The complementarity between ecological infrastructure types benefits natural enemies and pollinators in a Mediterranean vineyard agroecosystem
Corresponding Author
Natalia Rosas-Ramos
Departamento de Biología Animal, Facultad de Biología, Universidad de Salamanca, Campus Miguel de Unamuno s/n, Salamanca, Spain
Correspondence
Natalia Rosas-Ramos, Área de Zoología, Facultad de Biología (Edificio de Farmacia, planta 5), Universidad de Salamanca, Campus Miguel de Unamuno s/n, Salamanca 37007, Spain.
Email: [email protected]
Search for more papers by this authorLaura Baños-Picón
Departamento de Biología Animal, Facultad de Biología, Universidad de Salamanca, Campus Miguel de Unamuno s/n, Salamanca, Spain
Search for more papers by this authorJosé Tormos
Departamento de Biología Animal, Facultad de Biología, Universidad de Salamanca, Campus Miguel de Unamuno s/n, Salamanca, Spain
Search for more papers by this authorJosep D. Asís
Departamento de Biología Animal, Facultad de Biología, Universidad de Salamanca, Campus Miguel de Unamuno s/n, Salamanca, Spain
Search for more papers by this authorCorresponding Author
Natalia Rosas-Ramos
Departamento de Biología Animal, Facultad de Biología, Universidad de Salamanca, Campus Miguel de Unamuno s/n, Salamanca, Spain
Correspondence
Natalia Rosas-Ramos, Área de Zoología, Facultad de Biología (Edificio de Farmacia, planta 5), Universidad de Salamanca, Campus Miguel de Unamuno s/n, Salamanca 37007, Spain.
Email: [email protected]
Search for more papers by this authorLaura Baños-Picón
Departamento de Biología Animal, Facultad de Biología, Universidad de Salamanca, Campus Miguel de Unamuno s/n, Salamanca, Spain
Search for more papers by this authorJosé Tormos
Departamento de Biología Animal, Facultad de Biología, Universidad de Salamanca, Campus Miguel de Unamuno s/n, Salamanca, Spain
Search for more papers by this authorJosep D. Asís
Departamento de Biología Animal, Facultad de Biología, Universidad de Salamanca, Campus Miguel de Unamuno s/n, Salamanca, Spain
Search for more papers by this authorFunding information Universidad de Salamanca, Grant/Award Numbers: Programa I: USAL2015/18, Programa I: USAL2017, Programa XIII: Financiación Grupos Investigación; Universidad de Salamanca - Banco Santander, Grant/Award Number: Predoctoral contract; Banco Santander
Abstract
Under the current scenario of biodiversity loss across agroecosystems, the preservation of ecological infrastructures is crucial to maintain ecosystem functions and deliver ecosystem services such as pollination or biological control of pests, which largely determine agricultural productivity and food security. The role that ecological infrastructures such as hedges or strips have in enhancing functionally important groups, including predators, parasitoids and pollinators has been reasonably well investigated in temperate areas. However, it is much less documented in agroecosystems from the Mediterranean basin, even though this area has been identified as a biodiversity hotspot for conservation priorities. In a study developed during 2014 in a traditional vineyard agroecosystem in Northern Spain using a combination of different sampling methods, we analysed beneficial arthropod assemblages across four types of linear ecological infrastructures: woodland hedges, rosaceous hedges, grass strips and flower strips. We investigated the value of these elements as a source of predators, parasitoids and pollinators. We show that ecological infrastructures across this Mediterranean vineyard agroecosystem support functionally important groups and that the abundance, richness and distribution of families of each functional group is determined by features characterising the different types of those infrastructures. Ecological infrastructures with a suitable level of structural diversity constitute an important reservoir of predators. On the other hand, parasitoids and pollinators were limited by the availability of hosts, pollen and nectar resources. Flower strips, less complex infrastructures that offer a high amount of floral resources, benefited communities of both parasitoids and pollinators. Because of the variability in habitat preference found among the different functionally important taxa, we highlight the importance of preserving different types of ecological infrastructures across vineyard agroecosystems to maintain well-structured assemblages of beneficial arthropods and maximise underlying services.
Supporting Information
| Filename | Description |
|---|---|
| aab12529-sup-0001-Supinfo.docxWord 2007 document , 35.3 KB |
Table S1 List of orders and families of beneficial arthropods sampled. For each family, the abundance per ecological infrastructure type (FS: flower strips; GS: grass strips; RH: rosaceous hedges; WH: woodland hedges), the total abundance and the functional group are provided. Abundances per ecological infrastructure of those families included in de Correspondence analysis are given in bold. Table S2 List of bee families and genera sampled, with the number of individuals collected per genus. Table S3 Mean ± SD of the abundance and family richness of predators, pollinators and parasitoids per month in each type of ecological infrastructure. |
Please note: The publisher is not responsible for the content or functionality of any supporting information supplied by the authors. Any queries (other than missing content) should be directed to the corresponding author for the article.
REFERENCES
- Addinsoft. (2016). XLSTAT 2016: Data analysis and statistical solution for Microsoft excel. Paris, France: Addinsoft SARL.
- Balzan, M. V., Bocci, G., & Moonen, A. C. (2014). Augmenting flower trait diversity in wildflower strips to optimise the conservation of arthropod functional groups for multiple agroecosystem services. Journal of Insect Conservation, 18, 713–728.
- S. S. Bell, E. D. McCoy, & H. R. Mushinsky (Eds.). (1991). Habitat structure: The physical arrangement of objects in space. Dordrecht, Netherlands: Springer Science & Business Media.
10.1007/978-94-011-3076-9Google Scholar
- Bianchi, F. J. J. A., Booij, C. J. H., & Tscharntke, T. (2006). Sustainable pest regulation in agricultural landscapes : A review on landscape composition, biodiversity and natural pest control. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 273, 1715–1727.
- Billeter, R., Liira, J., Bailey, D., Bugter, R., Arens, P., Augenstein, I., … Edwards, P. J. (2008). Indicators for biodiversity in agricultural landscapes: A pan-European study. Journal of Applied Ecology, 45, 141–150.
- E. F. Boller, F. Häni, & H.-M. Poehling (Eds.). (2004). Ecological infrastructures: Ideabook on functional biodiversity at the farm level ( 1st ed.). Lindau, Switzerland: Swiss Centre for Agricultural Extension and Rural Development (LBL).
- Campbell, A. J., Wilby, A., Sutton, P., & Wäckers, F. L. (2017). Do sown flower strips boost wild pollinator abundance and pollination services in a spring-flowering crop? A case study from UK cider apple orchards. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment, 239, 20–29.
- G. Ceballos (Ed.). (1941). Las tribus de los himenópteros de España. Madrid, Spain: Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas.
- D. C. Coleman, D. A. Crossley, & P. F. Hendrix (Eds.). (2004). Fundamentals of soil ecology. Cambridge, MA: Elsevier Academic Press.
- Eggers, B., Matern, A., Drees, C., Eggers, J., Härdtle, W., & Assmann, T. (2010). Value of semi-open corridors for simultaneously connecting open and wooded habitats: A case study with ground beetles. Conservation Biology, 24, 256–266.
- Ekroos, J., Olsson, O., Rundlöf, M., Wätzold, F., & Smith, H. G. (2014). Optimizing agri-environment schemes for biodiversity, ecosystem services or both? Biological Conservation, 172, 65–71.
- European Commision. (2013). An EU-wide strategy on Green Infrastructure: Enhancing Europe's Natural Capital. Green Infrastructure: The European Commission.
- Fauvel, G. (1999). Diversity of Heteroptera in agroecosystems: Role of sustainability and bioindication. Amsterdam, Netherlands: Elsevier Science B.V.
- Finke, D. L., & Denno, R. F. (2006). Spatial refuge from intraguild predation: Implications for prey suppression and trophic cascades. Oecologia, 149, 265–275.
- Franin, K., Barić, B., & Kuštera, G. (2016). The role of ecological infrastructure on beneficial arthropods in vineyards. Spanish Journal of Agricultural Research, 14, 1–10.
- Frank, S. D., Wratten, S. D., Sandhu, H. S., & Shrewsbury, P. M. (2007). Video analysis to determine how habitat strata affects predator diversity and predation of Epiphyas postvittana (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae) in a vineyard. Biological Control, 41, 230–236.
- Frank, S. D., Shrewsbury, P. M., & Denno, R. F. (2011). Plant versus prey resources: Influence on omnivore behavior and herbivore suppression. Biological Control, 57, 229–235.
- Froidevaux, J. S. P., Louboutin, B., & Jones, G. (2017). Does organic farming enhance biodiversity in Mediterranean vineyards? A case study with bats and arachnids. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment, 249, 112–122.
- Gallai, N., Salles, J. M., Settele, J., & Vaissière, B. E. (2009). Economic valuation of the vulnerability of world agriculture confronted with pollinator decline. Ecological Economics, 68, 810–821.
- Garibaldi, L. A., Steffan-Dewenter, I., Winfree, R., Aizen, M. A., Bommarco, R., Cunningham, S. A., … Klein, A. M. (2013). Wild pollinators enhance fruit set of crops regardless of honey bee abundance. Science, 339, 1608–1611.
- Garratt, M. P. D., Senapathi, D., Coston, D. J., Mortimer, S. R., & Potts, S. G. (2017). The benefits of hedgerows for pollinators and natural enemies depends on hedge quality and landscape context. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment, 247, 363–370.
- I. Gauld, & B. Bolton (Eds.). (1988). The hymenoptera. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
- U. Gerson, R. L. Smiley, & R. Ochoa (Eds.). (2003). Mites (Acari) for Pest control. Oxford, England: Blackwell Science Ltd.
10.1002/9780470750995Google Scholar
- Gillespie, M. A. K., Gurr, G. M., & Wratten, S. D. (2016). Beyond nectar provision: The other resource requirements of parasitoid biological control agents. Entomologia Experimentalis et Applicata, 159, 207–221.
- Gomez, J. E., Lohmiller, J., & Joern, A. (2016). Importance of vegetation structure to the assembly of an aerial web-building spider community in north American open grassland. Journal of Arachnology, 44, 28–35.
- Gotelli, N. J., & Colwell, R. K. (2011). Estimating species richness. In A. E. Magurran & B. J. McGill (Eds.), Biological diversity: Frontiers in measurement and assessment (pp. 39–54). Oxford, NY: Oxford University Press.
- G. M. Gurr, S. D. Wratten, & M. A. Altieri (Eds.). (2004). Ecological Engineering for Pest Management: Advances in Habitat Manipulation for Arthropods. Collingwood, Australia: CSIRO.
10.1071/9780643098411Google Scholar
- Hammer, Ø., Harper, D. A. T., & Ryan, P. D. (2001). PAST: Paleontological statistics software package for education and data analysis. Palaeontologia Electronica, 4, 1–9.
- Hatley, C. L., & MacMahon, J. A. (1980). Spider community organization: Seasonal variation and the role of vegetation architecture. Environmental Entomology, 9, 632–639.
- Hewitt, G. M. (2011). Mediterranean peninsulas: The evolution of hotspots. In F. E. Zachos & J. C. Habel (Eds.), Biodiversity hotspots (pp. 123–147). Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg.
10.1007/978-3-642-20992-5_7Google Scholar
- Janssen, A., Sabelis, M. W., Magalhães, S., Montserrat, M., & Van Der Hammen, T. (2007). Habitat structure affects intraguild predation. Ecology, 88, 2713–2719.
- Klaus, F., Bass, J., Marholt, L., Müller, B., Klatt, B., & Kormann, U. (2015). Hedgerows have a barrier effect and channel pollinator movement in the agricultural landscape. Journal of Landscape Ecology, 8, 22–31.
10.1515/jlecol-2015-0001Google Scholar
- Koji, S., Khan, Z. R., & Midega, C. A. O. (2007). Field boundaries of Panicum maximum as a reservoir for predators and a sink for Chilo partellus. Journal of Applied Entomology, 131, 186–196.
- Kuefler, D., Hudgens, B., Haddad, N. M., Morris, W. F., & Thurgate, N. (2010). The conflicting role of matrix habitats as conduits and barriers for dispersal. Ecology, 91, 944–950.
- Landis, D. A., Wratten, S. D., & Gurr, G. M. (2000). Habitat management to conserve natural enemies of arthropod pests in agriculture. Annual Review of Entomology, 45, 175–201.
- Langellotto, G. A., & Denno, R. F. (2004). Responses of invertebrate natural enemies to complex-structured habitats: A meta-analytical synthesis. Oecologia, 139, 1–10.
- Lefebvre, M., Papaïx, J., Mollot, G., Deschodt, P., Lavigne, C., Ricard, J. M., … Franck, P. (2017). Bayesian inferences of arthropod movements between hedgerows and orchards. Basic and Applied Ecology, 21, 76–84.
- Lengyel, S., Déri, E., & Magura, T. (2016). Species richness responses to structural or compositional habitat diversity between and within grassland patches: A multi-taxon approach. PLoS One, 11, e0149662.
- Loomis, J. D., & Cameron, G. N. (2014). Impact of the invasive shrub Amur honeysuckle (Lonicera maackii) on shrub-layer insects in a deciduous forest in the eastern United States. Biological Invasions, 16, 89–100.
- J. F. McAlpine, B. V. Peterson, G. E. Shewell, H. J. Teskey, J. R. Vockeroth, & D. M. Wood (Eds.). (1981). Manual of nearctic diptera (Vol. 2). Canada: Ministry of Supply and Services.
- J. F. McAlpine, B. V. Peterson, G. E. Shewell, H. J. Teskey, J. R. Vockeroth, & D. M. Wood (Eds.). (1987). Manual of nearctic diptera. Volume 2. Ottawa, Canada: Ministry of Supply and Services.
- Moerkens, R., Leirs, H., Peusens, G., & Gobin, B. (2009). Are populations of European earwigs, Forficula auricularia, density dependent? Entomologia Experimentalis et Applicata, 130, 198–206.
- Morandin, L. A., & Kremen, C. (2013). Hedgerow restoration promotes pollinator populations and exports native bees to adjacent field. Ecological Applications, 23, 829–839.
- Morandin, L. A., Long, R. F., & Kremen, C. (2014). Hedgerows enhance beneficial insects on adjacent tomato fields in an intensive agricultural landscape. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment, 189, 164–170.
- Morrison, J., Izquierdo, J., Plaza, E. H., & González-Andújar, J. L. (2017). The role of field margins in supporting wild bees in Mediterranean cereal agroecosystems: Which biotic and abiotic factors are important? Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment, 247, 216–224.
- Muñoz-Cardenas, K., Fuentes, L. S., Cantor, R. F., Rodríguez, C. D., Janssen, A., & Sabelis, M. W. (2014). Generalist red velvet mite predator (Balaustium sp.) performs better on a mixed diet. Experimental and Applied Acarology, 62, 19–32.
- Myers, N., Mittermeier, R. A., Mittermeier, C. G., da Fonseca, G. A. B., & Kent, J. (2000). Biodiversity hotspots for conservation priorities. Nature, 403, 853–858.
- Nielsen, U. N., Osler, G. H. R., & Campbell, C. D. (2010). The influence of vegetation type, soil properties and precipitation on the composition of soil mite and microbial communities at the landscape scale. Journal of Biogeography, 37, 1317–1328.
- O'Connell, D. M., Lee, W. G., Monks, A., & Dickinson, K. J. M. (2010). Does microhabitat structure affect foliar mite assemblages? Ecological Entomology, 35, 317–328.
- Potts, S. G., Biesmeijer, J. C., Kremen, C., Neumann, P., Schweiger, O., & Kunin, W. E. (2010). Global pollinator declines: Trends, impacts and drivers. Trends in Ecology and Evolution, 25, 345–353.
- R Development Core Team. (2016). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing.
- Rands, S. A., & Whitney, H. M. (2010). Effects of pollinator density-dependent preferences on field margin visitations in the midst of agricultural monocultures: A modelling approach. Ecological Modelling, 221, 1310–1316.
- Rands, S. A., & Whitney, H. M. (2011). Field margins, foraging distances and their impacts on nesting pollinator success. PLoS One, 6, e25971.
- Robertson, G. P., & Swinton, S. M. (2005). Reconciling agricultural productivity and environmental integrity: A grand challenge for agriculture. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment, 3, 38–46.
- Robinson, J. V. (1981). The effect of architectural variation in habitat on a spider community: An experimental field study. Ecology, 62, 73–80.
- Rosas-Ramos, N., Baños-Picón, L., Tobajas, E., de Paz, V., Tormos, J., & Asís, J. D. (2018). Value of ecological infrastructure diversity in the maintenance of spider assemblages: A case study of Mediterranean vineyard agroecosystems. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment, 265, 244–253.
- Rosas-Ramos, N., Baños-Picón, L., Trivellone, V., Moretti, M., Tormos, J., & Asís, J. D. (2019). Ecological infrastructures across Mediterranean agroecosystems: Towards an effective tool for evaluating their ecological quality. Agricultural Systems, 173, 355–363.
- Roulston, T. H., & Goodell, K. (2011). The role of resources and risks in regulating wild bee populations. Annual Review of Entomology, 56, 293–312.
- Rundlöf, M., Lundin, O., & Bommarco, R. (2018). Annual flower strips support pollinators and potentially enhance red clover seed yield. Ecology and Evolution, 8, 1–12.
- Rusch, A., Valantin-Morison, M., Sarthou, J.-P., & Roger-Estrade, J. (2010). Biological control of insect pests in Agroecosystems: Effects of crop management, farming systems, and seminatural habitats at the landscape scale: A review. In D. L. Sparks (Ed.), Advances in Agronomy (pp. 219–259). New York: Academic Press.
10.1016/B978-0-12-385040-9.00006-2Google Scholar
- Rypstra, A. L. (1983). The importance of food and space in limiting web-spider densities; a test using field enclosures. Oecologia, 59, 312–316.
- Samaranayake, K. G. L. I., & Costamagna, A. C. (2018). Levels of predator movement between crop and neighboring habitats explain pest suppression in soybean across a gradient of agricultural landscape complexity. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment, 259, 135–146.
- Sarthou, J. P., Badoz, A., Vaissière, B., Chevallier, A., & Rusch, A. (2014). Local more than landscape parameters structure natural enemy communities during their overwintering in semi-natural habitats. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment, 194, 17–28.
- Schmidt, M. H., Lauer, A., Purtauf, T., Thies, C., Schaefer, M., & Tscharntke, T. (2003). Relative importance of predators and parasitoids for cereal aphid control. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 270, 1905–1909.
- R. T. Schuh, & J. A. Slater (Eds.). (1995). True bugs of the world. New York, NY: Cornell University Press.
- Sharley, D. J., Hoffmann, A. A., & Thomson, L. J. (2008). The effects of soil tillage on beneficial invertebrates within the vineyard. Agricultural and Forest Entomology, 10, 233–243.
- Spears, L. R., & MacMahon, J. A. (2012). An experimental study of spiders in a shrub-steppe ecosystem: The effects of prey availability and shrub architecture. Journal of Arachnology, 40, 218–227.
- Tews, J., Brose, U., Grimm, V., Tielbörger, K., Wichmann, M. C., Schwager, M., & Jeltsch, F. (2004). Animal species diversity driven by habitat heterogeneity/diversity: The importance of keystone structures. Journal of Biogeography, 31, 79–92.
- Thomson, L. J., & Hoffmann, A. A. (2009). Vegetation increases the abundance of natural enemies in vineyards. Biological Control, 49, 259–269.
- Triplehorn, C. A., & Johnson, N. F. (2005). Borror and Delong's introduction to the study of insects. Belmont, CA: Thomson Brooks/Cole.
- Tschumi, M., Albrecht, M., Bärtschi, C., Collatz, J., Entling, M. H., & Jacot, K. (2016). Perennial, species-rich wildflower strips enhance pest control and crop yield. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment, 220, 97–103.
- Uetz, G. W. (1991). Habitat structure and spider foraging. In S. S. Bell, E. D. McCoy, & H. R. Mushinsky (Eds.), Habitat Structure (pp. 325–348). Dordrecht, Netherlands: Springer Netherlands.
10.1007/978-94-011-3076-9_16Google Scholar
- Vasconcellos-Neto, J., Messas, Y. F., da Silva Souza, H., Villanueva-Bonila, G. A., & Romero, G. Q. (2017). Spider–plant interactions: An ecological approach. In C. Viera & M. O. Gonzaga (Eds.), Behaviour and ecology of spiders (pp. 165–214). Cham, Switzerland: Springer International Publishing.
10.1007/978-3-319-65717-2_7Google Scholar
- Wäckers, F. L., Romeis, J., & van Rijn, P. (2007). Nectar and pollen feeding by insect herbivores and implications for multitrophic interactions. Annual Review of Entomology, 53, 301–323.
- Wardhaugh, C. W., Stork, N. E., & Edwards, W. (2012). Feeding guild structure of beetles on Australian tropical rainforest trees reflects microhabitat resource availability. Journal of Animal Ecology, 81, 1086–1094.
- Westphal, C., Vidal, S., Horgan, F. G., Gurr, G. M., Escalada, M., Van Chien, H., … Settele, J. (2015). Promoting multiple ecosystem services with flower strips and participatory approaches in rice production landscapes. Basic and Applied Ecology, 16, 681–689.
- Westrich, P. (1996). Habitat requirements of central European bees and the problems of partial habitats. In A. Matheson, S. L. Buchmann, C. O'Toole, P. Westrich, & I. H. Williams, (Eds.), The conservation of bees (pp. 1–16). New York, NY: Academic Press.
- Williams, N. M., Crone, E. E., Roulston, T. H., Minckley, R. L., Packer, L., & Potts, S. G. (2010). Ecological and life-history traits predict bee species responses to environmental disturbances. Biological Conservation, 143, 2280–2291.
Citing Literature
Article Metrics
Citations (CrossRef):
30When publishers deposit their content metadata to CrossRef, article citations are tracked and linked, allowing you to see how many times each article has been cited.
Altmetrics:
Scite metrics
Scite uses AI to classify citations by whether they support, contradict, or merely mention the referenced claims.
Explore this article's citation statements on scite.ai
Share QR Code
Generating QR code
QR code copied to clipboard!
Something went wrong while generating your QR code. Please try again in a moment. If the issue persists, refresh the page or contact support.
Export citation

Unable to load citation data. Please try again in a moment.
How to cite
Rosas-Ramos
Download Citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click on download.
This feature enables you to download the bibliographic information (also called citation data, header data, or metadata) for the articles on our site.
Citation manager file format
Use the dropdown list to choose how to format the bibliographic data you're harvesting. Several citation manager formats are available, including EndNote and BibTex. You can then copy the formatted citation (as displayed) or download it as file, to your device. If the RefWorks format is chosen, the 'Download' button will be replaced with an option to directly export to RefWorks




