|||
| Forensic |
|||
| |
|||
| Public (dokimasia) |
|||
| before the Council (Boule) |
|||
| [[Boule (ancient Greece)|Boulē]] |
|||
| Defense at scrutiny before the Council |
|||
| — |
|||
|- |
|- |
||
| {{anchor|Lysias 17}}17 |
|||
| 17. On The Property Of Eraton |
|||
| On the Property of Eraton |
|||
| c. 397 BC |
|||
| 397 BC |
|||
| forensic, in private cases [B3] |
|||
| Forensic |
|||
| |
|||
| Private (property claim) |
|||
| |
|||
| Court |
|||
| Recovery of property |
|||
| — |
|||
|- |
|- |
||
| {{anchor|Lysias 18}}18 |
|||
| 18. On The Property Of The Brother Of Nicias: Peroration |
|||
| On the Property of the Brother of Nicias: Peroration |
|||
| c. 396 BC |
|||
| 396 BC |
|||
| forensic, in public cases [A2] |
|||
| Forensic |
|||
| |
|||
| Public (illegality) |
|||
| |
|||
| Court |
|||
| Peroration concerning property subject to public claim |
|||
| — |
|||
|- |
|- |
||
| {{anchor|Lysias 19}}19 |
|||
| 19. On the Property of Aristophanes |
|||
| On the Property of Aristophanes |
|||
| c. 388-387 BC |
|||
| 388–387 BC |
|||
| forensic, in public cases [A3] |
|||
| Forensic |
|||
| |
|||
| Public (state claims) |
|||
| |
|||
| Court |
|||
| Proceedings about property and state claims |
|||
| — |
|||
|- |
|- |
||
| {{anchor|Lysias 20}}20 |
|||
| 20. For Polystratus |
|||
| For Polystratus |
|||
| c. 410 BC |
|||
| 410 BC |
|||
| forensic, in public cases [A1] |
|||
| Forensic |
|||
| Polystratus is prosecuted for his acts against democracy. Polystratus' son defends him. |
|||
| Public (state offences) |
|||
| |
|||
| Court |
|||
| Defense against prosecution for anti-democratic acts |
|||
| — |
|||
|- |
|- |
||
| {{anchor|Lysias 21}}21 |
|||
| 21. Defense Against a Charge of Taking Bribes |
|||
| Defense Against a Charge of Taking Bribes |
|||
| 403/2 BC |
| 403/2 BC |
||
| Forensic |
|||
| forensic, in public cases [A1] |
|||
| Public (state offences) |
|||
| Defendant pleads the court not to condemn him for corruption. |
|||
| Court |
|||
| |
|||
| Defense against bribery/corruption charge |
|||
| — |
|||
|- |
|- |
||
| {{anchor|Lysias 22}}22 |
|||
| 22. Against the Corn-Dealers |
|||
| Against the Corn-Dealers |
|||
| 386 BC |
| 386 BC |
||
| Forensic |
|||
| forensic, in public cases [A1] |
|||
| Public (state offences) |
|||
|A Council (Boule) member prosecutes a number of grain retailers for alleged price-fixing. |
|||
| [[Boule (ancient Greece)|Boulē]] |
|||
| |
|||
| Prosecution of grain retailers for price-fixing |
|||
| — |
|||
|- |
|- |
||
| {{anchor|Lysias 23}}23 |
|||
| 23. Against Pancleon |
|||
| Against Pancleon |
|||
| uncertain (400/399?) |
|||
| Uncertain (400/399?) |
|||
| forensic, in private cases [B4] |
|||
| Forensic |
|||
| |
|||
| Private (special plea) |
|||
| |
|||
| Court |
|||
| — |
|||
| — |
|||
|- |
|- |
||
| {{anchor|Lysias 24}}24 |
|||
| 24. For the Disabled Man |
|||
| For the Disabled Man |
|||
| uncertain |
|||
| Uncertain |
|||
| forensic, in public cases [A4] |
|||
| Forensic |
|||
| Lysias, an allegedly disabled man, defends himself against accusations of not being eligible for a pension before the Council (Boule). |
|||
| Public (dokimasia) |
|||
| |
|||
| [[Boule (ancient Greece)|Boulē]] |
|||
| Defense of eligibility for disability pension |
|||
| — |
|||
|- |
|- |
||
| {{anchor|Lysias 25}}25 |
|||
| 25. Defense Against a Charge of Subverting the Democracy |
|||
| Defense Against a Charge of Subverting the Democracy |
|||
| c. 401-399 BC |
|||
| 401–399 BC |
|||
| forensic, in public cases [A4] |
|||
| Forensic |
|||
| A man defends himself against a charge of treason; he is accused of being a supporter of the [[Thirty Tyrants]]. |
|||
| Public (dokimasia) |
|||
| |
|||
| Court |
|||
| Defense against alleged support for the Thirty |
|||
| — |
|||
|- |
|- |
||
| {{anchor|Lysias 26}}26 |
|||
| 26. On the Scrutiny of Evandros |
|||
| On the Scrutiny of Evandros |
|||
| 382 BC |
| 382 BC |
||
| Forensic |
|||
| forensic, in public cases [A4] |
|||
| Public (dokimasia) |
|||
| |
|||
| [[Boule (ancient Greece)|Boulē]] |
|||
| |
|||
| Scrutiny of an official designate |
|||
| — |
|||
|- |
|- |
||
| {{anchor|Lysias 27}}27 |
|||
| 27. Against Epicrates and his Fellow-Envoys |
|||
| Against Epicrates and his Fellow-Envoys |
|||
| ca. 390 BC |
|||
| 390 BC |
|||
| forensic, in public cases [A1] |
|||
| Forensic |
|||
| |
|||
| Public (state offences) |
|||
| |
|||
| Court |
|||
| Charges against envoys for misconduct |
|||
| — |
|||
|- |
|- |
||
| {{anchor|Lysias 28}}28 |
|||
| 28. Against Ergocles |
|||
| Against Ergocles |
|||
| 388 BC |
| 388 BC |
||
| Forensic |
|||
| forensic, in public cases [A1] |
|||
| Public (state offences) |
|||
| |
|||
| Court |
|||
| |
|||
| Prosecution for financial/military misconduct |
|||
| — |
|||
|- |
|- |
||
| {{anchor|Lysias 29}}29 |
|||
| 29. Against Philocrates |
|||
| Against Philocrates |
|||
| 388 BC |
| 388 BC |
||
| Forensic |
|||
| forensic, in public cases [A3] |
|||
| Public (state claims) |
|||
| |
|||
| Court |
|||
| |
|||
| — |
|||
| — |
|||
|- |
|- |
||
| {{anchor|Lysias 30}}30 |
|||
| 30. Against [[Nicomachus (scribe)|Nicomachus]] |
|||
| Against Nicomachus |
|||
| 399 BC |
| 399 BC |
||
| Forensic |
|||
| forensic, in public cases [A1] |
|||
| Public (state offences) |
|||
| |
|||
| Court |
|||
| |
|||
| Charges tied to law-revision activities |
|||
| — |
|||
|- |
|- |
||
| {{anchor|Lysias 31}}31 |
|||
| 31. Against Philon |
|||
| Against Philon |
|||
| c. 403–398 BC |
|||
| 403–398 BC |
|||
| forensic, in public cases [A4] |
|||
| Forensic |
|||
| Philon have been elected to the council by lot. The speaker objects his election. |
|||
| Public (dokimasia) |
|||
| |
|||
| Court |
|||
| Objection to a councilor-elect’s fitness/loyalty |
|||
| — |
|||
|- |
|- |
||
| {{anchor|Lysias 32}}32 |
|||
| 32. Against Diogeiton |
|||
| Against Diogeiton |
|||
| c. 400 BC |
|||
| 400 BC |
|||
| forensic, in private cases [B2] |
|||
| Forensic |
|||
| A guardian is accused of holding out the money belonging to his wards. |
|||
| Private (guardianship) |
|||
| |
|||
| Court |
|||
| Guardian accused of withholding wards’ property |
|||
| — |
|||
|- |
|- |
||
| 33 |
| {{anchor|Lysias 33}}33 |
||
| [[Olympic Oration (Lysias)|Olympic Oration]] |
|||
| 388 or 384 BC |
| 388 or 384 BC |
||
| Epideictic |
|||
| epideictic |
|||
| — |
|||
| |
|||
| Olympia |
|||
| |
|||
| Festival oration urging Panhellenic policy |
|||
| — |
|||
|- |
|- |
||
| {{anchor|Lysias 34}}34 |
|||
| 34. Against the Subversion of the Ancestral Constitution |
|||
| Against the Subversion of the Ancestral Constitution |
|||
| 403 BC |
| 403 BC |
||
| Deliberative |
|||
| deliberative |
|||
| — |
|||
| Lysias speaks against a proposal that citizenship of Athens should only be confined to land owners. |
|||
| [[Ecclesia (ancient Athens)|Assembly]] |
|||
| |
|||
| Against proposal to confine citizenship to landowners |
|||
| — |
|||
|} |
|} |
||
=== Fragments === |
|||
NOTES "A": FORENSIC, RELATING TO PUBLIC CASES |
|||
[[Hermann Sauppe]] collected 355 fragments under the name of Lysias, printed in ''Oratores Attici'' II, 170–216; 252 of these belong to 127 speeches known by title, and six are comparatively substantial.{{cite book |last=Sauppe |first=Hermann |editor-last=Baiter |editor-first=Johann Georg |title=Oratores Attici |volume=2 |location=Zurich |publisher=Orell, Füssli |year=1839 |pages=170–216}} Among the larger items, the fragmentary ''For Pherenicus'' is datable to 381–380 BC and is frequently treated as the latest secure work in the corpus.{{cite book |last=Carey |first=Christopher |title=Lysiae Orationes |series=Oxford Classical Texts |location=Oxford |publisher=Oxford University Press |year=2007 |chapter=Praefatio}}{{cite book |last=Todd |first=S. C. |title=A Commentary on Lysias, Speeches 1–11 |location=Oxford |publisher=Oxford University Press |year=2007 |pages=1–5}} |
|||
# Relating to Offences directly against the State ({{lang|grc|γραφαὶ δημοσίων ἀδικημάτων}}); such as treason, malversation in office, embezzlement of public moneys. |
|||
# Cases relating to Unconstitutional Procedure ({{lang|grc|γραφὴ παρανόμων}}) |
|||
# Cases relating to *Claims for Money withheld from the State ({{lang|grc|ἀπογραφαί}}). |
|||
# Cases relating to a Scrutiny (δοκιμασία); especially the Scrutiny, by the Senate, of Officials Designate |
|||
# Cases relating to Military Offences ({{lang|grc|γραφαὶ λιποταξίου, ἀστρατείας}}) |
|||
# Cases relating to Murder or Intent to Murder ({{lang|grc|γραφαὶ φόνου, τραύματος ἐκ προνοίας}}) |
|||
# Cases relating to Impiety ({{lang|grc|γραφαὶ ἀσεβείας}}) |
|||
Modern editions incorporate the fragment dossier with updated testimonia and numbering, and discuss authenticity case-by-case in the apparatus and introductions.{{cite book |last=Gernet |first=Louis |author2=Bizos, Marcel |title=Lysias |series=Collection Budé |location=Paris |publisher=Les Belles Lettres |year=1959–1962}}{{cite book |last=Carey |first=Christopher |title=Lysiae Orationes |series=Oxford Classical Texts |location=Oxford |publisher=Oxford University Press |year=2007}} |
|||
NOTES "B": FORENSIC, RELATING TO PRIVATE CASES |
|||
# Action for [[Libel]] (δίκη κακηγορίας) |
|||
# Action by a Ward against a Guardian ({{lang|grc|δίκη ἐπιτροπῆς}}) |
|||
# Trial of a Claim to Property (διαδικασία) |
|||
# Answer to a Special Plea ({{lang|grc|πρὸς παραγραφήν}}) |
|||
=== Miscellaneous === |
=== Miscellaneous === |
||
A short piece titled ''To His Companions, a Complaint of Slanders'' is transmitted in later lists and is usually judged non-genuine, a school exercise attributed to Lysias at a much later date.{{cite book |editor-last=Dover |editor-first=Kenneth J. |title=Lysias and the Corpus Lysiacum |location=Berkeley |publisher=University of California Press |year=1968 |pages=1–15}}{{cite book |last=Todd |first=S. C. |title=A Commentary on Lysias, Speeches 1–11 |location=Oxford |publisher=Oxford University Press |year=2007 |pages=ix–x}} |
|||
To his Companions, a Complaint of Slanders, viii. (certainly spurious). |
|||
The speech reproduced and critiqued in Plato’s ''Phaedrus'' (230e–234) is commonly treated as Platonic composition rather than a verbatim text by Lysias. Ancient testimonia already frame it as a showpiece for analysis, and modern stylometric and philological studies support Platonic authorship, though discussion continues over the degree of fidelity to Lysianic style.{{cite book |last=Brandwood |first=Leonard |title=The Chronology of Plato's Dialogues |location=Cambridge |publisher=Cambridge University Press |year=1990 |pages=240–246}}{{cite book |last=Carey |first=Christopher |title=Lysiae Orationes |series=Oxford Classical Texts |location=Oxford |publisher=Oxford University Press |year=2007 |chapter=Praefatio}} |
|||
The speech attributed to Lysias in Plato's ''Phaedrus'' 230e–234. This speech has generally been regarded as Plato's own work; but the certainty of this conclusion will be doubted by those who observe: |
|||
*the elaborate preparations made in the dialogue for a recital of the ''erōtikos'' which shall be verbally exact, |
|||
*the closeness of the criticism made upon it.{{cn|date=April 2018}} |
|||
If the satirist were merely analysing his own composition, such criticism would have little point. Lysias is the earliest writer who is known to have composed ''erōtikoi''; it is as representing both rhetoric and a false ''erōs'' that he is the object of attack in the ''Phaedrus''. Stylistic differences between the speech and the rest of the ''Phaedrus'' have also been taken to suggest that the speech was genuine.Brandwood, L., ''The Chronology of Plato's Dialogues'' ([[Cambridge University Press]], 1990), pp. 240–246. |
|||
== |
==Editions== |
||
Three hundred and fifty-five of these are collected by [[Hermann Sauppe]], ''Oratores Attici'', ii. 170–216. Two hundred and fifty-two of them represent one hundred and twenty-seven speeches of known title; and of six the fragments are comparatively large. Of these, the fragmentary speech ''For Pherenicus'' belongs to 381 or 380 BC, and is thus the latest known work of Lysias. In literary and historical interest, the first place among the extant speeches of Lysias belongs to that ''Against Eratosthenes'' (403 BC), one of the [[Thirty Tyrants]], whom Lysias arraigns as the murderer of his brother Polemarchus. The speech is an eloquent and vivid picture of the reign of terror which the Thirty established at Athens; the concluding appeal, to both parties among the citizens, is specially powerful. |
|||
Next in importance is the speech ''Against Agoratus'' (388 BC), one of our chief authorities for the internal history of Athens during the months which immediately followed the defeat at [[Battle of Aegospotami|Aegospotami]]. The Olympiacus (388 BC) is a brilliant fragment, expressing the spirit of the festival at Olympia, and exhorting Greeks to unite against their common foes. ''The Plea for the Constitution'' (403 BC) is interesting for the manner in which it argues that the well-being of Athens—now stripped of empire—is bound up with the maintenance of democratic principles. The speech ''For Mantitheus'' (392 BC) is a graceful and animated portrait, of a young Athenian ''hippeus'', making a spirited defence of his honor against the charge of disloyalty. The defence ''For the'' ''Invalid'' is a humorous character-sketch. The speech ''Against Pancleon'' illustrates the intimate relations between Athens and [[Plataea]], while it gives us some picturesque glimpses of Athenian town life. The defence of the person who had, been charged with destroying a ''mona'', or sacred olive, places us amidst the country life of Attica. And the speech ''Against Theomnestus'' deserves attention for its curious evidence of the way in which the ordinary vocabulary of Athens had changed between 600 and 400 BC. |
|||
==Notes== |
|||
{{Reflist}} |
|||
==References== |
|||
Editions by |
Editions by |
||
*[[Aldine Press|Aldus]] (''[[Editio princeps]]'', Venice, 1513) |
*[[Aldine Press|Aldus]] (''[[Editio princeps]]'', Venice, 1513) |
||
| Line 290: | Line 396: | ||
*T. Thalheim (1901, [[Teubner]] series, with bibliography) – [https://books.google.com/books?id=SkcMAAAAIAAJ PDF] |
*T. Thalheim (1901, [[Teubner]] series, with bibliography) – [https://books.google.com/books?id=SkcMAAAAIAAJ PDF] |
||
*[[Carel Gabriel Cobet|C. G. Cobet]] (4th ed., by J. J. Hartman, 1905) |
*[[Carel Gabriel Cobet|C. G. Cobet]] (4th ed., by J. J. Hartman, 1905) |
||
*{{Interlanguage link |
*{{Interlanguage link|Karl Hude|da}}, [[Oxford Classical Texts]], 1912 |
||
*W. R. M. Lamb, [[Loeb Classical Library]], 1930 |
*W. R. M. Lamb, [[Loeb Classical Library]], 1930 |
||
*Umberto Albini, Greek text and Italian translation, Florence: Sansoni, 1955 |
*Umberto Albini, Greek text and Italian translation, Florence: Sansoni, 1955 |
||
*[[Louis Gernet]] and {{Interlanguage link |
*[[Louis Gernet]] and {{Interlanguage link|Marcel Bizos|fr}}, [[Collection Budé]], 2 vols., 1959–1962 |
||
*Enrico Medda, Greek text and Italian translation, 2 vols., Milan: BUR, 1992–1995 |
*Enrico Medda, Greek text and Italian translation, 2 vols., Milan: BUR, 1992–1995 |
||
*Christopher Carey, Oxford Classical Texts, 2007 |
*Christopher Carey, Oxford Classical Texts, 2007 |
||
| Line 312: | Line 418: | ||
* There is a special lexicon to Lysias by D. H. Holmes (Bonn, 1895, [https://books.google.com/books?id=PWn6RpMy3-EC online]). See also [[Richard Claverhouse Jebb|Jebb]]'s ''Attic Orators'' (1893, [https://archive.org/details/atticoratorsfro02jebbgoog vol. 1], [https://archive.org/details/atticoratorsfro03jebbgoog vol. 2]) and ''Selections from the Attic Orators'' (2nd ed.; 1st ed. [https://archive.org/details/selectionsfroma00isacgoog online]). |
* There is a special lexicon to Lysias by D. H. Holmes (Bonn, 1895, [https://books.google.com/books?id=PWn6RpMy3-EC online]). See also [[Richard Claverhouse Jebb|Jebb]]'s ''Attic Orators'' (1893, [https://archive.org/details/atticoratorsfro02jebbgoog vol. 1], [https://archive.org/details/atticoratorsfro03jebbgoog vol. 2]) and ''Selections from the Attic Orators'' (2nd ed.; 1st ed. [https://archive.org/details/selectionsfroma00isacgoog online]). |
||
* The first volume of a full commentary on the speeches is S. C. Todd, ''A Commentary on Lysias, Speeches 1–11''. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2007. pp. ix, 783. {{ISBN|978-0-19-814909-5}}. |
* The first volume of a full commentary on the speeches is S. C. Todd, ''A Commentary on Lysias, Speeches 1–11''. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2007. pp. ix, 783. {{ISBN|978-0-19-814909-5}}. |
||
* {{EB1911|wstitle=Lysias|volume=17|pages=182–184}} |
* {{EB1911|wstitle=Lysias|volume=17|pages=182–184|first=Richard Claverhouse|last=Jebb|author-link=Richard Claverhouse Jebb}} |
||
==References== |
|||
{{Reflist}} |
|||
==Further reading== |
==Further reading== |
||
* Bateman, John J. 1958. "Lysias and the Law." ''Transactions of the American Philological Association'' 89:276–285. |
* Bateman, John J. 1958. "Lysias and the Law." ''Transactions of the American Philological Association'' 89:276–285. |
||
* Dover, Kenneth J., ed. 1968. ''Lysias and the Corpus Lysiacum.'' Berkeley and Los Angeles: California Univ. Press. |
* Dover, Kenneth J., ed. 1968. ''Lysias and the Corpus Lysiacum.'' Berkeley and Los Angeles: California Univ. Press. |
||
* Figueira, T. 1986. "Sitopolai and Sitophylakes in Lysias’ |
* Figueira, T. 1986. "Sitopolai and Sitophylakes in Lysias’ "Against the Graindealers": Governmental Intervention in the Athenian Economy." ''Phoenix'' 40:149–171. |
||
* Gagarin, Michael. 2001. "Women’s Voices in Attic Oratory." In ''Making Silence Speak. Women’s Voices in Greek Literature and Society.'' Edited by L. McClure and A. Lardinois, 161–176. Princeton, NJ: Princeton Univ. Press. |
* Gagarin, Michael. 2001. "Women’s Voices in Attic Oratory." In ''Making Silence Speak. Women’s Voices in Greek Literature and Society.'' Edited by L. McClure and A. Lardinois, 161–176. Princeton, NJ: Princeton Univ. Press. |
||
* Griffith-Williams, Brenda. 2013. Violence in Court: Law and Rhetoric in Athenian and English Assault Cases. ''Greece and Rome'' 60.1: 89–100. |
* Griffith-Williams, Brenda. 2013. Violence in Court: Law and Rhetoric in Athenian and English Assault Cases. ''Greece and Rome'' 60.1: 89–100. |
||
| Line 329: | Line 438: | ||
{{Library resources box |by=yes |onlinebooks=yes |others=yes |about=yes |label=Lysias |
{{Library resources box |by=yes |onlinebooks=yes |others=yes |about=yes |label=Lysias |
||
|viaf= |lccn= |lcheading= |wikititle= }} |
|viaf= |lccn= |lcheading= |wikititle= }} |
||
* {{ |
* {{commons-inline}} |
||
* {{wikisource author-inline}} |
* {{wikisource author-inline}} |
||
* [http://www.attalus.org/info/orators.html#lysias The Speeches of Lysias] – links to online translations |
* [http://www.attalus.org/info/orators.html#lysias The Speeches of Lysias] – links to online translations |
||
Latest revision as of 04:21, 28 August 2026
Lysias | |
|---|---|
| Λυσίας | |
Statue by Jean Dedieu (Gardens of Versailles) | |
| Born | c. 445 BC |
| Died | c. 380 BC |
| Occupation | Logographer (speechwriter) |
| Relatives |
|
| Writing career | |
| Notable works |
|
Lysias (/ˈlɪsiəs/; Λυσίας; c. 445 – c. 380 BC) was an Athenian logographer and one of the ten Attic orators later canonized by Aristophanes of Byzantium and Aristarchus of Samothrace. He wrote speeches for litigants across a wide range of public and private actions during the late fifth and early fourth centuries BC, with thirty-four transmitted in the medieval corpus and many others known by title or fragment. Ancient critics, especially Dionysius of Halicarnassus, and modern scholarship identify Lysias as an exemplar of the plain style, emphasizing idiomatic diction, character-appropriate voice, and concise narrative framing. His speech Against Eratosthenes and the fragmentary Olympic Oration are commonly cited for historical evidence on postwar Athens and for programmatic statements on Greek politics.
Life
[edit]According to Dionysius of Halicarnassus and the author of the life ascribed to Plutarch, Lysias was born in 459 BC, which would accord with a tradition that Lysias reached, or passed, the age of eighty. This date was evidently obtained by reckoning back from the foundation of Thurii (444 BC), since there was a tradition that Lysias had gone there at the age of fifteen.[1] Modern critics, in general, place his birth later, c. 445 BC, and place the trip to Thurii around 430 BC.[2]
Cephalus, his father, was a native of Syracuse, and on the invitation of Pericles had settled at Athens. The opening scene of Plato's Republic is set at the house of Cephalus's eldest son, Polemarchus, in Piraeus. The tone of the picture warrants the inference that the Sicilian family were well known to Plato, and that their houses must often have been hospitable to such gatherings.[1] Further, Plato's Phaedrus opens with Phaedrus coming from conversation with Lysias at the house of Epicrates of Athens: he meets Socrates, with whom he will read and discuss the speech of Lysias he heard.
At Thurii, the colony newly planted on the Tarentine Gulf, the boy may have seen Herodotus, now a man in middle life, and a friendship may have grown up between them. There, too, Lysias is said to have commenced his studies in rhetoric—doubtless under a master of the Sicilian school possibly, as tradition said, under Tisias, the pupil of Corax, whose name is associated with the first attempt to formulate rhetoric as an art.[1] The Athenian invasion of Sicily in 415–413 BC during the Peloponnesian War would ultimately create difficulties for Lysias's family, especially when the campaign ended in a devastating defeat for Athens.[citation needed] The continued attempt to link Lysias to the famous names of the era is illustrated by the ancient ascription to Lysias of a rhetorical exercise purporting to be a speech in which the captive Athenian general Nicias appealed for mercy to the Sicilians. The terrible blow to Athens quickened the energies of an anti-Athenian faction at Thurii. Lysias and his elder brother Polemarchus, with three hundred other persons, were accused of Atticizing. They were driven from Thurii and settled at Athens (412 BC).[1]
Lysias and Polemarchus were rich men, having inherited property from their father, Cephalus; and Lysias claims that, though merely resident aliens, they discharged public services with a liberality which shamed many of those who enjoyed the franchise (Against Eratosthenes xii.20). The fact that they owned house property shows that they were classed as isoteleis (ἰσοτελεῖς), i.e. foreigners who paid only the same tax as citizens, being exempt from the special tax (μετοίκιον) on resident aliens. Polemarchus occupied a house in Athens itself, Lysias another in the Piraeus, near which was their shield factory, employing a hundred and twenty skilled slaves.[1]
In 404 BC, the Thirty Tyrants were established at Athens under the protection of a Spartan garrison. One of their earliest measures was an attack upon the resident aliens, who were represented as disaffected to the new government. Lysias and Polemarchus were on a list of ten singled out to be the first victims. Polemarchus was arrested and compelled to drink hemlock. Lysias had a narrow escape, with the help of a large bribe. He slipped by a back-door out of the house in which he was a prisoner and took a boat to Megara. It appears that he rendered valuable services to the exiles during the reign of the tyrants, and in 403 Thrasybulus proposed that these services be recognised by the bestowal of the citizenship. The Boule, however, had not yet been reconstituted, and hence the measure could not be introduced to the ecclesia by the requisite preliminary resolution (προβούλευμα). On this ground, it was successfully opposed.[1]
During his later years, Lysias—now probably a comparatively poor man owing to the rapacity of the tyrants and his own generosity to the Athenian exiles—appears as a hard-working member of a new profession—that of logographer, a writer of speeches to be delivered in the law courts. The thirty-four extant are but a small fraction. From 403 to about 380 BC, his industry must have been incessant. The notices of his personal life in these years are scanty. In 403 he came forward as the accuser of Eratosthenes, one of the Thirty Tyrants. This was his only direct contact with Athenian politics. The story that he wrote a defence for Socrates, which the latter declined to use, probably arose from a confusion. Several years after the death of Socrates, the sophist Polycrates composed a declamation against him, to which Lysias replied.[3][1]
A more authentic tradition represents Lysias as having spoken his own Olympiacus at the Olympic festival of 388 BC,[4] to which Dionysius I of Syracuse had sent a magnificent embassy. Tents embroidered with gold were pitched within the sacred enclosure, and the wealth of Dionysius was vividly shown by the number of chariots which he had entered. Lysias lifted up his voice to denounce Dionysius as, next to Artaxerxes, the worst enemy of Hellas, and to impress upon the assembled Greeks that one of their foremost duties was to deliver Sicily from a hateful oppression. The latest work of Lysias which can be dated (a fragment of a speech For Pherenicus) belongs to 381 or 380 BC. He probably died in or soon after 380 BC.[1]
Style
[edit]| Part of a series on |
| Rhetoric |
|---|
Lysias displays literary tact, humour, and attention to character in his extant speeches, and is famous for using his skill to conceal his art. It was obviously desirable that a speech written for delivery by a client should be suitable to his age, station and circumstances. Lysias was the first to make this adaptation truly artistic.[5] His language is crafted to flow easily, in contrast to his predecessor Antiphon's pursuit of majestic emphasis, to his pupil (and close follower in many respects) Isaeus' more conspicuous display of artistry and more strictly logical manner of argumentation,[6] and later to the forceful oratory of Demosthenes.
Translated into terms of ancient criticism, he became the model of the plain style (ἰσχνὸς χαρακτήρ, ἰσχνὴ/λιτὴ/ἀφελὴς λέξις: genus tenue or subtile). Greek and then Roman critics distinguished three styles of rhetorical composition—the grand (or elaborate), the plain and the middle, the plain being nearest to the language of daily life. Greek rhetoric began in the grand style; then Lysias set an exquisite pattern of the plain; and Demosthenes might be considered as having effected an almost ideal compromise.[5]
The vocabulary of Lysias is relatively simple and would later be regarded as a model of pure diction for Atticists. Most of the rhetorical figures are sparingly used—except such as consist in the parallelism or opposition of clauses. The taste of the day not yet emancipated from the influence of the Sicilian rhetoric probably demanded a large use of antithesis. Lysias excels in vivid description; he has also the knack of marking the speaker's character by light touches. The structure of his sentences varies a good deal according to the dignity of the subject. He has equal command over the periodic style (κατεστραμμένη λέξις) and the non-periodic or continuous (εἰρομένη, διαλελυμένη). His disposition of his subject-matter is always simple. The speech has usually four parts: introduction (προοίμιον), narrative of facts (διήγησις), proofs (πίστεις), which may be either external, as from witnesses, or internal, derived from argument on the facts, and, lastly, conclusion (ἐπίλογος).[5]
It is in the introduction and the narrative that Lysias is seen at his best. In his greatest extant speech—that Against Eratosthenes—and also in the fragmentary Olympiacus, he has pathos and fire; but these were not characteristic qualities of his work. In Cicero's judgment (De Orat. iii. 7, 28) Demosthenes was peculiarly distinguished by force (vis), Aeschines by resonance (sonitus); Hypereides by acuteness (acumen); Isocrates by sweetness (suavitas); the distinction which he assigns to Lysias is subtilitas, an Attic refinement—which, as he elsewhere says (Brutus, 16, 64) is often joined to an admirable vigour (lacerti). Nor was it oratory alone to which Lysias rendered service; his work had an important effect on all subsequent Greek prose, by showing how perfect elegance could be joined to plainness. Here, in his artistic use of familiar idiom, he might fairly be called the Euripides of Attic prose. His style has attracted interest from modern readers, because it is employed in describing scenes from the everyday life of Athens.[5]
Works
[edit]Extant speeches
[edit]Thirty-four Lysias speeches survive in their entirety. Three fragmentary ones have come down under the name of Lysias, while 127 more, now lost, are known from smaller fragments or from titles. In the Augustan age 425 works bore his name, of which more than 200 were allowed as genuine by the critics.[5]
The numbering follows the Loeb edition (Lamb). "Jurisdiction" distinguishes public vs private actions where identifiable; "Forum" records Boulē, assembly, or law court when specified by the sources. Concise notes flag authorship or transmission issues.
| No. | Speech | Date (approx.) | Genre | Jurisdiction | Forum | Core issue | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | On the Murder of Eratosthenes | Uncertain | Forensic | Public (homicide); Private (special plea) | Court | Euphiletos argues the killing was not premeditated | — |
| 2 | Funeral Oration | 392 BC? | Epideictic | — | — | Praise of fallen soldiers during the Corinthian War | Authorship Uncertain |
| 3 | Against Simon | 393 BC or later | Forensic | Public (wounding); Private (special plea) | Court | — | — |
| 4 | On a Wound by Premeditation | Uncertain | Forensic | Public (wounding with intent) | Court | Defense against charge of wounding with intent to kill | — |
| 5 | For Callias | Uncertain | Forensic | Public (impiety) | Court | Defense against impiety accusations | Fragmentary |
| 6 | Against Andocides | 400/399 BC | Forensic | Public (impiety) | Court | — | Generally considered spurious; beginning lost |
| 7 | Defense in the Matter of the Olive Stump | 396 BC or later | Forensic | Public (impiety) | Court | Defense concerning a sacred olive | — |
| 8 | Accusation of Calumny | Uncertain | Forensic | Private (property claim) | Court | — | Spurious |
| 9 | For the Soldier | 395–387 BC | Forensic | Public (state claims) | Court | — | — |
| 10 | Against Theomnestus 1 | 384–383 BC | Forensic | Private (slander) | Court | — | — |
| 11 | Against Theomnestus 2 | 384–383 BC | Forensic | Private (slander) | Court | — | Epitome of Lysias 10 |
| 12 | Against Eratosthenes | 403 BC or soon after | Forensic | Public (homicide) | Court | Accusation of one of the Thirty for Polemarchus’ murder | Widely circulated as a reading text |
| 13 | Against Agoratus | 399 BC | Forensic | Public (homicide) | Court | Prosecution arising from post-Aegospotami politics | — |
| 14 | Against Alcibiades 1 | 395 BC | Forensic | Public (military offences) | Court | Charges linked to Alcibiades’ conduct | — |
| 15 | Against Alcibiades 2 | 395 BC | Forensic | Public (military offences) | Court | Companion to 14 | — |
| 16 | In Defense of Mantitheus | 392–389 BC | Forensic | Public (dokimasia) | Boulē | Defense at scrutiny before the Council | — |
| 17 | On the Property of Eraton | 397 BC | Forensic | Private (property claim) | Court | Recovery of property | — |
| 18 | On the Property of the Brother of Nicias: Peroration | 396 BC | Forensic | Public (illegality) | Court | Peroration concerning property subject to public claim | — |
| 19 | On the Property of Aristophanes | 388–387 BC | Forensic | Public (state claims) | Court | Proceedings about property and state claims | — |
| 20 | For Polystratus | 410 BC | Forensic | Public (state offences) | Court | Defense against prosecution for anti-democratic acts | — |
| 21 | Defense Against a Charge of Taking Bribes | 403/2 BC | Forensic | Public (state offences) | Court | Defense against bribery/corruption charge | — |
| 22 | Against the Corn-Dealers | 386 BC | Forensic | Public (state offences) | Boulē | Prosecution of grain retailers for price-fixing | — |
| 23 | Against Pancleon | Uncertain (400/399?) | Forensic | Private (special plea) | Court | — | — |
| 24 | For the Disabled Man | Uncertain | Forensic | Public (dokimasia) | Boulē | Defense of eligibility for disability pension | — |
| 25 | Defense Against a Charge of Subverting the Democracy | 401–399 BC | Forensic | Public (dokimasia) | Court | Defense against alleged support for the Thirty | — |
| 26 | On the Scrutiny of Evandros | 382 BC | Forensic | Public (dokimasia) | Boulē | Scrutiny of an official designate | — |
| 27 | Against Epicrates and his Fellow-Envoys | 390 BC | Forensic | Public (state offences) | Court | Charges against envoys for misconduct | — |
| 28 | Against Ergocles | 388 BC | Forensic | Public (state offences) | Court | Prosecution for financial/military misconduct | — |
| 29 | Against Philocrates | 388 BC | Forensic | Public (state claims) | Court | — | — |
| 30 | Against Nicomachus | 399 BC | Forensic | Public (state offences) | Court | Charges tied to law-revision activities | — |
| 31 | Against Philon | 403–398 BC | Forensic | Public (dokimasia) | Court | Objection to a councilor-elect’s fitness/loyalty | — |
| 32 | Against Diogeiton | 400 BC | Forensic | Private (guardianship) | Court | Guardian accused of withholding wards’ property | — |
| 33 | Olympic Oration | 388 or 384 BC | Epideictic | — | Olympia | Festival oration urging Panhellenic policy | — |
| 34 | Against the Subversion of the Ancestral Constitution | 403 BC | Deliberative | — | Assembly | Against proposal to confine citizenship to landowners | — |
Fragments
[edit]Hermann Sauppe collected 355 fragments under the name of Lysias, printed in Oratores Attici II, 170–216; 252 of these belong to 127 speeches known by title, and six are comparatively substantial.[7] Among the larger items, the fragmentary For Pherenicus is datable to 381–380 BC and is frequently treated as the latest secure work in the corpus.[8][9]
Modern editions incorporate the fragment dossier with updated testimonia and numbering, and discuss authenticity case-by-case in the apparatus and introductions.[10][11]
Miscellaneous
[edit]A short piece titled To His Companions, a Complaint of Slanders is transmitted in later lists and is usually judged non-genuine, a school exercise attributed to Lysias at a much later date.[12][13]
The speech reproduced and critiqued in Plato’s Phaedrus (230e–234) is commonly treated as Platonic composition rather than a verbatim text by Lysias. Ancient testimonia already frame it as a showpiece for analysis, and modern stylometric and philological studies support Platonic authorship, though discussion continues over the degree of fidelity to Lysianic style.[14][15]
Editions
[edit]Editions by
- Aldus (Editio princeps, Venice, 1513)
- with variorum notes, by J. J. Reiske (1772)
- Immanuel Bekker (1823)
- W. S. Dobson (1828) in Oratores Attici
- Johann Georg Baiter and Hermann Sauppe, Oratores Attici, vol. 1, Zurich, 1839, pp. 59 ff.
- C. Scheibe (1852)
- T. Thalheim (1901, Teubner series, with bibliography) – PDF
- C. G. Cobet (4th ed., by J. J. Hartman, 1905)
- Karl Hude, Oxford Classical Texts, 1912
- W. R. M. Lamb, Loeb Classical Library, 1930
- Umberto Albini, Greek text and Italian translation, Florence: Sansoni, 1955
- Louis Gernet and Marcel Bizos, Collection Budé, 2 vols., 1959–1962
- Enrico Medda, Greek text and Italian translation, 2 vols., Milan: BUR, 1992–1995
- Christopher Carey, Oxford Classical Texts, 2007
Editions of select speeches by
- J. H. Bremi (1845)
- R. Rauchenstein (1848, revised by C. Fuhr, 1880–1881)
- H. Frohberger (1866–1871)
- H. van Herwerden (1863)
- Andreas Weidner (1888)
- Evelyn Shirley Shuckburgh (1882) – PDF
- F. J. Snell, Epitaphios, Clarendon Press, (1887)
- A. Westermann and W. Binder (1887–1890)
- G. P. Bristol (1892)
- M. H. Morgan (1895) – PDF
- W. H. Wait (1898) – PDF
- C. D. Adams (1905) – PDF
- There is a special lexicon to Lysias by D. H. Holmes (Bonn, 1895, online). See also Jebb's Attic Orators (1893, vol. 1, vol. 2) and Selections from the Attic Orators (2nd ed.; 1st ed. online).
- The first volume of a full commentary on the speeches is S. C. Todd, A Commentary on Lysias, Speeches 1–11. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2007. pp. ix, 783. ISBN 978-0-19-814909-5.
- This article incorporates text from a publication now in the public domain: Jebb, Richard Claverhouse (1911). "Lysias". In Chisholm, Hugh (ed.). Encyclopædia Britannica. Vol. 17 (11th ed.). Cambridge University Press. pp. 182–184.
References
[edit]- 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Jebb 1911, p. 182.
- ↑ Debra Nails, The People of Plato (Hackett, 2002), p. 190, and S.C. Todd, "Lysias," in Oxford Classical Dictionary 3rd ed. (1996).
- ↑ John Addington Symonds, A problem in Greek Ethics, XII, p. 64
- ↑ "Sir Richard C. Jebb, Selections from the Attic Orators, Lysias, Ὀλυμπιακός". www.perseus.tufts.edu. Retrieved 24 September 2023.
- 1 2 3 4 5 Jebb 1911, p. 183.
- ↑ Cf. Dionysius of Halicarnassus, Isaeus 61 and Jebb, Attic Orators (1893), vol. 2, pp. 290ff.
- ↑ Sauppe, Hermann (1839). Baiter, Johann Georg (ed.). Oratores Attici. Vol. 2. Zurich: Orell, Füssli. pp. 170–216.
- ↑ Carey, Christopher (2007). "Praefatio". Lysiae Orationes. Oxford Classical Texts. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
- ↑ Todd, S. C. (2007). A Commentary on Lysias, Speeches 1–11. Oxford: Oxford University Press. pp. 1–5.
- ↑ Gernet, Louis; Bizos, Marcel (1959–1962). Lysias. Collection Budé. Paris: Les Belles Lettres.
- ↑ Carey, Christopher (2007). Lysiae Orationes. Oxford Classical Texts. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
- ↑ Dover, Kenneth J., ed. (1968). Lysias and the Corpus Lysiacum. Berkeley: University of California Press. pp. 1–15.
- ↑ Todd, S. C. (2007). A Commentary on Lysias, Speeches 1–11. Oxford: Oxford University Press. pp. ix–x.
- ↑ Brandwood, Leonard (1990). The Chronology of Plato's Dialogues. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. pp. 240–246.
- ↑ Carey, Christopher (2007). "Praefatio". Lysiae Orationes. Oxford Classical Texts. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Further reading
[edit]- Bateman, John J. 1958. "Lysias and the Law." Transactions of the American Philological Association 89:276–285.
- Dover, Kenneth J., ed. 1968. Lysias and the Corpus Lysiacum. Berkeley and Los Angeles: California Univ. Press.
- Figueira, T. 1986. "Sitopolai and Sitophylakes in Lysias’ "Against the Graindealers": Governmental Intervention in the Athenian Economy." Phoenix 40:149–171.
- Gagarin, Michael. 2001. "Women’s Voices in Attic Oratory." In Making Silence Speak. Women’s Voices in Greek Literature and Society. Edited by L. McClure and A. Lardinois, 161–176. Princeton, NJ: Princeton Univ. Press.
- Griffith-Williams, Brenda. 2013. Violence in Court: Law and Rhetoric in Athenian and English Assault Cases. Greece and Rome 60.1: 89–100.
- Lateiner, Donald. 1981. "An Analysis of Lysias’ Political Defense Speeches." Rivista storica dell’Antichità 11:147–160.
- Loening, Thomas C. 1981. "The Autobiographical Speeches of Lysias and the Biographical Tradition." Hermes 109:280–294.
- Rydberg-Cox, Jeff. 2005. "Talking about Violence: Clustered Participles in the Speeches of Lysias." Literary and Linguistic Computing 20.2: 219–235.
- Shear, Julia L. 2013. "Their Memories Will Never Grow Old: The Politics of Remembrance in the Athenian Funeral Orations." Classical Quarterly 63.2: 511–536.
- Wolpert, Andrew. 2002. "Lysias 18 and Athenian Memory of Civil War." Transactions of the American Philological Association 132.1–2: 109–126.
External links
[edit]
Media related to Lysias at Wikimedia Commons- Works by or about Lysias at Wikisource
- The Speeches of Lysias – links to online translations
- Life of Lysias – attributed to Plutarch
- Works by Lysias at Project Gutenberg
- Works by or about Lysias at the Internet Archive