Jump to content

Commons:Esplanada

Add topic
From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Latest comment: 23 days ago by Tiagozxc19 in topic If this is ever submitted, the request

Esplanada

em outras línguas:
A página de projeto Esplanada noutras línguas:
English · 🌐


POR FAVOR, SENTE-SE, PEÇA UM CAFEZINHO E SINTA-SE À VONTADE.

Esta página serve para todo o gênero de conversas e perguntas em português sobre a WIKIMEDIA COMMONS.

Se está começando agora na Commons vide os primeiros passos, também pode encontrar respostas em perguntas frequentes

Para discutir problemas sobre licenças pode perguntar abaixo, mas uma boa leitura em licenciamento talvez possa lhe elucidar.


Por favor, ao final da sua mensagem assine utilizando ~~~~ ou clicando no botão

Também escreva sobre o que se trata a mensagem no "sumário" para facilitar visualizações.



Em breve, sua wiki estará apenas em modo de leitura

[edit]

Trizek (WMF) 12:58, 15 September 2026 (UTC)Reply

Plot Kids

[edit]
Field Value
platform Wikipedia (pt.wikipedia)
language pt-BR
subject Plot Kids
target user subpage Usuário(a):/Plot Kids. NOT Draft space, which does not exist on pt.wikipedia
who_edits Plot, with a declared conflict of interest. An uninvolved editor moves it to article space
images logo, via Wikimedia Commons under CC BY-SA 4.0. No non-free upload. See the image section
status approved

pt.wikipedia: Plot Kids

[edit]

No qualifying source is currently inspectable. The ND Mais television-segment page is a plausible lead, but the visible page never names Plot Kids and the video/body is unavailable. G1’s 2021 sector report does not name Plot Kids; Folha’s 2021 feature names Explot; Folha’s 2025 report mentions Plot Kids only in a recipient list.

The draft is factually conservative, but it remains working material, not a submission. Reassess only after at least two independent publications provide significant company-level coverage.

Submit the Truth and Tales product draft first; it has two confirmed substantial sources.


The mechanics are different from what the brief assumed

[edit]

pt.wikipedia has no Draft namespace. Verified with action=query&meta=siteinfo&siprop=namespaces on 2026-09-15: en.wikipedia has namespace 118 Draft and 119 Draft talk; pt.wikipedia has neither, and no Articles for Creation process. Recorded as Q17.

So the route is:

  1. The draft lives at Usuário(a):/Plot Kids, a user subpage. Wikipédia:Conflito de interesses explicitly permits this.
  2. The conflict of interest is declared on the user page, before the draft is created, not after.
  3. Review is requested at a relevant WikiProjeto or at the Esplanada.
  4. An uninvolved editor moves it to article space. Plot does not move it. That is the whole point of the process and moving it yourself converts a compliant draft into a COI violation.

One account, named, disclosed. Wikipédia:Conflito de interesses warns that single-purpose promotional accounts get warned and then blocked. An account that only ever edits Plot pages looks like exactly that even when every edit is accurate.

The model, and what to copy from it

[edit]

Behold Studios on pt.wikipedia, read as raw wikitext on 2026-09-15, page id 4762331. It is the closest comparable: a Brazilian independent games studio, similar scale, with an article that has survived.

Its entire structure is an infobox, three paragraphs and {{referências}}. No section headings other than external links. That is the target length. A longer draft about a company with one source reads as padding.

Copy its citation discipline, which is unusually good. Every {{citar web}} carries citação= with the supporting sentence quoted verbatim from the source. That does two things: it lets a reviewer verify without opening the link, and it makes it impossible to cite a source that does not actually say the thing. Use citação= on every reference in this draft. It is the single most useful habit for a COI submission.

Do not copy Behold’s defects. It contains a malformed , an unaccented titulo=, and a trailing space in a product name. And do not copy Hoplon Infotainment’s sourcing at all: that article, also a Florianópolis studio, carries an uncited promotional sentence, bare-URL references and a dead link. Model length on both; model sourcing on Behold only.

What can and cannot be cited

[edit]
Fact Source Usable
Founding date, founders Plot’s own site yes, for these two facts only. Behold does exactly this
What the company makes ND Mais 2021-05-27 unverified. The inspectable page does not name Plot; do not use until the segment is recovered
Google Play Indie Games Fund awarded to Play Friends, 2024 Folha de São Paulo 2025-04-23 yes. Independent confirmation of the fund’s terms
BIG Festival 2022 award BIG Festival’s own results page, plus IGN Brasil yes. An award record verifies an award
Bubu co-production G1 2016-11-16, plus the existing pt.wikipedia article yes
Anything about the company G1 2021-09-20 no. It does not mention Plot Kids
Developer of Truth and Tales Folha 2021-05-22 careful. It says Explot. See Q29
Team size, wishlists, user counts doc 01 no. Changing numbers with no independent source

The draft

[edit]

{{Info/Empresa

|nome_empresa       = '''Plot Kids'''

|logo               =

|logo_tamanho       =

|imagem             =

|tipo_empresa       = Privada

|indústria          = [[Indústria de jogos eletrônicos|Jogos eletrônicos]] e [[animação]]

|fundação           = 2014{{citar web|título=Plot Interactive|url=https://plotinteractive.com/|acessodata=16 de setembro de 2026|citação=Games, apps, animation, and original IP for entertainment and education since 2014.|língua=inglês}}

|fundador           = Luiza Guerreiro e Leonardo Bilck

|sede               = [[Florianópolis]], [[Santa Catarina]], [[Brasil]]

|area_servida       =

|num empregados     =

|produtos           = {{Lista simples|

* ''Truth and Tales''

* ''Play Friends: Party Games''

* ''Sunny Trails''

}}

|página             = [https://plotinteractive.com/ plotinteractive.com]

}}


'''Plot Kids''' é uma empresa brasileira de [[Indústria de jogos eletrônicos|jogos eletrônicos]] e [[animação]], fundada em 2014 em [[Florianópolis]], [[Santa Catarina]], por Luiza Guerreiro e Leonardo Bilck. A empresa também atua sob o nome Plot Interactive e produz jogos, aplicativos e animação.


Entre seus produtos estão o aplicativo infantil ''Truth and Tales'' e os jogos ''Play Friends: Party Games'' e ''Sunny Trails''. Em 2024, a Plot Kids esteve entre os dez estúdios latino-americanos selecionados para o Google Play Indie Games Fund com o projeto então denominado ''Play Together TV''.{{citar web|título=Programas de fomento ajudam desenvolvedores de games a sair do amadorismo|url=https://www1.folha.uol.com.br/tec/2025/04/programas-de-fomento-ajudam-desenvolvedores-de-games-a-sair-do-amadorismo.shtml|acessodata=16 de setembro de 2026|data=23 de abril de 2025|obra=[[Folha de S.Paulo]]|citação=outros quatro estúdios brasileiros foram selecionados em 2024: o baiano Vish Game Studio, o paulistano Little Leo Games, o catarinense Plot Kids e o carioca Minimol Games}}{{citar web|título=Conheça os 10 estúdios de jogos indie selecionados para o Indie Games Fund 2024|url=https://blog.google/intl/pt-br/produtos/android-chrome-play/conheca-os-10-estudios-de-jogos-indie-selecionados-para-o-indie-games-fund-2024/|acessodata=16 de setembro de 2026|obra=Google|citação=Plot Kids - Play Together TV (Brasil)}} Em 2022, ''Beliche Voador'' recebeu o prêmio de Melhor Jogo Educacional no [[BIG Festival]].{{citar web|título=Games 2022|url=https://www.bigfestival.com.br/games2022.html|acessodata=16 de setembro de 2026|obra=BIG Festival}}{{citar web|título=Conheça os melhores jogos do BIG Festival 2022|url=https://br.ign.com/big-festival/100099/feature/conheca-os-melhores-jogos-do-big-festival-2022|acessodata=16 de setembro de 2026|data=10 de julho de 2022|obra=[[IGN|IGN Brasil]]}}


A empresa também atua em animação para televisão e foi responsável pela produção executiva da série ''[[Bubu e as Corujinhas]]''.{{citar web|título=Corujinha Bubu, criada em SC, deve virar desenho animado na TV fechada|url=https://g1.globo.com/sc/santa-catarina/noticia/2016/11/corujinha-bubu-criada-em-sc-deve-virar-desenho-animado-na-tv-fechada.html|acessodata=16 de setembro de 2026|data=16 de novembro de 2016|obra=[[G1]]|citação=A animação foi desenvolvida por um estúdio de Blumenau chamado Belli Studio e a produção executiva é do estúdio de Florianópolis Plot Kids.}}



Decisions inside the draft

[edit]

num empregados is deliberately empty. Doc 01 gives about 20 core people and a network of 45 or more. Neither figure has an independent source, and the Folha 2021 piece’s “equipe fixa de 13 funcionários” is about Explot, not Plot Kids. An uncited headcount is one of the exact defects that makes the Hoplon article weak. Behold has an uncited 7; do not copy that.

No logo value yet. See the image section.

Plot Kids leads, not Plot Interactive. The opposite of the choice made for IGDB and MobyGames, and for the same underlying reason: audience. This is a general-purpose encyclopedia in Portuguese, the company is registered and locally known as Plot Kids, and the ND Mais source uses that framing. Plot Interactive appears in the first paragraph as the other trading name, which is the accurate relationship.

“Beliche Voador” is named, the award is named, and the year is named, with two references. That is the only shape in which an award belongs in a Wikipedia article. It is also why the studio’s other awards are absent: each would need the same treatment and the article does not need a list.

The Étoile du Jouet award for Snow & Stella is left out entirely. Sources split between 2014 and 2015, per Q6. An article is the worst place to publish a date you cannot defend.

No release date or price for Sunny Trails, which is the sunny-unannounced rule, and no wishlist figures anywhere.

|página= holds the publication name, not a page number. That is unconventional but it is what Behold’s article does with [[Correio Braziliense]] and Metacritic, and consistency with the local house style matters more than the parameter’s name.

What is deliberately not in the draft

[edit]
  • No mention of ABRAGAMES, ACATE, ASCJogos or BRAVI membership. All are verifiable, none is independent coverage, and a membership list in a company article reads as CV padding.
  • No Luiza Guerreiro biography. WP:INHERITORG runs both ways: the company does not become notable through her, and she does not become notable through it.
  • No “50+ projects”, no “70+ countries”. Changing figures with no independent source.
  • No client list. Naming clients to establish credibility is what a portfolio page is for.
  • No mention of Medialab or the CNPJ. True, in the registry, and of no encyclopedic interest. It belongs on Wikidata and Crunchbase.
  • Nothing from docs 04 or 06.

Images, and why the non-free route is closed

[edit]

The logo goes to Wikimedia Commons under CC BY-SA 4.0, uploaded by Plot as the copyright holder. Then the article uses the Commons file. Wikipédia:Conflito de interesses explicitly encourages a connected party to upload its own media under a free licence, and states that reduced resolution is acceptable.

The non-free fair-use route is closed, and this is a real interaction the brief did not anticipate. WP:NFCC criterion 1 permits non-free content only where no free equivalent exists or could be created. Once Plot licenses its own logo on Commons, a free equivalent exists, and the non-free option is correctly gone. The two plans cannot both run for the same image. Commons is the better outcome. Recorded as Q19.

Two consequences to hold on to:

  1. WP:NFCC criterion 9 bars non-free content from drafts in any case. Uploaded before acceptance, a non-free file sits in no article and becomes deletable after seven days under speedy criterion F5. So even where a non-free rationale is the right route, the upload happens after acceptance, never before.
  2. A Commons upload is irrevocable. Only upload assets Plot owns outright. That is fine for the Plot Kids logo and is not fine for Bubu or Witch and Prince, both CHECK CONTRACT.

image-manifest.md carries the file names, licences and the upload order.

The conflict-of-interest disclosure

[edit]

Post this on the user page before creating the draft. Plain text, no template: {{editar COI}} does not exist on pt.wikipedia, verified 2026-09-15, and there is no pt equivalent of the English edit-request templates. Recorded as Q18.

Declaração de conflito de interesses: tenho vínculo remunerado com a Plot Kids. Uso uma única conta identificada e não movo para o domínio principal páginas que criei sobre a empresa ou seus produtos. Os rascunhos ficam em subpáginas desta conta e são submetidos à revisão de editores sem vínculo antes de qualquer publicação.

Do not use {{Aviso-conflito de interesses}}. It exists, but it is a warning template for a user’s talk page, so placing it yourself misrepresents what it is for.

The same disclosure covers the Wikidata packs, where paid-contribution disclosure is a policy rather than a courtesy. See Q16.

If this is ever submitted, the request

[edit]

Post at a WikiProjeto or the Esplanada, not on an article talk page, since no article exists yet.

Peço revisão de um rascunho sobre a Plot Kids, empresa de jogos e animação de Florianópolis, em

Usuário(a):/Plot Kids.


Declaro conflito de interesses: trabalho na empresa. Não pretendo mover a página para o domínio

principal. Se algum editor sem vínculo considerar que o texto atende aos critérios, agradeço a

avaliação; se não atender, prefiro que permaneça como rascunho.


Sobre as fontes: a página da ND Mais de 27 de maio de 2021 parece corresponder a uma reportagem sobre a empresa, mas o texto ou vídeo não está disponível para conferência e a página visível não identifica a Plot Kids. As demais referências verificam fatos específicos, como o fundo do Google Play e o prêmio no BIG Festival 2022; não são oferecidas como base de notoriedade.

That last paragraph is doing the work. Naming your own weakest point to a reviewer costs nothing, because the reviewer will find it in the first minute anyway, and it changes how the rest of the submission reads. It is also the difference between a COI editor who has read the guideline and one who has not.


A Wikipedia que você leu e parte de material de estudos de um estudante da univali Tiagozxc19 (talk) 14:30, 18 September 2026 (UTC)Reply